Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Carl Richardson is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Carl Richardson.


Journal of The Air & Waste Management Association | 1998

Factors affecting mercury control in utility flue gas using activated carbon

Todd R. Carey; Oliver W. Hargrove; Carl Richardson; Ramsay Chang; Frank B. Meserole

The Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) is conducting research to investigate mercury removal in utility flue gas using sorbents. Bench-scale and pilot-scale tests have been conducted to determine the abilities of different sor-bents to remove mercury in simulated and actual flue gas streams. Bench-scale tests have investigated the effects of various sorbent and flue gas parameters on sorbent performance. These data are being used to develop a theoretical model for predicting mercury removal by sorbents at different conditions. This paper describes the results of parametric bench-scale tests investigating the removal of mercuric chloride and elemental mercury by activated carbon. Results obtained to date indicate that the adsorption capacity of a given sorbent is dependent on many factors, including the type of mercury being adsorbed, flue gas composition, and adsorption temperature. These data provide insight into potential mercury adsorption mechanisms and suggest that the removal of mercury involves both physical and chemical mechanisms. Understanding these effects is important since the performance of a given sorbent could vary significantly from site to site depending on the coal- or gas-matrix composition.


Journal of The Air & Waste Management Association | 2002

Effect of NOx Control Processes on Mercury Speciation in Utility Flue Gas

Carl Richardson; Tom Machalek; Scott D. Miller; Chuck Dene; Ramsay Chang

Abstract The speciation of Hg in coal-fired flue gas can be important in determining the ultimate Hg emissions as well as potential control options for the utility. The effects of NOx control processes, such as selective catalytic reduction (SCR) and selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR), on Hg speciation are not well understood but may impact emissions of Hg. EPRI has investigated the reactions of Hg in flue gas at conditions expected for some NOx control processes. This paper describes the methodology used to investigate these reactions in actual flue gas at several power plants. Results have indicated that some commercial SCR catalysts are capable of oxidizing elemental Hg in flue gas obtained from the inlets of SCR or air heater units. Results are affected by various flue gas and operating parameters. The effect of flue gas composition, including the presence of NH3, has been evaluated. The influence of NH3 on fly ash Hg reactions also is being investigated.


Journal of The Air & Waste Management Association | 1999

Modeling Mercury Removal by Sorbent Injection

Frank B. Meserole; Ramsay Chang; Todd R. Carey; James Machac; Carl Richardson

Sorbents for removing mercury from flue gases of coal-fired power plants are presently being evaluated due to potential regulation of mercury emissions under Title III of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments. Laboratory tests have been conducted to evaluate the adsorption characteristics of potential sorbents and the effects of flue gas constituents on these characteristics. This paper presents a theoretical model that combines the adsorption characteristics measured in the lab with mass transfer considerations to predict mercury removal by the duct injection process in actual flue gas streams. The model was used to determine the effect of various sorbent properties on mercury removal when injecting a powdered sorbent upstream of either an electrostatic precipitator (ESP) or fabric filter. Mercury removal is expected to differ between these configurations since the mass transfer conditions are different in an ESP and fabric filter. The model was used to determine when mercury removal is limited by mass transfer and when it is limited by sorbent capacity. This information defines conditions when removal can be improved by reducing particle size or increasing sorbent capacity. In both cases, removal can be increased by injecting more sorbent.


Journal of The Air & Waste Management Association | 2002

Assessing Sorbents for Mercury Control in Coal-Combustion Flue Gas

Sharon Sjostrom; Timothy George Ebner; Trevor Ley; Richard Slye; Carl Richardson; Tom Machalek; Mandi Richardson; Ramsay Chang

Abstract Sorbent injection for Hg control is one of the most promising technologies for reducing Hg emissions from power-generation facilities, particularly units that do not require wet scrubbers for SO2 control. Since 1992, EPRI has been assessing the performance of Hg sorbents in pilot-scale systems installed at full-scale facilities. The initial tests were conducted on a 5000-acfm (142-m3/min) pilot baghouse. Screening potential sorbents at this scale required substantial resources for installation and operation and did not provide an opportunity to characterize sor-bents over a wide temperature range. Data collected in the laboratory and in field tests indicate that sorbents are affected by flue gas composition and temperature. Tests carried out in actual flue gas at a number of power plants also have shown that sorbent performance can be site-specific. In addition, data collected at a field site often are different from data collected in the laboratory, with simulated flue gas mixed to match the major components in the site’s gas. To effectively estimate the costs of Hg sorbent systems at different plants, a measure of sorbent performance in the respective flue gases must be obtained. However, injection testing at multiple facilities with large pilot systems is not practical. Over the past five years, fixed-bed characterization testing, modeling studies, and bench-scale injection testing have been undertaken to develop a low-cost technique to characterize sorbent performance in actual flue gas and subsequently to project normalized costs for Hg removal prior to full-scale demonstration. This article describes the techniques used and summarizes field-testing results from two plants burning Powder River Basin (PRB) coal for commercial activated carbon and several other sorbent types. Full-scale projections based on the results and data collected on larger-scale systems also are included.


Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis | 1999

Development of carbon-based adsorbents for removal of mercury emissions from coal combustion flue gas

Massoud Rostam-Abadi; S. Cheni; Mark J. Rood; Ramsay Chang; Todd R. Carey; Carl Richardson; B. Rosenhoover

Publisher Summary This chapter illustrates that the minimum amount of carbon needed to achieve specific mercury removal efficiency by sorbent injection into a flue gas stream can be predicted by assuming mass transfer limitations. Mercury removal effectiveness can be increased by decreasing the size of the carbon injected, increasing the residence time, or the amount of carbon injected. If mercury removal is limited by the reactivity and capacity of the carbon (i.e. not mass transfer limited), then significantly more carbon than the amount predicted by mass transfer limitations may be needed for effective mercury removal unless the reactivity and capacity of the carbon can be improved through structural and surface chemistry changes. Intra particle diffusion is not important because of the small carbon sizes normally used for injection.


Archive | 2013

Evaluation of Dry Sorbent Injection Technology for Pre-Combustion CO{sub 2} Capture

Carl Richardson; William Steen; Eugenio Triana; Thomas Machalek; Jenny Davila; Claire Schmit; Andrew Wang; Brian Temple; Yongqi Lu; Hong Lu; Luzheng Zhang; David Ruhter; Massoud Rostam-Abadi; Maryam Sayyah; Brandon R. Ito; Kenneth S. Suslick

This document summarizes the work performed on Cooperative Agreement DE-FE0000465, “Evaluation of Dry Sorbent Technology for Pre-Combustion CO{sub 2} Capture,” during the period of performance of January 1, 2010 through September 30, 2013. This project involves the development of a novel technology that combines a dry sorbent-based carbon capture process with the water-gas-shift reaction for separating CO{sub 2} from syngas. The project objectives were to model, develop, synthesize and screen sorbents for CO{sub 2} capture from gasified coal streams. The project was funded by the DOE National Energy Technology Laboratory with URS as the prime contractor. Illinois Clean Coal Institute and The University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign were project co-funders. The objectives of this project were to identify and evaluate sorbent materials and concepts that were suitable for capturing carbon dioxide (CO{sub 2}) from warm/hot water-gas-shift (WGS) systems under conditions that minimize energy penalties and provide continuous gas flow to advanced synthesis gas combustion and processing systems. Objectives included identifying and evaluating sorbents that efficiently capture CO{sub 2} from a gas stream containing CO{sub 2}, carbon monoxide (CO), and hydrogen (H{sub 2}) at temperatures as high as 650 °C and pressures of 400-600 psi. After capturing the CO{sub 2}, the sorbents would ideally be regenerated using steam, or other condensable purge vapors. Results from the adsorption and regeneration testing were used to determine an optimal design scheme for a sorbent enhanced water gas shift (SEWGS) process and evaluate the technical and economic viability of the dry sorbent approach for CO{sub 2} capture. Project work included computational modeling, which was performed to identify key sorbent properties for the SEWGS process. Thermodynamic modeling was used to identify optimal physical properties for sorbents and helped down-select from the universe of possible sorbent materials to seven that were deemed thermodynamically viable for the process. Molecular modeling was used to guide sorbent synthesis through first principles simulations of adsorption and regeneration. Molecular dynamics simulations also modeled the impact of gas phase impurities common in gasified coal streams (e.g., H{sub 2}S) on the adsorption process. The role of inert dopants added for mechanical durability to active sorbent materials was also investigated through molecular simulations. Process simulations were conducted throughout the project to help determine the overall feasibility of the process and to help guide laboratory operating conditions. A large component of the program was the development of sorbent synthesis methods. Three different approaches were used: mechanical alloying (MA), flame spray pyrolysis (FSP), and ultrasonic spray pyrolysis (USP). Sorbents were characterized by a host of analytical techniques and screened for SEWGS performance using a thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA). A feedback loop from screening efforts to sorbent synthesis was established and used throughout the project lifetime. High temperature, high pressure reactor (HTPR) systems were constructed to test the sorbents at conditions mimicking the SEWGS process as identified through process modeling. These experiments were conducted at the laboratory scale to examine sorbents for their CO{sub 2} capacity, conversion of CO to CO{sub 2}, and impacts of adsorption and regeneration conditions, and syngas composition (including impurities and H2O:CO ratio). Results from the HTPR testing showed sorbents with as high as 0.4 g{sub CO{sub 2}}/g{sub sorbent} capacity with the ability to initially shift the WGS completely towards CO{sub 2}/H{sub 2}. A longer term experiment with a simple syngas matrix and N{sub 2}/steam regeneration stream showed a USP sorbent to be stable through 50 adsorption-regeneration cycles, though the sorbent tested had a somewhat diminished initial capacity. The program culminated in a technoeconomic assessment in which two different approaches were taken; one approach was intended to be technically conservative while the second required several key engineering challenges to be met in order to succeed. The project team is confident that, with the proper support, those challenges could be met. The second approach relies on a slipstream of H{sub 2} from the shifted syngas and O{sub 2} from an air separation unit (ASU) to be combusted in the presence of the sorbent for regeneration; termed a regenerating boiler. The approach also makes use of the heat of adsorption to generate >400 MW of turbine quality steam; total plant gross energy output as high as 1 GW was estimated for an IGCC with an initial gross energy output of 737 MW, without any additional coal usage. The regenerating boiler concept could benefit further from additional heat integration, but the results of this effort show a COE of


Energy & Fuels | 1998

Preparation and evaluation of coal-derived activated carbons for removal of mercury vapor from simulated coal combustion flue fases

Shiaoguo Chen; Massoud Rostam-Abadi; Mark J. Rood; Carl Richardson; Todd R. Carey; Ramsay Chang


Energy & Fuels | 2007

Characteristics of fly ashes from full-scale coal-fired power plants and their relationship to mercury adsorption

Yongqi Lu; Massoud Rostam-Abadi; Ramsay Chang; Carl Richardson; Jennifer Paradis

97.50 per MWh for a rational combination of operating parameters and sorbent lifetime as well as conservative estimates for steam turbines, gas turbine, and ASU. If the COE of CO{sub 2} transmission, storage and monitoring (


Environmental Progress | 2000

Assessing Sorbent Injection Mercury Control Effectiveness in Flue Gas Streams

Todd R. Carey; Carl Richardson; Ramsay Chang; Frank B. Meserole; Massoud Rostam-Abadi; Scott Chen


Fuel Processing Technology | 2009

Evaluation of low ash impact sorbent injection technologies for mercury control at a Texas lignite/PRB fired power plant

Katherine Dombrowski; Carl Richardson; Jackie Padilla; Kevin Fisher; Tom Campbell; Ramsay Chang; Craig Eckberg; John Hudspeth; Andrew O'Palko; Sara Pletcher

5.60 / MWh) is added to the base case for an IGCC (

Collaboration


Dive into the Carl Richardson's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ramsay Chang

Electric Power Research Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Frank B. Meserole

Electric Power Research Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hossein Ghezel-Ayagh

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dilip Patel

London South Bank University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrew O'Palko

United States Department of Energy

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge