Carmelita Marcantoni

Effect of renal artery stenting on left ventricular mass: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND Whether renal revascularization reduces left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with coronary artery disease is uncertain. STUDY DESIGN Randomized clinical trial testing the effect of renal artery stenting versus medical therapy on left ventricular hypertrophy progression in patients affected by ischemic heart disease and renal artery stenosis. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS Incident patients with ischemic heart disease undergoing cardiac catheterization with renal artery stenosis >50%-≤80%. INTERVENTION Revascularization plus standard medical therapy versus medical therapy alone. OUTCOMES Primary end point was change in echocardiographic left ventricular mass index (LVMI). MEASUREMENTS Clinical and echocardiographic studies were performed at baseline and after 1 year. RESULTS 84 patients were randomly assigned: 43 to revascularization plus standard medical therapy and 41 to medical therapy alone. At baseline, clinical characteristics were similar in the 2 study groups. After 1 year, there was no statistically significant difference between longitudinal change in the medical therapy group versus that in the medical therapy plus revascularization group for LVMI (2.1; 95% CI, -6.1 to 10.3 g/m(2)), blood pressure (systolic, -0.2 [95% CI, -9.1 to 8.8 mm Hg]; diastolic, -3.3 [95% CI, -8.4 to 1.8 mm Hg]), or estimated glomerular filtration rate (1.5; 95% CI, -5.8 to 8.9 mL/min/1.73 m(2)). The number of major cardiovascular events was similar in the 2 groups (revascularization plus standard medical therapy [fatal, n = 2; nonfatal, n = 11] and medical therapy alone [fatal, n = 2; nonfatal, n = 11]). LIMITATIONS Patients with very severe renal artery stenosis were excluded from the study. CONCLUSIONS Our study was unable to detect a clinically significant benefit of renal revascularization on LVMI in patients with coronary artery disease and renal artery stenosis of 50%-80%.

Chest ultrasound and hidden lung congestion in peritoneal dialysis patients

BACKGROUND Chest ultrasound (US) is a non-invasive well-validated technique for estimating extravascular lung water (LW) in patients with heart diseases and in end-stage renal disease. We systematically applied this technique to the whole peritoneal dialysis (PD) population of five dialysis units. METHODS We studied the cross-sectional association between LW, echocardiographic parameters, clinical [pedal oedema, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class] and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) markers of volume status in 88 PD patients. RESULTS Moderate to severe lung congestion was evident in 41 (46%) patients. Ejection fraction was the echocardiographic parameter with the strongest independent association with LW (r = -0.40 P = 0.002). Oedema did not associate with LW on univariate and multivariate analysis. NYHA class was slightly associated with LW (r = 0.21 P = 0.05). Among patients with severe lung congestion, only 27% had pedal oedema and the majority (57%) had no dyspnoea (NYHA Class I). Similarly, the prevalence of patients with BIA, evidence of volume excess was small (11%) and not significantly different (P = 0.79) from that observed in patients with mild or no congestion (9%). CONCLUSIONS In PD patients, LW by chest US reveals moderate to severe lung congestion in a significant proportion of asymptomatic patients. Intervention studies are necessary to prove the usefulness of chest US for optimizing the control of fluid excess in PD patients.

Incorporating Glomerular filtration rate or creatinine clearance by the modification of diet in renal disease equation or the Cockcroft–Gault equations to improve the Global Accuracy of the Age, Creatinine, Ejection Fraction [ACEF] score in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND The aim of the present study was to appraise the comparative ability of different ACEF models incorporating glomerular filtration rate or creatinine clearance estimated by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease [ACEFMDRD] or Cokcroft-Gault [ACEFCG] equations, respectively, over the original ACEF score (ACEFSrCr) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS A total of 537 patients were analyzed by different measures of discrimination, calibration and net reclassification improvement (NRI). RESULTS A significant gradient in all-cause mortality was consistently seen with all the models at 30 days, 1 year and 5 years. The comparison of the three models showed that the best balance in terms of discrimination and calibration for all-cause mortality was offered by the ACEFCG at 30 days, the ACEFMDRD at 1 year and similarly by the ACEFCG and ACEFMDRD at 5 years. At 30 days, the NRI was +32.9% for ACEFMDRD over ACEFSrCr and +16% for ACEFCG over ACEFSrCr. At 1 year, the NRI was 13.8% for ACEFMDRD over ACEFSrCr and -7.8% for ACEFCG over ACEFSrCr. At 5 years, the NRI was +7.7% for both the ACEFMDRD and the ACEFCG over the ACEFSrCr. CONCLUSIONS In patients undergoing PCI, the ACEF score is associated with satisfactory early-, mid- and long-term discrimination regardless of the definition of renal function. However, incorporating glomerular filtration rate or creatinine clearance by the MDRD or CG formulas in the ACEF score yields superior calibration compared with the original SrCr-based equation, with the ACEFMDRD displaying superior reclassification ability over the ACEFCG and ACEFSrCr at 30 days and 1 year.

Non-Hemodynamically Significant Renal Artery Stenosis Predicts Cardiovascular Events in Persons with Ischemic Heart Disease

Background/Aims: Recently, we reported that small renal arteries, defined by a low reference diameter (RD) or minimal luminal diameter (MD), are independently associated with a low GFR, resistant hypertension, and onset of contrast-induced nephropathy and suggested a post-hoc analysis of CORAL trial based on RD categories. Here we hypothesized that RD and MD are markers of nontraditional cardiovascular risk factors and tested whether low RD and MD could impact the prognosis of patients with ischemic heart disease. Methods: Prospective cohort study. We used proportional hazards models to analyze the first onset of cardiovascular events in relation with RD, MD, or percentage of renal artery stenosis (RAS) in those with low-to-moderate RAS (10-70%) (n = 181). Results: During the median follow-up of 4.5 (range, 0.1-5) years, 27.8% participants (n = 623; mean age, 64 years; 29% women) experienced a cardiovascular event (35.4% in those with RAS 10-70%). The presence of low-to-moderate RAS was associated with cardiovascular events. In these subjects, those with low MD were associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular events (MD >4.2 mm, HR: 1; MD 3.2-4.2 mm, HR: 1.66, 95% CI: 0.74-3.72, p = 0.22; MD <3.2 mm, HR: 3.72, 95% CI: 1.65-8.40, p = 0.002). When MD was added to a standard risk-factor model, risk prediction improvement was by 4.1%. Results were qualitatively similar if MD was replaced by RD or percentage of stenosis, but with smaller improvement of risk prediction and model fit. Conclusions: In patients with ischemic heart disease and low-to-moderate RAS, MD is a significant predictor of cardiovascular events, improves risk prediction, and may represent a valuable biomarker of cardiovascular disease risk. i 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel

ANGIOTENSIN CONVERTING ENZYME INHIBITORS IN NONDIABETIC RENAL DISEASE

The class of antihypertensive agents that act by blocking angiotensin II has been shown in several experimental models to have the interesting ability to protect the kidney. In patients with nondiabetic renal disease, a number of controlled clinical trials have shown angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors to achieve a better control of blood pressure and significantly reduce the rate of progression of renal failure in comparison with conventional agents. In addition, treatment with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors has helped to achieve new information on the optimal blood pressure target to be reached in order to protect the residual renal function maximally.

Reference Renal Artery Diameter Is a Stronger Predictor of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy than Chronic Kidney Disease in Patients with High Cardiovascular Risk

Introduction: The incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) increases in high cardiovascular risk patients. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a known risk factor for CIN development. In a previous report, we demonstrated that the mean reference renal artery diameter (RVD) is an important determinant of CKD in patients undergoing coronary angiography for ischemic heart disease. However, RVD was never tested as a predictor of CIN. Aim: To look at the predictors of CIN. Methods: A total of 218 consecutive patients undergoing coronary and renal angiography were enrolled from the cohort of the RAS-CAD study (NCT 01173666). CIN was defined as a relative increase in baseline serum creatinine ≧25% within 1 week of contrast administration. Results: The incidence of CIN was 22%. In a fully adjusted model, contrast medium dose (20 ml increase, OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.06–1.19, p < 0.001), iso-osmolar contrast media (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.09–0.99, p < 0.05), atherosclerotic renovascular disease (OR 2.69, 95% CI 1.32–5.48, p < 0.05), and RVD (1 mm/1.73 m2 increase, OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.41–0.86, p < 0.05) had the greatest effect on outcome and were identified as independent predictors of CIN. CKD was selected as a predictor of CIN only in a model without RVD. Conclusions: In patients undergoing coronary angiography for ischemic heart disease, RVD is a stronger predictor of CIN than CKD.

Management of Hypertension in Renal Disease

The treatment of systemic hypertension in chronic renal disease is now mostly based on the administration of drugs which are able to reduce proteinuria and to slow down the progressive functional deterioration. Angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), which lower both proteinuria and blood pressure, have emerged as drugs of choice in proteinuric patients with either normal renal function or mild to moderate chronic renal failure. In non proteinuric nephropathies no controlled studies exist demonstrating the superiority of ACEI over other drugs. In these conditions calcium antagonists might also be used. The approach to patients with hypertension and renal disease should always take into consideration the quality of the results that are to be achieved. If the aim is to control blood pressure and to protect other organs at risk, then a variety of drugs can be used. If the aim is to reduce proteinuria and slow down progression, then ACEI, possibly associated with calcium antagonists, are the drugs of choice.