Camille N. Abboud

Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF): Receptor biology, signal transduction, and neutrophil activation

Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) are two of the growing number of recognized cytokines involved in the regulation of hematopoiesis. The purification of these factors and the subsequent cloning of the cDNAs which encode these proteins have led to their widespread clinical use in the setting of therapy or disease-induced myelosuppression. Although originally purified on the basis of their colony-stimulating properties, GM-CSF and G-CSF may also play important roles in the regulation of effector cell function. The mechanisms underlying progenitor cell proliferation and effector cell stimulation remain poorly understood. However, the characterization of the GM-CSF and G-CSF receptors and recent work in signal transduction are helping to elucidate these mechanisms. This paper will review the biology of the GM-CSF and G-CSF receptors, the mechanisms of post-receptor signal transduction, and the resultant effects on neutrophil function. In addition, the current and potential clinical uses of these factors will be examined in light of their ability to activate and perhaps enhance the function of neutrophils.

Mechanisms of cytopenia in human immunodeficiency virus infection

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection often has effects on the hematopoietic system which can be distinguished from the concurrent effects of medications or opportunistic infections. Exactly how the virus mediates these effects remains uncertain, but both in vivo and in vitro studies have pointed up possible direct and indirect modes of hematopoietic suppression. Whether a significant fraction of CD34+ cells in vivo are infected with HIV remains controversial, but most studies using in situ polymerase chain reaction techniques would suggest not. Other more indirect modes of hematopoietic cell suppression such as production of autoantibodies, production of other humoral inhibitory factors, T-cell mediated suppression of hematopoiesis, or production of inhibitory or stimulatory cytokines may also be contributory. It is probable that several of these mechanisms may occur simultaneously, and an increased understanding of their role may lead to improved strategies to correct the cytopenias which often accompany HIV disease.

Integrins and Adhesive Receptors in Normal and Leukemic CD34+ Progenitor Cells: Potential Regulatory Checkpoints for Cellular Traffic

Multiple adhesion receptors are involved in the interaction of hematopoietic cells with the marrow microenvironment. This work characterizes the expression of various adhesive receptors on normal early hematopoietic precursors and reviews how they might be altered in leukemic states. Early hematopoietic CD34+ cells express CD18, CD11a, CD49d, CD49e, CD44, ICAM-1, and ICAM-3. Likewise, most AML samples express CD49d, CD49e, and CD44. In addition to mediating the adherence of progenitors to the marrow, these multiple receptors and their respective ligands may serve to regulate in vivo leukemic cell agrees from marrow and the ability of certain leukemic phenotypes to selectively seek extramedullary sanctuary sites such as the skin and the central nervous system.

State of the art: The hypereosinophilic syndromes

Many disease states such as parasitic infestations, malignancies, collagen vascular diseases, and allergies are associated with eosinophilia. The diagnosis of idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) requires a persistent elevation in the total eosinophil count (greater than 1500/mm3) for over 6 months, associated organ damage and no detectable underlying cause. This review provides an updated summary of the cytokine cascade that controls eosinophil production and delineates our current understanding of the clinical features of hypereosinophilic states. We also examine the central role of T-lymphocyte activation in eosinophilia, and have attempted to integrate current treatment strategies for HES with the physiology of eosinophilopoiesis.