Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Carlos A. Quesada is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Carlos A. Quesada.


Science | 2009

Drought sensitivity of the Amazon rainforest

Oliver L. Phillips; Luiz E. O. C. Aragão; Simon L. Lewis; Joshua B. Fisher; Jon Lloyd; Gabriela Lopez-Gonzalez; Yadvinder Malhi; Abel Monteagudo; J. Peacock; Carlos A. Quesada; Geertje M.F. van der Heijden; Samuel Almeida; Iêda Leão do Amaral; Luzmila Arroyo; Gerardo Aymard; Timothy R. Baker; Olaf Banki; Lilian Blanc; Damien Bonal; Paulo M. Brando; Jérôme Chave; Atila Alves de Oliveira; Nallaret Dávila Cardozo; Claudia I. Czimczik; Ted R. Feldpausch; Maria Aparecida Freitas; Emanuel Gloor; Niro Higuchi; Eliana M. Jimenez; Gareth Lloyd

Amazon forests are a key but poorly understood component of the global carbon cycle. If, as anticipated, they dry this century, they might accelerate climate change through carbon losses and changed surface energy balances. We used records from multiple long-term monitoring plots across Amazonia to assess forest responses to the intense 2005 drought, a possible analog of future events. Affected forest lost biomass, reversing a large long-term carbon sink, with the greatest impacts observed where the dry season was unusually intense. Relative to pre-2005 conditions, forest subjected to a 100-millimeter increase in water deficit lost 5.3 megagrams of aboveground biomass of carbon per hectare. The drought had a total biomass carbon impact of 1.2 to 1.6 petagrams (1.2 × 1015 to 1.6 × 1015 grams). Amazon forests therefore appear vulnerable to increasing moisture stress, with the potential for large carbon losses to exert feedback on climate change.


New Phytologist | 2010

Drought–mortality relationships for tropical forests

Oliver L. Phillips; Geertje M.F. van der Heijden; Simon L. Lewis; Gabriela Lopez-Gonzalez; Luiz E. O. C. Aragão; Jon Lloyd; Yadvinder Malhi; Abel Monteagudo; Samuel Almeida; Esteban Álvarez Dávila; Iêda Leão do Amaral; Sandy Andelman; Ana Andrade; Luzmila Arroyo; Gerardo Aymard; Timothy R. Baker; Lilian Blanc; Damien Bonal; Atila Alves de Oliveira; Kuo-Jung Chao; Nallaret Dávila Cardozo; Lola Da Costa; Ted R. Feldpausch; Joshua B. Fisher; Nikolaos M. Fyllas; Maria Aparecida Freitas; David Galbraith; Emanuel Gloor; Niro Higuchi; Eurídice N. Honorio

*The rich ecology of tropical forests is intimately tied to their moisture status. Multi-site syntheses can provide a macro-scale view of these linkages and their susceptibility to changing climates. Here, we report pan-tropical and regional-scale analyses of tree vulnerability to drought. *We assembled available data on tropical forest tree stem mortality before, during, and after recent drought events, from 119 monitoring plots in 10 countries concentrated in Amazonia and Borneo. *In most sites, larger trees are disproportionately at risk. At least within Amazonia, low wood density trees are also at greater risk of drought-associated mortality, independent of size. For comparable drought intensities, trees in Borneo are more vulnerable than trees in the Amazon. There is some evidence for lagged impacts of drought, with mortality rates remaining elevated 2 yr after the meteorological event is over. *These findings indicate that repeated droughts would shift the functional composition of tropical forests toward smaller, denser-wooded trees. At very high drought intensities, the linear relationship between tree mortality and moisture stress apparently breaks down, suggesting the existence of moisture stress thresholds beyond which some tropical forests would suffer catastrophic tree mortality.


Nature | 2015

Long-term decline of the Amazon carbon sink

Roel J. W. Brienen; Oliver L. Phillips; Ted R. Feldpausch; Emanuel Gloor; Timothy R. Baker; Jon Lloyd; Gabriela Lopez-Gonzalez; Abel Monteagudo-Mendoza; Yadvinder Malhi; Simon L. Lewis; R. Vásquez Martínez; Miguel Alexiades; E. Álvarez Dávila; Patricia Alvarez-Loayza; Ana Andrade; Luiz E. O. C. Aragão; Alejandro Araujo-Murakami; E.J.M.M. Arets; Luzmila Arroyo; Olaf S. Bánki; Christopher Baraloto; Jorcely Barroso; Damien Bonal; Rene G. A. Boot; José Luís C. Camargo; Carolina V. Castilho; V. Chama; Kuo-Jung Chao; Jérôme Chave; James A. Comiskey

Atmospheric carbon dioxide records indicate that the land surface has acted as a strong global carbon sink over recent decades, with a substantial fraction of this sink probably located in the tropics, particularly in the Amazon. Nevertheless, it is unclear how the terrestrial carbon sink will evolve as climate and atmospheric composition continue to change. Here we analyse the historical evolution of the biomass dynamics of the Amazon rainforest over three decades using a distributed network of 321 plots. While this analysis confirms that Amazon forests have acted as a long-term net biomass sink, we find a long-term decreasing trend of carbon accumulation. Rates of net increase in above-ground biomass declined by one-third during the past decade compared to the 1990s. This is a consequence of growth rate increases levelling off recently, while biomass mortality persistently increased throughout, leading to a shortening of carbon residence times. Potential drivers for the mortality increase include greater climate variability, and feedbacks of faster growth on mortality, resulting in shortened tree longevity. The observed decline of the Amazon sink diverges markedly from the recent increase in terrestrial carbon uptake at the global scale, and is contrary to expectations based on models.


Journal of Vegetation Science | 2002

An international network to monitor the structure, composition and dynamics of Amazonian forests (RAINFOR)

Yadvinder Malhi; Oliver L. Phillips; Jon Lloyd; Timothy R. Baker; James Wright; Samuel Almeida; L. Arroyo; T. Frederiksen; John Grace; Niro Higuchi; Timothy J. Killeen; William F. Laurance; C. Leaño; Simon L. Lewis; Patrick Meir; Abel Monteagudo; David A. Neill; P. Núñez Vargas; S.N. Panfil; S. Patiño; Nigel C. A. Pitman; Carlos A. Quesada; A. Rudas-Ll.; Rafael de Paiva Salomão; Scott R. Saleska; Natalino Silva; M. Silveira; W.G. Sombroek; Renato Valencia; R. Vásquez Martínez

Abstract The Amazon basin is likely to be increasingly affected by environmental changes: higher temperatures, changes in precipitation, CO2 fertilization and habitat fragmentation. To examine the important ecological and biogeochemical consequences of these changes, we are developing an international network, RAINFOR, which aims to monitor forest biomass and dynamics across Amazonia in a co-ordinated fashion in order to understand their relationship to soil and climate. The network will focus on sample plots established by independent researchers, some providing data extending back several decades. We will also conduct rapid transect studies of poorly monitored regions. Field expeditions analysed local soil and plant properties in the first phase (2001–2002). Initial results suggest that the network has the potential to reveal much information on the continental-scale relations between forest and environment. The network will also serve as a forum for discussion between researchers, with the aim of standardising sampling techniques and methodologies that will enable Amazonian forests to be monitored in a coherent manner in the coming decades. Abbreviation: PSP = Permanent sample plot.


Global Ecology and Biogeography | 2014

Markedly divergent estimates of Amazon forest carbon density from ground plots and satellites

Edward T. A. Mitchard; Ted R. Feldpausch; Roel J. W. Brienen; Gabriela Lopez-Gonzalez; Abel Monteagudo; Timothy R. Baker; Simon L. Lewis; Jon Lloyd; Carlos A. Quesada; Manuel Gloor; Hans ter Steege; Patrick Meir; Esteban Álvarez; Alejandro Araujo-Murakami; Luiz E. O. C. Aragão; Luzmila Arroyo; Gerardo Aymard; Olaf Banki; Damien Bonal; Sandra A. Brown; Foster Brown; Carlos Cerón; Victor Chama Moscoso; Jérôme Chave; James A. Comiskey; Fernando Cornejo; Massiel Corrales Medina; Lola Da Costa; Flávia R. C. Costa; Anthony Di Fiore

Aim The accurate mapping of forest carbon stocks is essential for understanding the global carbon cycle, for assessing emissions from deforestation, and for rational land-use planning. Remote sensing (RS) is currently the key tool for this purpose, but RS does not estimate vegetation biomass directly, and thus may miss significant spatial variations in forest structure. We test the stated accuracy of pantropical carbon maps using a large independent field dataset. Location Tropical forests of the Amazon basin. The permanent archive of the field plot data can be accessed at: http://dx.doi.org/10.5521/FORESTPLOTS.NET/2014_1 Methods Two recent pantropical RS maps of vegetation carbon are compared to a unique ground-plot dataset, involving tree measurements in 413 large inventory plots located in nine countries. The RS maps were compared directly to field plots, and kriging of the field data was used to allow area-based comparisons. Results The two RS carbon maps fail to capture the main gradient in Amazon forest carbon detected using 413 ground plots, from the densely wooded tall forests of the north-east, to the light-wooded, shorter forests of the south-west. The differences between plots and RS maps far exceed the uncertainties given in these studies, with whole regions over- or under-estimated by > 25%, whereas regional uncertainties for the maps were reported to be < 5%. Main conclusions Pantropical biomass maps are widely used by governments and by projects aiming to reduce deforestation using carbon offsets, but may have significant regional biases. Carbon-mapping techniques must be revised to account for the known ecological variation in tree wood density and allometry to create maps suitable for carbon accounting. The use of single relationships between tree canopy height and above-ground biomass inevitably yields large, spatially correlated errors. This presents a significant challenge to both the forest conservation and remote sensing communities, because neither wood density nor species assemblages can be reliably mapped from space.


Global Change Biology | 2015

The linkages between photosynthesis, productivity, growth and biomass in lowland Amazonian forests

Yadvinder Malhi; Christopher E. Doughty; Gregory R. Goldsmith; Daniel B. Metcalfe; Cécile A. J. Girardin; Toby R. Marthews; Jhon del Aguila-Pasquel; Luiz E. O. C. Aragão; Alejandro Araujo-Murakami; Paulo M. Brando; Antonio Carlos Lola da Costa; Javier E. Silva-Espejo; Filio Farfán Amézquita; David Galbraith; Carlos A. Quesada; Wanderley Rocha; Norma Salinas-Revilla; Divino Vicente Silvério; Patrick Meir; Oliver L. Phillips

Understanding the relationship between photosynthesis, net primary productivity and growth in forest ecosystems is key to understanding how these ecosystems will respond to global anthropogenic change, yet the linkages among these components are rarely explored in detail. We provide the first comprehensive description of the productivity, respiration and carbon allocation of contrasting lowland Amazonian forests spanning gradients in seasonal water deficit and soil fertility. Using the largest data set assembled to date, ten sites in three countries all studied with a standardized methodology, we find that (i) gross primary productivity (GPP) has a simple relationship with seasonal water deficit, but that (ii) site-to-site variations in GPP have little power in explaining site-to-site spatial variations in net primary productivity (NPP) or growth because of concomitant changes in carbon use efficiency (CUE), and conversely, the woody growth rate of a tropical forest is a very poor proxy for its productivity. Moreover, (iii) spatial patterns of biomass are much more driven by patterns of residence times (i.e. tree mortality rates) than by spatial variation in productivity or tree growth. Current theory and models of tropical forest carbon cycling under projected scenarios of global atmospheric change can benefit from advancing beyond a focus on GPP. By improving our understanding of poorly understood processes such as CUE, NPP allocation and biomass turnover times, we can provide more complete and mechanistic approaches to linking climate and tropical forest carbon cycling.


Plant Ecology & Diversity | 2014

The productivity, metabolism and carbon cycle of two lowland tropical forest plots in south-western Amazonia, Peru

Yadvinder Malhi; Filio Farfán Amézquita; Christopher E. Doughty; Javier E. Silva-Espejo; Cécile A. J. Girardin; Daniel B. Metcalfe; Luiz E. O. C. Aragão; Lidia P. Huaraca-Quispe; Ivonne Alzamora-Taype; Luzmilla Eguiluz-Mora; Toby R. Marthews; Kate Halladay; Carlos A. Quesada; Amanda L. Robertson; Joshua B. Fisher; Joana Zaragoza-Castells; Clara M. Rojas-Villagra; Yulina Pelaez-Tapia; Norma Salinas; Patrick Meir; Oliver L. Phillips

Background: The forests of western Amazonia are known to be more dynamic that the better-studied forests of eastern Amazonia, but there has been no comprehensive description of the carbon cycle of a western Amazonian forest. Aims: We present the carbon budget of two forest plots in Tambopata in south-eastern Peru, western Amazonia. In particular, we present, for the first time, the seasonal variation in the detailed carbon budget of a tropical forest. Methods: We measured the major components of net primary production (NPP) and total autotrophic respiration over 3–6 years. Results: The NPP for the two plots was 15.1 ± 0.8 and 14.2 ± 1.0 Mg C ha−1 year−1, the gross primary productivity (GPP) was 35.5 ± 3.6 and 34.5 ± 3.5 Mg C ha−1 year−1, and the carbon use efficiency (CUE) was 0.42 ± 0.05 and 0.41 ± 0.05. NPP and CUE showed a large degree of seasonality. Conclusions: The two plots were similar in carbon cycling characteristics despite the different soils, the most notable difference being high allocation of NPP to canopy and low allocation to fine roots in the Holocene floodplain plot. The timing of the minima in the wet–dry transition suggests they are driven by phenological rhythms rather than being driven directly by water stress. When compared with results from forests on infertile forests in humid lowland eastern Amazonia, the plots have slightly higher GPP, but similar patterns of CUE and carbon allocation.


Plant Ecology & Diversity | 2013

Residence times of woody biomass in tropical forests

David Galbraith; Yadvinder Malhi; Kofi Affum-Baffoe; Andrea D. de Almeida Castanho; Christopher E. Doughty; Rosie A. Fisher; Simon L. Lewis; Kelvin S.-H. Peh; Oliver L. Phillips; Carlos A. Quesada; Bonaventure Sonké; Jon Lloyd

Background: The woody biomass residence time (τw) of an ecosystem is an important variable for accurately simulating its biomass stocks. Methods and results: We reviewed published data from 177 forest plots across the tropics and found a six-fold variation (23–129 years) in τw across our dataset, with a median τw of ca. 50 years. This value is similar to the median default value across 21 vegetation models for tropical forests, although the range of values used in models is large (20 to 200 years). Conclusions: The notion of a constant τw across all tropical forests may be of limited utility, given the large observed variation in τw. We found that while there was little relationship between climate variables and τw, there was evidence that edaphic factors exerted a strong influence on τw. In both the Neotropics and the Paleotropics, τw was highest in heavily weathered soils, suggesting that low soil fertility and/or non-limiting soil physical conditions exert a critical influence on τw. There is considerable uncertainty in how τw will be affected by global environmental change, especially by increased atmospheric CO2. Even small changes in τw could significantly reduce the future tropical forest carbon sink predicted by many vegetation models.


Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B | 2011

Variations in Amazon forest productivity correlated with foliar nutrients and modelled rates of photosynthetic carbon supply

Lina M. Mercado; S. Patiño; Tomas F. Domingues; Nikolaos M. Fyllas; Graham P. Weedon; Stephen Sitch; Carlos A. Quesada; Oliver L. Phillips; Luiz E. O. C. Aragão; Yadvinder Malhi; A. J. Dolman; Natalia Restrepo-Coupe; Scott R. Saleska; Timothy R. Baker; Samuel Almeida; Niro Higuchi; Jon Lloyd

The rate of above-ground woody biomass production, WP, in some western Amazon forests exceeds those in the east by a factor of 2 or more. Underlying causes may include climate, soil nutrient limitations and species composition. In this modelling paper, we explore the implications of allowing key nutrients such as N and P to constrain the photosynthesis of Amazon forests, and also we examine the relationship between modelled rates of photosynthesis and the observed gradients in WP. We use a model with current understanding of the underpinning biochemical processes as affected by nutrient availability to assess: (i) the degree to which observed spatial variations in foliar [N] and [P] across Amazonia affect stand-level photosynthesis; and (ii) how these variations in forest photosynthetic carbon acquisition relate to the observed geographical patterns of stem growth across the Amazon Basin. We find nutrient availability to exert a strong effect on photosynthetic carbon gain across the Basin and to be a likely important contributor to the observed gradient in WP. Phosphorus emerges as more important than nitrogen in accounting for the observed variations in productivity. Implications of these findings are discussed in the context of future tropical forests under a changing climate.


Plant Ecology & Diversity | 2013

On the delineation of tropical vegetation types with an emphasis on forest/savanna transitions

Mireia Torello-Raventos; Ted R. Feldpausch; Elmar M. Veenendaal; Franziska Schrodt; Gustavo Saiz; Tomas F. Domingues; Gloria Djagbletey; Andrew J. Ford; J.E. Kemp; Beatriz Schwantes Marimon; Ben Hur Marimon Junior; Eddie Lenza; J. A. Ratter; Leandro Maracahipes; Denise Sasaki; Bonaventure Sonké; Louis Zapfack; Hermann Taedoumg; Daniel Villarroel; Michael Schwarz; Carlos A. Quesada; F. Yoko Ishida; G. B. Nardoto; Kofi Affum-Baffoe; L. Arroyo; David M. J. S. Bowman; Halidou Compaore; Kalu J.E. Davies; Adama Diallo; Nikolaos M. Fyllas

Background: There is no generally agreed classification scheme for the many different vegetation formation types occurring in the tropics. This hinders cross-continental comparisons and causes confusion as words such as ‘forest’ and ‘savanna’ have different meanings to different people. Tropical vegetation formations are therefore usually imprecisely and/or ambiguously defined in modelling, remote sensing and ecological studies. Aims: To integrate observed variations in tropical vegetation structure and floristic composition into a single classification scheme. Methods: Using structural and floristic measurements made on three continents, discrete tropical vegetation groupings were defined on the basis of overstorey and understorey structure and species compositions by using clustering techniques. Results: Twelve structural groupings were identified based on height and canopy cover of the dominant upper stratum and the extent of lower-strata woody shrub cover and grass cover. Structural classifications did not, however, always agree with those based on floristic composition, especially for plots located in the forest–savanna transition zone. This duality is incorporated into a new tropical vegetation classification scheme. Conclusions: Both floristics and stand structure are important criteria for the meaningful delineation of tropical vegetation formations, especially in the forest/savanna transition zone. A new tropical vegetation classification scheme incorporating this information has been developed.

Collaboration


Dive into the Carlos A. Quesada's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jon Lloyd

Imperial College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jérôme Chave

Paul Sabatier University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Abel Monteagudo

Missouri Botanical Garden

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge