Camila Moreira Machado

How erosive drinks and enzyme inhibitors impact bond strength to dentin

Concern has been raised about the bonding of restorative procedures to an erosive lesion, given the change in organic and inorganic composition and structure of this substrate. This in vitro study evaluated the effect of erosive drinks and an enzyme inhibitor (2% chlorhexidine digluconate - 2% CHX) on bond strength to dentin. Sixty sound human third molars were selected, and the occlusal enamel was flattened, exposing the dentin surface. The specimens were randomly divided into three groups: AS-Artificial saliva (control group), RC- Regular Cola and ZC- Zero Cola. Twenty specimens were immersed in their respective solution for 1 minute, 3 times a day, over the course of 5 days. After acid etching and before bonding with Adper Single Bond 2, half of the samples of each group (n = 10) were treated with 2% CHX, whereas the other half (n = 10) were not, forming the control group (CONV). All the specimens were restored with Filtek Z250 composite resin filled in Tygon tubes (0.48 mm2), yielding six microcylinders for microshear bond strength testing. Three composite resin microcylinders of each specimen were tested after 1 month, and the remaining microcylinders were tested after 6 months. Failure modes were determined using a stereomicroscope (40x). The data were statistically analyzed by three-way ANOVA and Tukey tests (α = 0.05). Overall bonding was reduced after 6 months, regardless of treatment. The 2% CHX enhanced bond strength after 1 month only in the ZC group, and did not enhance bonding performance to demineralized dentin by erosive protocol after 6 months in any group.

Effect of ethanol-dissolved rhodamine B marker on mechanical properties of non-simplified adhesives

OBJECTIVES Rhodamine B (RB) is commonly used to evaluate dental polymers, including dental bonding systems (DBS). For reliability assessments, its effect should not only allow visualization of the dentin-polymer interface but also must not interfere with the bonding of the DBS to dentin as measured by the microtensile bond strength and hardness tests. MATERIAL AND METHODS Flat human dentin surfaces were prepared and randomly distributed (n = 10) into six groups: Adper Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (MP) or Clearfil SE Bond (SE) in concentrations of none/control, 0.02 or 0.1 mg/mL. These combinations were prepared through ethanol dissolution to improve their penetration into the dentin. All specimens were fabricated with Filtek Z250 (n = 10) and prepared for a microtensile bond test (μTBS) (0.5 mm/min) after 7 days and 6 months. The failure modes were determined using a stereomicroscope (×40). For the hardness test, flat human dentin blocks were prepared and treated as previously described (n = 6). The specimens were stored at 37 °C/48 h and were tested (Knoop indenter - 25 gF/10 s). Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and Tukey tests for multiple comparisons (α = 0.05). The effect of time was evaluated using the Student t-test. RESULTS For 7-day μTBS, both the DBS and RB concentrations were significant factors (p < 0.01). After 6 months, only the RB concentration was significantly different. Adhesive failures were prevalent for all groups. Regarding hardness, the DBS differed only with the use of 0.10 mg/mL of RB. CONCLUSIONS Ethanol-dissolved rhodamine B in concentrations of 0.02 and 0.10 mg/mL in non-simplified adhesives can affect the physical-mechanical properties of functional monomer-based systems rather more than those of BisGMA systems.

The Effect of CAD/CAM Crown Material and Cement Type on Retention to Implant Abutments: CAD/CAM Crown Retentiveness on Ti-Base Abutments

PURPOSE To evaluate the pullout resistance of CAD/CAM implant-supported crowns cemented with provisional and definitive cements on Ti-base implant abutments. MATERIALS AND METHODS Sixty crowns were milled for use in Ti-base implant abutments and divided (n = 15/group) according to material, as follows: (a) [Pr] Temporary acrylic resin; (b) [Co-Cr] Cobalt-Chromium alloy; (c) [Zr] polycrystalline zirconia; and (d) [Ti] titanium. The cementation was performed with RelyX Temp NE (RxT) cement or RelyX U200 self-etching resin cement, under a 50 N (5 kg) load for 10 minutes. Twenty-four hours after cementation, the crowns were subjected to the pullout test in a universal test machine, at a 1.0 mm/min crosshead speed. The tests were performed first without cement to evaluate frictional resistance (Baseline), then with provisional cement (RelyX Temp NE without cement again (Baseline After RxT), and finally with resin cement (U200). The results were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey test (p < 0.05). RESULTS Data evaluation as a function of cement type demonstrated the superiority of resin-based cements relative to provisional and baseline groups (p < 0.01). While Co-Cr crowns presented the highest pullout strength values, Pr showed the lowest values (data collapsed over cement) (p < 0.001). Retentiveness data as a function of both factors demonstrated similar pullout resistance between groups without cement (p < 0.001), except Zr baseline. Also, Co-Cr presented higher pullout strength compared to other materials. CONCLUSIONS Self-adhesive resin cement exhibited superior retention compared to temporary cement, regardless of crown material. Co-Cr and titanium presented higher levels of retention to Ti-base abutment after being cemented.

Effect of aging and testing method on bond strength of CAD/CAM fiber-reinforced composite to dentin

OBJECTIVES To evaluate and compare the outcomes of shear (S) and microtensile (μT) bond strength tests of CAD/CAM fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) to dentin. Aging with either fatigue or thermocycling were conducted for comparison with baseline microtensile group. METHODS CAD/CAM FRC (Trinia, Bicon LLC, Boston, USA) blocks were milled to 3-mm diameter cylinders for shear and to blocks (5×5×5mm) for μT. Sixty extracted human molars were flattened to obtain dentin surfaces and randomly divided in four groups (n=15): (1) SC: samples tested in shear 24h after bonding; (2) μTC: samples tested in μT 24h after bonding); (3) μTF: samples submitted to mechanical fatigue prior to μT test, and; (4) μTT: thermocycling prior to μT test. Bonding system was applied onto the FRC material (Cera-Resin Bond, CRB, Shofu Dental, Kyoto, Japan). A conventional three-step adhesive system (All-bond 3, Bisco, Schaumburg, USA) was use with a self-cure resin cement (C&B resin cement, Bisco, Schaumburg, USA). Bond strength tests were conducted at 0.75mm/min and data analyzed using Weibull distribution (p<0.05). RESULTS Weibull contour plots showed a significantly lower characteristic strength (η) and Weibull modulus (m) for SC (η=6.9MPa and m=1.4) compared to μTC (η=20.9MPa and m=4.5). Fatigued and thermocycled μT groups presented significantly reduced characteristic strength (η=3.1MPa and η=4.1MPa, respectively) compared to μTC. Weibull modulus was significantly reduced only for SC and μTF groups compared μTC. Failure predominantly occurred at the cement/FRC interface. SIGNIFICANCE FRC bonded to dentin samples presented lower Weibull modulus and characteristic bond strength when immediately tested in shear compared to microtensile. Aging through thermocycling or mechanical fatigue significantly reduced the characteristic strength in microtensile testing, with the majority of failures emerging between restoration material and cement interface.

Influence of Erosive and Abrasive Cycling on Bonding of Different Adhesive Systems to Enamel: An In situ Study

This study evaluated the impact of orange juice on the bond strength (BS) of dentin bonding systems (DBSs) to enamel surface after simulation with an in situ/ ex vivo erosive cycling. One hundred and ninety two bovine enamel fragments (4x4x2mm) were obtained and randomized regarding superficial microhardness and distributed to palatal devices for 8 volunteers, in three phases (one for each DBS), containing 8 blocks, which were, allocated in 4 pairs. Daily, these pairs were subjected extraorally to the following conditions: CONT- neither erosive nor abrasive challenge; ERO- erosive challenge only; ABR- abrasive challenge only and ERO + ABR- with erosive and abrasive challenges. Erosive cycles (immersion in orange juice, 3 times/day/5 min/5 days) or/and abrasive challenges (electric toothbrush, 3 times/day/1 min/5 days) were performed. After these cycles, all specimens were restored with the adhesive systems Adper Scotchbond Multi Purpose (MP), Adper Single Bond 2 (SB) or Clearfil SE Bond (SE), and the composite resin Filtek Z250. After 7 days, sticks (area ≅1 mm2) were obtained and subjected to the microtensile bond strength test (μTBS) at 0.5 mm/min. Data was statistically analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey tests (a=0.05). Failure modes were determined using a digital microscope (40´). DBS was the only statistical significant factor. SE was the unique DBS not affected in any challenge, whereas MP and SB performed according to the scenario. The adhesive and mixed failures were predominant in all groups. Overall performance suggested that BS to enamel after erosive /abrasive challenged by orange juice was not affected and it was material-dependent.