Carlo Tomino

Impact of Body Mass Index and Obesity on Clinical Response to Systemic Treatment for Psoriasis

Objective: Our aim was to assess the role of the body mass index (BMI) in the clinical response to systemic treatment for psoriasis. Methods: A nationwide cohort study of patients receiving a new systemic treatment for plaque psoriasis at reference centres in Italy was conducted. Information was gathered through a web-based electronic form. Patients being maintained on the same medication and with data available at 8 and 16 weeks by March 31, 2007, were eligible. The outcome was a reduction in the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) of at least 75% at follow-up compared to baseline (PASI-75). Results: Out of 8,072 patients enrolled, 2,368 were eligible and analysable at 8 weeks and 2,042 at 16 weeks. PASI-75 was achieved by 819 patients (34.5%) at 8 weeks and 1,034 (50.6%) at 16 weeks. The proportion steadily decreased with increased values of BMI. Compared to normal weight (BMI = 20–24) the adjusted odds ratio for achieving PASI-75 in obese patients was 0.73 (95% CI = 0.58–0.93) at 8 weeks and 0.62 (95% CI = 0.49–0.79) at 16 weeks. The impact of the BMI did not show remarkable variations according to the drug prescribed at entry. Conclusion: The BMI affects the early clinical response to systemic treatment for psoriasis.

Effect of sex, age, and transmission category on the progression to AIDS and survival of zidovudine-treated symptomatic patients

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of transmission category and demographic, clinical and immunological characteristics on the progression to AIDS and survival of zidovudine-treated patients. DesignProspective multicentre cohort study of symptomatic non-AIDS patients. SettingEighty-three clinical centres reporting data to the National Zidovudine Registry. PatientsA total of 1468 patients enrolled between July 1987 and January 1991 were analysed. Main outcome measuresThree-year AIDS-free survival probability estimates since therapy start. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of progression to AIDS and survival. ResultsFaster progression was associated with increasing age (8% risk increase for a 5-year increase), low baseline CD4+ count (39% risk increase for 100 × 106/l cells decrease), and zidovudine > 1000 mg/day (20% risk increase compared with ≤ 1000 mg/day). Homosexual men had a 33% risk increase compared with other risk groups. The presence of fever and oral candidiasis at enrolment were also independently associated with a higher risk of progression. Differences in the risk of progression were not significant between men and women. Older age, baseline CD4+ count, homosexual behaviour, fever and oral candidiasis were independently associated with a shorter survival. ConclusionsOur results confirm that age and baseline CD4+ count are independent predictors of progression, but do not provide evidence for differences in clinical outcome between the sexes. The higher risk of progression to AIDS and shorter survival for homosexual men appears to be correlated with the higher risk of developing Kaposis sarcoma.

Phase II controlled trial of post-exposure immunization with recombinant gp160 versus antiretroviral therapy in asymptomatic HIV-1-infected adults

Objective:To alter the natural course of HIV-1 infection by inducing or potentiating immune responses to HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein. Design:Multicentre, double-blind, three-arm, placebo-controlled study. Setting:Outpatients attending clinics in two University Hospitals. Patients:Ninety-nine asymptomatic HIV-1-infected adults with CD4+ T-cell counts > 400 and < 600 × 106/l and no previous antiretroviral therapy were included. Interventions:Patients were randomly assigned to three groups treated with: (i) gp160 in alum over a 2-year period in combination with placebo for the full study duration (n = 32); (ii) gp160 in alum over a 2-year period in combination with zidovudine for the full study duration (n = 34); and (iii) alum over a 2-year period in combination with zidovudine for the full study duration (n = 33). Results:Immunotherapy was well tolerated and no significant differences in disease progression were seen in the treatment groups. The majority of patients (85%) receiving gp160 showed persistent lymphoproliferative responses to the immunogen and to a different Env antigen preparation. CD4+ cell count changes in patients receiving zidovudine alone were significantly higher than those seen in patients receiving immunotherapy alone after 1 year of treatment. Zidovudine administration was associated with initial transient reduction of plasma viraemia. Conclusions:Prolonged immunization with a soluble HIV-1 subunit provided no benefit to asymptomatic HIV-1-infected patients and was inferior to zidovudine monotherapy. Furthermore, immunization with gp160 shortened the duration of the transient viral load reduction induced by zidovudine.

Quality of life outcomes of combination zidovudine- didanosine-nevirapine and zidovudine-didanosine for antiretroviral-naive advanced HIV-infected patients.

ObjectivesTo evaluate the quality of life outcomes in antiretroviral-naive patients randomized to zidovudine plus didanosine versus zidovudine plus didanosine plus nevirapine for treatment of advanced HIV disease (the Istituto Superiore di Sanità 047 trial). DesignA 48-week randomized, double-blind trial. MethodsSixty patients were enrolled and evaluated over 24 weeks. Quality of life was assessed using a modified version of the Medical Outcomes Study-HIV Health Survey. For analysis, we calculated two summary scores reflecting the physical (PHS) and the mental (MHS) components of health. ResultsAlthough the three-drug combination was superior at inducing immunologic and virologic responses, the two-drug regimen was superior for both PHS and MHS, especially at week 8 where differences were both statistically and clinically significant (5.8 and 9.2 points, respectively, P < 0.02 for both). Quality of life changes paralleled trends in body weight and Karnofsky performance status score. ConclusionAlthough a three-drug antiretroviral therapy regimen was superior in terms of short term virologic/immunologic response, the two-drug regimen was better in terms of quality of life. In general, triple therapy remains the most effective treatment option. However, quality of life assessments can yield results that may be discordant with and complementary to those obtained using conventional endpoints. Comparative trials should collect a comprehensive range of outcome measures, including patient-reported quality of life, in order to provide clinicians and patients with additional information that may influence treatment decisions.

Risk factors and occurrence of rash in HIV-positive patients not receiving nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor: data from a randomized study evaluating use of protease inhibitors in nucleoside-experienced patients with very low CD4 levels (<50 cells/microL).

Most of the studies evaluating rash in HIV‐positive patients have focused on nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI), particularly nevirapine, and little is known about the occurrence of rash and the risk factors for its development in patients receiving regimens not based on NNRTI.

Survival of zidovudine-treated patients with AIDS compared with that of contemporary untreated patients. Italian Zidovudine Evaluation Group

OBJECTIVE To assess the long-term effectiveness of zidovudine (AZT) in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). This assessment has never been adequately done because controlled clinical trials were stopped early and survival comparisons were made with historical controls. DESIGN Nonrandomized contemporary observational study of patients treated and not treated with zidovudine. SETTING Twenty-three AIDS treatment centers throughout Italy that reported cases to the National Registry of AIDS Cases between July 1987 and March 1988. PATIENTS One hundred fifty-nine zidovudine-treated and 112 untreated patients with AIDS, the majority of whom had acquired human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection through intravenous drug use. OUTCOME MEASURES Median survival and 1- and 2-year survival for treated and untreated groups, as estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was also used to identify independent predictors of survival among the variables studied. RESULTS Patients were similar with respect to CD4/CD8 ratio, age, sex, clinical and immunological status at diagnosis, and source of HIV infection. After 24 months, survival was 45.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 36.1% to 55.7%) in the treated group and 20.5% (95% CI, 12.6% to 28.3%) in the untreated group, with median survival of 21.2 and 9.6 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Possible biases of this study include imperfect matching for clinical status and better overall medical care of treated patients. Nevertheless, we believe that the observed differences in survival were primarily due to zidovudine treatment.

HIV‐related morbidity and mortality in patients starting protease inhibitors in very advanced HIV disease (CD4 count of < 50 cells/µL): an analysis of 338 clinical events from a randomized clinical trial*

AIDS defining events occur infrequently in the presence of CD4 counts above 200 cells/µL. It is, however, uncertain for most of the AIDS defining conditions whether this threshold can be considered equally safe in patients with a previously very low CD4 nadir.

Plasma HIV-1 copy number and in vitro infectivity of plasma prior to and during combination antiretroviral treatment.

Some studies on untreated patients have shown a general correlation between plasma HIV copy number and plasma infectivity in in vitro models. Recent observations also indicate that HIV-RNA level is an important predictor of perinatal transmission and may also have a role in heterosexual transmission. To further analyse the correlation between HIV viral load and plasma infectivity, we studied the relationship between HIV-1 plasma copy number and plasma infectivity prior to and during treatment with antiretroviral combination regimens in HIV-1 infected adults. Plasma infectivity was assessed in vitro by coculture of plasma from HIV-positive patients with PHA-stimulated fresh PBMC from uninfected donors. A positive plasma isolation, in almost all cases (43/45) and irrespective of treatment status, was associated with an HIV viral load higher than 100000 copies per ml, with higher plasma HIV-1 RNA values in isolation-positive samples compared with isolation-negative samples (median values, 710000 vs. 37500 copies per ml, respectively). SI and NSI strains had similarly high viral load values (470000 vs. 790000 copies per ml), but CD4 counts were lower in the SI phenotype group. Our data indicate that low levels of viral load are only exceptionally associated with isolation from plasma in the in vitro model we used. This observation confirms indirectly the presence of an association between viral load and infectivity. The requisite of a high plasma viral load in order to obtain infectivity (i.e. positivity of HIV isolation from plasma) also seems maintained under antiretroviral treatment, adding confidence in the conclusion that reductions in viral load translate into reduction of plasma infectivity. Due to the extreme complexity of factors determining transmission, a very prudent interpretation of the results is essential when information from experimental studies has to be transferred to clinical situations requiring assessment of risks or clinical decisions.

Hospitalizations and Costs of Treatment for Protease Inhibitor-Based Regimens in Patients with Very Advanced HIV-Infection (CD4 < 50/mm3)

Abstract Purpose: To describe the cost of hospitalization and treatment in patients with very advanced disease who tart different regimens based on a protease inhibitor (PI). Method: An observational retrospective analysis was performed on data from a 48-week randomized, multicenter study. Analysis was based on a subgroup of centers that were geographically defined. Costs of ordinary hospital admissions and of antiretroviral treatment were considered. Incidence of hospitalization and number of days free from hospitalization during the period of observation were calculated. Cost and hospitalization measures were compared among patients receiving three different therapeutic regimens: only PI, PI plus one nucleoside, or PI plus two nucleosides. A multivariate analysis was used to assess cost differences, controlling for variables potentially able to influence outcome. Results: Overall, among 166 patients starting PI (PI plus two nucleosides, 71; PI plus one nucleoside, 65; only PI, 30), 162 ordinary hospital admissions were observed during about 1 year of follow-up. Monthly rates of admission per person and incidence of first hospitalization on 100 person-months showed a clear inverse relationship with the number of drugs comprising the baseline treatment regimen, with the lower rates for the triple therapy group (0.06 and 3.9, respectively), intermediate values for the dual therapy group (0.10 and 8.1, respectively), and higher rates for the PI monotherapy group (0.15 and 13.7, respectively). The average number of days free from hospitalization per month was 29.5 in the triple therapy group, 28.6 in the dual therapy group, and 27.9 in the monotherapy group. The results of cost analysis showed, despite higher cost of antiretroviral treatment, that global costs were progressively lower using regimens of increasing potency: Compared to PI monotherapy, global cost (costs of antiretroviral treatment and of hospitalizations combined) per month per patient was 31.9% lower for the triple therapy group and 19.3% lower for the dual therapy. Global cost for the triple therapy was 15.7% lower compared to global cost for dual therapy. After adjustment for CD4 count, AIDS status, and Karnofsky score, both hospitalization costs and global costs were significantly lower for triple therapy compared to monotherapy (p = .002 and .039, respectively). Conclusion: In advanced and nucleoside-experienced patients, PI-containing regimens have a differential impact according to the overall strength of the regimen, with the best effects on both hospitalizations and treatment costs obtained using PI within potent combination regimens.

A Randomized Trial Comparing the Introduction of Ritonavir or Indinavir in 1251 Nucleoside-Experienced Patients with Advanced HIV Infection

ISS-IP1, a multicenter, randomized, 48-week open trial, was designed to compare the introduction of ritonavir or indinavir in patients with previous nucleoside experience and CD4+ cell counts below 50/mm3. Concomitant antiretroviral treatment with nucleoside analogs was allowed. Primary efficacy measures were survival and time to a new AIDS-defining event or death, analyzed through the whole period of observation by the intention-to-treat approach. Primary toxicity measures were time to treatment discontinuation and adverse events, grade at least 3/serious, analyzed by an on-treatment approach. Evaluation-of efficacy also included CD4+ cell and RNA response. The trial enrolled 1251 patients in 5 months. At baseline, mean CD4+ cell count was about 20 cells/mm3 and mean HIV RNA copy number was 4.9 log10/ml in both groups. Overall, 402 patients in the ritonavir group and 250 patients in the indinavir group permanently discontinued the assigned treatment (relative risk, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.68-2.30; p = 0.0001), with most of this difference dependent on a higher number of discontinuation for adverse events in the ritonavir group. After a mean follow-up of 307 days (ritonavir, 304; indinavir, 309), 124 deaths (ritonavir, 61; indinavir, 63; relative risk, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.67-1.36; p = 0.80) and 330 new AIDS-defining events (ritonavir, 170; indinavir, 160; relative risk, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.85-1.31; p = 0.60) were observed. CD4+ cell counts increased in both groups in patients still receiving treatment, with about 100 cells gained by week 24 and 150 cells gained by week 48. Body weight also increased over time in both groups. Analysis of RNA response showed a decrease of 1.5 log10 or higher in both treatment groups. Overall, 400 patients in the ritonavir group and 338 patients in the indinavir group developed at least one grade 3/serious new adverse event during follow-up (relative risk, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.28-1.72; p = 0.0001). Favorable CD4+ cell and RNA responses at 24 and 48 weeks were observed in both groups of patients remaining on treatment. Indinavir showed slightly better effects in sustaining RNA, CD4+ cell, and body weight responses. Ritonavir and indinavir results were comparable in terms of clinical outcome (survival and AIDS-defining events).