Carl Jacquemyn
Imperial College London
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Carl Jacquemyn.
AAPG Bulletin | 2015
Carl Jacquemyn; Marijke Huysmans; Dave Hunt; Giulio Casini; Rudy Swennen
ABSTRACT In recent years, fracture-controlled (hydrothermal) dolomitization in association with igneous activity has gained interest in hydrocarbon exploration. The geometry and distribution of dolomite bodies in this setting are of major importance for these new plays. The Latemar platform presents a spectacularly exposed outcrop analogue for carbonate reservoirs affected by igneous activity and dolomitization. Light detection and ranging (LIDAR) scanning and digital outcrop models (DOMs) of outcrops offer a great opportunity to derive geometrical information. Only a few analysis methods exist to quantitatively assess huge amounts of georeferenced three-dimensional lithology data. This study presents a novel quantitative approach to describe three-dimensional spatial variation of lithology derived from DOMs. This approach is applied to the Latemar platform to determine dolomite body geometry and distribution in relation to crosscutting dikes. A high-resolution photorealistic DOM of the Latemar platform allows description of dolomite occurrences in three dimensions, with high precision at platform scale. This results in a unique lithology dataset of limestone, dolomite, and dike positions. This dataset is analyzed by true three-dimensional variography for the geospatial description of dolomite distribution. In most studies, three-dimensional geostatistics is the combination of two-dimensional horizontal and one-dimensional vertical variation. In this study, the dolomite occurrences are extensive in three dimensions and cannot be reduced to a two-dimensional + one-dimensional case. Therefore, the concept of two-dimensional variogram maps is expanded to a three-dimensional description of lithology variation. Three-dimensional anisotropy detection is used to derive principal directions in the occurrence of dolomite. Two small-scale (
Geological Society, London, Special Publications | 2012
Carl Jacquemyn; Rudy Swennen; Paola Ronchi
Abstract The Cretaceous Apulia Platform, exposed in the Murge area (southern Italy), suffered intense (palaeo)karstification. This study focuses on the controlling factors of karstification with emphasis on fracturing. Mechanical stratigraphy was used to calculate the fracture density within different sedimentary sequences. Several mechanical units were defined and a characteristic relationship was found between unit thicknesses and fracture density, that is, fracture density increases if layer thickness decreases. In some of the quarries studied, sedimentary cycles are clearly present that are also reflected in the fracture density logs. The degree of karstification within a mechanical unit is proportional to the mean fracture spacing. Based on fracture orientation data extracted from LIDAR scans, different orientation clusters were observed between fractures that are karstified and fractures that are not karstified, post-dating karstification. The clusters of karstified fractures are related to the compression of the southern Apennines. The fractures became dissolution enlarged during the Pleistocene uplift caused by bulging of the Apulia Platform. This main karstification phase occurred prior to Late-Pleistocene deposition and before the formation of orthogonal fracture sets.
Geosphere | 2016
Richard R. Jones; Mark A. Pearce; Carl Jacquemyn; Francesca Watson
Total least squares regression is a reliable and efficient way to analyze the geometry of a best-fit plane through georeferenced data points. The suitability of the input data, and the goodness of fit of the data points to the best-fit plane are considered in terms of their dimensionality, and they are quantified using two parameters involving the minimum and intermediate eigenvalues from the regression, as well as the spatial precision of the data.
ECMOR XV - 15th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery | 2016
Y. Melnikova; Carl Jacquemyn; H. Osman; Pablo Salinas; Gerard J. Gorman; Gary J. Hampson; Matthew D. Jackson
Geologic heterogeneities play a key role in reservoir performance. Surface based geologic modeling (SBGM) offers an alternative approach to conventional grid-based methods and allows multi-scale geologic features to be captured throughout the modeling process. In SBGM, all geologic features that impact the distribution of material properties, such as porosity and permeability, are modeled as a set of volumes bounded by surfaces. Within these volumes, the material properties are constant. The surfaces have parametric, grid-free representation, which, in principle, allows for unlimited complexity, since no resolution is implied at the stage of modeling and features of any scale can be included. Surface based models are discretized only when required for numerical analysis. We report here a new automated and integrated workflow for creating and meshing stochastic, surface-based models. Surfaces are represented through non-uniform rational B-splines (NURBS). Multiple relations between surfaces are captured through geologic rules that are translated into Boolean operations (intersection, union, subtraction). Finally, models are discretized using fully unstructured tetrahedral meshes coupled with a geometry-adaptive sizing function that efficiently approximate complex geometries. We demonstrate the new workflow via examples of multiple erosional channelized geobodies, fault models and a fracture network. We also show finite element flow simulations of the resulting geologic models, using the Imperial College Finite Element Reservoir Simulator (IC-FERST) that features dynamic adaptive mesh optimization. Mesh adaptivity allows us to focus computational effort on the areas of interest, such as the location of water saturation front. The new approach has broad application in modeling subsurface flow.
