Carinne Granchi

Reliability of navigated knee stability examination : A cadaveric evaluation

Background Clinical examination remains empirical and may be confusing in the setting of rotatory knee instabilities. Computerized navigation systems provide the ability to visualize and quantify coupled knee motions during knee stability examination. Hypothesis An image-free navigation system can reliably register and collect multiplanar knee kinematics during knee stability examination. Study Design Controlled laboratory study. Methods Coupled knee motions were determined by a robotic/UFS testing system and by an image-free navigation system in 6 cadaveric knees that were subjected to (1) isolated varus stress and (2) combined varus and external rotation force at 0°, 30°, and 60°. This protocol was performed in intact knees and after complete sectioning of the posterolateral corner (lateral collateral ligament, popliteus tendon, and popliteofibular ligament). The correlation between data from the surgical navigation system and the robotic positional sensor was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient. The 3-dimensional motion paths of the intact and sectioned knees were assessed qualitatively using the navigation display system. Results Intraclass correlation coefficients between the robotic sensor and the navigation system for varus and external rotation at 0°, 30°, and 60° were all statistically significant at P < .01. The overall intraclass correlation coefficient for all tests was 0.9976 (P < .0001). Real-time visualization of the coupled motions was possible with the navigation system. Post hoc analysis of the knee motion paths during loading distinguished distinct rotatory patterns. Conclusion Surgical navigation is a precise intraoperative tool to quantify knee stability examination and may help delineate pathologic multiplanar or coupled knee motions, particularly in the setting of complex rotatory instability patterns. Repeatability of load application during clinical stability testing remains problematic. Clinical Relevance Surgical navigation may refine the diagnostic evaluation of knee instability.

Changes in the Length of Virtual Anterior Cruciate Ligament Fibers During Stability Testing A Comparison of Conventional Single-Bundle Reconstruction and Native Anterior Cruciate Ligament

Background Conventional tunnel positions for single-bundle (SB) transtibial anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction are located in the posterolateral (PL) tibial footprint and the anteromedial (AM) femoral footprint, resulting in an anatomic mismatch graft that is more vertical than native fibers. This vertical mismatch position may significantly influence the ability of an ACL graft to stabilize the knee. Hypothesis Anatomic ACL fibers undergo a greater change in length during anterior translation and internal rotation than a conventional SB reconstruction from the PL tibial footprint to the AM femoral footprint. Study Design Controlled laboratory study. Methods The Praxim ACL Surgetics navigation system was used to acquire kinematic data during a flexion/extension cycle and to register all points within the ACL footprint from 5 fresh-frozen cadaveric knees. Virtual fibers were placed in the center of the AM and PL bundles as well as central and conventional SB positions. After transection of the ACL, the absolute length change and apparent strain of the fibers were computed for each knee during the Lachman and anterior drawer tests and internal rotation at 0° and 30° of flexion. Results Each of the anatomic fibers (AM, PL, and central) had more elongation and apparent strain than the conventional SB fiber during the Lachman maneuver. During the anterior drawer test, the AM and central (but not the PL) fibers lengthened significantly more and the AM had more apparent strain than the conventional SB fiber. During internal rotation at 0° and 30° of flexion, anatomic fibers elongated significantly more than the conventional fiber. Except for the AM fiber with the knee at full extension, apparent strain was greater in all anatomic fibers than in the conventional SB fiber during internal rotation maneuvers. Conclusion In ACL-deficient cadaveric knees, anatomic fibers undergo greater elongation and apparent strain in response to anterior translation and internal rotation maneuvers than a conventional SB graft. Because of their optimal orientation, anatomic fibers may resist pathologic anterior translation and internal rotation more than the conventional SB position. Clinical Relevance Conventional placement of a single-bundle graft results in suboptimal changes in fiber length and strain, suggesting that alternatives such as anatomic placement of an SB graft or double-bundle reconstruction may result in greater control of translation and rotation.

Comparison of 3-Dimensional Obliquity and Anisometric Characteristics of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Positions Using Surgical Navigation

Background Surgical navigation allows continuous intraoperative monitoring of ACL graft anisometry and 3-dimensional obliquity. However, normative anisometry and obliquity measurements for different single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament graft positions are not well described. Hypothesis ACL Grafts placed in anteromedial and posterolateral bundle positions will have distinct anisometric profiles and 3-dimensional obliquities. A graft placed centrally in anterior cruciate ligament insertion sites will have different obliquity and anisometry than a conventional (single-bundle) graft extending from the tibias posterolateral aspect to the femurs anteromedial aspect. Study Design Controlled laboratory study. Methods Five cadaveric knees were tested. A surgical navigation system was used to create 4 virtual graft positions in the anterior cruciate ligament footprint: (1) anteromedial, (2) posterolateral, (3) central, and (4) posterolateral tibia to anteromedial femur (conventional). Obliquity at various flexion angles and anisometry of each virtual grafts central fiber were determined. Results Anteromedial and posterolateral fibers are relatively parallel up to 30° of flexion. At higher degrees of flexion, the anteromedial position is more oblique in the sagittal plane, while the posterolateral position is more oblique in the axial plane. The conventional single-bundle position is significantly more vertical than the central position in multiple planes throughout the range of motion. The anteromedial fiber is most isometric, while the posterolateral fiber is the least isometric at all flexion angles. There is no significant difference in the anisometry between the central or conventional positions at any flexion angle. The posterolateral, central, and conventional fibers were longest at full extension and slackened with progressive flexion. Conclusion Anteromedial and posterolateral graft positions can be distinguished by sagittal and axial plane obliquity at flexion angles >30° and by anisometry measurements. Conventional positioning produces a relatively vertical graft placement compared with the central position but has similar anisometry characteristics. Our data suggest that posterolateral, central, and conventional grafts should be fixed at or near full extension to avoid excessive tightening during motion. Clinical Relevance This study provides anisometry and 3-dimensional obliquity data for various graft positions using surgical navigation. The failure of single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction to restore intact knee kinematics may be partly due to the relative vertical placement of conventional grafts compared with the central anterior cruciate ligament footprint position.

Influence of anterior cruciate ligament bundles on knee kinematics: clinical assessment using computer-assisted navigation.

Background The synergistic functions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament in restraining anterior laxity are known. Cadaveric experiments have also suggested different functions of the 2 bundles in controlling a combined rotatory load simulating the pivot shift. Hypothesis The posterolateral bundle is important in controlling the coupled tibial axial rotation laxity occurring during clinical laxity tests performed in vivo, particularly the pivot-shift maneuver. Study Design Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods Twenty-one patients underwent navigated 2-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The navigation was additionally used to measure the knee kinematics in response to the anterior drawer test (performed at 90°), Lachman test (performed at 20° of flexion), and pivot-shift test. Two sequential reconstruction protocols were used to assess the contribution of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles to restraining tibial translations and coupled axial rotation occurring with the manually performed clinical laxity tests. Results Anterior tibial translation during the anterior drawer test was better restrained by anteromedial bundle reconstruction than by posterolateral bundle reconstruction. Conversely, posterolateral bundle reconstruction better restrained anterior tibial translation during the Lachman test. Both bundles contributed to the control of anterior laxity during the pivot shift. However, the posterolateral bundle was more important than was the anteromedial bundle in controlling the tibial rotational component (posterolateral bundle reconstruction caused a 53% reduction in tibial rotation laxity compared with a 42% reduction with anteromedial bundle reconstruction, P < .0001). Conclusion This study provides objective, in vivo data about how the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles act differentially to stabilize the knee, particularly during the pivot shift. The posterolateral bundle was important in controlling not only anterior laxity toward knee extension but the rotational component of the pivot shift.

A navigated 8-in-1 femoral cutting guide for total knee arthroplasty technical development and cadaveric evaluation.

The goals of this study were to determine the precision of femoral component placement using a novel computes assisted surgery (CAS)-enabled 8-in-1 cutting guide in cadaver limbs and to identify errors generated at various stages of the cutting process. The cutting guide placement was on average within 1 degrees or millimeter of the target position in the varus/valgus, axial rotation, and cut height directions and within 2 degrees or millimeters, in all other directions. The difference between the desired femoral component and the impacted trial component position, defined as the execution error, averaged 0.9 degrees +/- 1.7 degrees of varus rotation, 0.8 +/- 2.3 mm of lateral translation, and 0.3 +/- 1 mm of proximal translation in the coronal plane (+/-SD). In the sagittal and axial planes, the execution error averaged 2.8 degrees +/- 2.5 degrees of flexion, 3.4 +/- 1.3 mm of anterior translation, and 0.7 degrees +/- 2.7 degrees of external rotation. CAS permits accurate placement of 8-in-1 jigs for valgus/varus, axial rotation, and cut height but is less accurate in the sagittal plane. Care should be taken when executing the cuts, which can affect precision in the sagittal plane more than actual positioning of the jig.