Carl Westmoreland

A PGC-1α-Mediated Transcriptional Network Maintains Mitochondrial Redox and Bioenergetic Homeostasis against Doxorubicin-Induced Toxicity in Human Cardiomyocytes: Implementation of TT21C.

Chemical toxicity testing is fast moving in a direction that relies increasingly on cell-basedin vitroassays anchored on toxicity pathways according to the toxicity testing in the 21st century vision. Identifying points of departure (POD) via these assays and revealing their mechanistic underpinnings via computational modeling of the relevant pathways are critical and challenging steps. Here we used doxorubicin (DOX) as a prototype chemical to study mitochondrial toxicity in human AC16 cells. Mitochondrial toxicity has been linked to cardiovascular risk of DOX, which has limited its clinical use as an antitumor drug. Ourin vitrostudy revealed a well-defined POD concentration of DOX below which adaptive induction of proliferator-activated receptor-γ coactivator-1α (PGC-1α) -mediated mitochondrial genes, including NRF-1, MnSOD, UCP2, and COX1, concurred with negligible changes in mitochondrial superoxide and cytotoxicity. At higher DOX concentrations adversity became significant with elevated superoxide and suppressed ATP levels. A computational model was formulated to simulate the PGC-1α-mediated transcriptional network comprising multiple negative feedback loops that underlie redox and bioenergetics homeostasis in the mitochondrion. The model recapitulated the transition phase from adaptive to adverse responses, supporting the notion that saturated induction of PGC-1α-mediated gene network underpins POD. The model further predicts (follow-up experiments verified) that silencing PGC-1α compromises the adaptive function of the transcriptional network, leading to disruption of mitochondria and cytotoxicity at lower DOX concentrations. In summary, our study demonstrates that combining pathway-focusedin vitroassays and computational simulation of relevant biochemical network is synergistic for understanding dose-response behaviors in the low-dose region and identifying POD.

Computational chemistry, systems biology and toxicology. Harnessing the chemistry of life: revolutionizing toxicology. a commentary.

There is a continuing interest in, and increasing imperatives for, the development of alternative methods for toxicological evaluations that do not require the use of animals. Although a significant investment has resulted in some achievements, progress has been patchy and there remain many challenges. Among the most significant hurdles is developing non‐animal methods that would permit assessment of the potential for a chemical or drug to cause adverse health effects following repeated systemic exposure. Developing approaches to address this challenge has been one of the objectives of the European Partnership for Alternative Approaches to Animal Testing (EPAA). The EPAA is a unique partnership between the European Commission and industry that has interests in all aspects of reducing, refining and replacing the use of animals (the ‘3Rs’). One possible strategy that emerged from a broad scientific debate sponsored by the EPAA was the opportunity for developing entirely new paradigms for toxicity testing based upon harnessing the increasing power of computational chemistry in combination with advanced systems biology. This brief commentary summarizes a workshop organized by the EPAA in 2010, that had the ambitious title of ‘Harnessing the Chemistry of Life: Revolutionizing Toxicology’. At that workshop international experts in chemistry, systems biology and toxicology sought to map out how best developments in these sciences could be exploited to design new strategies for toxicity testing using adverse effects in the liver as an initial focus of attention. Here we describe the workshop design and outputs, the primary purpose being to stimulate debate about the need to align different areas of science with toxicology if new and truly innovative approaches to toxicity testing are to be developed. Copyright

Assuring consumer safety without animals Applications for tissue engineering

Humans are exposed to a variety of chemicals in their everyday lives through interactions with the environment and through the use of consumer products. It is a basic requirement that these products are tested to assure they are safe under normal and reasonably foreseeable conditions of use. Within the European Union, the majority of tests used for generating toxicological data rely on animals. However recent changes in legislation (e.g. 7th amendment of the Cosmetics Directive and REACH) are driving researchers to develop and adopt non-animal alternative methods with which to assure human safety. Great strides have been made to this effect, but what other opportunities/technologies exist that could expedite this? Tissue engineering has increasing scope to contribute to replacing animals with scientifically robust alternatives in basic research and safety testing, but is this application of the technology being fully exploited? This review highlights how the consumer products industry is applying tissue engineering to ensure chemicals are safe for human use without using animals, and identifies areas for future development and application of the technology.

Chemical safety without animals

541 The importance of shear stress, pulsatile flow and pressure to the development of the arterial system, and perhaps to the emergence of HSCs, is a question of great interest1,7,10–12. Bioengineering approaches that emphasize differentiating pluripotent stem cells with biomechanical forces, which are known to promote arteriogenesis, after activation of stage-specific Wnt signaling is a logical next step in our search for the HSC.

Non-cytotoxic concentrations of acetaminophen induced mitochondrial biogenesis and antioxidant response in HepG2 cells

Mitochondrial dysfunction has been implicated in acute, severe liver injury caused by overdose of acetaminophen (APAP). However, whether mitochondrial biogenesis is involved is unclear. Here we demonstrated that mitochondrial biogenesis, as indicated by the amounts of mitochondrial DNA and proteins, increased significantly in HepG2 cells exposed to low, non-cytotoxic concentrations of APAP. This heightened response was accompanied by upregulated expression of PGC-1α, NRF-1 and TFAM, which are key transcriptional regulators of mitochondrial biogenesis. Additionally, antioxidants including glutathione, MnSOD, HO-1, NQO1, and Nrf2 were also significantly upregulated. In contrast, for HepG2 cells exposed to high, cytotoxic concentration of APAP, mitochondrial biogenesis was inhibited and the expression of its regulatory proteins and antioxidants were concentration-dependently downregulated. In summary, our study indicated that mitochondrial biogenesis, along with antioxidant induction, may be an important cellular adaptive mechanism counteracting APAP-induced toxicity and overwhelming this cytoprotective capacity could result in liver injury.

International Harmonization and Cooperation in the Validation of Alternative Methods

The development and validation of scientific alternatives to animal testing is important not only from an ethical perspective (implementation of 3Rs), but also to improve safety assessment decision making with the use of mechanistic information of higher relevance to humans. To be effective in these efforts, it is however imperative that validation centres, industry, regulatory bodies, academia and other interested parties ensure a strong international cooperation, cross-sector collaboration and intense communication in the design, execution, and peer review of validation studies. Such an approach is critical to achieve harmonized and more transparent approaches to method validation, peer-review and recommendation, which will ultimately expedite the international acceptance of valid alternative methods or strategies by regulatory authorities and their implementation and use by stakeholders. It also allows achieving greater efficiency and effectiveness by avoiding duplication of effort and leveraging limited resources. In view of achieving these goals, the International Cooperation on Alternative Test Methods (ICATM) was established in 2009 by validation centres from Europe, USA, Canada and Japan. ICATM was later joined by Korea in 2011 and currently also counts with Brazil and China as observers. This chapter describes the existing differences across world regions and major efforts carried out for achieving consistent international cooperation and harmonization in the validation and adoption of alternative approaches to animal testing.

Use of Adverse Outcome Pathways in Human Risk Assessment and Toxicology

Mechanistic information has been used for many years to inform chemical hazard and risk assessments. NRC reports and several agency strategic plans in recent years promote the large-scale use of mechanistic information, organized in the form of pathways at different levels of biological organization as a basis to underpin a dramatic change in the way chemical assessment is performed. As a result, there now exist international collaborations to develop the data and knowledge bases, guidance and principles for development and use of “Adverse Outcome Pathways” (AOPs). Many of the principles for developing and using pathways are based on experience with Mode of Action frameworks for human health risk assessment. Expert groups within the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) are publishing guidance and partnering with the US EPA and European Commissions Joint Research Centre (JRC) to develop a public knowledge base for building AOPs on a large scale. Although this direction is fairly new, there are many pathways already in development. In addition, pathway-based approaches are increasingly being applied to a variety of assessments of hazard in a number of sectors. This chapter describes the genesis of the AOP concept, the development of the necessary tools based on international collaborations, and provides some examples of the use of AOPs in human health risk assessment.