Carlos Calvo

Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibition Compared With Enalapril on the Risk of Clinical Progression in Surviving Patients With Heart Failure

Background— Clinical trials in heart failure have focused on the improvement in symptoms or decreases in the risk of death and other cardiovascular events. Little is known about the effect of drugs on the risk of clinical deterioration in surviving patients. Methods and Results— We compared the angiotensin-neprilysin inhibitor LCZ696 (400 mg daily) with the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril (20 mg daily) in 8399 patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction in a double-blind trial. The analyses focused on prespecified measures of nonfatal clinical deterioration. In comparison with the enalapril group, fewer LCZ696-treated patients required intensification of medical treatment for heart failure (520 versus 604; hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.74–0.94; P=0.003) or an emergency department visit for worsening heart failure (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.52–0.85; P=0.001). The patients in the LCZ696 group had 23% fewer hospitalizations for worsening heart failure (851 versus 1079; P<0.001) and were less likely to require intensive care (768 versus 879; 18% rate reduction, P=0.005), to receive intravenous positive inotropic agents (31% risk reduction, P<0.001), and to have implantation of a heart failure device or cardiac transplantation (22% risk reduction, P=0.07). The reduction in heart failure hospitalization with LCZ696 was evident within the first 30 days after randomization. Worsening of symptom scores in surviving patients was consistently more common in the enalapril group. LCZ696 led to an early and sustained reduction in biomarkers of myocardial wall stress and injury (N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide and troponin) versus enalapril. Conclusions— Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition prevents the clinical progression of surviving patients with heart failure more effectively than angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01035255.

Effects of Time of Day of Treatment on Ambulatory Blood Pressure Pattern of Patients With Resistant Hypertension

Patients with resistant hypertension present high prevalence of a non-dipper blood pressure pattern. Recent results indicate that non-dipping is related partly to the absence of 24-hour therapeutic coverage in patients treated with single morning doses. Accordingly, we investigated the impact of treatment time on the blood pressure pattern in 700 patients with resistant hypertension on the basis of clinic measurements who were studied by 48-hour ambulatory monitoring. Among them, 299 patients received all their medication on awakening, and 401 were taking ≥1 antihypertensive drug at bedtime. The percentage of patients with controlled ambulatory blood pressure was double in patients taking 1 drug at bedtime (P=0.008). Among the 578 patients with true resistant hypertension, subjects receiving 1 drug at bedtime showed a significant reduction in the 24-hour mean of systolic and diastolic blood pressure (3.1 and 1.6 mm Hg, respectively; P<0.011). This reduction was much more prominent during nighttime (5.1 and 3.0 mm Hg; P<0.001). Accordingly, the diurnal/nocturnal blood pressure ratio was significantly increased by 2.7 and the prevalence on non-dipping reduced (56.9 versus 81.9%; P<0.001) in patients taking 1 drug at bedtime. Compared with patients receiving all drugs on awakening, subjects with 1 drug at bedtime also showed significant reductions in the average values of glucose, cholesterol, fibrinogen, and urinary albumin excretion (P<0.011). In patients with resistant hypertension, pharmacological therapy should take into account when to treat with respect to the rest–activity cycle of each patient to improve control and to avoid the non-dipper pattern associated to higher cardiovascular risk.

Treatment of non-dipper hypertension with bedtime administration of valsartan.

Background Previous results have indicated that valsartan administration at bedtime, as opposed to upon wakening, may improve the diurnal: nocturnal ratio of blood pressure without loss in 24-h coverage and efficacy. Objectives To investigate the administration time-dependent antihypertensive efficacy of valsartan in non-dipper patients. Methods We studied 148 non-dipper patients with grade 1–2 essential hypertension, aged 53.0 ± 12.6 years, who were randomly assigned to receive valsartan (160 mg/day) as a monotherapy either on awakening or at bedtime. Blood pressure was measured every 20 min during the day and every 30 min at night for 48 consecutive hours before and after 3 months of treatment. Physical activity was simultaneously monitored every minute by wrist actigraphy to accurately calculate the diurnal and nocturnal means of blood pressure on a per subject basis. Results The significant blood pressure reduction after 3 months of valsartan (P < 0.001) was similar for both treatment times (13.1 and 8.5 mmHg reduction in the 24-h mean of systolic and diastolic blood pressure with morning administration; 14.7 and 10.3 mmHg with bedtime administration; P > 0.126 for treatment-time effect). The diurnal: nocturnal ratio of blood pressure was significantly increased only when valsartan was administered before bedtime, which resulted in 75% of the patients in this group reverting to dippers, a significant increase in the percentage of patients with controlled blood pressure over 24 h, and a reduction in urinary albumin excretion. Conclusions In non-dipper hypertensive patients, dosing time with valsartan should be chosen at bedtime, for improved efficacy during the nocturnal resting hours, as well as the potential associated reduction in cardiovascular risk.

Decrease in Urinary Albumin Excretion Associated With the Normalization of Nocturnal Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Subjects

Previous results have indicated that valsartan administration at bedtime as opposed to on wakening improves the diurnal/nocturnal ratio of blood pressure without loss in efficacy and therapeutic coverage. We hypothesized that increasing this ratio could reduce microalbuminuria. We conducted a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint trial on 200 previously untreated nonproteinuric patients with grade 1 to 2 essential hypertension, assigned to receive valsartan (160 mg/d) as a monotherapy either on awakening or at bedtime. Blood pressure was measured by ambulatory monitoring for 48 consecutive hours before and after 3 months of treatment. Physical activity was simultaneously monitored every minute by wrist actigraphy to accurately calculate the diurnal and nocturnal means of blood pressure on a per-subject basis. The significant blood pressure reduction after 3 months of therapy was similar for both treatment times. The diurnal/nocturnal blood pressure ratio was unchanged after valsartan on awakening, but significantly increased from 7.5 to 12.2 (P<0.001) when valsartan was administered at bedtime. Urinary albumin excretion was significantly reduced by 41% after bedtime treatment. This reduction was independent of the 24-hour blood pressure decrease but highly correlated with the decrease in nocturnal blood pressure and mainly with the increase in diurnal/nocturnal ratio (P<0.001). Bedtime valsartan administration improves the diurnal/nocturnal blood pressure ratio to a more dipper profile. This normalization of the circadian blood pressure pattern is associated with a significant decrease in urinary albumin excretion and plasma fibrinogen, and could thus reduce the increased cardiovascular risk in nondipper hypertensive patients.

Comparison of the Efficacy of Morning Versus Evening Administration of Telmisartan in Essential Hypertension

Valsartan administration at bedtime as opposed to on wakening improves the sleep time–relative blood pressure decline toward a more dipper pattern without loss in 24-hour efficacy. Yet to be determined is whether this administration time-dependent efficacy is a class-related feature, characteristic of all angiotensin receptor blockers or specific only to valsartan. Terminal half-life is a major difference between angiotensin receptor blockers, being largest (≈24 hours) for telmisartan. This trial investigated the administration time-dependent antihypertensive efficacy of telmisartan. We studied 215 patients with hypertension (114 men and 101 women), 46.4±12.0 years of age, randomly assigned to receive telmisartan (80 mg/d) as a monotherapy either on awakening or at bedtime. Blood pressure was measured for 48 hours before and after 12 weeks of treatment. The significant blood pressure reduction after treatment was similar for both groups. Bedtime administration of telmisartan, however, was more efficient than morning dosing in reducing the nocturnal blood pressure mean. The sleep time–relative blood pressure decline was slightly reduced after telmisartan on awakening but significantly increased with bedtime dosing, thus reducing the prevalence of nondipping from baseline by 76%. Telmisartan administered at bedtime, as opposed to morning dosing, improved the sleep time–relative blood pressure decline toward a more dipper pattern without loss in 24-hour efficacy. Nocturnal BP regulation is significantly better achieved with bedtime dosing of telmisartan. Results from this prospective trial suggest that these beneficial features of bedtime dosing may be class related for angiotensin receptor blockers. These results should be taken into account when prescribing this class of antihypertensive medication for treatment of essential hypertension.

