Carlos E. Mendez
Albany Medical College
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Carlos E. Mendez.
Diabetes Care | 2013
Carlos E. Mendez; Ki-Tae Mok; Ashar Ata; Robert J. Tanenberg; Jorge Calles-Escandon; Guillermo E. Umpierrez
OBJECTIVE To investigate the association between glycemic variability (GV) and both length of stay (LOS) and 90-day mortality in noncritically ill hospitalized patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This study retrospectively analyzed 4,262 admissions to the general medicine or surgery services during a 2 year period. Patients with point-of-care glucose monitoring and a minimum of two glucose values per day on average were selected. GV was assessed by SD and coefficient of variation (CV). Data were analyzed with linear and logistic multivariate regression analysis in separate models for SD and CV. Analysis was performed with generalized estimating equations to adjust for correlation between multiple admissions in some individual cases. RESULTS After exclusions, 935 admissions comprised the sample. Results of adjusted analysis indicate that for every 10 mg/dL increase in SD and 10–percentage point increase in CV, LOS increased by 4.4 and 9.7%, respectively. Relative risk of death in 90 days also increased by 8% for every 10-mg/dL increase in SD. These associations were independent of age, race, service of care (medicine or surgery), previous diagnosis of diabetes, HbA1c, BMI, the use of regular insulin as a sole regimen, mean glucose, and hypoglycemia occurrence during the hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate that increased GV during hospitalization is independently associated with longer LOS and increased mortality in noncritically ill patients. Prospective studies with continuous glucose monitoring are necessary to investigate this association thoroughly and to generate therapeutic strategies targeted at decreasing GV.
Endocrine Practice | 2012
Shridhar N. Iyer; Almond J. Drake; R. West; Carlos E. Mendez; Robert J. Tanenberg
OBJECTIVE To report the first postmarketing case of necrotizing pancreatitis in a patient on combination therapy of sitagliptin and exenatide. METHODS We describe the patients clinical presentation, laboratory test results, imaging, and autopsy findings. RESULTS A 76-year-old woman with a history of type 2 diabetes mellitus presented with severe abdominal pain, vomiting, and fever requiring hospital admission. She had been treated with exenatide for 3 years to manage her diabetes mellitus. A few weeks before presentation, sitagliptin was added, presumably to further optimize her glycemic control. Acute pancreatitis was diagnosed during hospital admission. At initial presentation, her serum amylase concentration was 1136 U/L (reference range, 10-130 U/L) and her lipase concentration was greater than 3500 U/L (reference range, 0-75 U/L). In addition, computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis demonstrated extensive previous cholecystectomy, reported no alcohol consumption, and had a normal lipid profile. Although she had a long-standing history of diabetes mellitus, she had no history of pancreatitis or other risk factors that would have caused her to develop the underlying condition. After initial brief improvement, her symptoms worsened, and despite aggressive care, her clinical state deteriorated and she died. Autopsy findings demonstrated acute necrotizing pancreatitis with complete digestion of the pancreas. CONCLUSIONS Considering the temporal relationship of her symptoms to the addition of sitagliptin to her existing exenatide regimen, this case strongly suggests a possible causal link between exenatide or sitagliptin (or the combination of the 2 drugs) and the etiology of pancreatitis in this patient.
Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy | 2010
Carlos E. Mendez; Robert J. Tanenberg; Walter J. Pories
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery (RYGB) reverses type 2 diabetes (DM2) in approximately 83% of patients with morbid or severe obesity. This procedure has been performed in small numbers of severely obese patients with type 1 diabetes (DM1), but the impact on glycemic control and insulin requirement in this population has not been widely described. We report three patients with DM1 and severe obesity that underwent RYGB. Weight, glycemic control, and insulin requirements before and one year after the procedure were compared. Significant weight loss was achieved by all three patients but insulin requirements decreased in only 2 patients. In contrast, glycemic control (A1C) remained suboptimal in all three patients up to one year after the surgery. These findings suggest that RYGB leads to important weight loss and positively affects insulin sensitivity. However, reaching optimal glycemic control in patients with DM1 diabetes remains challenging due to persisting insulin deficiency.
Journal of diabetes science and technology | 2016
Amisha Wallia; Guillermo E. Umpierrez; Stanley A. Nasraway; David C. Klonoff; Sara M. Alexanian; Enrico Cagliero; Curtiss B. Cook; Boris Draznin; Andjela Drincic; Linda M. Gaudiani; Roma Y. Gianchandani; Janice L. Gilden; Mikhail Kosiborod; Kristen Kulasa; Lillian F. Lien; Cecilia C. Low Wang; Greg Maynard; Carlos E. Mendez; Thomas R. Pieber; Gerry Rayman; Chanhaeng Rhee; Daniel J. Rubin; Robert J. Rushakoff; Stanley Schwartz; Mitchell G. Scott; Jane Jeffrie Seley; Garry S. Tobin; Robert A. Vigersky; Pride Investigators
In May 2015 the Diabetes Technology Society convened a panel of 27 experts in hospital medicine and endocrinology to discuss the current and potential future roles of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in delivering optimum health care to hospitalized patients in the United States. The panel focused on 3 potential settings for CGM in the hospital, including (1) the intensive care unit (ICU), (2) non-ICU, and (3) continuation of use of home CGM in the hospital. The group reviewed barriers to use and solutions to overcome the barriers. They concluded that CGM has the potential to improve the quality of patient care and can provide useful information to help health care providers learn more about glucose management. Widespread adoption of CGM by hospitals, however, has been limited by added costs and insufficient outcome data.In May 2015 the Diabetes Technology Society convened a panel of 27 experts in hospital medicine and endocrinology to discuss the current and potential future roles of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in delivering optimum health care to hospitalized patients in the United States. The panel focused on 3 potential settings for CGM in the hospital, including (1) the intensive care unit (ICU), (2) non-ICU, and (3) continuation of use of home CGM in the hospital. The group reviewed barriers to use and solutions to overcome the barriers. They concluded that CGM has the potential to improve the quality of patient care and can provide useful information to help health care providers learn more about glucose management. Widespread adoption of CGM by hospitals, however, has been limited by added costs and insufficient outcome data.
Diabetes Spectrum | 2014
Carlos E. Mendez; Guillermo E. Umpierrez
In Brief Hyperglycemia in the hospital setting affects 38–46% of noncritically ill hospitalized patients. Evidence from observational studies indicates that inpatient hyperglycemia, in patients with and without diabetes, is associated with increased risks of complications and mortality. Substantial evidence indicates that correction of hyperglycemia through insulin administration reduces hospital complications and mortality in critically ill patients, as well as in general medicine and surgery patients. This article provides a review of the evidence on the different therapies available for hyperglycemia management in noncritically ill hospitalized patients.
Endocrine Practice | 2015
Carlos E. Mendez; Ashar Ata; Joanne M. Rourke; Steven C. Stain; Guillermo E. Umpierrez
OBJECTIVE Hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, and glycemic variability have been associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and overall costs of care in hospitalized patients. At the Stratton VA Medical Center in Albany, New York, a process aimed to improve inpatient glycemic control by remotely assisting primary care teams in the management of hyperglycemia and diabetes was designed. METHODS An electronic query comprised of hospitalized patients with glucose values <70 mg/dL or >350 mg/dL is generated daily. Electronic medical records (EMRs) are individually reviewed by diabetes specialist providers, and management recommendations are sent to primary care teams when applicable. Glucose data was retrospectively examined before and after the establishment of the daily inpatient glycemic survey (DINGS) process, and rates of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia were compared. RESULTS Patient-day mean glucose slightly but significantly decreased from 177.6 ± 64.4 to 173.2 ± 59.4 mg/dL (P<.001). The percentage of patient-days with any value >350 mg/dL also decreased from 9.69 to 7.36% (P<.001), while the percentage of patient-days with mean glucose values in the range of 90 to 180 mg/dL increased from 58.1 to 61.4% (P<.001). Glycemic variability, assessed by the SD of glucose, significantly decreased from 53.9 to 49.8 mg/dL (P<.001). Moreover, rates of hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL) decreased significantly by 41% (P<.001). CONCLUSION Quality metrics of inpatient glycemic control improved significantly after the establishment of the DINGS process within our facility. Prospective controlled studies are needed to confirm a causal association.
Diabetes Care | 2013
Shridhar N. Iyer; Robert J. Tanenberg; Carlos E. Mendez; R. Lee West; Almond J. Drake
In recent years, incretin-based therapies such as glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists (GLP-1) and dipeptidyl peptidase-IV inhibitors (DPP-IV) have become important therapeutic options for treatment of type 2 diabetes. Although these agents are considered safe, long-term safety outcome studies are lacking. Theoretically, the combination of these two classes of agents could increase efficacy, but there is no strong supporting clinical evidence. While both GLP-1 and DPP-IV agents are approved for use as monotherapy and with other diabetes drugs, the combined use of these drugs classes has not been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In a recent case report, Patel et al. (1) noted an improvement in glycemic control in a patient with type 2 diabetes on a combination of …
Current Diabetes Reports | 2016
Carlos E. Mendez; Paul J. Der Mesropian; Roy O. Mathew; Barbara Slawski
Hyperglycemia and acute kidney injury (AKI) are frequently observed during the perioperative period. Substantial evidence indicates that hyperglycemia increases the prevalence of AKI as a surgical complication. Patients who develop hyperglycemia and AKI during the perioperative period are at significantly elevated risk for poor outcomes such as major adverse cardiac events and all-cause mortality. Early observational and interventional trials demonstrated that the use of intensive insulin therapy to achieve strict glycemic control resulted in remarkable reductions of AKI in surgical populations. However, more recent interventional trials and meta-analyses have produced contradictory evidence questioning the renal benefits of strict glycemic control. Although the exact mechanisms through which hyperglycemia increases the risk of AKI have not been elucidated, multiple pathophysiologic pathways have been proposed. Hypoglycemia and glycemic variability may also play a significant role in the development of AKI. In this literature review, the complex relationship between hyperglycemia and AKI as well as its impact on clinical outcomes during the perioperative period is explored.
Hospital Practice | 2013
Carlos E. Mendez; Guillermo E. Umpierrez
Abstract Patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) have minimal to absent pancreatic β-cell function and rely on the exogenous delivery of insulin to obtain adequate and life-sustaining glucose homeostasis. Maintaining glycemic control is challenging in hospitalized patients with T1DM, as insulin requirements are influenced by the presence of acute medical or surgical conditions, as well as altered nutritional intake. The risks of hyperglycemia, ketoacidosis, hypoglycemia, and glycemic variability are increased in hospitalized patients with T1DM. Diabetic ketoacidosis and severe hypoglycemia are the 2 most common emergency conditions that account for the majority of hospital admissions in patients with T1DM. The association between hyperglycemia and increased risk of complications and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is well established; however, the impact of glycemic control on clinical outcomes has not been determined in patients with T1DM who present without ketoacidosis. To decrease complications associated with insulin therapy, health care professionals must be well versed in the use of insulin because it is a common source of medication error. For non-critically ill, hospitalized patients, subcutaneous insulin given to cover basal and prandial needs instead of sliding scale is the preferred method of insulin dosing. Protocols are available for initiating and titrating insulin doses, as well as for transitioning from an insulin infusion to a subcutaneous regimen. In our review, we identify and discuss special considerations related to inpatient glycemic control of non-ketotic patients with T1DM. Additionally, point differences and similarities associated with the management of patients with T2DM are discussed.
Current Diabetes Reports | 2017
Carlos E. Mendez; Guillermo E. Umpierrez
Purpose of ReviewThe purpose of this article was to review recent guideline recommendations on glycemic target, glucose monitoring, and therapeutic strategies, while providing practical recommendations for the management of medical and surgical patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) admitted to critical and non-critical care settings.Recent FindingsStudies evaluating safety and efficacy of insulin pump therapy, continuous glucose monitoring, electronic glucose management systems, and closed loop systems for the inpatient management of hyperglycemia are described.SummaryDue to the increased prevalence and life expectancy of patients with type 1 diabetes, a growing number of these patients require hospitalization every year. Inpatient diabetes management is complex and is best provided by a multidisciplinary diabetes team. In the absence of such resource, providers and health care staff must become familiar with the features of this condition to avoid complications such as severe hyperglycemia, ketoacidosis, hypoglycemia, or glycemic variability. We reviewed most recent guidelines and relevant literature in the topic to provide practical recommendations for the inpatient management of patients with T1D.