Mathematical Geosciences | 2018
Carl Jacquemyn; Matthew D. Jackson; Gary J. Hampson
Building geometrically realistic representations of geological heterogeneity in reservoir models is a challenging task that is limited by the inflexibility of pre-defined pillar or cornerpoint grids. The surface-based modelling workflow uses grid-free surfaces that allows efficient creation of geological models without the limitations of pre-defined grids. Surface-based reservoir modelling uses a boundary representation approach in which all heterogeneity of interest (structural, stratigraphic, sedimentological, diagenetic) is modelled by its bounding surfaces, independent of any grid. Volumes bounded by these surfaces are internally homogeneous and, thus, no additional facies or petrophysical modelling is performed within these geological domains and no grid or mesh discretisation is needed during modelling. Any heterogeneity to be modelled within such volumes is incorporated by adding surfaces. Surfaces and curves are modelled using a parametric non-uniform rational B-splines (NURBS) description. These surfaces are efficient to generate and manipulate, and allow fast creation of multiple realisations of geometrically realistic reservoir models. Multiple levels of surface hierarchy are introduced to allow modelling of all features of interest at the required level of detail; surfaces at one hierarchical level are constructed so as to truncate or conform to surfaces of a higher hierarchical level. This procedure requires the joining, terminating and stacking of surfaces to ensure that models contain “watertight” surface-bounded volumes. NURBS curves are used to represent well trajectories accurately, including multi-laterals or side-tracks. Once all surfaces and wells have been generated, they are combined into a reservoir model that takes into account geological relationships between surfaces and preserves realistic geometries.
ECMOR XV - 15th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery | 2016
Carl Jacquemyn; Y. Melnikova; Matthew D. Jackson; Gary J. Hampson; Cédric M. John
Most reservoir modelling/simulation workflows represent geological heterogeneity on a pillar-grid defined early in the modelling process. However, it is challenging to represent many common geological features using pillar grids: examples include intersecting faults, recumbent folds, slumps, and non-monotonic injection structures such as salt diapirs. It is also challenging to represent multi-scale features, because the same number of pillars must be present in all layers so there is little flexibility to adjust the areal grid resolution. We present a surface-based geological modelling (SBGM) workflow that uses NURBS (Non-Uniform Rational B-Splines) surfaces to represent geological heterogeneities without reference to a pre-defined grid. The NURBS surfaces represent a broad range of heterogeneity types, including faults, fractures, stratigraphic surfaces across a range of length-scales, and boundaries between different facies or lithologies. The geological model is constructed using the NURBS surfaces and a mesh created only when required for flow simulation or other calculations. The mesh preserves the geometry of the modelled surfaces. NURBS surfaces are an efficient and flexible tool to model complex geometries and are common in many modelling and engineering disciplines; however, they are rarely used in reservoir modelling. Complex surfaces can be created using a small number of control points; modelling with NURBS surfaces is therefore computationally efficient. We report here a variety of new stochastic approaches to create geological NURBS surfaces, including (1) extrusion of spatially variable cross-sections, (2) parametric 3D geometry templates, and (3) perturbation of control points to yield similar results to some pixel-based geostatistical methods. Surface interactions, such as erosion, stacking or conforming, are enforced to ensure geological relationships are preserved and the boundary representation is watertight. We illustrate our NURBS SBGM approach via a number of examples, including channelized sandbodies, clinoforms, sedimentary cycles, fractures, crosscutting faults, recumbent folds and combinations thereof.
ECMOR XVI - 16th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery | 2018
Zhenfeng Zhang; Sebastian Geiger; Margaret Rood; Carl Jacquemyn; Matthew D. Jackson; Gary J. Hampson; F.M. De Calvalho; C.C.M. Machado Silva; J. Machado Silva; M. Costa Sousa
Hydrocarbon reservoir models have a high degree of uncertainty regarding their reservoir geometry and structure. A range of conceptual models should therefore be generated to explore how first-order uncertainties impact fluids-in-place, reservoir dynamics, and development decisions. However, it is very time consuming to generate and explore a large number of conceptual models using conventional reservoir modelling and simulation workflows. Key reservoir concepts are therefore often locked in early and are difficult to change later. To overcome this challenge, the Rapid Reservoir Modelling (RRM) software has been developed to prototype reservoir models across scales and test their dynamic behaviour. RRM complements existing workflows in that conceptual models can be prototyped, explored, compared, and ranked rapidly prior to detailed reservoir modelling. Reservoir geology is sketched in 2D with geological operators and translated in real-time into geologically correct 3D models. Flow diagnostics provide quantitative information for these reservoir model prototypes about their static and dynamic behaviours. Numerical well testing (NWT) is implemented to further interrogate the reservoir model. The combination of surface-based reservoir modelling with geological operators, flow diagnostics and NWT on unstructured grids enable, for the first time, rapid prototyping of reservoir geologies with real-time feedback on fluid flow behaviour.
Marine and Petroleum Geology | 2014
Carl Jacquemyn; Hamdy El Desouky; Dave Hunt; Giulio Casini; Rudy Swennen
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids | 2017
Pablo Salinas; Dimitrios Pavlidis; Zhihua Xie; Christopher C. Pain; Carl Jacquemyn; Y. Melnikova; Matthew D. Jackson
Sedimentology | 2018
God'spower I. Onyenanu; Carl Jacquemyn; Gavin H. Graham; Gary J. Hampson; Peter Fitch; Matthew D. Jackson