Carlo J. Iasella

Janus kinase inhibition for immunosuppression in solid organ transplantation: Is there a role in complex immunologic challenges?

Inhibition of the Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) pathway for immunosuppression in solid organ transplantation is appealing due to its specificity for immune cell function, particularly for JAK3. This is due to its unique association with only the common gamma chain (γc). The γc is an appealing immunosuppression target in transplantation because of the critically important lymphokines that act at it, including IL-2, IL-4, IL-7, IL-9, IL-15, and IL-21. Tofacitinib was initially purported to selectively inhibit solely JAK3, but subsequent analyses have also demonstrated its activity at the other members of the JAK family. Clinical outcomes have validated tofacitinibs pan-JAK activity in kidney transplantation after demonstrating an increased risk of infection and malignancy as compared to CNI-based regimens. After these trials, tofacitinib investigation for use in transplantation has effectively ceased. However, a post-hoc analysis has shed new light on the monitoring of tofacitinib exposure in order to predict infection and oncologic events. With new methods to monitor tofacitinib exposure, clinicians may be able to effectively reduce toxicities while providing a high level of immunosuppression. The purpose of this review to identify when, and for whom, JAK inhibitors may provide benefit in solid organ transplantation.

Adverse Drug Reactions : Type A (Intrinsic) or Type B (Idiosyncratic)

Hepatotoxic adverse drug reactions are associated with significant morbidity and mortality and are the leading cause of postmarketing regulatory action in the United States. They are classified as Type A (intrinsic) or Type B (idiosyncratic). Type A are predictable, dose-related toxicities, often identified in preclinical or clinical trials, and usually occur in overdose settings or with pre-existing hepatic impairment. Type B are not clearly related to increasing dose and are associated with drug-specific and patient-specific characteristics and environmental risks. Rare Type B reactions are often identified postmarketing. Identification and management, including electronic resources, has evolved.

Maintenance Belatacept-based Immunosuppression in Lung Transplantation Recipients Who Failed Calcineurin Inhibitors

Background Traditional immunosuppressive regimens (ISR) used in lung transplantation rely on calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) that occasionally cause severe adverse reactions necessitating discontinuation. Belatacept is a novel costimulation antagonist approved for use in renal transplantation which lacks data in lung transplantation. This series aims to describe the response to belatacept ISR in 11 lung transplantation recipients after CNI failure. Methods Single-center, retrospective medical record review of adult lung transplant recipients (LTR) before and after conversion to belatacept-based ISR. Patients were evaluated at fixed time points before and after belatacept initiation. Primary outcome was incidence of acute cellular rejection (ACR). Secondary outcomes included incidence of infection, chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) progression, death, change in mean arterial pressure, and estimated glomerular filtration rate. Results Eleven LTRs received belatacept with a mean of 246 (91-1064) days of follow-up after conversion. Four were changed to belatacept for thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, 3 for posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, 2 for recurrent ACR, 1 for CLAD, and 1 for renal-sparing. ACR was not different before and after belatacept (P = 0.17). Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was significantly higher postbelatacept (32.53 vs 45.26, P = 0.04). Mean incidence of infections (24.4% vs 16.0%, P = 0.55) and mean arterial pressure (97.5 vs 92.1 P = 0.38) were not different. Progression of CLAD occurred in 2 patients. At the end of follow-up, 7 of 11 patients were alive. Conclusions Belatacept-based ISR appear to produce reasonable results in LTRs who fail CNI-based ISR. Larger prospective trials appear warranted in lung transplantation.

Belatacept for Maintenance Immunosuppression in Cardiothoracic Transplantation: The Potential Frontier.

Current immunosuppressive regimens with calcineurin inhibitors have improved the management of patients after transplantation. However, their adverse effects are linked to increased morbidity and limit the long‐term survival of heart and lung transplant recipients. Belatacept, a costimulation inhibitor interfering with the interaction between CD28 on T cells and the B7 ligands on antigen presenting cells, has shown success and is currently approved for use in renal transplant recipients. Furthermore, it lacks many of the cardiovascular, metabolic, neurologic, and renal adverse of effects of calcineurin inhibitors that have the largest impact on long‐term survival in cardiothoracic transplant. Additionally, it requires no therapeutic drug monitoring and is only administered once a month. Limitations to belatacept use have been observed that must be considered when comparing immunosuppression options. Despite this, maintenance immunosuppression with belatacept has the potential to improve outcomes in cardiothoracic transplant recipients, as it has with kidney transplant recipients. However, no large clinical trials investigating belatacept for maintenance immunosuppression in heart and lung transplant recipients exist. There is a large need for focused research of belatacept in cardiothoracic transplantation. Belatacept is a viable treatment option for maintenance immunosuppression, and it is reasonable to pursue more evidence in cardiothoracic transplant recipients.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder in lung transplant recipients

A systematic review of papers in English on post‐transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) in lung transplant recipients (LTR) using MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases was performed. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations were strictly adhered to. Pooled odds ratios (pOR) were calculated from a random‐effects model, and heterogeneity among studies was quantitated using I2 values. Fourteen studies published from 2005 to 2015 were included in the meta‐analysis. One hundred and sixty‐four lung transplant recipients were included. LTRs who received single vs bilateral were associated with a 7.67‐fold risk of death after PTLD (6 studies with 64 LTRs; pOR 7.67 95% CI 1.98‐29.70; P = .003). pOR of death for early onset PTLD (<1 year post‐LT) vs late onset (>1 year post‐LT) was not different (3 studies with 72 LTRS; pOR 0.62, 95% CI 0.20‐1.86, P = .39). Standardized mean difference (SMD) in time from transplant to PTLD onset between LTRs who died vs alive was not different (9 studies with 109 LTRs; SMD 0.03, 95% CI −0.48‐0.53, P = .92). Survival in polymorphic vs monomorphic PTLD and extranodal vs nodal disease was similar (4 studies with 31 LTRs; pOR 0.44, 95% CI 0.08‐2.51; P = .36. 6 studies with 81 LTRs; pOR 1.05 95% CI 0.31‐3.52, P = .94). This meta‐analysis demonstrates that single LTRs are at a higher risk of death vs bilateral LTRs after the development of PTLD.

Increasing tacrolimus time‐in‐therapeutic range is associated with superior one‐year outcomes in lung transplant recipients

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) are the backbone of traditional immunosuppressive regimens for lung transplant recipients (LTR). The CNIs are both narrow therapeutic index drugs with significant interpatient and intrapatient variability that require therapeutic drug monitoring to ensure safety and effectiveness. We hypothesized that tacrolimus time‐in‐therapeutic range (TTR) affects acute and chronic rejection rates in LTRs. This was a single‐center, observational, cross‐sectional study of 292 adult LTRs. Subjects who received tacrolimus posttransplant for the first year were included. TTR was calculated at 1 year using protocol goal ranges (12‐15 mg/mL months 0–6; 10–12 mg/mL for months 7–12). The primary outcome was acute cellular rejection (ACR) burden at 1 year. Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), mortality, and infection rate were assessed as secondary outcomes at 1 year. Primary and secondary outcomes were assessed using logistic regression. Increasing TTR by 10% was associated with a significantly lower likelihood of high‐burden ACR at 1 year on univariable (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.40–0.54, P < .001) and multivariable (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.47–0.86, P = .003) assessment, controlling for age and induction agent. Increasing TTR by 10% was also associated with lower rates of CLAD (P < .001) and mortality (P < .001) at 1 year. Prospective studies confirming these findings appear warranted.

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety Analysis of Dual Antiplatelet Therapies Within an Integrated Delivery System.

Background: Dual antiplatelet therapy is a mainstay of care for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) patients; however, uncertainty exists in real-world practice about comparative effectiveness and safety outcomes. Objective: To evaluate outcomes of different oral P2Y12 inhibitors in PCI patients. Methods: We retrospectively studied patients treated between July 1, 2010, and December 31, 2013. Patients received clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor, or more than 1 antiplatelet (switch) during PCI. Outcomes were evaluated for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and bleeding at 1 year. Propensity score matching with Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to determine predictors of MACE and bleeding. Results: A total of 8127 patients were included: clopidogrel (n = 6872), prasugrel (n = 605), ticagrelor (n = 181), and switch (n = 469). Treatment with prasugrel was associated with the lowest risk of MACE using multivariate regression (odds ratio [OR] = 0.57; 95% CI = 0.36-0.92; P = 0.02). In the propensity score–matched analysis, only the prasugrel group was associated with a lower risk of MACE compared with the clopidogrel group. Clopidogrel was associated with the lowest risk of major bleeding using multivariate regression (OR = 0.64; 95% CI = 0.42-0.98; P = 0.042). Both ticagrelor (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.00; 95% CI = 1.11-3.59) and the switch groups (HR = 1.65; 95% CI = 1.09-2.50) were associated with a greater risk of major bleeding compared with clopidogrel. However, no differences were found in the propensity score–matched analysis. Conclusions: Dual antiplatelet therapies differed in both MACE and bleeds in a real-world setting of PCI. Prasugrel was associated with fewer MACE, whereas clopidogrel had fewer major bleeding events.