Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Candyce D. Tart is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Candyce D. Tart.


Biological Psychiatry | 2013

D-Cycloserine Enhancement of Fear Extinction is Specific to Successful Exposure Sessions: Evidence from the Treatment of Height Phobia

Jasper A. J. Smits; David Rosenfield; Michael W. Otto; Mark B. Powers; Stefan G. Hofmann; Michael J. Telch; Mark H. Pollack; Candyce D. Tart

BACKGROUND Whereas some studies have shown clear evidence for an augmentation effect of D-cycloserine (DCS) on exposure therapy for anxiety disorders, other studies have shown weak effects or no effect at all. Some preclinical data suggest that the DCS augmentation effect is moderated by the success of extinction learning. Therefore, we conducted a reanalysis of existing data to examine whether the effects of DCS on clinical outcome would vary as a function of response to the exposure session (i.e., exposure success). METHODS In a clinical trial, patients with height phobia received two sessions involving 30 minutes of virtual reality exposure therapy and were randomly assigned to a pill placebo (n = 14) or 50 mg of DCS (n = 15) immediately after each session. RESULTS Mixed-effects regression analysis showed that the effects of DCS administration on clinical improvement was moderated by the level of fear experienced just before concluding exposure sessions. Patients receiving DCS exhibited significantly greater improvement in symptoms relative to patients who received placebo when fear was low at the end of the exposure. In contrast, when end fear was still elevated, patients receiving DCS improved less compared with those receiving placebo. CONCLUSIONS D-cycloserine appears to enhance the benefits of exposure treatment when applied after a successful session, but it seems to have detrimental effects when administered after inadequate/unsuccessful exposure sessions.


American Journal of Psychiatry | 2013

d-Cycloserine as an Augmentation Strategy With Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Social Anxiety Disorder

Stefan G. Hofmann; Jasper A. J. Smits; David Rosenfield; Naomi M. Simon; Michael W. Otto; Alicia E. Meuret; Luana Marques; Angela Fang; Candyce D. Tart; Mark H. Pollack

OBJECTIVE The authors examined whether D-cycloserine, a partial agonist at the glutamatergic N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor, augments and accelerates a full course of comprehensive cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) in adults with generalized social anxiety disorder. METHOD This was a multisite randomized placebo-controlled efficacy study with 169 medication-free adults with generalized social anxiety disorder, of whom 144 completed the 12-week treatment and 131 completed the three follow-up assessments. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 50 mg of D-cycloserine or placebo 1 hour before each of five exposure sessions that were part of a 12-session cognitive-behavioral group treatment. Response and remission status was determined at baseline, throughout treatment, at end of treatment, and at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up assessments by assessors who were blind to treatment condition. RESULTS D-Cycloserine-augmented and placebo-augmented CBT were associated with similar completion rates (87% and 82%), response rates (79.3% and 73.3%), and remission rates (34.5% and 24.4%) at the posttreatment assessment; response and remission rates were largely maintained at the follow-up assessments. Although D-cycloserine was associated with a 24%-33% faster rate of improvement in symptom severity and remission rates relative to placebo during the treatment phase, the groups did not differ in response and remission rates. CONCLUSIONS D-Cycloserine did not augment a full course of comprehensive CBT for social anxiety disorder.


Child Abuse & Neglect | 2009

Children's Adjustment Problems in Families Characterized by Men's Severe Violence toward Women: Does Other Family Violence Matter?.

Renee McDonald; Ernest N. Jouriles; Candyce D. Tart; Laura C. Minze

OBJECTIVE This research examined whether additional forms of family violence (partner-child aggression, mother-child aggression, and womens intimate partner violence [IPV]) contribute to childrens adjustment problems in families characterized by mens severe violence toward women. METHODS Participants were 258 children and their mothers recruited from domestic violence shelters. Mothers and children completed measures of mens IPV, womens IPV, partner-child aggression, and mother-child aggression. Mothers provided reports of childrens internalizing and externalizing behavior problems; children provided reports of their appraisals of threat in relation to interparent conflict. RESULTS After controlling for sociodemographics and mens IPV: (1) each of the additional forms of family violence (partner-child aggression, mother-child aggression, and womens IPV) was associated with childrens externalizing problems; (2) partner-child aggression was associated with internalizing problems; and (3) partner-child aggression was associated with childrens threat appraisals. The relation of mother-child aggression to externalizing problems was stronger for boys than for girls; gender differences were not observed for internalizing problems or threat appraisals. CONCLUSIONS Mens severe IPV seldom occurs in the absence of other forms of family violence, and these other forms appear to contribute to childrens adjustment problems. Parent-child aggression, and partner-child aggression in particular, are especially important. Systematic efforts to identify shelter children who are victims of parental violence seem warranted. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Mens severe IPV seldom occurs in the absence of other forms of family violence (partner-child aggression, mother-child aggression, and womens IPV), and these different forms of family violence all contribute to childrens adjustment problems. Treatment programs for children who come to domestic violence shelters should address these different forms of family violence, especially parent-child aggression.


Journal of Psychiatric Research | 2013

Augmentation of exposure therapy with post-session administration of d-cycloserine

Candyce D. Tart; Pamela Handelsman; Lindsey B. DeBoer; David Rosenfield; Mark H. Pollack; Stefan G. Hofmann; Mark B. Powers; Michael W. Otto; Jasper A. J. Smits

BACKGROUND Pre-session administration of d-cycloserine (DCS) has been found to augment exposure therapy outcomes in a variety of anxiety disorders. To be able to enhance learning only for successful exposure sessions, it would be beneficial to have the option of administering DCS after rather than before the session, a strategy encouraged by pre-clinical work. We believe the present study is the first published report on the efficacy of post-session administration of DCS in humans. METHOD Adults (N = 29) with a DSM-IV diagnosis of acrophobia were randomized to receive two sessions of virtual reality exposure therapy (VRE) in combination with placebo or 50 mg of DCS. Instead of administering the pill prior to each of the sessions, as has been done in extant work, we administered the pill immediately following each session. Measures of acrophobia severity were collected at baseline, at each treatment session, 1-week post-treatment, and at 1-month follow-up. RESULTS Mixed-effects repeated-measures ANOVAs and GLMMs revealed significant improvement in all outcome measures over time, but no between-group differences were observed. At post-treatment, 63.5% of patients in the placebo condition vs. 60.0% of those in the DCS condition were in remission. At 1-month follow up, 63.4% of those in the placebo condition vs. 66.6% of those in the DCS condition were in remission. CONCLUSIONS These findings do not support the application of post-session DCS administration for augmenting the efficacy of exposure-based treatments. Possible reasons for these findings are discussed. TRIAL REGISTRY The Trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01102803).


Journal of Psychiatric Research | 2011

Specificity of disgust vulnerability in the distinction and treatment of OCD

Bunmi O. Olatunji; Candyce D. Tart; Bethany G. Ciesielski; Patrick B. McGrath; Jasper A. J. Smits

A growing body of research has implicated disgust as a potential risk factor for the development and maintenance of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). The first aim of the present study was to determine whether related, yet distinct, disgust vulnerabilities are endorsed more strongly by individuals with OCD than by those with another anxiety disorder. The second aim was to examine the unique contributions of changes in disgust to symptom improvement observed with exposure-based treatment for OCD. In study 1, individuals with OCD, generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), and nonclinical controls (NCCs) completed a measure of disgust propensity and disgust sensitivity. Compared to NCCs and individuals with GAD, those with OCD more strongly endorsed disgust propensity. However, individuals with OCD did not significantly differ from individuals with GAD in disgust sensitivity, although both groups reported significantly higher disgust sensitivity levels compared to NCCs. Study 2 comprised mediation analyses of symptom improvement among individuals with OCD and revealed that decreases in disgust propensity over time mediated improvement in OCD symptoms, even after controlling for improvements in negative affect. The implications of these findings for conceptualizing the role of disgust in the nature and treatment of OCD are discussed.


JAMA Psychiatry | 2017

D-Cycloserine Augmentation of Exposure-Based Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Anxiety, Obsessive-Compulsive, and Posttraumatic Stress Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data

David Mataix-Cols; Lorena Fernández de la Cruz; Benedetta Monzani; David Rosenfield; Erik Andersson; Ana Pérez-Vigil; Paolo Frumento; Rianne A. de Kleine; Jo Ann Difede; Boadie W. Dunlop; Lara J. Farrell; Daniel A. Geller; Maryrose Gerardi; Adam J. Guastella; Stefan G. Hofmann; Gert Jan Hendriks; Matt G. Kushner; Francis S. Lee; Eric J. Lenze; Cheri A. Levinson; Harry McConnell; Michael W. Otto; Jens Plag; Mark H. Pollack; Kerry J. Ressler; Thomas L. Rodebaugh; Barbara O. Rothbaum; Michael S. Scheeringa; Anja Siewert-Siegmund; Jasper A. J. Smits

Importance Whether and under which conditions D-cycloserine (DCS) augments the effects of exposure-based cognitive behavior therapy for anxiety, obsessive-compulsive, and posttraumatic stress disorders is unclear. Objective To clarify whether DCS is superior to placebo in augmenting the effects of cognitive behavior therapy for anxiety, obsessive-compulsive, and posttraumatic stress disorders and to evaluate whether antidepressants interact with DCS and the effect of potential moderating variables. Data Sources PubMed, EMBASE, and PsycINFO were searched from inception to February 10, 2016. Reference lists of previous reviews and meta-analyses and reports of randomized clinical trials were also checked. Study Selection Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were (1) double-blind randomized clinical trials of DCS as an augmentation strategy for exposure-based cognitive behavior therapy and (2) conducted in humans diagnosed as having specific phobia, social anxiety disorder, panic disorder with or without agoraphobia, obsessive-compulsive disorder, or posttraumatic stress disorder. Data Extraction and Synthesis Raw data were obtained from the authors and quality controlled. Data were ranked to ensure a consistent metric across studies (score range, 0-100). We used a 3-level multilevel model nesting repeated measures of outcomes within participants, who were nested within studies. Results Individual participant data were obtained for 21 of 22 eligible trials, representing 1047 of 1073 eligible participants. When controlling for antidepressant use, participants receiving DCS showed greater improvement from pretreatment to posttreatment (mean difference, −3.62; 95% CI, −0.81 to −6.43; P = .01; d = −0.25) but not from pretreatment to midtreatment (mean difference, −1.66; 95% CI, −4.92 to 1.60; P = .32; d = −0.14) or from pretreatment to follow-up (mean difference, −2.98, 95% CI, −5.99 to 0.03; P = .05; d = −0.19). Additional analyses showed that participants assigned to DCS were associated with lower symptom severity than those assigned to placebo at posttreatment and at follow-up. Antidepressants did not moderate the effects of DCS. None of the prespecified patient-level or study-level moderators was associated with outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance D-cycloserine is associated with a small augmentation effect on exposure-based therapy. This effect is not moderated by the concurrent use of antidepressants. Further research is needed to identify patient and/or therapy characteristics associated with DCS response.


Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology | 2013

Behavioral versus cognitive treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder: an examination of outcome and mediators of change

Bunmi O. Olatunji; David Rosenfield; Candyce D. Tart; Jean Cottraux; Mark B. Powers; Jasper A. J. Smits

OBJECTIVE To examine symptom change over time, the effect of attrition on treatment outcome, and the putative mediators of cognitive therapy (CT) versus behavior therapy (BT) for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) using archival data. METHOD Sixty-two adults with OCD were randomized to 20 sessions of CT (N = 30) or BT (N = 32) that consisted of 4 weeks of intensive treatment (16 hr total) and 12 weeks of maintenance sessions (4 hr). Independent evaluators assessed OCD severity using the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) at baseline and at Weeks 4, 16 (posttreatment), 26, and 52 (follow-up). Behavioral avoidance, depressive symptoms, and dysfunctional beliefs regarding responsibility were also measured at each assessment. Study hypotheses were tested using multilevel modeling. RESULTS The slope of change in Y-BOCS scores was significantly greater in BT than in CT (d = 0.69), and those receiving BT had lower Y-BOCS scores at the final assessment than those receiving CT (d = 1.17). The greater slope of change in BT versus CT did not differ for dropouts versus completers. Reduction in depressed mood mediated changes in Y-BOCS across the 2 treatments, but a reduction in sense of responsibility and a decrease in avoidance did not. Instead, Y-BOCS improvements appeared to precede a decrease in avoidance. CONCLUSIONS BT may have some therapeutic advantage over CT in the treatment of OCD, and this advantage does not appear to be due to a differential pattern of responding for treatment dropouts versus completers. Further, inconsistent with hypotheses, improvements in OCD symptoms were mediated by reductions in depressed mood instead of decreases in avoidance and responsibility. Theoretical, methodological, and clinical implications are discussed.


Journal of Psychiatric Research | 2010

Psychotropic medication use mediates the relationship between mood and anxiety disorders and obesity: findings from a nationally representative sample.

Jasper A. J. Smits; David Rosenfield; Amber A. Mather; Candyce D. Tart; Christine A. Henriksen; Jitender Sareen

Growing evidence points to a relationship between obesity and both mood and anxiety disorders, but the question of what accounts for this association remains unanswered. The present study examined the use of psychotropic medications as a mediator of the mood/anxiety disorder-obesity relationship. Data came from the public use dataset of the Canadian Community Health Survey Cycle 1.2 (age 15 years and older, N = 36,984). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition psychiatric diagnoses of 12-month mood disorders (e.g., major depressive disorder, mania) and anxiety disorders (e.g., panic attacks, panic disorder, social phobia, agoraphobia) were examined as was use of psychotropic medications (e.g., antidepressants, antipsychotics, anxiolytics, hypnotics, mood stabilizers) and obesity (defined as body mass index ≥30). A series of multiple logistic regression analyses were completed to test study hypotheses. Covariates in these analyses included sociodemographic factors, physical activity, and physical illness burden. The use of two medication classes, namely antidepressants and antipsychotics, emerged as significant predictors of obesity as well as mediators of the psychiatric diagnosis-obesity relationship after evaluating all psychotropic medication classes simultaneously, while also controlling for other theoretically relevant variables. The use of these two medications accounted for 86% of the relationship between mood disorders and obesity and 32% of the relationship between anxiety disorders and obesity. The study findings guide advances in the theoretical conceptualization of the mechanisms involved in mood/anxiety disorder-obesity relations. Clinical implications are discussed.


Eating Behaviors | 2012

Physical activity as a moderator of the association between anxiety sensitivity and binge eating

Lindsey B. DeBoer; Candyce D. Tart; Katherine Presnell; Mark B. Powers; Austin S. Baldwin; Jasper A. J. Smits

Individuals with elevated anxiety sensitivity (AS; i.e., fear of somatic arousal) may binge eat to reduce emotional distress. Because physical activity reduces stress reactivity, we predicted that: (1) the relation between AS and binge eating would be moderated by physical activity and (2) coping motives for eating would mediate the association between AS and binge eating such that the relation would be stronger for those low in physical activity. Participants (N=167) completed online self-report measures. Regression analyses revealed that moderate-intensity physical activity (MPA) moderated the relation between AS and binge eating such that AS was not related to binge eating among those who frequently engaged in MPA but was related to binge eating among those who did not report engaging in MPA. Vigorous-intensity physical activity (VPA) moderated in the opposite direction such that the relation between AS and binge eating was significant among persons reporting high levels of VPA but less strong among persons reporting low levels of VPA. The mediation model was also significant, but was not moderated by MPA or VPA. Theoretical and clinical implications are discussed.


The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry | 2012

Evaluation of the Glycine Transporter Inhibitor Org 25935 as Augmentation to Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Panic Disorder: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Kari R. Nations; Jasper A. J. Smits; David F. Tolin; Barbara O. Rothbaum; Stefan G. Hofmann; Candyce D. Tart; Allen Lee; Jacques Schipper; Magnus Sjogren; Dixi Xue; Armin Szegedi; Michael W. Otto

OBJECTIVE A growing body of evidence supports the efficacy of D-cycloserine (DCS), a partial agonist at the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) glutamate receptor, as augmentation to cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) in the treatment of anxiety disorders. Org 25935 is a glycine transporter 1 inhibitor that acts to increase synaptic glycine levels and enhance NMDA-mediated glutamatergic activity. The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy of a glutamatergic compound other than DCS in a CBT augmentation paradigm. METHOD This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group clinical trial for which participants were recruited from November 2008 through February 2010. Eligible adult patients diagnosed (DSM-IV) with panic disorder with or without agoraphobia (N = 40) were scheduled to receive 5 manualized CBT treatment sessions. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either a dose of Org 25935 (4 mg or 12 mg) or placebo 2 hours prior to the start of CBT sessions 3, 4, and 5. The primary endpoint was symptomatic change as measured by the Panic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS) 1 week following the last CBT session. RESULTS Although mean PDSS total scores decreased significantly from baseline to end of treatment in every group, no statistically significant benefit was observed for Org 25935 (4 or 12 mg) over placebo on the primary endpoint or on any secondary efficacy endpoint. Org 25935 showed no safety issues at either dose but was much better tolerated at the 4-mg dose level than at the 12-mg dose level. CONCLUSIONS Org 25935 demonstrated no benefit over placebo in augmenting CBT for panic disorder. Study limitations and implications are discussed. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00725725.

Collaboration


Dive into the Candyce D. Tart's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jasper A. J. Smits

University of Texas at Austin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David Rosenfield

Southern Methodist University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark B. Powers

Southern Methodist University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark H. Pollack

Rush University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Katherine Presnell

Southern Methodist University

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge