Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Cara L. Grimes is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Cara L. Grimes.


Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2015

Mesh Sacrocolpopexy Compared With Native Tissue Vaginal Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Nazema Y. Siddiqui; Cara L. Grimes; Elizabeth R. Casiano; Husam Abed; Peter C. Jeppson; Cedric K. Olivera; Tatiana Sanses; Adam C. Steinberg; Mary M. South; Ethan M Balk; Vivian W. Sung

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review outcomes after mesh sacrocolpopexy compared with native tissue vaginal repairs in women with apical prolapse. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov through June 4, 2012. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: For anatomic and functional analyses, we included studies comparing mesh sacrocolpopexy to native tissue vaginal repairs with at least 6 months follow-up. The primary outcome was anatomic “success” after surgery. Secondary outcomes were reoperation and symptom outcomes. We included large case series and comparative studies with shorter follow-up to increase power for adverse event analyses. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Evidence quality was assessed with the Grades for Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Meta-analyses were performed when at least three studies reported the same outcome. We included 13 comparative studies for anatomic success, reoperation, and symptom outcomes. Moderate-quality evidence supports improved anatomic outcomes after mesh sacrocolpopexy; very low-quality evidence shows no differences in reoperation between sacrocolpopexy and native tissue vaginal repairs. Evidence was insufficient regarding which procedures result in improved bladder or bowel symptoms. Low-quality evidence showed no differences in postoperative sexual function. Adverse event data were compiled and meta-analyzed from 79 studies. When including larger noncomparative studies, ileus or small bowel obstruction (2.7% compared with 0.2%, P<.01), mesh or suture complications (4.2% compared with 0.4%, P<.01), and thromboembolic phenomena (0.6% compared with 0.1%, P=.03) were more common after mesh sacrocolpopexy compared with native tissue vaginal repairs. CONCLUSION: When anatomic durability is a priority, we suggest that mesh sacrocolpopexy may be the preferred surgical option. When minimizing adverse events or reoperation is the priority, there is no strong evidence supporting one approach over the other.


Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2012

Sacral colpopexy followed by refractory Candida albicans osteomyelitis and discitis requiring extensive spinal surgery.

Cara L. Grimes; Jasmine Tan-Kim; Garfin; Charles W. Nager

BACKGROUND: Sacral colpopexy is an effective approach to treat vaginal vault prolapse. We report a case of serious Candida albicans infection at the site of sacral mesh attachment. CASE: A 63-year-old woman developed back pain 4 months after sacral colpopexy. Imaging revealed L5 and S1 osteomyelitis and discitis. This was refractory to medical management and surgical debridement with mesh removal and tissue excision in the surgical plane. Cultures demonstrated C albicans. This ultimately required extensive spinal surgery, including two discectomies, L5 corpectomy, partial corpectomies, canal decompression, strut fusion, and posterior screw and rod stabilization and fusion. CONCLUSION: C albicans lumbosacral osteomyelitis and discitis is a rare but serious complication after sacral colpopexy that can result in significant morbidity.


Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2016

Salpingo-oophorectomy at the Time of Benign Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review.

Elizabeth Casiano Evans; Kristen A. Matteson; Francisco J. Orejuela; Marianna Alperin; Ethan M Balk; Sherif A. El-Nashar; Jonathan L. Gleason; Cara L. Grimes; Peter C. Jeppson; Cara Mathews; Thomas L. Wheeler; Miles Murphy

OBJECTIVE: To compare the long-term risks associated with salpingo-oophorectomy with ovarian conservation at the time of benign hysterectomy. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to January 30, 2015. We included prospective and retrospective comparative studies of women with benign hysterectomy who had either bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) or conservation of one or both ovaries. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Reviewers double-screened 5,568 citations and extracted eligible studies into customized forms. Twenty-six comparative studies met inclusion criteria. Studies were assessed for results, quality, and strength of evidence. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Studies were extracted for participant, intervention, comparator, and outcomes data. When compared with hysterectomy with BSO, prevalence of reoperation and ovarian cancer was higher in women with ovarian conservation (ovarian cancer risk of 0.14–0.7% compared with 0.02–0.04% among those with BSO). Hysterectomy with BSO was associated with a lower incidence of breast and total cancer, but no difference in the incidence of cancer mortality was found when compared with ovarian conservation. All-cause mortality was higher in women younger than age 45 years at the time of BSO who were not treated with estrogen replacement therapy (hazard ratio [HR] 1.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04–1.92). Coronary heart disease (HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.04–1.54) and cardiovascular death were higher among women with BSO (HR 1.84, 95% CI 1.27–2.68), especially women younger than 45 years who were not treated with estrogen. Finally, there was an increase in the prevalence of dementia and Parkinson disease among women with BSO compared with conservation, especially in women younger than age 50 years. Clinical practice guidelines were devised based on these results. CONCLUSION: Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy offers the advantage of effectively eliminating the risk of ovarian cancer and reoperation but can be detrimental to other aspects of health, especially among women younger than age 45 years.


Female pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery | 2014

What happens to the posterior compartment and bowel symptoms after sacrocolpopexy?: Evaluation of 5-year outcomes from E-CARE

Cara L. Grimes; Emily S. Lukacz; Marie G. Gantz; Lauren Klein Warren; Linda Brubaker; Halina Zyczynski; Holly E. Richter; John Eric Jelovsek; Geoffrey W. Cundiff; Paul Fine; Anthony G. Visco; Min Zhang; Susan Meikle

Objectives The objective of this study was to describe posterior prolapse (pPOP) and obstructed defecation (OD) symptoms 5 years after open abdominal sacrocolpopexy (ASC). Methods We grouped the extended colpopexy and urinary reduction efforts trial participants with baseline and 5-year outcomes into 3 groups using baseline posterior Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) points and concomitant posterior repair (PR) (no PR, Ap <0; no PR, Ap ≥0; and +PR). Posterior colporrhaphy, perineorrhaphy, or sacrocolpoperineopexy were included as PR, which was performed at surgeon’s discretion. Outcomes were dichotomized into presence/absence of pPOP (Ap ≥0) and OD symptoms (≥2 on 1 or more questions about digital assistance, excessive straining, or incomplete evacuation). Composite failure was defined by both pPOP and OD symptoms or pPOP reoperation. Results Ninety participants completed baseline and 5-year outcomes or were retreated with mean follow-up of 7.1 ± 1.0 years. Of those with no PR (Ap <0), 2 women (2/36; 9%) developed new pPOP with OD symptoms; 1 underwent subsequent PR. Nearly all (23/24; 96%) with no PR (Ap ≥0) demonstrated sustained resolution of pPOP, and none underwent PR. Fourteen percent (4/29) of +PR underwent repeat PR within 5 years, and 12% had recurrent pPOP. Regardless of PR, OD symptoms improved in all groups after ASC, although OD symptoms were still present in 17% to 19% at 5 years. Conclusions Symptomatic pPOP is common 5 years after ASC regardless of concomitant PR. Obstructed defecation symptoms may improve after ASC regardless of PR. Recurrent pPOP and/or reoperation was highest among those who received concomitant PR at ASC. Further studies identifying criteria for concomitant PR at the time of ASC are warranted.


International Urogynecology Journal | 2012

Posterior vaginal compartment prolapse and defecatory dysfunction: are they related?

Cara L. Grimes; Emily S. Lukacz

While posterior vaginal compartment prolapse and defecatory dysfunction are highly prevalent conditions in women with pelvic floor disorders, the relationship between anatomy and symptoms, specifically obstructed defecation, is incompletely understood. This review discusses the anatomy of the posterior vaginal compartment and definitions of defecatory dysfunction and obstructed defecation. A clinically useful classification system for defecatory dysfunction is highlighted. Available tools for the measurement of symptoms, physical findings, and imaging in women with posterior compartment prolapse are discussed. Based on a critical review of the literature, we investigate and summarize whether posterior compartment anatomy correlates with function. Definitions of obstructed defecation and significant posterior compartment prolapse are proposed for future exploration.


Female pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery | 2011

Urinary tract infections.

Cara L. Grimes; Emily S. Lukacz

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are prevalent and an important topic for the urogynecologist. In this article, we review important definitions, the pathophysiology, and identifiable risk factors for UTI. In addition, the evaluation and management of UTIs is summarized. Finally, attention is focused on UTIs in special populations, including pregnant, hospitalized, and postoperative patients. The latest recommendations from the urologic, infectious disease, gynecologic, and systematic review literature are discussed.


International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics | 2013

A case–control study of risk factors for ileus and bowel obstruction following benign gynecologic surgery

Danielle D. Antosh; Cara L. Grimes; Aimee L. Smith; Sarah Friedman; Brook L. Mcfadden; Catrina C. Crisp; Arielle Allen; Robert E. Gutman; Rebecca G. Rogers

To identify risk factors leading to the development of postoperative ileus and small‐bowel obstruction (SBO) after benign gynecologic surgery.


International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics | 2013

Management of ileus and small-bowel obstruction following benign gynecologic surgery.

Arielle Allen; Danielle D. Antosh; Cara L. Grimes; Catrina C. Crisp; Aimee L. Smith; Sarah Friedman; Brook L. Mcfadden; Robert E. Gutman; Rebecca G. Rogers

To describe practice preferences for the diagnosis and management of ileus and small‐bowel obstruction (SBO) following benign gynecologic surgery.


American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 2017

Feasibility of prophylactic salpingectomy during vaginal hysterectomy

Danielle D. Antosh; Rachel High; Heidi W. Brown; Sallie S. Oliphant; Husam Abed; Nisha Philip; Cara L. Grimes

BACKGROUND: The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends that “the surgeon and patient discuss the potential benefits of the removal of the fallopian tubes during a hysterectomy in women at population risk of ovarian cancer who are not having an oophorectomy,” resulting in an increasing rate of salpingectomy at the time of hysterectomy. Rates of salpingectomy are highest for laparoscopic and lowest for vaginal hysterectomy. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to determine the feasibility of bilateral salpingectomy at the time of vaginal hysterectomy. Secondary objectives included identification of factors associated with unsuccessful salpingectomy and assessment of its impact on operating time, blood loss, surgical complications, and menopausal symptoms. STUDY DESIGN: This was a multicenter, prospective study of patients undergoing planned vaginal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingectomy. Baseline medical data along with operative findings, operative time, and blood loss for salpingectomy were recorded. Uterine weight and pathology reports for all fallopian tubes were reviewed. Patients completed the Menopause Rating Scale at baseline and at postoperative follow‐up. Descriptive analyses were performed to characterize the sample and compare those with successful and unsuccessful completion of planned salpingectomy using Student t test, and χ2 test when appropriate. Questionnaire scores were compared using paired t tests. RESULTS: Among 77 patients offered enrollment, 74 consented (96%), and complete data were available regarding primary outcome for 69 (93%). Mean age was 51 years. Median body mass index was 29.1 kg/m2; median vaginal parity was 2, and 41% were postmenopausal. The indications for hysterectomy included prolapse (78%), heavy menstrual bleeding (20%), and fibroids (11%). When excluding conversions to alternate routes, vaginal salpingectomy was successfully performed in 52/64 (81%) women. Mean operating time for bilateral salpingectomy was 11 (±5.6) minutes, with additional estimated blood loss of 6 (±16.3) mL. There were 8 surgical complications: 3 hemorrhages >500 mL and 5 conversions to alternate routes of surgery, but none of these were due to the salpingectomy. Mean uterine weight was 102 g and there were no malignancies on fallopian tube pathology. Among the 17 patients in whom planned bilateral salpingectomy was not completed, unilateral salpingectomy was performed in 7 patients. Reasons for noncompletion included: tubes high in the pelvis (8), conversion to alternate route for pathology (4), bowel or sidewall adhesions (3), tubes absent (1), and ovarian adhesions (1). Prior adnexal surgery (odds ratio, 2.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.5–5.5; P = .006) and uterine fibroids (odds ratio, 5.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.5–22.5; P = .02) were the only significant factors associated with unsuccessful bilateral salpingectomy. Mean menopause scores improved after successful salpingectomy (12.7 vs 8.6; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Vaginal salpingectomy is feasible in the majority of women undergoing vaginal hysterectomy and increases operating time by 11 minutes and blood loss by 6 mL. Women with prior adnexal surgery or uterine fibroids should be counseled about the possibility that removal may not be feasible.


Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease | 2011

Interobserver reliability of microscopic assessment of saline-prepared vaginal fluid.

James L. Whiteside; Themarge A. Small; Todd A. MacKenzie; Cara L. Grimes; Lauren E. Shore; Debra Birenbaum

Objective. To determine the interobserver reliability of microscopic assessment of saline-prepared vaginal fluid. Materials and Methods. Blind-paired microscopic assessments of saline-prepared vaginal fluid collected from women presenting for gynecologic care were compared using concordance and weighted chance-corrected agreement statistics (&kgr;). Results. Vaginal fluid from 105 women was collected and examined by 65 distinct observer pairs. The mean age of participants was 39 years, with vaginal itch (29%) followed by discharge (21%) as the most common presenting complaints. The &kgr; value for microscopic findings ranged from 0.28 (normal flora) to 0.50 (clue cells >20%). The &kgr; value for vaginitis diagnoses ranged from 0.25 (atrophic vaginitis) to 0.45 (bacterial vaginosis). Conclusions. Interobserver agreement in the microscopic assessment of vaginal fluid is at best moderate. The value of microscopy in the diagnosis of vaginitis is uncertain, and effort should be directed to improve the precision of this tool.

Collaboration


Dive into the Cara L. Grimes's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Danielle D. Antosh

MedStar Washington Hospital Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Heidi W. Brown

University of Wisconsin-Madison

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Miles Murphy

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Cedric K. Olivera

SUNY Downstate Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge