Carl-Johan Rundgren
Stockholm University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Carl-Johan Rundgren.
CBE- Life Sciences Education | 2010
Lena Tibell; Carl-Johan Rundgren
Molecular life science is one of the fastest-growing fields of scientific and technical innovation, and biotechnology has profound effects on many aspects of daily life—often with deep, ethical dimensions. At the same time, the content is inherently complex, highly abstract, and deeply rooted in diverse disciplines ranging from “pure sciences,” such as math, chemistry, and physics, through “applied sciences,” such as medicine and agriculture, to subjects that are traditionally within the remit of humanities, notably philosophy and ethics. Together, these features pose diverse, important, and exciting challenges for tomorrows teachers and educational establishments. With backgrounds in molecular life science research and secondary life science teaching, we (Tibell and Rundgren, respectively) bring different experiences, perspectives, concerns, and awareness of these issues. Taking the nature of the discipline as a starting point, we highlight important facets of molecular life science that are both characteristic of the domain and challenging for learning and education. Of these challenges, we focus most detail on content, reasoning difficulties, and communication issues. We also discuss implications for education research and teaching in the molecular life sciences.
Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research | 2017
Shu-Nu Chang Rundgren; Carl-Johan Rundgren
ABSTRACT Based on the EU FP 7 project, PROFILES, this article presents our findings from a three-round Delphi study conducted in Sweden that aimed at establishing a consensus on how science education should be developed for citizens to enhance civic scientific literacy. A total of 100 stakeholders (9th graders, school teachers, scientists, and science education researchers) were involved in our Delphi study in 2012–2013. The results revealed that there were some highly ranked consensus ideas: environmental issues, inquiry skills, motivation/interest, and holistic comprehension. The conclusions of our research imply the importance of involving different stakeholders in the educational reconstruction process; we suggest that schoolteachers in particular should play a vital role.
International Journal of Science Education | 2018
Ilana A. Manneh; Carl-Johan Rundgren; Karim Hamza; Lars Eriksson
ABSTRACT In this study, we explore the issues and challenges involved in supporting students’ learning to discern relevant and critical aspects of determining oxidation states of atoms in complex molecules. We present a detailed case of an interaction between three students and a tutor during a problem-solving class, using the analytical tool of practical epistemology analysis (PEA). The results show that the ability to make relevant distinctions between the different parts of a molecule for solving the problem, even with the guidance of the tutor, seemed to be challenging for students. These shifts were connected to both purposes that were specific for solving the problem at hand, and additional purposes for general learning of the subject matter, in this case how to assign oxidation states in molecules. The students sometimes could not follow the additional purposes introduced by the tutor, which made the related distinctions more confusing. Our results indicate that in order to provide adequate support and guidance for students the tutor needs to consider how to sequence, move between, and productively connect the different purposes introduced in a tutor-student interaction. One way of doing that is by first pursuing the purposes for solving the problem and then successively introduce additional, more general purposes for developing students’ learning of the subject matter studied. Further recommendations drawn from this study are discussed as well.
International Journal of Science Education | 2017
Ilana Kaufmann; Karim Hamza; Carl-Johan Rundgren; Lars Eriksson
ABSTRACT This study explores first-year university students’ reasoning as they learn to draw Lewis structures. We also present a theoretical account of the formal procedure commonly taught for drawing these structures. Students’ discussions during problem-solving activities were video recorded and detailed analyses of the discussions were made through the use of practical epistemology analysis (PEA). Our results show that the formal procedure was central for drawing Lewis structures, but its use varied depending on situational aspects. Commonly, the use of individual steps of the formal procedure was contingent on experiences of chemical structures, and other information such as the characteristics of the problem given. The analysis revealed a number of patterns in how students constructed, checked and modified the structure in relation to the formal procedure and the situational aspects. We suggest that explicitly teaching the formal procedure as a process of constructing, checking and modifying might be helpful for students learning to draw Lewis structures. By doing so, the students may learn to check the accuracy of the generated structure not only in relation to the octet rule and formal charge, but also to other experiences that are not explicitly included in the formal procedure.
Archive | 2015
Shu-Nu Chang Rundgren; Carl-Johan Rundgren
The importance of making science relevant for students has been addressed differently by science education researchers during the past 60 years, which has been pointed out in a thorough review on the meaning of ‘relevance’ of science education (Stuckey, Hofstein, Mamlok-Naaman, & Eilks, 2013). However, the declining interest in science subjects and in pursuing science as careers in the majority of developed countries still is at hand today (e.g. George, 2006; Stuckey et al., 2013).
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education | 2010
Carl-Johan Rundgren; Lena Tibell
Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching | 2010
Shu-Nu Chang Rundgren; Carl-Johan Rundgren
Nordic Studies in Science Education | 2012
Carl-Johan Rundgren
Nordic Studies in Science Education | 2012
Carl-Johan Rundgren
Journal of Biological Education | 2010
Carl-Johan Rundgren; Shu-Nu Chang Rundgren; Konrad J. Schönborn