Calogero Cammà

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: The benefit of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal cancer has been extensively studied but data on survival are still equivocal. Objective: To assess the effectiveness of chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery in the reduction of mortality in patients with resectable oesophageal cancer. Methods: Computerised bibliographic searches of MEDLINE and CANCERLIT (1970–2002) were supplemented with hand searches of reference lists. Study selection: Studies were included if they were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing preoperative chemoradiotherapy plus surgery with surgery alone, and if they included patients with resectable histologically proven oesophageal cancer without metastatic disease. Six eligible RCTs were identified and included in the meta-analysis. Data extraction: Data on study populations, interventions, and outcomes were extracted from each RCT according to the intention to treat method by three independent observers and combined using the DerSimonian and Laird method. Results: Chemoradiotherapy plus surgery compared with surgery alone significantly reduced the three year mortality rate (odds ratio (OR) 0.53 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31–0.93); p = 0.03) (number needed to treat = 10). Pathological examination showed that preoperative chemoradiotherapy downstaged the tumour (that is, less advanced stage at pathological examination at the time of surgery) compared with surgery alone (OR 0.43 (95% CI 0.26–0.72); p = 0.001). The risk for postoperative mortality was higher in the chemoradiotherapy plus surgery group (OR 2.10 (95% CI 1.18–3.73); p = 0.01). Conclusions: In patients with resectable oesophageal cancer, chemoradiotherapy plus surgery significantly reduces three year mortality compared with surgery alone. However, postoperative mortality was significantly increased by neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Further large scale multicentre RCTs may prove useful to substantiate the benefit on overall survival.

Interferon and prevention of hepatocellular carcinoma in viral cirrhosis: an evidence-based approach

BACKGROUND/AIMS To evaluate by meta-analysis of available literature whether interferon (IFN) reduces the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related Child A cirrhosis. METHODS Three randomized controlled trials and 15 nonrandomized controlled trials, including 4614 patients and comparing IFN to no treatment, were selected. Data on the incidence of HCC in IFN treated and untreated patients were extracted from each study. Meta-analysis by the DerSimonian and Laird risk difference (RD) method was used to pool observations. RESULTS A different incidence of HCC between treated and untreated cirrhotic patients was observed for HCV (overall RD -12.8%; 95% CI -8.3 to -17.2%, P < 0.0001) and HBV (overall RD -6.4%; 95% CI -2.8 to -10%, P < 0.001). In HCV-related cirrhosis, the rate of HCC development was lower in sustained responders to IFN than in untreated patients (overall RD -19.1%; 95% CI -13.1 to -25.2%, P < 0.00001), with low heterogeneity among trials (P=0.053), and also in nonresponders vs. untreated patients (overall RD -11.8%; 95% CI -6.4 to -19.1%, P < 0.0001), although with significant heterogeneity. Inconsistency among the studies was a major problem, both for HCV (chi2 = 58.16 with 13 DF; P < 0.0001) and HBV (chi2 = 26.4 with 6 DF; P = 0.0001) related cirrhosis, and also when follow-up was shorter than 60 months. Consistent results were only observed when assessing data from European reports: in this subgroup no preventive effect of HCC was shown for HBV (overall RD -4.8%; 95% CI -11.1-1.5%, P, not significant), and only a weak effect for HCV (overall RD -10%; 95% CI -5.9 to -14.2%; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Literature data pooling suggests a slight preventive effect of IFN on HCC development in patients with HCV-related cirrhosis. The magnitude of this effect is low and the observed benefit might be due to spurious associations. The preventive effect is more evident among sustained responders to IFN. IFN does not seem to affect the rate of HCC in HBV-related cirrhosis.

Hepatocellular carcinoma : a worldwide problem and the major risk factors

Male sex, age, cirrhosis, and HBsAg are the major risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The geographic distribution of HCC is highly uneven, such that three distinct incidence areas are recognized. To clarify the reason(s) for this geographic variability of HCC, the risk factors in earch incidence area were assessed. In parallel with the geographic distribution of HCC, HBsAg prevalence was highest in both HCC patients and in general population in Africa and Asia, where mothers of HCC patients are frequently HBsAg-positive, suggesting that hepatitis B virus hyperendemicity and perinatal infection account for the high HCC incidence in these areas. Cirrhosis, which is found on autopsy in 80% of the cases of HCC patients worldwide, is the most prevalent risk factor for HCC in areas where hepatitis B virus infection is less common. However, HBsAg carriage adds to the HCC risk carried by cirrhosis and explains the higher incidence of HCC in cirrhotics from Africa and Asia as well as elsewhere. Available data suggest that chronic HCV infection is a risk factor for cirrhosis and HCC. HBV vaccination should decrease HCC incidence rates worldwide; however, HCC prevention in regions where HBsAg carriage is infrequent may also require prevention of the other causes of cirrhosis in order for HCC rates to decline.

Low vitamin D serum level is related to severe fibrosis and low responsiveness to interferon‐based therapy in genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C

25‐Hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) can potentially interfere with inflammatory response and fibrogenesis. Its role in disease progression in chronic hepatitis C (CHC) and its relation with histological and sustained virological response (SVR) to therapy are unknown. One hundred ninety‐seven patients with biopsy‐proven genotype 1 (G1) CHC and 49 healthy subjects matched by age and sex were consecutively evaluated. One hundred sixty‐seven patients underwent antiviral therapy with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin. The 25(OH)D serum levels were measured by high‐pressure liquid chromatography. Tissue expression of cytochrome (CY) P27A1 and CYP2R1, liver 25‐hydroxylating enzymes, were assessed by immunochemistry in 34 patients with CHC, and in eight controls. The 25(OH)D serum levels were significantly lower in CHC than in controls (25.07 ± 9.92 μg/L versus 43.06 ± 10.19; P < 0.001). Lower levels of 25(OH)D were independently linked to female sex (P = 0.007) and necroinflammation (P = 0.04) by linear regression analysis. CYP27A1, but not CYP2R1, was directly related to 25(OH)D levels (P = 0.01), and inversely to necroinflammation (P = 0.01). Low 25(OH)D (odds ratio [OR], 0.942; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.893–0.994) and cholesterol (OR, 0.981; 95%CI, 0.969–0.992) levels, older age (OR, 1.043; 95%CI, 1.002–1.085), high ferritin (OR, 1.003; 95%CI, 1.001–1.005), and necroinflammation (OR, 2.235; 95%CI, 1.014–4.929) were independently associated with severe fibrosis (F3–F4) by multivariate logistic analysis. Seventy patients (41%) achieved SVR. By multivariate analysis, hepatic steatosis (OR, 0.971; 95%CI, 0.944–0.999), lower cholesterol (OR, 1.009; 95% CI, 1.000–1.018), and 25(OH)D levels (OR, 1.039; 95%CI, 1.002–1.077) were independently associated with no SVR. Conclusion: G1 CHC patients had low 25(OH)D serum levels, possibly because of reduced CYP27A1 expression. Low vitamin D is linked to severe fibrosis and low SVR on interferon (IFN)‐based therapy. (HEPATOLOGY 2010.)

Hepatitis C virus infection as a risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis : a case-control study

OBJECTIVE To determine whether chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is an independent risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma and whether it increases the cirrhosis-related risk for hepatocellular carcinoma. DESIGN Two pair-matched case-control studies. SETTING A referral-based hospital. PATIENTS In study I, 212 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (197 of whom had known underlying cirrhosis) were compared with controls who had chronic nonhepatic diseases. In study II, the 197 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and cirrhosis were compared with 197 pair-matched controls who had cirrhosis but not hepatocellular carcinoma. MEASUREMENTS Levels of antibody to HCV (anti-HCV), hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), and antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) were assayed, and alcohol abuse was assessed by history. MAIN RESULTS In study I, 151 patients (71%) with hepatocellular carcinoma were anti-HCV positive compared with 11 controls (5%) with chronic nonhepatic diseases (odds ratio, 42; 95% CI, 22 to 95). Multivariate analysis showed that anti-HCV was an independent risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma (odds ratio, 69; CI, 15 to 308). The analysis also showed that HBsAg (odds ratio, 8.7; CI, 1.5 to 50) and anti-HBc (odds ratio, 4.2 (CI, 1.7 to 11) were risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma. No statistically significant interaction was found between anti-HCV and the markers of HBV infection. In study II, 146 patients (74%) with hepatocellular carcinoma and cirrhosis were anti-HCV positive compared with 122 patients (62%) with cirrhosis alone (odds ratio, 1.8; CI, 1.1 to 2.8). Multivariate analysis confirmed that anti-HCV (odds ratio, 2.0; CI, 1.3 to 32) and HBsAg (odds ratio, 2.0; CI, 1.0 to 4.2) were independent risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS Hepatitis C virus infection is a risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma, apparently by inducing cirrhosis and, to a lesser extent, by enhancing the risk in patients with cirrhosis. Hepatitis C virus infection acts independently of HBV infection (another risk factor) and of alcohol abuse, age, or gender.

Enoxaparin Prevents Portal Vein Thrombosis and Liver Decompensation in Patients With Advanced Cirrhosis

BACKGROUND & AIMS We performed a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of enoxaparin, a low-molecular-weight heparin, in preventing portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in patients with advanced cirrhosis. METHODS In a nonblinded, single-center study, 70 outpatients with cirrhosis (Child-Pugh classes B7-C10) with demonstrated patent portal veins and without hepatocellular carcinoma were assigned randomly to groups that were given enoxaparin (4000 IU/day, subcutaneously for 48 weeks; n = 34) or no treatment (controls, n = 36). Ultrasonography (every 3 months) and computed tomography (every 6 months) were performed to check the portal vein axis. The primary outcome was prevention of PVT. Radiologists and hepatologists that assessed outcomes were blinded to group assignments. Analysis was by intention to treat. RESULTS At 48 weeks, none of the patients in the enoxaparin group had developed PVT, compared with 6 of 36 (16.6%) controls (P = .025). At 96 weeks, no patient developed PVT in the enoxaparin group, compared with 10 of 36 (27.7%) controls (P = .001). At the end of the follow-up period, 8.8% of patients in the enoxaparin group and 27.7% of controls developed PVT (P = .048). The actuarial probability of PVT was lower in the enoxaparin group (P = .006). Liver decompensation was less frequent among patients given enoxaparin (11.7%) than controls (59.4%) (P < .0001); overall values were 38.2% vs 83.0%, respectively (P < .0001). The actuarial probability of liver decompensation was lower in the enoxaparin group (P < .0001). Eight patients in the enoxaparin group and 13 controls died. The actuarial probability of survival was higher in the enoxaparin group (P = .020). No relevant side effects or hemorrhagic events were reported. CONCLUSIONS In a small randomized controlled trial, a 12-month course of enoxaparin was safe and effective in preventing PVT in patients with cirrhosis and a Child-Pugh score of 7-10. Enoxaparin appeared to delay the occurrence of hepatic decompensation and to improve survival.

Field-practice study of sorafenib therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: A prospective multicenter study in Italy

A multicenter randomized controlled trial established sorafenib as a standard of care for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Because the study was prematurely interrupted due to survival benefits in the sorafenib arm, we conducted an observational study to adequately assess risks and benefits of this regimen in field practice. Starting in 2008, all clinically compensated patients with advanced HCC and those with an intermediate HCC who were unfit or failed to respond to ablative therapies were consecutively evaluated in six liver centers in Italy, for tolerability as well as radiologic and survival response to 800‐mg/d sorafenib therapy. Treatment was down‐dosed or interrupted according to drug label. Two hundred ninety‐six patients (88% Child‐Pugh A, 75% Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer [BCLC]‐C, and 25% BCLC‐B) received sorafenib for 3.8 months (95% CI 3.3‐4.4). Two hundred sixty‐nine (91%) patients experienced at least one adverse event (AE), whereas 161 (54%) had to reduce dosing. Treatment was interrupted in 103 (44%) for disease progression, in 95 (40%) for an AE, and in 38 (16%) for liver deterioration. The median survival was 10.5 months in the overall cohort, 8.4 months in BCLC‐C versus 20.6 months in BCLC‐B patients (P < 0.0001), and 21.6 months in the 77 patients treated for >70% of the time with a half dose versus 9.6 months in the 219 patients treated for >70% of the time with a full dose. At month 2 of treatment, the overall radiologic response was 8%. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, macrovascular invasion, extrahepatic spread of the tumor, radiologic response at month 2, and sorafenib dosing were independent predictors of shortened survival. Conclusion: Overall, safety, effectiveness, and generalizability of sorafenib therapy in HCC was validated in field practice. The effectiveness of half‐dosed sorafenib may have implications for tailored therapy. (HEPATOLOGY 2011)

A meta‐analysis of survival rates of untreated patients in randomized clinical trials of hepatocellular carcinoma

Knowing the spontaneous outcome of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is important for designing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of new therapeutic approaches; however, survival of patients in the absence of treatment is highly variable, and prognostic factors influencing outcomes are incompletely defined. The aims of this meta‐analysis were to estimate the 1‐year and 2‐year survival rates of untreated HCC patients enrolled in RCTs of palliative treatments, and to identify prognostic factors. RCTs evaluating therapies for HCC with placebo or no‐treatment arms were identified on MEDLINE through April 2009. Data were combined in a random effect model. Primary outcomes were 1‐year and 2‐year survival. Thirty studies met the inclusion criteria. The pooled estimates of the survival rates were 17.5% at 1 year (95% confidence interval [95%CI], 11%‐27%; range, 0%‐75%) and 7.3% at 2 years (95%CI, 3.9%‐13%; range, 0%‐50%). Heterogeneity among studies was highly significant (P < 0.0001) both for 1‐year and 2‐year survival, and persisted when RCTs were stratified according to all patient and study features. Through meta‐regression, impaired performance status, Child‐Pugh B‐C class, and presence of portal vein thrombosis were all independently associated with shorter survival. Ascites was strongly linked to a worse outcome in intermediate/advanced Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stages. Conclusion: This meta‐analysis confirms the heterogeneity of behavior of untreated HCC and provides a sound basis for stratifying patients with HCC according to expected survival in future trials of new anti‐cancer agents. (HEPATOLOGY 2010.)

Effect of peginterferon alfa‐2a on liver histology in chronic hepatitis C: A meta‐analysis of individual patient data

Multicenter randomized trials have shown that once‐weekly pegylated interferon (peginterferon) alfa‐2a is more efficacious than conventional interferon alfa‐2a (IFN) in patients with chronic hepatitis C. We performed a meta‐analysis of 1,013 previously untreated patients (from 3 randomized trials) with pretreatment and post‐treatment liver biopsies to assess the differences between peginterferon alfa‐2a and IFN in terms of their effects on liver histology. Reported values were standardized mean differences (SMD) between patients receiving peginterferon alfa‐2a and those receiving IFN (post‐treatment value minus baseline value for each group). We used a random‐effects model to quantify the average effect of peginterferon alfa‐2a on liver histology. Peginterferon alfa‐2a significantly reduced fibrosis compared with IFN (SMD, −0.14; 95% CI: −0.27, −0.01; P = .04). A reduction in fibrosis was observed among sustained virologic responders (SMD, −0.59; 95% CI: −0.89, −0.30; P < .0001) and patients with recurrent disease (SMD, −0.34; 95% CI: −0.54, −0.14; P = .0007), whereas no significant reduction was observed among nonresponders (SMD, −0.13; 95% CI: −0.32, 0.05; P = .15). Logistic regression analysis indicated that patients with sustained virologic responses (SVRs) had an odds ratio (OR) of 1.61 (95% CI: 1.14, 2.29) for reduction in fibrosis compared with patients without SVRs, whereas obese patients (body mass index [BMI] > 30 kg/m2) had an OR of 0.56 (95% CI: 0.35, 0.90) compared with normal‐weight (BMI < 25 kg/m2) and overweight patients (BMI, 25–30 kg/m2). In conclusion, in patients with chronic hepatitis C with or without cirrhosis, peginterferon alfa‐2a (relative to IFN) significantly reduced fibrosis. The beneficial effects of peginterferon on liver histology are closely related to virologic response. (HEPATOLOGY 2004;39:333–342.)

Insulin resistance is associated with steatosis in nondiabetic patients with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C

Conflicting data exist regarding the relationship between hepatitis C virus genotype 1 and hepatic steatosis as well as the latters role in the progression of fibrosis and treatment response. We assessed factors associated with hepatic steatosis in genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C and the impact of hepatic fat on fibrosis development and interferon responsiveness. Two hundred ninety‐one non‐diabetic patients with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C were examined for the presence of steatosis and its correlation with clinical, virological, and biochemical data, including insulin resistance (IR), evaluated by the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) score. Steatosis was graded as mild (1%‐20% of hepatocytes involved), moderate (21%‐40% of hepatocytes involved), and severe (>40% of hepatocytes involved). Steatosis was mild in 110 of 291 (37.8%) and moderate/severe in 55 of 291 (18.9%) subjects. By logistic regression, moderate/severe steatosis was independently associated with the female sex (odds ratio [OR] 2.74; 95% CI 1.40‐5.35), high γ‐glutamyltransferase levels (OR 1.52; 95% CI 1.22‐1.91), and HOMA‐score (OR 1.076; 95% CI 1.001‐1.26). By logistic regression, moderate/severe steatosis (OR 2.78; 95% CI 1.21‐6.4), and platelet counts (OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.96‐0.98) were independent predictors of advanced fibrosis. Patients with moderate/severe steatosis had an OR of 0.52 (95% CI 0.30‐0.90) for sustained virological response compared with patients with mild/absent steatosis. In conclusion, in nondiabetic European patients with genotype 1 hepatitis C at low risk for the metabolic syndrome, the prevalence of steatosis was nearly 60%. IR is a risk factor for moderate/severe steatosis, especially in men. Moderate/severe steatosis has clinical relevance, being associated with advanced fibrosis and hyporesponsiveness to antiviral therapy. (HEPATOLOGY 2006;43:64–71.)