C. W. Wiltshire

DYNAMICS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN A GENERALIST PREDATOR AND SLUGS OVER FIVE YEARS

Although communities of generalist invertebrate predators are known to be capable of suppressing pests, little is known about the long-term population dynamics of individual species of generalist predators and single classes of prey in the field. We present evidence of a dynamic interaction between a generalist insect predator, the carabid beetle Pterostichus melanarius, and its slug prey. We analyzed the numbers of slugs and beetles in an arable field over a 5-yr period, during the main activity period of the beetles from June to September. The field contained 25 plots comprising five replicates of five cultural treatments. An index of the nutritional status of the 8497 beetles collected was obtained by weighing the crop of each beetle (a measure of total prey availability per predator). There was a strong relationship between the crop mass of the beetles and slug numbers in the soil, indicating that slugs were a major part of the diet of the beetles. The change in the beetle population from year to year was strongly related to both slug numbers in the soil and the crop mass of the beetles. This indicated that the slugs influenced the nutritional status, and hence the reproductive success, of the beetles. The predators had a significant effect on slug population growth between years but not between months within years. The temporal effect of these processes was a between-year coupling of beetle and slug population dynamics, buffered by feeding on other prey. The relationship appears to be similar to that between mammalian predators and limited numbers of prey species in the subarctic, where one prey species forms a substantial proportion of the total available food resources. Such relationships may be common in agroecosystems, where species diversity is low, and may be a significant factor driving periodic fluctuations in the abundance of both predators and pests.

Biodiversity vs. biocontrol: positive and negative effects of alternative prey on control of slugs by carabid beetles

Environment-friendly farming techniques seek to increase invertebrate biodiversity in part with the intention of encouraging greater numbers of predators that will help to control crop pests. However, in theory, this effect may be negated if the availability of a greater abundance and diversity of alternative prey diverts predators away from feeding on pests. The hypothesis that access to alternative prey can lead to reduced pest suppression under semi-field conditions was tested. Alternative prey type and diversity were manipulated in 70 mesocosms over 7+ weeks in the presence of the carabid Pterostichus melanarius (Illiger), a known predator of slugs, and reproducing populations of the slug Deroceras reticulatum (Müller). Significantly fewer slugs survived where no alternative prey were provided. Maximum slug numbers and biomass were found in treatments containing either carabids plus a high diversity of alternative prey (many species of earthworm and three of Diptera larvae) or a single additional prey (blowfly larvae, Calliphora vomitoria Linnaeus). In these treatments slug numbers and biomass were as high as in plots lacking predators. The effects of alternative prey were taxon-specific. Alternative prey strongly affected carabid fitness in terms of biomass and egg load. The fittest predators (those with access to high alternative prey diversity or C. vomitoria larvae) reduced slug numbers the least. The mean individual slug weights were greater in treatments with alternative prey than where no alternative prey were provided to the carabids. These results suggest that pests may survive and reproduce more rapidly in patches where predators have access to alternative prey.

Influence of seed depth and molluscicide pellet placement and timing on slug damage, activity and survival in winter wheat

Abstract In a laboratory experiment, grey field slugs ( Deroceras reticulatum ) were introduced to trays of clay soil drilled with wheat seeds at 10 or 25 mm depth. Trays were left without molluscicide, or methiocarb pellets were drilled with the seeds or placed on the surface of the soil immediately after drilling. In the absence of molluscicide, there was less damage to seeds drilled at 25 mm than at 10 mm. Methiocarb pellets drilled with seeds at 10 mm depth killed slugs and reduced damage to seeds and seedlings, but the percentage of seeds killed was similar to the percentage of deeper-drilled seeds killed where no molluscicide had been applied. Pellets drilled with deeper-sown seeds did not kill slugs, or reduce damage to seeds and seedlings, whereas pellets placed on the soil surface immediately after sowing were effective in killing slugs and reducing plant damage irrespective of drilling depth. The best protection from slug damage was provided by deeper drilling combined with pellets broadcast on the soil surface. In a field experiment, methiocarb pellets broadcast immediately after drilling at two depths killed slugs and protected seedlings from damage, whereas pellets drilled with seeds were ineffective because seed-bed conditions prevented slugs from reaching seeds and pellets (only 4% of seeds were killed by slugs in the absence of molluscicide treatment). The implications of these results for slug control and for non-target fauna (wood mice and ground beetles) are discussed.