Administration-Time-Dependent Effects of Doxazosin GITS on Ambulatory Blood Pressure of Hypertensive Subjects

Previous studies have shown that a single nighttime dose of standard doxazosin, an α-adrenergic antagonist, reduces blood pressure (BP) throughout the 24 h. We investigated the administration-time-dependent effects of the new doxazosin gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) formulation. We studied 91 subjects (49 men and 42 women), 56.7 ± 11.2 (mean ± SD) yrs of age with grade 1–2 essential hypertension; 39 patients had been previously untreated, and the remaining 52 had been treated with two antihypertensive medications with inadequate control of their hypertension. The subjects of the two groups, the monotherapy and polytherapy groups, respectively, were randomly assigned to receive the single daily dose of doxazosin GITS (4 mg/day) either upon awakening or at bedtime. BP was measured by ambulatory monitoring every 20 min during the day and every 30 min at night for 48 consecutive hours just before and after 3 months of treatment. After 3 months of doxazosin GITS therapy upon awakening, there was a small and nonstatistically significant reduction in BP (1.8 and 3.2 mm Hg in the 24 h mean of systolic and diastolic BP in monotherapy; 2.2 and 1.9 mm Hg in polytherapy), mainly because of absence of any effect on nocturnal BP. The 24 h mean BP reduction was larger and statistically significant (6.9 and 5.9 mm for systolic and diastolic BP, respectively, in monotherapy; 5.3 and 4.5 mm Hg in polytherapy) when doxazosin GITS was scheduled at bedtime. This BP-lowering effect was similar during both the day and nighttime hours. Doxazosin GITS ingested daily on awakening failed to provide full 24 h therapeutic coverage. Bedtime dosing with doxazosin GITS, however, significantly reduced BP throughout the 24 h both when used as a monotherapy and when used in combination with other antihypertensive pharmacotherapy. Knowledge of the chronopharmacology of doxazosin GITS is key to optimizing the efficiency of its BP-lowering effect, and this must be taken into consideration when prescribing this medication to patients.

Seasonal Variation of Fibrinogen in Dipper and Nondipper Hypertensive Patients

Background—A seasonal variation with higher values in winter has been previously reported in plasma fibrinogen, a recognized marker of the potential risk of myocardial infarction and stroke. The lack of nocturnal decline in blood pressure has also been associated with an increase in cardiovascular events. Accordingly, we have compared the yearly variation of plasma fibrinogen in dipper and nondipper hypertensive patients. Methods and Results—We studied 1006 stage 1 to 2 hypertensive patients (482 men and 524 women, 53.0±13.4 years of age). Blood pressure was measured every 20 minutes during the day and every 30 minutes at night for 48 consecutive hours. Physical activity was simultaneously evaluated at 1-minute intervals with a wrist actigraph. A blood sample was collected on the same day before starting blood pressure monitoring. The circannual variation of fibrinogen was established for all patients as well as for subgroups of dippers and nondippers (n=513; nocturnal blood pressure decline <10%) by multiple-component analysis. For the whole group of patients, fibrinogen was characterized by a highly significant seasonal variation (P <0.001) with a mean value of 318 mg/dL, double circannual amplitude (extent of predictable change along the year) of 40 mg/dL, and time of peak value in February. Throughout the year, the nondippers showed higher plasma fibrinogen levels than did the dippers (P <0.001). Conclusions—The elevated plasma fibrinogen levels in nondipper patients appear to be directly related to their increased risk in vascular events, which are more prominent during the late winter months.

Administration-time-dependent effects of antihypertensive treatment on the circadian pattern of blood pressure.

Purpose of reviewMany studies show that the extent of the nocturnal blood-pressure decline is deterministic of cardiovascular injury and risk. Accordingly, there is growing interest in how to tailor the treatment of hypertensive patients according to their circadian blood-pressure pattern. Recent findingsDifferences in efficacy depending on the time of day of drug administration lead to differences in effects of antihypertensive drugs on the nocturnal decline relative to the diurnal mean of blood pressure. Thus, bedtime dosing with nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) is more effective than morning dosing, while also reducing significantly secondary effects. Bedtime administration of trandolapril results in a safe and effective means of controlling morning blood pressure without inducing excessive reduction nocturnally. The dose–response curve, therapeutic coverage, and efficacy of doxazosin GITS are all markedly dependent on the circadian time of drug administration. Moreover, valsartan administration at bedtime as opposed to upon wakening results in improved day/night blood-pressure ratio, a significant increase in the percentage of controlled patients after treatment, and a significant reduction in urinary albumin excretion. SummaryNocturnal hypertension increases ones risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, nephrosclerosis, and progression to end-stage kidney failure in renal patients. Normalization of the circadian blood-pressure pattern is considered an important clinical goal of pharmacotherapy because it may slow the advance of renal injury. Chronotherapy provides a means of individualizing treatment of hypertension according to the circadian blood-pressure profile of each patient, and constitutes a new option in optimizing blood-pressure control and reducing risk.

Influencia de la duración y la frecuencia de muestreo en la medición ambulatoria de la presión arterial

Introduccion y objetivos La mayoria de los estudios con medicion ambulatoria de la presion arterial se han basado en registros obtenidos cada 15-30 min durante 24 h. Hemos examinado el impacto de la duracion y la frecuencia de muestreo en la estimacion de parametros de diagnostico derivados de la medicion ambulatoria. Metodos Estudiamos a 1.450 pacientes hipertensos y un grupo control de 378 voluntarios normotensos. La presion arterial se midio cada 20 min entre las 7.00 y las 23.00 y cada 30 min en la noche durante 48 h consecutivas. Los datos fueron divididos generandose distintas series con datos obtenidos a intervalos de 1, 2, 3 o 4 h durante 48 h. Tambien se crearon un par de series con la frecuencia de muestreo original para las primeras y ultimas 24 h. Se comparo la concordancia del valor medio de presion entre las series originales y cada grupo de series diezmadas. Resultados La variabilidad en la estimacion de la media de presion aumenta de forma progresiva con la perdida de datos, con un rango de error creciente desde 11 mmHg con datos cada hora hasta 28 mmHg con datos cada 4 h. Este rango de error aumenta todavia mas (36 mmHg) cuando, a la frecuencia de muestreo original, se recorta la serie a 24 h. Conclusiones Este estudio demuestra que la reproducibilidad de los valores medios de presion arterial depende mas de la duracion que de la frecuencia de muestreo. Los resultados indican que 24 h de medicion pueden ser insuficientes en el diagnostico de hipertension, la identificacion del patron dipper y la valoracion de la eficacia terapeutica.

Administration Time‐Dependent Effects of Valsartan on Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Elderly Hypertensive Subjects

Previous results have indicated that valsartan administration at bed‐time, as opposed to upon wakening, improves the diurnal/nocturnal ratio of blood pressure (BP) toward a normal dipping pattern, without loss of 24 h efficacy. This ratio is characterized by a progressive decrease with aging. Accordingly, we investigated the administration time‐dependent antihypertensive efficacy of valsartan, an angiotensin blocking agent, in elderly hypertensive patients. We studied 100 elderly patients with grade 1–2 essential hypertension (34 men and 66 women), 68.2±4.9 years of age, randomly assigned to receive valsartan (160 mg/d) as a monotherapy either upon awakening or at bed‐time. BP was measured for 48 h by ambulatory monitoring, at 20 min intervals between 07∶00 to 23∶00 h and at 30 min intervals at night, before and after 3 months of therapy. Physical activity was simultaneously monitored every minute by wrist actigraphy to accurately determine the duration of sleep and wake spans to enable the accurate calculation of the diurnal and nocturnal means of BP for each subject. There was a highly significant BP reduction after 3 months of valsartan treatment (p<0.001). The reduction was slightly larger with bed‐time dosing (15.3 and 9.2 mm Hg reduction in the 24 h mean of systolic and diastolic BP, respectively) than with morning dosing (12.3 and 6.3 mm Hg reduction in the 24 h mean of systolic and diastolic BP, respectively). The diurnal/nocturnal ratio, measured as the nocturnal decline of BP relative to the diurnal mean, was unchanged in the group ingesting valsartan upon awakening (−1.0 and −0.3 for systolic and diastolic BP; p>0.195). This ratio was significantly increased (6.6 and 5.4 for systolic and diastolic BP; p<0.001) when valsartan was ingested at bed‐time. The reduction of the nocturnal mean was doubled in the group ingesting valsartan at bed‐time, as compared to the group ingesting it in the morning (p<0.001). In elderly hypertensive patients, mainly characterized by a diminished nocturnal decline in BP, bed‐time valsartan dosing is better than morning dosing since it improves efficacy during the nighttime sleep span, with the potential reduction in cardiovascular risk that has been associated with a normalized diurnal/nocturnal BP ratio.