Carlo De Angelis
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Carlo De Angelis.
Gynecologic Oncology | 1992
Robert Buckman; Carlo De Angelis; P. Shaw; Al Covens; R. Osborne; Ian Kerr; Rick Reed; Howard Michaels; Milton Woo; Raymond M. Reilly; J. Law; Reuben Baumal; Eric S. Groves; Alexander Marks
Abstract A phase I/II study of intraperitoneal (ip) radioimmunotherapy was conducted in ovarian or breast cancer patients with symptomatic chemotherapy-resistant ascites using a novel anti-mucin monoclonal antibody (mAb) 2G3 labeled with 131 I. Tracer doses of 2 mCi [ 131 I]2G3 were given by ip injection to 11 patients, followed by increasing therapeutic doses up to 150 mCi (cumulative) in 9 patients. There was no serious toxicity. Temporary palliation of ascites was observed in 3 of 4 patients who received doses greater than 50 mCi. Total body elimination half-life of the radiolabeled antibody assessed by gamma scintigraphy ranged from 95 to 250 hr, longer than data previously reported in patients without ascites treated with ip administered radiolabeled antibodies. However, uptake of radiolabel by tumor nodules was small and variable (2 × 10 −4 − 2 × 10 −2 % ID/g), and preferential uptake by tumor compared to normal peritoneum was observed in only 2 of 5 patients in whom biopsies were obtained. These results suggest that the observed palliation of ascites is due to prolonged retention of radiolabeled antibody in the peritoneal cavity even in the absence of specific targeting.
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management | 2010
S. Lawrence Librach; Maryse Bouvette; Carlo De Angelis; Justine Farley; Doreen Oneschuk; José Pereira; Ann Syme
Constipation is a highly prevalent and distressing symptom in patients with advanced, progressive illnesses. Although opioids are one of the most common causes of constipation in patients with advanced, progressive illness, it is important to note that there are many other potential etiologies and combinations of causes that should be taken into consideration when making treatment decisions. Management approaches involve a combination of good assessment techniques, preventive regimens, appropriate pharmacological treatment of established constipation, and frequent monitoring. In this vulnerable patient population, maintenance of comfort and respect for individual preferences and sensitivities should be overriding considerations when making clinical decisions. This consensus document was developed by a multidisciplinary group of leading Canadian palliative care specialists in an effort to define best practices in palliative constipation management that will be relevant and useful to health care professionals. Although a wide range of options exists to help treat constipation and prevent its development or recurrence, there is a limited body of evidence evaluating pharmacological interventions. These recommendations are, therefore, based on the best of the available evidence, combined with expert opinion derived from experience in clinical practice. This underscores the need for further clinical evaluation of the available agents to create a robust, evidence-based foundation for treatment decisions in the management of constipation in patients with advanced, progressive illness.
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research | 2011
Kristopher Dennis; Ernesto Maranzano; Carlo De Angelis; Lori Holden; Shun Wong; Edward Chow
Radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (RINV) are common and troublesome symptoms experienced by patients undergoing radiotherapy. Although quality of life and symptom control now figure prominently in evaluations of cancer therapies, progress in RINV research and clinical prevention has been slow. This article summarizes the major guidelines for the prevention of RINV; their structure, recommendations, evidence base and notable issues. It also examines the current challenges and controversies related to RINV clinical management and research, and provides possible solutions for them that could ultimately lead to better patient care.
Journal of the National Cancer Institute | 2013
Nina Lathia; Pierre K. Isogai; Carlo De Angelis; Thomas J. Smith; Matthew C. Cheung; Nicole Mittmann; Jeffrey S. Hoch; Scott E. Walker
BACKGROUND Febrile neutropenia is a serious toxicity of cancer chemotherapy that is usually treated in hospital. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of filgrastim and pegfilgrastim as primary prophylaxis against febrile neutropenia in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients undergoing chemotherapy. METHODS We used a Markov model that followed patients through induction chemotherapy to compare the three prophylaxis strategies: 1) no primary prophylaxis against febrile neutropenia; 2) primary prophylaxis with 10 days of filgrastim therapy; and 3) primary prophylaxis with a single dose of pegfilgrastim. The target population was a hypothetical cohort of 64-year-old men and women with DLBCL. Data sources included published literature and current clinical practice. The analysis was conducted from a publicly funded health-care system perspective. The main outcome measures included costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). RESULTS In the base-case analysis, costs associated with no primary prophylaxis, primary prophylaxis with 10 days of filgrastim, and primary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim were CaD
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2012
Kristopher Dennis; Liying Zhang; Stephen Lutz; Angela van Baardwijk; Yvette M. van der Linden; Tanya Holt; Palmira Foro Arnalot; Jean-Léon Lagrange; Ernesto Maranzano; Rico Liu; K.K. Wong; Lea-Choung Wong; Vassilios Vassiliou; Benjamin W. Corn; Carlo De Angelis; Lori Holden; C. Shun Wong; Edward Chow
7314, CaD
Journal of Radiation Oncology | 2013
Kristopher Dennis; Leila Makhani; Ernesto Maranzano; Petra Feyer; Liang Zeng; Carlo De Angelis; Lori Holden; C. Shun Wong; Edward Chow
13947, and CaD
Hospital Practice | 2014
Feng Xie; Robert Hopkins; Natasha Burke; Mohdhar Habib; Carlo De Angelis; Mark Pasetka; Angie Giotis; Ron Goeree
16290, respectively. The QALYs associated with the three strategies were 0.2004, 0.2015, and 0.2024, respectively. The ICER for the filgrastim vs no primary prophylaxis strategy was CaD
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology | 2018
Kristopher Dennis; Liang Zeng; Carlo De Angelis; Hans T. Chung; Natalie G. Coburn; Edward Chow; C. Shun Wong
5796000 per QALY. The ICER for the pegfilgrastim vs filgrastim primary prophylaxis strategy was CaD
Supportive Care in Cancer | 2017
Kristopher Dennis; Rehana Jamani; Clare McGrath; Leila Makhani; Henry Lam; Patrick Bauer; Carlo De Angelis; Natalie G. Coburn; C. Shun Wong; Edward Chow
2611000 per QALY. All one-way sensitivity analyses yielded ICERs greater than CaD
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2012
Julia Warr; David Yam; Shannon Goodall; Leah VanDraanen; Angie Giotis; Mark Pasetka; Carlo De Angelis; Urban Emmenegger
400000 per QALY. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves show that 20.0% of iterations are cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of CaD