Carmelo Mignosa

Comparison of Complications and Outcomes to One Year of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis

Comparisons of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with severe aortic stenosis remain sparse or limited by a short follow-up. We sought to evaluate early and midterm outcomes of consecutive patients (n = 618) undergoing successful TAVI (n = 218) or isolated SAVR (n = 400) at 2 centers. The primary end point was incidence of Valvular Academic Research Consortium-defined major adverse cerebrovascular and cardiac events (MACCEs) up to 1 year. Control of potential confounders was attempted with extensive statistical adjustment by covariates and/or propensity score. In-hospital MACCEs occurred in 73 patients (11.8%) and was more frequent in patients treated with SAVR compared to those treated with TAVI (7.8% vs 14.0%, p = 0.022). After addressing potential confounders using 3 methods of statistical adjustment, SAVR was consistently associated with a higher risk of MACCEs than TAVI, with estimates of relative risk ranging from 2.2 to 2.6 at 30 days, 2.3 to 2.5 at 6 months, and 2.0 to 2.2 at 12 months. This difference was driven by an adjusted increased risk of life-threatening bleeding at 6 and 12 months and stroke at 12 months with SAVR. Conversely, no differences in adjusted risk of death, stroke and myocardial infarction were noted between TAVI and SAVR at each time point. In conclusion, in a large observational registry with admitted potential for selection bias and residual confounding, TAVI was not associated with a higher risk of 1-year MACCEs compared to SAVR.

Use of a novel anticoagulation strategy during ECMO in a pediatric population: single-center experience.

We describe a novel anticoagulation strategy with continuous intravenous antithrombin infusion and intermittent heparin infusion in pediatric population during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). From November 2004 through February 2006, 11 patients required ECMO for postcardiotomy cardiorespiratory failure. The mean duration of support time was 112 hours (range 68–192 hours). Since April 2005, we modified our anticoagulation protocol in the last six patients. Continuous antithrombin infusion was started immediately after surgery based on the lab result. The antithrombin level was maintained >100% using the following formula: 100 (target value) – (Antithrombin value on lab test) × weight in 4 hours. Antithrombin value was checked at 4-hour intervals. Heparin infusion was started when the antithrombin value was > 100% and remained stable for more than 12 hours and the amount of bleeding was < 2 ml/kg for more than 3 consecutive hours; then heparin infusion was started at 2 UI/kg/h via the oxygenator (target ACT was not < 150 seconds). Three patients in the first group died. Eight patients were weaned and discharged; the third, fourth, and fifth required surgical revision for bleeding. One experienced minor neurologic sequelae. Neither surgical revision nor thromboembolic complications occurred in the new anticoagulation group. A novel anticoagulation strategy utilizing continuous intravenous antithrombin and intermittent heparin infusion reduced significantly surgical revision for bleeding in the first 48 hours. This has translated into excellent overall outcomes.

Early and intermediate outcome after aortic valve replacement with a sutureless bioprosthesis: Results of a multicenter study

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of aortic valve replacement with the sutureless Perceval S aortic valve bioprosthesis (Sorin Biomedica Cardio Srl, Saluggia, Italy). METHODS This is a retrospective analysis of 314 patients (mean age, 77.9 ± 5.0 years, mean European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II, 9.0% ± 7.6%) who underwent aortic valve replacement with the Perceval S valve with (94 patients) or without (220 patients) concomitant coronary artery bypass surgery at 5 European centers. RESULTS The Perceval S valve was successfully implanted in all but 1 patient (99.7%). The mean aortic crossclamping time was 43 ± 20 minutes (isolated procedure, 39 ± 15 minutes; concomitant coronary surgery, 52 ± 26 minutes). Severe paravalvular leak occurred in 2 patients (0.6%). In-hospital mortality was 3.2% (1.4% after isolated procedure and 7.4% after concomitant coronary surgery). In-hospital mortality was 2.8% and 4.0% among patients with a European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II less than 10% and 10% or greater, respectively (P = .558). Octogenarians had slightly higher in-hospital mortality (5.2% vs 2.0%, P = .125; after isolated procedure: 2.7% vs 0.7%, P = .223; after concomitant coronary surgery: 9.5% vs 5.8%, P = .491) compared with younger patients. Full sternotomy did not increase the in-hospital mortality risk compared with ministernotomy or minithoracotomy access (1.3% vs 1.4%, when adjusted for baseline covariates: P = .921; odds ratio, 0.886; 95% confidence interval, 0.064-12.346). One-year survival was 90.5%. Freedom from valve-related mortality, stroke, endocarditis, and reoperation was 99.0%, 98.1%, 99.2%, and 98.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The sutureless Perceval S valve is associated with excellent early survival in high-risk patients, particularly among those undergoing an isolated procedure. Further studies are needed to prove the durability of this bioprosthesis.

Bidirectional Glenn and antegrade pulmonary blood flow: temporary or definitive palliation?

BACKGROUND We sought to investigate the role of the bidirectional Glenn with antegrade pulmonary blood flow in the surgical history of children with univentricular hearts. METHODS A series of 246 patients, from three joint institutions, having univentricular heart with restricted but not critical pulmonary blood flow received a bidirectional cavopulmonary shunt with additional forward pulmonary blood flow. All patients have been studied according to their progression, or not, to Fontan operation. Two hundred and eight (84.5%) patients underwent bidirectional cavopulmonary anastomosis as primary palliation. Twenty patients (8.1%) with previous pulmonary artery banding were also enrolled in the study. Patients who had received additional pulmonary blood flow through a previous systemic to pulmonary artery shunt for the critical pulmonary blood flow were excluded. RESULTS No in-hospital death occurred. Follow-up was complete at 100%. Mean follow-up was 4.2 +/- 2.8 years (range, 6 months to 7 years). During the observational period 73 (29.7%) patients, considered optimal candidates, underwent Fontan completion for increasing cyanosis and (or) hematocrit and (or) fatigue with exertion. Three patients expired after total cavopulmonary connection (3 of 73; 4.1% mortality rate). The remaining 173 (70.3%) patients are alive with initial palliation. All patients were still well palliated with an arterial oxygen saturation at rest about 90%. CONCLUSIONS According to our experience and results, bidirectional Glenn with antegrade pulmonary blood flow may be an excellent temporary palliation prior to a Fontan operation, which can be performed at the onset of symptoms. Bidirectional Glenn may also be the best possible palliation for a suboptimal candidate for Fontan.

European Multicenter Study on Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (E-CABG registry): Study Protocol for a Prospective Clinical Registry and Proposal of Classification of Postoperative Complications

BackgroundClinical evidence in coronary surgery is usually derived from retrospective, single institutional series. This may introduce significant biases in the analysis of critical issues in the treatment of these patients. In order to avoid such methodological limitations, we planned a European multicenter, prospective study on coronary artery bypass grafting, the E-CABG registry.DesignThe E-CABG registry is a multicenter study and its data are prospectively collected from 13 centers of cardiac surgery in university and community hospitals located in six European countries (England, Italy, Finland, France, Germany, Sweden). Data on major and minor immediate postoperative adverse events will be collected. Data on late all-cause mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization will be collected during a 10-year follow-up period. These investigators provided a score from 0 to 10 for any major postoperative adverse events and their rounded medians were used to stratify the severity of these complications in four grades. The sum of these scores for each complication/intervention occurring after coronary artery bypass grafting will be used as an additive score for further stratification of the prognostic importance of these events.DiscussionThe E-CABG registry is expected to provide valuable data for identification of risk factors and treatment strategies associated with suboptimal outcome. These information may improve the safety and durability of coronary artery bypass grafting. The proposed classification of postoperative complications may become a valuable research tool to stratify the impact of such complications on the outcome of these patients and evaluate the burden of resources needed for their treatment.Clinical Trials numberNCT02319083

Sutureless, rapid deployment valves and stented bioprosthesis in aortic valve replacement: recommendations of an International Expert Consensus Panel.

OBJECTIVES After a panel process, recommendations on the use of sutureless and rapid deployment valves in aortic valve replacement were given with special respect as an alternative to stented valves. METHODS Thirty-one international experts in both sutureless, rapid deployment valves and stented bioprostheses constituted the panel. After a thorough literature review, evidence-based recommendations were rated in a three-step modified Delphi approach by the experts. RESULTS Literature research could identify 67 clinical trials, 4 guidelines and 10 systematic reviews for detailed text analysis to obtain a total of 28 recommendations. After rating by the experts, 12 recommendations were identified and degree of consensus for each was determined. Proctoring and education are necessary for the introduction of sutureless valves on an institutional basis as well as for the individual training of surgeons. Sutureless and rapid deployment should be considered as the valve prosthesis of first choice for isolated procedures in patients with comorbidities, old age, delicate aortic wall conditions such as calcified root, porcelain aorta or prior implantation of aortic homograft and stentless valves as well as for concomitant procedures and small aortic roots to reduce cross-clamp time. Intraoperative transoesophageal echocardiography is highly recommended, and in case of right anterior thoracotomy, preoperative computer tomography is strongly recommended. Suitable annular sizes are 19-27 mm. There is a contraindication for bicuspid valves only for Type 0 and for annular abscess or destruction due to infective endocarditis. Careful but complete decalcification of the aortic root is recommended to avoid paravalvular leakage; extensive decalcification should be avoided not to create annular defects. Proximal anastomoses of concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting should be placed during a single aortic cross-clamp period or alternatively with careful side clamping. Available evidence suggests that the use of sutureless and rapid deployment valve is associated with (can translate into) reduced early complications such as prolonged ventilation, blood transfusion, atrial fibrillation, pleural effusions and renal replacement therapy, respectively, and may result in reduced intensive care unit and hospital stay in comparison with traditional valves. CONCLUSION The international experts recommend various benefits of sutureless and rapid deployment technology, which may represent a helpful tool in aortic valve replacement for patients requiring a biological valve. However, further evidence will be needed to reaffirm the benefit of sutureless and rapid deployment valves.

Taussig-Bing anomaly and arterial switch: aortic arch obstruction does not influence outcome.

OBJECTIVE Aortic arch obstruction is a commonly associated problem in the Taussig-Bing anomaly. Between 1983 and 1995, 28 consecutive patients with Taussig-Bing anomaly underwent arterial switch operation with baffling of the left ventricle to neoaorta. Group A: 11/28 had associated aortic arch obstruction. Group B: 17/28 had isolated Taussig-Bing anomaly. We assessed whether the coexistence of subpulmonary ventricular septal defect and aortic arch obstruction pose an incremental risk factor. PATIENTS AND RESULTS Group A: Mean age and weight were 1.4+/-1.3 months and 3.5+/-0.4 kg. The aortic arch obstruction included: hypoplasia (5/11), interruption (4/11) and discrete coarctation (2/11). Seven patients had a one-stage correction, and four had initial arch repair followed by arterial switch operation. There were no hospital deaths (CL 0-28%). Over a follow-up of 638 patient-months (mean 64+/-39), there have been no late deaths, and all patients are in New York Heart Association class 1. There have been three cases of recurrent aortic arch obstruction (two requiring reoperation, and one requiring balloon dilation). One patient has been reoperated upon for right ventricular outflow tract obstruction. The actuarial survival and freedom from reoperation rates at 6 years were 100% (CL = 66-100%) and 72.9% (CL=38-92%) respectively. Group B: Mean age and weight were 5.9+/-8.4 months and 5+/-2.1 kg. All patients had a one-stage operation. There were two early deaths (11.8%, CL = 1-36%) and one late death over a follow-up of 678 patient-months (mean 52+/-31). All survivors are in New York Heart Association class 1 and there have been no reoperations. The actuarial survival and freedom from reoperation rates at 6 years were 81% (CL = 56-93%) and 100% (CL = 76-100%) respectively. CONCLUSIONS 1. Aortic arch obstruction has not adversely affected early or late survival (P>.05) or late functional class. 2. Patients with Taussig-Bing anomaly and aortic arch obstruction may have a higher reoperation rate than those with normal arch anatomy. 3. Taussing-Bing anomaly, with or without aortic arch obstruction, can be repaired with arterial switch operation during the neonatal period with good outcome.

Aortic valve replacement through full sternotomy with a stented bioprosthesis versus minimally invasive sternotomy with a sutureless bioprosthesis

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to analyse early postoperative outcomes and 2-year survival after aortic valve replacement (AVR) through a ministernotomy with a sutureless bioprosthesis implantation compared with a full sternotomy with implantation of a stented bioprosthesis. METHODS Patients who underwent primary isolated non-emergent AVR at six European centres were included in the study. Of these, 182 (32%) underwent a ministernotomy with a sutureless bioprosthesis (ministernotomy sutureless group) and 383 (68%) a full sternotomy with a stented bioprosthesis (full sternotomy stented group). Propensity score matching was used to reduce selection bias. RESULTS In the overall cohort, 30-day mortality was 1.6 and 2.1%, and 2-year survival was 92 and 92% in the ministernotomy sutureless group and in the full sternotomy stented group, respectively. Propensity score matching resulted in 171 pairs with similar characteristics and operative risk. Aortic cross-clamp (40 vs 65 min, P < 0.001) and cardiopulmonary bypass time (69 vs 87 min, P < 0.001) were shorter in the ministernotomy sutureless group. Patients undergoing ministernotomy received less packed red blood cells but the risk for postoperative permanent pacemaker implantation was higher. There were no differences regarding 30-day mortality or 2-year survival between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS AVR through a ministernotomy with implantation of a sutureless bioprosthesis was associated with shorter aortic cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass time and less transfusion of packed red blood cells, but a higher risk for postoperative permanent pacemaker implantation compared with a full sternotomy with a stented bioprosthesis.

Ministernotomy Versus Full Sternotomy Aortic Valve Replacement With a Sutureless Bioprosthesis: A Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to analyze early postoperative outcomes and 2-year survival after aortic valve replacement (AVR) with the sutureless Perceval bioprosthesis (Sorin Biomedica Cardio Srl, Salluggia, Italy) performed through ministernotomy compared with full sternotomy. METHODS This was a study of 267 consecutive patients who underwent isolated AVR with the sutureless Perceval bioprosthesis between 2007 and 2014 at 6 European centers. Of these, 189 (70.8%) were performed through ministernotomy and 78 through a full sternotomy. Propensity score matching was used to reduce selection bias. RESULTS In the overall cohort of ministernotomy and full sternotomy patients, in-hospital mortality was 1.1% and 2.6% and 2-year survival was 92% and 91%, respectively. Propensity score matching resulted in 56 pairs with similar characteristics and operative risk. Aortic cross-clamp (44 minutes in both groups, p = 0.931) and cardiopulmonary bypass time (69 vs 74 minutes, p = 0.363) did not differ between the groups. Apart from higher values in the ministernotomy group for postoperative peak gradients (28.1 vs 23.3 mm Hg, p = 0.026) and mean aortic valve gradients (15.2 vs 11.7 mm Hg, p = 0.011), early postoperative outcomes did not differ in the propensity-matched cohort. There were no differences in the in-hospital mortality rate or 2-year survival between the groups. CONCLUSIONS AVR with the sutureless Perceval bioprosthesis through a ministernotomy was a safe and reproducible procedure that was not associated with prolonged aortic cross-clamp or cardiopulmonary bypass time compared with a full sternotomy. Early postoperative outcomes and 2-year survival were comparable between patients undergoing ministernotomy and full sternotomy.

DIDECMO : A new polymethylpentene oxygenator for pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

We reviewed the performance of a new polymethylpentene oxygenator (DIDECMO, Dideco, Mirandola, Italy) in terms of clinical safety and efficiency in priming, oxygenation, and oxygenator resistance in neonatal and pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients. Between March 2005 and January 2006, 14 patients required ECMO in the San Vincenzo Hospital. Of these, 8 (median age, 9 days; range, 3 days to 15 months) received normothermic ECMO for postcardiotomy heart failure after surgery for congenital heart disease. The DIDECMO oxygenator was used in all patients (median weight, 2.4 kg; range, 2 to 7 kg). According to our previous experience, all patients received the same anticoagulation management. DIDECMO is a new phosphorylcholine-coated, polymethylpentene hollow-fiber oxygenator recommended for a maximum blood flow of 2300 ml/min with a membrane surface area of 0.67 m2 and validated to be used up to 5 days. Static priming was 100 ml and mean support time 05 hours (range, 36 to 198 hours). No oxygenators were changed during support. Median pressure drop during overall assistance was 24 mm Hg. Carbon dioxide elimination was obtained with a 1:1 blood flow/air flow ratio. Neither oxygenator-related major nor minor adverse events occurred during support. In our initial experience, the new polymethylpentene DIDECMO oxygenator provided adequate gas exchange and offered technical advantages in terms of low priming volume and acceptable hemodynamic resistance despite pulsatile flow regimen. Also, we used this device for more than 8 days without any technical problems.