Cari J. Connell

Two large prospective studies of mortality among men who use snuff or chewing tobacco (United States)

Background: Few prospective studies have examined the health risks associated with use of snuff and chewing tobacco.Methods: We studied the association between the use of spit tobacco (snuff or chewing tobacco) and mortality among men enrolled in Cancer Prevention Study I (CPS-I) in 1959 or Cancer Prevention Study II (CPS-II) in 1982. Analyses were based on men who reported exclusive use of snuff or chewing tobacco (7745 in CPS-I, 3327 in CPS-II) or no previous use of any tobacco product (69,662 in CPS-I, 111,482 in CPS-II) at baseline. Twelve-year follow-up of CPS-I, and 18-year follow-up of CPS-II identified 11,871 and 19,588 deaths, respectively. Cox proportional hazards models were used to control for age and other covariates.Results: Men who currently used snuff or chewing tobacco at baseline had higher death rates from all causes than men who did not in both CPS-I (hazard ratio [HR]=1.17, 95% CI=1.11–1.23) and CPS-II (HR=1.18, 95% CI=1.08–1.29). In CPS-I, current use of spit tobacco was statistically significantly associated with death from coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke, and diseases of the respiratory, digestive, and genitourinary systems, but not with death from cancer. In CPS-II, use of these products was significantly associated with death from CHD, stroke, all cancers combined, lung cancer, and cirrhosis. The associations with cardiovascular and other non-malignant endpoints were attenuated, but not eliminated, by controlling for measured covariates. Former use of spit tobacco was not associated with any endpoint in CPS-II. No clear dose response was observed with either the frequency or duration of usage for any endpoint.Conclusions: These two prospective studies provide limited evidence that current use of chewing tobacco or snuff may increase mortality from heart disease and stroke.

Underuse of Screening Sigmoidoscopy and Colonoscopy in a Large Cohort of US Adults

OBJECTIVES We examined the prevalence of endoscopy (sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy) by indication and by demographic and lifestyle factors. METHODS We analyzed cross-sectional data collected in 1997 from participants aged 50 years and older in the Cancer Prevention Study (CPS) II Nutrition Cohort. RESULTS Fifty-eight percent of men and 51% of women reported ever having undergone endoscopy; only 42% of men and 31% of women reported endoscopy for screening rather than for disease diagnosis or follow-up. Prevalence varied by demographic and lifestyle factors. CONCLUSIONS Efforts to increase colorectal cancer screening need to target women, all persons aged 50-64 years, and those with colorectal cancer risk factors. Future studies should distinguish endoscopy for screening from procedures for disease diagnosis and follow-up to avoid overestimating screening compliance.

Multivitamin use and colon cancer mortality in the Cancer Prevention Study II cohort (United States)

Objective: Multivitamins contain several nutrients, including folic acid, which are hypothesized to reduce colon cancer risk. Previous epidemiologic studies have suggested that effects of multivitamins containing substantial amounts of folic acid (introduced in 1973) may not be evident until 15 or more years since first use. Methods: We examined the association between daily multivitamin use and colon cancer mortality among 806,397 US men and women in the Cancer Prevention Study II cohort who completed a questionnaire at enrollment in 1982 and were followed for mortality through 1998. Results: After multivariate adjustment, multivitamin use at enrollment showed little association with colon cancer mortality. After 15 years since first use of a multivitamin potentially containing folic acid, we observed slightly decreased risk of colon cancer mortality (rate ratio (RR) = 0.89, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80–0.99). Consistent with previous reports, this association was stronger among participants consuming two or more alcoholic drinks per day (RR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.56–0.91). Conclusion: Our results are consistent with a modest reduction in colon cancer mortality associated with use of folic acid-containing multivitamins among moderate to heavy alcohol users.

Tobacco-related disease mortality among men who switched from cigarettes to spit tobacco

Background: Although several epidemiological studies have examined the mortality among users of spit tobacco, none have compared mortality of former cigarette smokers who substitute spit tobacco for cigarette smoking (“switchers”) and smokers who quit using tobacco entirely. Methods: A cohort of 116 395 men were identified as switchers (n = 4443) or cigarette smokers who quit using tobacco entirely (n = 111 952) when enrolled in the ongoing US American Cancer Society Cancer Prevention Study II. From 1982 to 31 December 2002, 44 374 of these men died. The mortality hazard ratios (HR) of tobacco-related diseases, including lung cancer, coronary heart disease, stroke and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression modelling adjusted for age and other demographic variables, as well as variables associated with smoking history, including number of years smoked, number of cigarettes smoked and age at quitting. Results: After 20 years of follow-up, switchers had a higher rate of death from any cause (HR 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01 to 1.15), lung cancer (HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.24 to 1.73), coronary heart disease (HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.29) and stroke (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.53) than those who quit using tobacco entirely. Conclusion: The risks of dying from major tobacco-related diseases were higher among former cigarette smokers who switched to spit tobacco after they stopped smoking than among those who quit using tobacco entirely.

A Large Cohort Study of Aspirin and Other Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs and Prostate Cancer Incidence

BACKGROUND Use of aspirin and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) has consistently been associated with a reduced risk of colon cancer. Recent epidemiologic studies have suggested that the use of NSAIDs, particularly aspirin, may also be associated with a reduced risk of prostate cancer, but the evidence remains limited. METHODS We examined the association between NSAID use and prostate cancer incidence among 70 144 men in the American Cancer Societys Cancer Prevention Study II Nutrition Cohort. Information on NSAID use was obtained from a questionnaire completed at study enrollment in 1992-1993 and was updated using follow-up questionnaires in 1997 and 1999. We calculated rate ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for prostate cancer incidence associated with NSAID use, adjusting for age and potential prostate cancer risk factors. RESULTS During follow-up from 1992-1993 through August 31, 2001, 4853 cases of incident prostate cancer were identified. Neither current aspirin use nor current use of NSAIDs (aspirin and other NSAIDs combined) was associated with prostate cancer risk, even at the highest usage level (60 or more pills per month). However, long-duration regular use (30 or more pills per month for 5 or more years) of NSAIDs was associated with reduced risk of prostate cancer (RR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.71 to 0.94). Long-duration regular use of aspirin was also associated with reduced risk of prostate cancer (RR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.73 to 0.99). The absolute rate of prostate cancer (standardized to the age distribution of study participants using 5-year age categories) was 1013 per 100,000 person-years among men who had never reported NSAID use, and 847 per 100,000 person-years among long duration regular NSAID users. CONCLUSIONS These results support the hypothesis that long duration regular NSAID use is associated with modestly reduced risk of prostate cancer.