Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Carlos Ponce is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Carlos Ponce.


PLOS ONE | 2012

Wire marking results in a small but significant reduction in avian mortality at power lines: a BACI designed study.

Rafael Barrientos; Carlos Ponce; Carlos Palacín; Carlos A. Martín; Beatriz Martín; Juan Carlos Alonso

Background Collision with electric power lines is a conservation problem for many bird species. Although the implementation of flight diverters is rapidly increasing, few well-designed studies supporting the effectiveness of this costly conservation measure have been published. Methodology/Principal Findings We provide information on the largest worldwide marking experiment to date, including carcass searches at 35 (15 experimental, 20 control) power lines totalling 72.5 km, at both transmission (220 kV) and distribution (15 kV–45 kV) lines. We found carcasses of 45 species, 19 of conservation concern. Numbers of carcasses found were corrected to account for carcass losses due to removal by scavengers or being overlooked by researchers, resulting in an estimated collision rate of 8.2 collisions per km per month. We observed a small (9.6%) but significant decrease in the number of casualties after line marking compared to before line marking in experimental lines. This was not observed in control lines. We found no influence of either marker size (large vs. small spirals, sample of distribution lines only) or power line type (transmission vs. distribution, sample of large spirals only) on the collision rate when we analyzed all species together. However, great bustard mortality was slightly lower when lines were marked with large spirals and in transmission lines after marking. Conclusions Our results confirm the overall effectiveness of wire marking as a way to reduce, but not eliminate, bird collisions with power lines. If raw field data are not corrected by carcass losses due to scavengers and missed observations, findings may be biased. The high cost of this conservation measure suggests a need for more studies to improve its application, including wire marking with non-visual devices. Our findings suggest that different species may respond differently to marking, implying that species-specific patterns should be explored, at least for species of conservation concern.


PLOS ONE | 2014

Repeatability of Feather Mite Prevalence and Intensity in Passerine Birds

Javier Diaz-Real; David Serrano; Javier Pérez-Tris; Sofía Fernández-González; Ana Bermejo; Juan Antonio Calleja; Javier Puente; Diana De Palacio; J. L. Martínez; Rubén Moreno-Opo; Carlos Ponce; Óscar Frías; José Luis Tella; Anders Pape Møller; Jordi Figuerola; Péter L. Pap; I. Kovács; Csongor I. Vágási; Leandro Meléndez; Guillermo Blanco; Eduardo Aguilera; Juan Carlos Senar; Ismael Galván; Francisco Atiénzar; Emilio Barba; José L. Cantó; Verónica Cortés; Juan S. Monrós; Rubén Piculo; Matthias Vögeli

Understanding why host species differ so much in symbiont loads and how this depends on ecological host and symbiont traits is a major issue in the ecology of symbiosis. A first step in this inquiry is to know whether observed differences among host species are species-specific traits or more related with host-symbiont environmental conditions. Here we analysed the repeatability (R) of the intensity and the prevalence of feather mites to partition within- and among-host species variance components. We compiled the largest dataset so far available: 119 Paleartic passerine bird species, 75,944 individual birds, ca. 1.8 million mites, seven countries, 23 study years. Several analyses and approaches were made to estimate R and adjusted repeatability (Radj) after controlling for potential confounding factors (breeding period, weather, habitat, spatial autocorrelation and researcher identity). The prevalence of feather mites was moderately repeatable (R = 0.26–0.53; Radj = 0.32–0.57); smaller values were found for intensity (R = 0.19–0.30; Radj = 0.18–0.30). These moderate repeatabilities show that prevalence and intensity of feather mites differ among species, but also that the high variation within species leads to considerable overlap among bird species. Differences in the prevalence and intensity of feather mites within bird species were small among habitats, suggesting that local factors are playing a secondary role. However, effects of local climatic conditions were partially observed for intensity.


Ardeola | 2017

Food Availability But Not Sex Determines Morning Foraging Area Size in the Great Bustard Otis tarda, the Most Sexually Size-Dimorphic Bird Species

Luis M. Bautista; Carolina Bravo; Carlos Ponce; Dácil Unzué-Belmonte; Juan Carlos Alonso

Summary. Sexual size dimorphism (SSD) may favour physiological peculiarities in diet, behaviour and home-range size both across species and within species. Sex-specific differences in diet and behaviour have been reported in several bird species but there are fewer studies of foraging area size in sexually dimorphic bird species. Foraging area size should be greater in the bigger sex according to home-range size predictions based on body mass. We tested this prediction in a winter study of foraging area size in the Great Bustard Otis tarda, the most sexually size-dimorphic bird species, which forages in unisexual flocks. In this species the temporal pattern of a flocks feeding intensity; the proportion of birds actively feeding (FI) and the size of the morning foraging area (MFA) of each sex are unknown. We recorded the behaviour and movements of unisexual flocks of Great Bustards during winter mornings and sampled food availability to take into account its effect on FI and MFA. FI increased and then decreased through the morning in both sexes, and was lower in males than in females. This sexual difference was greater where legume availability was smaller. Legumes were the most preferred substrate type. Consequently, MFA sizes were smaller in sites with more legume availability. We did not find sexual differences either in the size of MFA or in the selection of the two preferred substrate types: legumes and stubble fields. MFA and FI were determined to a greater extent by ecological factors such as food availability than by metabolic requirements derived from body size differences. These results obtained from a short-term study do not preclude an effect of sexual size dimorphism on MFA size and FI of Great Bustards over longer periods but show that the body size effect on foraging behaviour may be smaller than predicted only by SSD.


The Auk | 2016

Dietary divergence in the most sexually size-dimorphic bird

Carolina Bravo; Carlos Ponce; Luis M. Bautista; Juan Carlos Alonso


Anuario Ornitológico de Madrid | 2005

Abundancia y distribución invernal de la ganga ortega (Pterocles orientalis) y la ganga ibérica (Pterocles alchata) en la Comunidad de Madrid

Carlos Palacín; Carlos A. Martín; Beatriz Martín; Carlos Ponce; Pablo Sastre


Revista de anillamiento | 2006

Biometría de la golondrina común (Hirundo rustica) en la colonia reproductora de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid

Juan Antonio Calleja; Carlos Ponce; Álvaro Díaz Pastor; Arantza Leal; Ana Cruz


Revista de anillamiento | 2015

La importancia de anillar con el modelo óptimo: el caso del carricero tordal

José Luis Greño; Guillermo Arnal; Pedro Marín; Carlos Mompó; Rubén Oliver; Carlos Ponce; Emilio Pons; Juan S. Monrós


Archive | 2011

Agri-environmental schemes: Conserving and improving habitat quality in Mediterranean farmland ecosystems

Carolina Bravo; Carlos Ponce; Carlos Palacín; Marina Magaña; Luis M. Bautista; Juan C. Alonso López


Revista de anillamiento | 2008

Migración del chotacabras cuellirrojo (Caprimulgus ruficollis) en la Comunidad de Madrid

Carlos Ponce; Juan Antonio Calleja; Óscar Magaña


Revista de anillamiento | 2008

Comparación latitudinal de la muda postjuvenil del mirlo común (Turdus merula) y del ruiseñor común (Luscinia megarhynchos)

Carlos Ponce; Juan Antonio Calleja; Álvaro Díaz Pastor

Collaboration


Dive into the Carlos Ponce's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Juan Antonio Calleja

Autonomous University of Barcelona

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Carlos Palacín

Spanish National Research Council

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Carolina Bravo

Spanish National Research Council

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Juan Carlos Alonso

Spanish National Research Council

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Luis M. Bautista

Spanish National Research Council

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Beatriz Martín

Autonomous University of Madrid

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Carlos A. Martín

Spanish National Research Council

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Javier Puente

Autonomous University of Madrid

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ana Bermejo

Autonomous University of Madrid

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge