Carlos Singer
University of Miami
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Carlos Singer.
Neurology | 1999
A. Brashear; Mark F. Lew; Dennis D. Dykstra; Cynthia L. Comella; Stewart A. Factor; Robert L. Rodnitzky; Richard Trosch; Carlos Singer; Mitchell F. Brin; J. J. Murray; J. D. Wallace; Aj Willmer-Hulme; M. Koller
OBJECTIVE To determine the safety and efficacy of botulinum toxin type B (BoNT/B) in patients with cervical dystonia (CD). BACKGROUND BoNT/B is a form of chemodenervation therapy for the treatment of patients with CD. METHODS The authors performed a 16-week, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of BoNT/B in patients with CD who continue to respond to botulinum toxin type A. Placebo, or 5,000 U or 10,000 U of BoNT/B was administered in two to four muscles involved clinically in CD. The Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS)-Total score at week 4 was the primary efficacy measure. Clinical assessments and adverse events were recorded for treatment day 1 and at weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16. RESULTS A total of 109 patients were enrolled randomly across all three treatment groups. The mean improvement in the TWSTRS-Total scores in each group at week 4 was 4.3 (placebo), 9.3 (5,000 U), and 11.7 (10,000 U). For the prospectively defined primary contrast (10,000 U versus placebo), highly significant differences were noted for the primary (TWSTRS-Total, baseline to week 4, p = 0.0004) and supportive secondary (Patient Global Assessment, baseline to week 4, p = 0.0001) outcome measures. Improvement in pain, disability, and severity of CD occurred for patients who were treated with BoNT/B when compared with placebo-treated patients. Overall, improvements associated with BoNT/B treatment were greatest for patients who received the 10,000-U dose. The duration of treatment effect for BoNT/B was 12 to 16 weeks for both doses. CONCLUSION Botulinum toxin type B (NeuroBloc) is safe and efficacious at 5,000 U and 10,000 U for the management of patients with cervical dystonia.
Annals of Human Genetics | 2010
Todd L. Edwards; William K. Scott; Cherylyn Almonte; Amber Burt; Eric Powell; Gary W. Beecham; Liyong Wang; Stephan Züchner; Ioanna Konidari; Gaofeng Wang; Carlos Singer; Fatta B. Nahab; Burton L. Scott; Jeffrey M. Stajich; Margaret A. Pericak-Vance; Jonathan L. Haines; Jeffery M. Vance; Eden R. Martin
Parkinson disease (PD) is a chronic neurodegenerative disorder with a cumulative prevalence of greater than one per thousand. To date three independent genome‐wide association studies (GWAS) have investigated the genetic susceptibility to PD. These studies implicated several genes as PD risk loci with strong, but not genome‐wide significant, associations.
Neurology | 1991
Bonnie E. Levin; M. M. Llabre; S. Reisman; William J. Weiner; Juan Sanchez-Ramos; Carlos Singer; M. C. Brown
We explored the nature of the visuospatial deficit in Parkinsons disease (PD) and its progression as a function of disease duration. We compared the performance of 183 patients with idiopathic PD and 90 control subjects matched for age and education on six visuospatial measures. We divided patients into three groups according to the disease duration: early (1 to 4 years), middle (5 to 10 years), and advanced (> 10 years). Performance deteriorated in five of the six visuospatial measures, as a function of disease duration. However, the pattern of visuospatial decline depended on whether dementia was present. The results were not influenced by age or anticholinergic medication. These findings support the presence of visuospatial deficits in PD patients, with a changing pattern of impairment related to dementia and progression of the disease.
Neurology | 1997
Mark F. Lew; B. T. Adornato; Drake D. Duane; Dennis D. Dykstra; Stewart A. Factor; Janice M. Massey; Mitchell F. Brin; Joseph Jankovic; Robert L. Rodnitzky; Carlos Singer; Michael R. Swenson; Daniel Tarsy; J. J. Murray; M. Koller; J. D. Wallace
We enrolled and treated 122 patients with idiopathic cervical dystonia in a double-blind, placebo-controlled safety and efficacy study of botulinum toxin type B (BotB). Both A-responsive and A-resistant patients were enrolled. Patients received intramuscular injections of either BotB (2,500 U, 5,000 U, or 10,000 U) or placebo. The primary outcome measure of efficacy was the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS)-Total score at 4 weeks following study drug administration. Secondary measures of efficacy were TWSTRS-Severity, -Disability, and -Pain subscale scores, and Analog Pain Assessment, Investigator Global Assessment, Patient Global Assessment, and Sickness Impact Profile scores. Duration of effect was estimated with an intent-to-treat analysis of responders. Safety measures included clinical parameters, laboratory tests, and adverse events. The primary and most of the secondary analyses indicated a statistically significant treatment effect and a dose response. BotB is safe, well tolerated, and efficacious in the treatment of cervical dystonia at the doses tested.
Neurology | 1993
William J. Weiner; Stewart A. Factor; Juan Sanchez-Ramos; Carlos Singer; C. Sheldon; L. Cornelius; A. Ingenito
Early combination therapy with bromocriptine (Br) and levodopa (LD) is believed to delay or prevent the onset of late treatment complications typically associated with LD monotherapy in Parkinsons disease (PD). Studies recommending this regimen have been uncontrolled. We evaluated this possibility in a 4-year, double-blind, randomized, parallel group trial comparing Br and LD both alone and in combination in 22 PD patients never before treated with dopaminergic medications. In the group receiving Br monotherapy, 17% had motor fluctuations (end-of-dose failure or on-off), 17% chorea, 33% dystonia, and 83% freezing. In the LD group, 33% had motor fluctuations, 56% chorea, 100% dystonia, and 22% freezing. In the combination group, 71% had motor fluctuations, 57% chorea, 71% dystonia, and 57% freezing. The frequency of dystonia was significantly lower with Br monotherapy than in the other two treatment groups. No other significant differences were observed. LD monotherapy appeared to have superior efficacy in the treatment of PD. Mean final doses of LD and Br were similar for the different treatment groups. Early combination therapy does not prevent or delay the onset of motor fluctuations or dyskinesia in PD.
Movement Disorders | 2005
Daniel Truong; Drake D. Duane; Joseph Jankovic; Carlos Singer; Lauren Seeberger; Cynthia L. Comella; Mark F. Lew; Robert L. Rodnitzky; Fabio O. Danisi; James Sutton; P. David Charles; Robert A. Hauser; Geoffrey Sheean
Botulinum toxin type A (Dysport) has been shown in European studies to be a safe and effective treatment for cervical dystonia. This multicenter, double‐blind, randomized, controlled trial assessed the safety and efficacy of Dysport in cervical dystonia patients in the United States. Eighty patients were randomly assigned to receive one treatment with Dysport (500 units) or placebo. Participants were followed up for 4 to 20 weeks, until they needed further treatment. They were assessed at baseline and weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20 after treatment. Dysport was significantly more efficacious than placebo at weeks 4, 8, and 12 as assessed by the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (10‐point vs. 3.8‐point reduction in total score, respectively, at week 4; P ≤ 0.013). Of participants in the Dysport group, 38% showed positive treatment response, compared to 16% in the placebo group (95% confidence interval, 0.02–0.41). The median duration of response to Dysport was 18.5 weeks. Side effects were generally similar in the two treatment groups; only blurred vision and weakness occurred significantly more often with Dysport. No participants in the Dysport group converted from negative to positive antibodies after treatment. These results confirm previous reports that Dysport (500 units) is safe, effective, and well‐tolerated in patients with cervical dystonia.
Sleep Medicine | 2013
B. F. Boeve; Michael H. Silber; Tanis J. Ferman; Siong-Chi Lin; Eduardo E. Benarroch; Ann M. Schmeichel; J. E. Ahlskog; Richard J. Caselli; Steven Jacobson; Marwan N. Sabbagh; Charles H. Adler; Bryan K. Woodruff; Thomas G. Beach; Alex Iranzo; Ellen Gelpi; Joan Santamaria; E. Tolosa; Carlos Singer; Deborah C. Mash; Corneliu C. Luca; Isabelle Arnulf; Charles Duyckaerts; Carlos H. Schenck; Mark W. Mahowald; Yves Dauvilliers; Neil Graff-Radford; Zbigniew K. Wszolek; Joseph E. Parisi; Brittany N. Dugger; Melissa E. Murray
OBJECTIVE To determine the pathologic substrates in patients with rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder (RBD) with or without a coexisting neurologic disorder. METHODS The clinical and neuropathologic findings were analyzed on all autopsied cases from one of the collaborating sites in North America and Europe, were evaluated from January 1990 to March 2012, and were diagnosed with polysomnogram (PSG)-proven or probable RBD with or without a coexisting neurologic disorder. The clinical and neuropathologic diagnoses were based on published criteria. RESULTS 172 cases were identified, of whom 143 (83%) were men. The mean±SD age of onset in years for the core features were as follows - RBD, 62±14 (range, 20-93), cognitive impairment (n=147); 69±10 (range, 22-90), parkinsonism (n=151); 68±9 (range, 20-92), and autonomic dysfunction (n=42); 62±12 (range, 23-81). Death age was 75±9 years (range, 24-96). Eighty-two (48%) had RBD confirmed by PSG, 64 (37%) had a classic history of recurrent dream enactment behavior, and 26 (15%) screened positive for RBD by questionnaire. RBD preceded the onset of cognitive impairment, parkinsonism, or autonomic dysfunction in 87 (51%) patients by 10±12 (range, 1-61) years. The primary clinical diagnoses among those with a coexisting neurologic disorder were dementia with Lewy bodies (n=97), Parkinsons disease with or without mild cognitive impairment or dementia (n=32), multiple system atrophy (MSA) (n=19), Alzheimers disease (AD)(n=9) and other various disorders including secondary narcolepsy (n=2) and neurodegeneration with brain iron accumulation-type 1 (NBAI-1) (n=1). The neuropathologic diagnoses were Lewy body disease (LBD)(n=77, including 1 case with a duplication in the gene encoding α-synuclein), combined LBD and AD (n=59), MSA (n=19), AD (n=6), progressive supranulear palsy (PSP) (n=2), other mixed neurodegenerative pathologies (n=6), NBIA-1/LBD/tauopathy (n=1), and hypothalamic structural lesions (n=2). Among the neurodegenerative disorders associated with RBD (n=170), 160 (94%) were synucleinopathies. The RBD-synucleinopathy association was particularly high when RBD preceded the onset of other neurodegenerative syndrome features. CONCLUSIONS In this large series of PSG-confirmed and probable RBD cases that underwent autopsy, the strong association of RBD with the synucleinopathies was further substantiated and a wider spectrum of disorders which can underlie RBD now are more apparent.
Neurology | 2012
Irene Hegeman Richard; Michael P. McDermott; Roger Kurlan; Jeffrey M. Lyness; Peter Como; Nancy Pearson; Stewart A. Factor; Jorge L. Juncos; C. Serrano Ramos; Matthew A. Brodsky; Carol A. Manning; Laura Marsh; L. Shulman; Hubert H. Fernandez; Kevin J. Black; M. Panisset; Chadwick W. Christine; Wei Jiang; Carlos Singer; Stacy Horn; Ronald F. Pfeiffer; David A. Rottenberg; John T. Slevin; L. Elmer; Daniel Z. Press; Hyson Hc; William M. McDonald
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) and a serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) in the treatment of depression in Parkinson disease (PD). Methods: A total of 115 subjects with PD were enrolled at 20 sites. Subjects were randomized to receive an SSRI (paroxetine; n = 42), an SNRI (venlafaxine extended release [XR]; n = 34), or placebo (n = 39). Subjects met DSM-IV criteria for a depressive disorder, or operationally defined subsyndromal depression, and scored >12 on the first 17 items of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D). Subjects were followed for 12 weeks (6-week dosage adjustment, 6-week maintenance). Maximum daily dosages were 40 mg for paroxetine and 225 mg for venlafaxine XR. The primary outcome measure was change in the HAM-D score from baseline to week 12. Results: Treatment effects (relative to placebo), expressed as mean 12-week reductions in HAM-D score, were 6.2 points (97.5% confidence interval [CI] 2.2 to 10.3, p = 0.0007) in the paroxetine group and 4.2 points (97.5% CI 0.1 to 8.4, p = 0.02) in the venlafaxine XR group. No treatment effects were seen on motor function. Conclusions: Both paroxetine and venlafaxine XR significantly improved depression in subjects with PD. Both medications were generally safe and well tolerated and did not worsen motor function. Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class I evidence that paroxetine and venlafaxine XR are effective in treating depression in patients with PD.
European Neurology | 1992
Carlos Singer; William J. Weiner; Juan Sanchez-Ramos
Forty-eight men with Parkinsons disease (PD) were interviewed utilizing a questionnaire which evaluated autonomic function. The study population included PD patients (mean age: 65.8 years, mean duration of PD: 8 years) and 32 elderly healthy nonparkinsonian males (mean age: 70.4 years). We found a significantly higher prevalence of the following symptoms of autonomic dysfunction in the parkinsonian patients: erectile dysfunction (60.4 vs. 37.5%), sensation of incomplete bladder emptying (41.6 vs. 15.6%), urgency (45.8 vs. 3.125%), constipation (43.9 vs. 6.25%), dysphagia (22.9 vs. 6.25%) and orthostatic dizziness (21.95 vs. 0%). Eighty-nine percent of parkinsonian patients had at least one of these autonomic symptoms, compared to 43% of control subjects (p less than 0.05). This study is the first comprehensive survey of autonomic symptomatology in PD compared to elderly healthy controls and confirms that autonomic nervous system dysfunction is a pervasive problem in PD. Erectile dysfunction is a significant problem in this patient group and contributes to deterioration in the quality of life.
European Neurology | 1992
Klaus Hornung; Wilfred A. Nix; G. Lanzi; U. Balottin; D. Franciotta; E. Maserati; A. Ottolini; F. Pasquali; P. Veggiotti; Reinhold Schmidt; Marco Poloni; Paolo Mazzarello; Umberto Laforenza; Cristiana Caramella; Cesare Patrini; Carlos Singer; William J. Weiner; Juan Sanchez-Ramos; C. Mastropaolo; M. Tondi; F. Carboni; S. Manca; F. Zoroddu; Itsuki Jibiki; Nariyoshi Yamaguchi; Hiroshi Matsuda; Kinichi Hisada; Pierre-Antoine Uldry; Julien Bogousslavsky; Hiroshi Morita
In a double-blind, placebo-controlled study, the efficacy, safety and tolerability of 100 mg oral sumatriptan, given as a dispersible tablet, was compared with that of 900 mg oral aspirin plus 10 mg oral metoclopramide in the acute treatment of migraine. A total of 358 patients treated up to three migraine attacks within 3 months, recording clinical information on a diary card. In attack 1, headache relief after 2 h, defined as a reduction in severity from severe or moderate pain to mild or no pain, was recorded in 56% (74/133) of patients who took sumatriptan and 45% (62/138) of patients who took aspirin plus metoclopramide (p = 0.078). This analysis of the primary efficacy end point was not statistically significant. However, for attacks 2 and 3 (secondary end points), headache relief was achieved in 58 versus 36% of patients (p = 0.001) and 65 versus 34% of patients (p less than 0.001), respectively. Relief from nausea, vomiting, photophobia and phonophobia was similar in both treatment groups. Rescue medication was required by fewer patients treated with sumatriptan than by those who received aspirin plus metoclopramide (attack 1, 34 versus 56%, p less than 0.001; attack 2, 32 versus 51%, p = 0.001, and attack 3, 35 versus 54%, p = 0.001). Sumatriptan also produced a faster improvement and resolution of migraine attacks. Comparing the sumatriptan and aspirin plus metoclopramide treatment groups, complete resolution of the attack occurred within 6 h in 32 versus 19% (attack 1), 35 versus 23% (attack 2) and 32 versus 20% of patients (attack 3).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)