C. Walck
Stockholm University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by C. Walck.
Physical Review Letters | 2013
Christian Bohm; Matthias Danninger; C. Finley; S. Flis; Per-Olof Hulth; K. Hultqvist; Seon-hee Seo; C. Walck; M. Wolf; M. Zoll
We have performed a search for muon neutrinos from dark matter annihilation in the center of the Sun with the 79-string configuration of the IceCube neutrino telescope. For the first time, the DeepCore subarray is included in the analysis, lowering the energy threshold and extending the search to the austral summer. The 317 days of data collected between June 2010 and May 2011 are consistent with the expected background from atmospheric muons and neutrinos. Upper limits are set on the dark matter annihilation rate, with conversions to limits on spin-dependent and spin-independent scattering cross sections of weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs) on protons, for WIMP masses in the range 20-5000 GeV/c2. These are the most stringent spin-dependent WIMP-proton cross section limits to date above 35 GeV/c2 for most WIMP models.
Physical Review D | 2013
Christian Bohm; Matthias Danninger; C. Finley; S. Flis; Per Olof Hulth; K. Hultqvist; C. Walck; M. Wolf; M. Zoll
We report on the measurement of the all particle cosmic ray energy spectrum with the IceTop air shower array in the energy range from 1.6 PeV up to 1.3 EeV. The IceTop air shower array is the surface component of the IceCube Neutrino Observatory at the geographical South Pole. The analysis was performed using IceTop in its 73 station configuration when it was 90% complete. The spectrum was derived using an iterative unfolding with shower size as an energy proxy. Corresponding authors: Bakhtiyar Ruzybayev1, Javier Gonzalez1 1 University of Delaware
Applied Optics | 1997
P. Askebjer; S. W. Barwick; Lars Bergström; A. Bouchta; Staffan Carius; Eva Dalberg; Kevin Engel; B. Erlandsson; Ariel Goobar; Lori Gray; A. Hallgren; F. Halzen; Hans Heukenkamp; Per Olof Hulth; Stephan Hundertmark; John Jacobsen; A. Karle; V. Kandhadai; Igor Liubarsky; Doug Lowder; Timothy Miller; Pat Mock; Robert M. Morse; R. Porrata; P. Buford Price; Austin Richards; H. Rubinstein; E. Schneider; Christian Spiering; O. Streicher
We discuss recent measurements of the wavelength-dependent absorption coefficients in deep South Pole ice. The method uses transit-time distributions of pulses from a variable-frequency laser sent between emitters and receivers embedded in the ice. At depths of 800-1000 m scattering is dominated by residual air bubbles, whereas absorption occurs both in ice itself and in insoluble impurities. The absorption coefficient increases approximately exponentially with wavelength in the measured interval 410-610 nm. At the shortest wavelength our value is approximately a factor 20 below previous values obtained for laboratory ice and lake ice; with increasing wavelength the discrepancy with previous measurements decreases. At ~415 to ~500 nm the experimental uncertainties are small enough for us to resolve an extrinsic contribution to absorption in ice: submicrometer dust particles contribute by an amount that increases with depth and corresponds well with the expected increase seen near the Last Glacial Maximum in Vostok and Dome C ice cores. The laser pulse method allows remote mapping of gross structure in dust concentration as a function of depth in glacial ice.We discuss recent measurements of the wavelength-dependent absorption coefficients in deep South Pole ice. The method uses transit time distributions of pulses from a variable-frequency laser sent between emitters and receivers embedded in the ice. At depths of 800 to 1000 m scattering is dominated by residual air bubbles, whereas absorption occurs both in ice itself and in insoluble impurities. The absorption coefficient increases approximately exponentially with wavelength in the measured interval 410 to 610 nm. At the shortest wavelength our value is about a factor 20 below previous values obtained for laboratory ice and lake ice; with increasing wavelength the discrepancy with previous measurements decreases. At around 415 to 500 nm the experimental uncertainties are small enough for us to resolve an extrinsic contribution to absorption in ice: submicron dust particles contribute by an amount that increases with depth and corresponds well with the expected increase seen near the Last Glacial Maximum in Vostok and Dome C ice cores. The laser pulse method allows remote mapping of gross structure in dust concentration as a function of depth in glacial ice.
Geophysical Research Letters | 1997
P. Askebjer; S. W. Barwick; Lars Bergström; A. Bouchta; Staffan Carius; E. Dalberg; B. Erlandsson; Ariel Goobar; L. Gray; A. Hallgren; F. Halzen; H. Heukenkamp; Per Olof Hulth; S. Hundertmark; J. Jacobsen; V. Kandhadai; A. Karle; I. Liubarsky; D. Lowder; T. Miller; P. Mock; Robert P. Morse; R. Porrata; P. B. Price; A. Richards; H. Rubinstein; E. Schneider; Ch. Spiering; O. Streicher; Q. Sun
Both absorption and scattering of light at wavelengths 410 to 610 nanometers were measured in the South Pole ice at depths 0.8 to 1 kilometer with the laser calibration system of the Antarctic Muon And Neutrino Detector Array (AMANDA). At the shortest wavelengths the absorption lengths exceeded 200 meters - an order of magnitude longer than has been reported for laboratory ice. The absorption shows a strong wavelength dependence while the scattering length is found to be independent of the wavelength, consistent with the hypothesis of a residual density of air bubbles in the ice. The observed linear decrease of the inverse scattering length with depth is compatible with an earlier measurement by the AMANDA collaboration (at ∼515 nanometers).
Nature | 2017
M. G. Aartsen; G. C. Hill; A. Kyriacou; S. Robertson; A. Wallace; B. J. Whelan; M. Ackermann; E. Bernardini; Stijn Blot; F. Bradascio; H.-P. Bretz; J. Brostean-Kaiser; A. Franckowiak; E. Jacobi; T. Karg; T. Kintscher; S. Kunwar; R. Nahnhauer; K. Satalecka; C. Spiering; J. Stachurska; A. Stasik; N. L. Strotjohann; A. Terliuk; M. Usner; Van Santen J; J. Adams; H. Bagherpour; J. A. Aguilar; I. Ansseau
Neutrinos interact only very weakly, so they are extremely penetrating. The theoretical neutrino–nucleon interaction cross-section, however, increases with increasing neutrino energy, and neutrinos with energies above 40 teraelectronvolts (TeV) are expected to be absorbed as they pass through the Earth. Experimentally, the cross-section has been determined only at the relatively low energies (below 0.4 TeV) that are available at neutrino beams from accelerators. Here we report a measurement of neutrino absorption by the Earth using a sample of 10,784 energetic upward-going neutrino-induced muons. The flux of high-energy neutrinos transiting long paths through the Earth is attenuated compared to a reference sample that follows shorter trajectories. Using a fit to the two-dimensional distribution of muon energy and zenith angle, we determine the neutrino–nucleon interaction cross-section for neutrino energies 6.3–980 TeV, more than an order of magnitude higher than previous measurements. The measured cross-section is about 1.3 times the prediction of the standard model, consistent with the expectations for charged- and neutral-current interactions. We do not observe a large increase in the cross-section with neutrino energy, in contrast with the predictions of some theoretical models, including those invoking more compact spatial dimensions or the production of leptoquarks. This cross-section measurement can be used to set limits on the existence of some hypothesized beyond-standard-model particles, including leptoquarks.
AIP Conference Proceedings | 2015
C. Finley; Markus Ahlers; Anastasios Belias; Kay Graf; Per Olof Hulth; K. Hultqvist; Oleg Kalekin; John Kelley; D. Real; Perry Sandstrom; C. Walck; Dawn Williams; J.D. Zornoza
Archive | 1993
S. Tilav; S. W. Barwick; A. Bouchta; Staffan Carius; Alan Coulthard; K. Engel; B. Erlandsson; Ariel Goobar; L. Gray; L. A. Hallgren; L. A. Halzen; F. Halzen; Per Olof Hulth; J. Jacobsen; V. Kandhadai; I. Liubarsky; D. M. Lowder; Timothy Miller; Robert P. Morse; Patrick W. OLeary; R. Porrata; Blaine Price; A. Richards; E. Schneider; Q. Sun; C. Walck; Andrew J. Westphal; G. Yodh