Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Carin A. Uyl-de Groot is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Carin A. Uyl-de Groot.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2006

Traditional Versus Up-Front [18F] Fluorodeoxyglucose–Positron Emission Tomography Staging of Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Dutch Cooperative Randomized Study

Gerarda J.M. Herder; Henk Kramer; Otto S. Hoekstra; Egbert F. Smit; Jan Pruim; Harm van Tinteren; Emile F.I. Comans; Paul Verboom; Carin A. Uyl-de Groot; Alle Welling; Marinus A. Paul; Maarten Boers; Pieter E. Postmus; Gerrit J.J. Teule; Harry J.M. Groen

PURPOSE We investigated whether application of positron emission tomography (PET) immediately after first presentation might simplify staging while maintaining accuracy, as compared with traditional strategy in routine clinical setting. METHODS At first presentation, patients with a provisional diagnosis of lung cancer without overt dissemination were randomly assigned to traditional work-up (TWU) according to international guidelines or early PET followed by histologic/cytologic verification of lesions, or imaging and follow-up. Patients with [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose (18FDG) -avid, noncentral tumors without suspicion of mediastinal or distant metastases on PET proceeded directly to thoracotomy. Follow-up in presumed benign lesions was at least 12 months. In patients treated with surgery or neoadjuvant therapy, the quality of staging was measured by comparing the clinical stage to the final stage (combination of peroperative staging and 6 months of follow-up). To investigate test substitution, we analyzed the number of (non)invasive tests to achieve clinical TNM staging, and its associated costs. RESULTS Between 1999 and 2001, 465 patients (233 TWU, 232 PET) were enrolled at 22 hospitals. The mean (standard deviation) number of procedures to finalize staging was equal in the TWU arm and the PET arm: 7.9 (2.0) v 7.9 (1.9), P = .90, respectively. Mediastinoscopies occurred significantly less often in the PET arm. Agreement between clinical and final stage was good in both arms (kappa = .85 v .78; P = .07). Costs did not differ significantly. CONCLUSION Up-front 18FDG-PET in patients with (suspected) lung cancer does not reduce the overall number of diagnostic test, but it maintains quality of TNM staging with the use of less invasive surgery.


European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | 2003

Cost-effectiveness of FDG-PET in staging non-small cell lung cancer: the PLUS study

Paul Verboom; Harm van Tinteren; Otto S. Hoekstra; Egbert F. Smit; Jan Ham van den Bergh; Ad J.M. Schreurs; Roland A. L. M. Stallaert; Piet Cm van Velthoven; Emile F.I. Comans; Fred W. Diepenhorst; Johan C. van Mourik; Pieter E. Postmus; Maarten Boers; E. W. M. Grijseels; Gerrit J.J. Teule; Carin A. Uyl-de Groot

Currently, up to 50% of the operations in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are futile owing to the presence of locally advanced tumour or distant metastases. More accurate pre-operative staging is required in order to reduce the number of futile operations. The cost-effectiveness of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18FDG-PET) added to the conventional diagnostic work-up was studied in the PLUS study. Prior to invasive staging and/or thoracotomy, 188 patients with (suspected) NSCLC were randomly assigned to conventional work-up (CWU) and whole-body PET or to CWU alone. CWU was based on prevailing guidelines. Pre-operative staging was followed by 1 year of follow-up. Outcomes are expressed in the percentage of correctly staged patients and the associated costs. The cost price of PET varied between €736 and €1,588 depending on the (hospital) setting and the procurement of 18FDG commercially or from on-site production. In the CWU group, 41% of the patients underwent a futile thoracotomy, whereas in the PET group 21% of the thoracotomies were considered futile (P=0.003). The average costs per patient in the CWU group were €9,573 and in the PET group, €8,284. The major cost driver was the number of hospital days related to recovery from surgery. Sensitivity analysis on the cost and accuracy of PET showed that the results were robust, i.e. in favour of the PET group. The addition of PET to CWU prevented futile surgery in one out of five patients with suspected NSCLC. Despite the additional PET costs, the total costs were lower in the PET group, mainly due to a reduction in the number of futile operations. The additional use of PET in the staging of patients with NSCLC is feasible, safe and cost saving from a clinical and from an economic perspective.


Breast Journal | 2006

Costs and Health Effects of Breast Cancer Interventions in Epidemiologically Different Regions of Africa, North America, and Asia

Mt Groot; Rob Baltussen; Carin A. Uyl-de Groot; Benjamin O. Anderson; Gabriel N. Hortobagyi

Abstract:  We estimated the costs and health effects of treating stage I, II, III, and IV breast cancer individually, of treating all stages, and of introducing an extensive cancer control program (treating all stages plus early stage diagnosis) in three epidemiologically different world regions—Africa, North America, and Asia. We developed a mathematical simulation model of breast cancer using the stage distribution and case fatality rates in the presence and absence of treatment as predictors of survival. Outcome measures were life‐years adjusted for disability (DALYs), costs (in 2000 U.S. dollars) of treatment and follow‐up, and cost‐effectiveness ratios (CERs; in dollars per DALY averted). Sensitivity analyses were performed to determine the robustness of the results. Treating patients with stage I breast cancer resulted in 23.41, 12.25, and 19.25 DALYs averted per patient in Africa, North America, and Asia, respectively. The corresponding average CERs compared with no intervention were


European Journal of Haematology | 2005

Self‐reported quality of life in elderly patients with aggressive non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma treated with CHOP chemotherapy

Jeanette K. Doorduijn; I. Buijt; Bronno van der Holt; Monique Steijaert; Carin A. Uyl-de Groot; Pieter Sonneveld

78,


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine | 2010

Chest CT and Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET Are Cost-Effective in Screening for Distant Metastases in Head and Neck Cancer Patients

Carin A. Uyl-de Groot; Asaf Senft; Remco de Bree; C. René Leemans; Otto S. Hoekstra

1960, and


Value in Health | 2012

Condition-Specific Preference-Based Measures: Benefit or Burden?

Matthijs M. Versteegh; Annemieke Leunis; Carin A. Uyl-de Groot; Elly A. Stolk

62 per DALY averted. The number of DALYs averted per patient decreased with stage; the value was lowest for stage IV treatment (0.18–0.19), with average CERs of


Cancer | 2008

Cost-effectiveness of temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme: A report from the EORTC 26981/22981 NCI-C CE3 intergroup study

Leida M. Lamers; Roger Stupp; Martin van den Bent; Maiwenn Al; Thierry Gorlia; Jean-Blaise Wasserfallen; Nicole Mittmann; Soo Jin Seung; Ralph Crott; Carin A. Uyl-de Groot

4986 in Africa,


Medical Decision Making | 2012

Mapping QLQ-C30, HAQ, and MSIS-29 on EQ-5D.

Matthijs M. Versteegh; Annemieke Leunis; Jolanda J. Luime; Mike Boggild; Carin A. Uyl-de Groot; Elly A. Stolk

70,380 in North America, and


PharmacoEconomics | 2012

Cost Effectiveness of Treatment With New Agents in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review

Mathilda L. Bongers; Veerle M.H. Coupé; Elise P. Jansma; Egbert F. Smit; Carin A. Uyl-de Groot

3510 per DALY averted in Asia. An extensive breast cancer program resulted in 16.14, 12.91, and 12.58 DALYs averted per patient and average CERs of


Haematologica | 2013

Cost-analysis of treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia with asparaginase preparations: the impact of expensive chemotherapy

Wing H. Tong; Inge M. van der Sluis; Cathelijne J.M. Alleman; Raphaële R. L. van Litsenburg; Gertjan J. L. Kaspers; Rob Pieters; Carin A. Uyl-de Groot

75,

Collaboration


Dive into the Carin A. Uyl-de Groot's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Pieter Sonneveld

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michel van Agthoven

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peter C. Huijgens

VU University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

William K. Redekop

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Margreet Franken

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jennifer G. Gaultney

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peter C. Levendag

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Saskia de Groot

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bob Löwenberg

Erasmus University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge