Carlos Gomez-Roca

Targeting tumor-associated macrophages with anti-CSF-1R antibody reveals a strategy for cancer therapy

Macrophage infiltration has been identified as an independent poor prognostic factor in several cancer types. The major survival factor for these macrophages is macrophage colony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF-1). We generated a monoclonal antibody (RG7155) that inhibits CSF-1 receptor (CSF-1R) activation. In vitro RG7155 treatment results in cell death of CSF-1-differentiated macrophages. In animal models, CSF-1R inhibition strongly reduces F4/80(+) tumor-associated macrophages accompanied by an increase of the CD8(+)/CD4(+) T cell ratio. Administration of RG7155 to patients led to striking reductions of CSF-1R(+)CD163(+) macrophages in tumor tissues, which translated into clinical objective responses in diffuse-type giant cell tumor (Dt-GCT) patients.

Phase I Trials of Molecularly Targeted Agents: Should We Pay More Attention to Late Toxicities?

PURPOSE Phase I trials traditionally aim at determining the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) using grade ≥ 3 toxicity data from cycle 1 (C1) only. This design dates from the era of conventional chemotherapy and may not be relevant for new molecularly targeted agents (MTAs) usually administered in a chronic fashion and for which late or moderate toxicities may deserve particular attention. PATIENTS AND METHODS All consecutive patients treated in phase I trials of MTAs at the Royal Marsden Hospital and Institut Gustave Roussy between January 2005 and July 2008 were included. Gastrointestinal, skin, and clinical renal toxicities of any grade and grades 3 to 4 toxic events of any type occurring at any cycle on treatment were recorded. Doses administered, treatment interruptions, dose modifications, and prescription of comedications were analyzed. RESULTS A total of 445 patients (1,566 cycles; median treatment duration, 55 days) were included in 36 eligible trials; 790 toxicities (590, grade 1; 176, grade, 2; 24 grades, 3 to 4) and 1,819 toxicities (1,521, grade 1; 265, grade 2; 33, grades 3 to 4) were recorded during and after C1, respectively; 57% of the grades 3 to 4 toxicities occurred after C1; 50% of patients presented their worst-grade toxicity after C1. The risk of grades 3 to 4 toxicity was 3% in cycles 1 to 6 and was almost null afterwards. No cumulative toxicities were observed. Median toxicity duration was 15 days, with comedication administered in 68% of events. CONCLUSION Moderate and severe toxicities occur regularly after the first cycle in phase I trials of MTAs and may deserve increased attention in the RP2D process for these agents.

Differential expression of biomarkers in primary non-small cell lung cancer and metastatic sites.

Introduction: The use of biomarkers to evaluate the presence of a target or to select a specific therapy is increasingly advocated. The correlation of biomarker expression between the primary tumor and its corresponding metastasis has not yet been well documented and analyzed in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: The expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), excision repair cross-complementing (ERCC1), vascular-endothelial growth factor receptor, and Ki-67 was immunohistochemically analyzed in tumor samples of primary NSCLC and one corresponding metastasis in a population of 49 patients. Results: Sixteen cases (33%) displayed clear discordance in the EGFR status between the primary tumor and the metastasis, with a significant trend toward downregulation of EGFR in the metastasis (p = 0.01). The ERCC1 status was discordant in 20 cases (41%), with a trend toward overexpression in brain and adrenal metastases (p = 0.01 and p = 0.08, respectively). The vascular-endothelial growth factor receptor and Ki-67 statuses were discordant in 13 (27%) and 15 (31%) cases, respectively. No difference in expression was observed between synchronous and metachronous metastasis. Conclusion: Biomarker expression is discordant between the primary tumor and its corresponding metastasis in about one third of patients with NSCLC. These findings should be considered in the setting of clinical trials and further explored using frozen material and high-throughput techniques.

Phase I Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Dose-Escalation Study of RG7160 (GA201), the First Glycoengineered Monoclonal Antibody Against the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor, in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors

PURPOSE We conducted a phase I dose-escalation study to characterize the safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetic (PK), and pharmacodynamic properties of RG7160 (GA201), a humanized and glycoengineered immunoglobulin G(1) anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody with enhanced antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS Seventy-five patients with advanced EGFR-positive solid tumors received RG7160 (50 to 1,400 mg) administered every week, every 2 weeks, or every 3 weeks. Dose escalation followed a three-plus-three trial design. RESULTS No maximum-tolerated dose was reached for any dosing schedule. Common adverse events (AEs) included rash (80% of patients), infusion-related reactions (77%), and hypomagnesemia (56%). Grades 3 and 4 AEs were rash (grade 3, 25%), infusion-related reaction (grade 3, 7%; grade 4, 1%), paronychia (grade 3, 3%), and hypomagnesemia (grade 3, 1%; grade 4, 1%). RG7160 exposure increased greater than proportionally over the 50- to 400-mg dose range (with greater than proportional decline in clearance) and approximately dose proportionally above 400 mg (where clearance plateaued). A marked reduction in circulating natural killer cells and increased infiltration of immune effector cells into skin rash were seen. Clinical efficacy included one complete response and two partial responses in patients with colorectal cancer (including one with KRAS mutation) and disease stabilization in 27 patients. CONCLUSION RG7160 had an acceptable safety profile with manageable AEs and demonstrated promising efficacy in this heavily pretreated patient cohort. On the basis of modeling of available PK parameters, the RG7160 dose selected for part two of this study is 1,400 mg on days 1 and 8 followed by 1,400 mg every 2 weeks.

Patient Selection for Oncology Phase I Trials: A Multi-Institutional Study of Prognostic Factors

PURPOSE The appropriate selection of patients for early clinical trials presents a major challenge. Previous analyses focusing on this problem were limited by small size and by interpractice heterogeneity. This study aims to define prognostic factors to guide risk-benefit assessments by using a large patient database from multiple phase I trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS Data were collected from 2,182 eligible patients treated in phase I trials between 2005 and 2007 in 14 European institutions. We derived and validated independent prognostic factors for 90-day mortality by using multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS The 90-day mortality was 16.5% with a drug-related death rate of 0.4%. Trial discontinuation within 3 weeks occurred in 14% of patients primarily because of disease progression. Eight different prognostic variables for 90-day mortality were validated: performance status (PS), albumin, lactate dehydrogenase, alkaline phosphatase, number of metastatic sites, clinical tumor growth rate, lymphocytes, and WBC. Two different models of prognostic scores for 90-day mortality were generated by using these factors, including or excluding PS; both achieved specificities of more than 85% and sensitivities of approximately 50% when using a score cutoff of 5 or higher. These models were not superior to the previously published Royal Marsden Hospital score in their ability to predict 90-day mortality. CONCLUSION Patient selection using any of these prognostic scores will reduce non-drug-related 90-day mortality among patients enrolled in phase I trials by 50%. However, this can be achieved only by an overall reduction in recruitment to phase I studies of 20%, more than half of whom would in fact have survived beyond 90 days.

Natural history, management and pharmacokinetics of Everolimus-induced-oral ulcers: Insights into compliance issues

BACKGROUND Oral ulcers is a well-recognised adverse event (AE) of mTOR inhibitors. Paradoxically, little is known about its natural history, risk factors, and basic management. PATIENTS AND METHODS AEs of 79 patients prospectively enrolled in 6 phase I-II studies testing everolimus were reviewed. The following parameters were analysed: incidence, severity, duration and associated AE. The association between OU and everolimus dose, pharmacokinetics and the effectiveness of empiric treatments were explored. RESULTS OU, grade 3-4 OU, prolonged time under OU and RCOU (recurrent and chronic oral ulcer) were observed in 72% 11%, 30% and 25% patients, respectively. Patients with antecedent of prior chemotherapy, with PS 1, or receiving everolimus in combination tended to present higher rates of prolonged time under OU and of grade 3-4 OU. As everolimus daily dose increased, the median time to OU was shorter, the median duration was longer and OU incidence tended to increase. Simultaneously, OU tended to be associated with higher everolimus exposure. None of the empiric treatments appeared effective against OU (preventive or curative intent). CONCLUSION Everolimus-induced OU is a frequent, recurrent and sometimes harmful complication. A dose effect relationship is displayed. Its daily management remains challenging. OU represents a key issue in the compliance of mTOR inhibitors.

Tumour growth rates and RECIST criteria in early drug development.

PURPOSE The evaluation of treatment efficacy with RECIST criteria does not take into account tumour growth dynamics. We notably investigated the impact of the pre-treatment tumour growth rate (GR) on the evaluation of treatment response. PATIENTS AND METHODS Seventy-six patients included in phase I clinical trials had scanographic evaluations before and after starting an experimental treatment. The GR was calculated for the pre-treatment period and for the experimental period (i.e. during the new treatment). Tumour response was evaluated per protocol at week 12 and at week 24 of the experimental period according to RECIST criteria. We studied the relation between pre-treatment and experimental GRs and RECIST tumour response. RESULTS On average the tumour GR was decreased by 40% during the experimental period; compared to the pretreatment period (p=0.03). An increased growth rate (acceleration of GR during experimental treatment compared to pretreatment) was observed in 20 (38%) of the 53 patients considered as non-progressive at week 12 according to RECIST. Conversely a decreased GR was observed in 12 out of 23 (53%) patients classified as progressive according to RECIST. The variation in the GR between the pre-treatment and experimental period was not significantly correlated with response evaluated according to RECIST at week 12 or at week 24 (p=0.45 and 0.44, respectively). CONCLUSIONS RECIST evaluation of tumour response depends on the natural history of the tumours and poorly measures the impact of treatment on the kinetics of tumour growth. Integrating pre-treatment GR evaluations could substantially improve the assessment of treatment efficacy in drug development.

Open-label, multicentre expansion cohort to evaluate imgatuzumab in pre-treated patients with KRAS-mutant advanced colorectal carcinoma.

AIM Imgatuzumab (GA201) is a novel anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) antibody glycoengineered for enhanced antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC). We investigated the efficacy of imgatuzumab in patients with EGFR-positive, KRAS-mutant advanced colorectal cancer. METHODS Patients received single-agent imgatuzumab (1400mg on day 1 and 8 followed by q2W) as third line therapy in an open-label, multicentre, non-randomised, expansion study. The primary end-point was tumour response. Pre- and on-treatment biopsies and blood samples were investigated for biomarkers related to imgatuzumabs believed mechanism of action (MoA). RESULTS 25 patients were treated and the best overall response was stable disease occurring in 40% of patients at 8weeks, 24% at 16weeks and 8% (two patients) at 32weeks. Median overall survival was 9.3months (95% confidence interval (CI): 5.1-12.3). Treatment-related rash, hypomagnesaemia and infusion-related reactions were the most common adverse events. Comparison of pre- and post-treatment biopsies revealed that the number of tumour-infiltrating immune cells increased notably after one cycle of therapy (median compound immune reactive score of 1491 versus 898 cells/mm(3) at baseline), whereas the number of peripheral natural killer cells decreased. A potential association between baseline tumour immune infiltration and clinical efficacy was seen. CONCLUSIONS These data may suggest that the MoA of imgatuzumab involves ADCC-related immune effects in the tumour and is not limited to simple receptor blockade.

Abstract CT231: BET-bromodomain inhibitor OTX015 shows clinically meaningful activity at nontoxic doses: interim results of an ongoing phase I trial in hematologic malignancies

Aim: The bromodomain and extraterminal (BET) subfamily of human bromodomain (BRD) proteins associates with acetylated chromatin and plays a key role in the epigenetic control of transcriptional activation, notably of genes with super-enhancers, such as the MYC oncogene. OTX015, a potent small molecule inhibitor of BRD2/3/4 (Noel et al, EORTC-NCI-AACR 2013), inhibits proliferation of a wide range of hematologic malignancies (HMs) in vitro (Bonetti et al, EORTC-NCI-AACR 2012; Boi et al, EORTC-NCI-AACR 2013; Braun et al, ASH 2013). This phase I study, designed to determine the recommended dose and pharmacokinetics of oral OTX015 as a single agent, is the first reported clinical study evaluating the effects of BRD inhibition in patients (pts) with HMs. Methods: Two independent cohorts of pts having failed all standard therapies were given ascending oral doses of OTX015 in a conventional 3+3 design, with acute leukemias (AL) treated 14 days on/7 days off and other HMs (OHM) treated continuously in 21-day cycles. OTX015 was given once daily (QD), then twice daily (BID). Results: From Jan to Dec 2013, 16 pts with AL (14 AML, 2 ALL) and 17 with OHM (6 DLBCL, 5 other lymphomas, 6 multiple myelomas) were enrolled over 4 dose levels, 10, 20, 40 and 80 mg QD. Exposure increased dose-proportionally. Plasma trough concentrations at 80 mg QD and 12h concentrations at 40 mg QD were ≥ IC50 values in vitro (250 nM), justifying the shift to a BID schedule. The 40 mg BID cohort is ongoing. Pts have a median age of 70 years (range 32-83) and median of 2 (1-8) prior therapies; 10 of 16 AL pts had AML secondary to pre-existing conditions or chemotherapy. No dose limiting toxicity was observed up to 80 mg QD/40 mg BID. Adverse events (AEs) were mainly grade (G) 1-2 hematologic and gastrointestinal events and diabetes aggravation. G 3-4 AEs were reversible thrombocytopenia in 3 pts with OHM (40 and 80 mg), and neutropenia, diarrhea, and elevated transaminases in 1 pt each. No cumulative toxicity was observed. Nine pts received >3 (range 4-7) cycles without or with minor interruptions. Among 28 pts evaluable for response, 6 had clinically meaningful activity, with 4 of 6 treated at 80 mg. Four pts with refractory/relapsed secondary or post-treatment AML achieved significant peripheral and bone marrow blast decrease or clearance, including 1 complete remission (CR) and 1 CR with incomplete recovery. Among OHM, 1 DLBCL had a partial response (PR) and 1 lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma had metabolic PR on cycle 2 PET-scan. Treatment of 5 of 6 responding pts is ongoing. Responses occurred in pts with various clinical, cytogenetic and molecular profiles. Conclusion: OTX015 is the first BRD inhibitor demonstrating clinical activity. Maximum tolerated dose was not reached at 80 mg QD or 40 mg BID; dose escalation is ongoing with the BID schedule and further schedule optimization. Updated results will be presented. Citation Format: Patrice E. Herait, Celine Berthon, Catherine Thieblemont, Emmanuel Raffoux, Valeria Magarotto, Anastasios Stathis, Xavier Thomas, Xavier Leleu, Carlos Gomez-Roca, Elodie Odore, Christophe Roumier, Fabrice Bourdel, Bruno Quesnel, Emanuele Zucca, Mauricette Michallet, Christian Recher, Esteban Cvitkovic, Keyvan Rezai, Claude Preudhomme, Thierry Facon, Antonio Palumbo, Herve Dombret. BET-bromodomain inhibitor OTX015 shows clinically meaningful activity at nontoxic doses: interim results of an ongoing phase I trial in hematologic malignancies. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr CT231. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-CT231

Concurrent radiotherapy for patients with metastatic melanoma and receiving anti-programmed-death 1 therapy: a safe and effective combination

A combination of immune-checkpoint inhibitors and radiation therapy (RT) represents a promising therapeutic strategy in part mediated by the abscopal effect, but clinical experience related to this combination remains scarce. Clinical data and patterns of treatment were retrospectively collected from all consecutive patients with metastatic melanoma and receiving programmed-death 1 (PD-1) immune-checkpoint inhibitors. Survival data, best overall response, and acute and delayed toxicities (graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, v 4.3) were compared between patients receiving concurrent RT (IR) or no irradiation (NIR). Fifty-nine patients received anti-PD-1 immunotherapy [pembrolizumab (n=28) or nivolumab (n=31)] between August 2014 and December 2015 at our institution. Among these, 29% (n=17) received palliative RT for a total of 21 sites, with a mean dose of 30 Gy delivered in 10 fractions. Acute and late toxicity profiles were similar in the two groups. After a 10-month median follow-up, the objective response rate (complete or partial response) was significantly higher in the IR group versus the NIR group (64.7 vs. 33.3%, P=0.02) and one complete responder after RT was compatible with an abscopal effect. The 6-month disease-free survival and overall survival rates for the NIR group versus the IR group were 49.7 versus 64.7% (P=0.32) and 58.8 versus 76.4% (P=0.42), respectively. We report here that the combination of RT and anti-PD-1 immunotherapy is well tolerated and leads to a significant higher tumor response rate within and outside the irradiated field, which is emphasized by the first reported case of an abscopal effect in solid tumors.