Carmen Criscitiello

The evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in breast cancer: recommendations by an International TILs Working Group 2014

BACKGROUND The morphological evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in breast cancer (BC) is gaining momentum as evidence strengthens for the clinical relevance of this immunological biomarker. Accumulating evidence suggests that the extent of lymphocytic infiltration in tumor tissue can be assessed as a major parameter by evaluation of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained tumor sections. TILs have been shown to provide prognostic and potentially predictive value, particularly in triple-negative and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-overexpressing BC. DESIGN A standardized methodology for evaluating TILs is now needed as a prerequisite for integrating this parameter in standard histopathological practice, in a research setting as well as in clinical trials. This article reviews current data on the clinical validity and utility of TILs in BC in an effort to foster better knowledge and insight in this rapidly evolving field, and to develop a standardized methodology for visual assessment on H&E sections, acknowledging the future potential of molecular/multiplexed approaches. CONCLUSIONS The methodology provided is sufficiently detailed to offer a uniformly applied, pragmatic starting point and improve consistency and reproducibility in the measurement of TILs for future studies.

Taxane-Based Combinations As Adjuvant Chemotherapy of Early Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

PURPOSE We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized trials that evaluated the efficacy of incorporating taxanes into anthracycline-based regimens for early breast cancer (EBC). We aimed to determine whether this approach improves disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) and whether benefits are maintained across relevant patient subgroups. METHODS Studies were retrieved by searching the PubMed database and the proceedings of major conferences. We extracted hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CIs for DFS and OS from each trial and obtained pooled estimates using an inverse-variance model. RESULTS Thirteen studies were included in the meta-analysis (N = 22,903 patients). The pooled HR estimate was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.79 to 0.87; P < .00001) for DFS and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.79 to 0.91; P < .00001) for OS. Risk reduction was not influenced by the type of taxane, by estrogen receptor (ER) expression, by the number of axillary metastases (N1 to 3 v N4+), or by the patients age/menopausal status. Sensitivity analysis showed that taxanes given in combination with anthracyclines, unlike sequential administration, did not significantly improve OS. However, the test for interaction showed that HR did not differ between the two schedules (P = .54). Taxane administration resulted in an absolute 5-year risk reduction of 5% for DFS and 3% for OS. CONCLUSION The addition of a taxane to an anthracycline-based regimen improves the DFS and OS of high-risk EBC patients. The DFS benefit was independent of ER expression, degree of nodal involvement, type of taxane, age/menopausal status of patient, and administration schedule.

Gene Modules and Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Subtypes: A Pooled Analysis

PURPOSE To investigate the association between chemotherapy response and gene expression modules describing important biologic processes and druggable oncogenic pathways in breast cancer (BC) subtypes. PATIENTS AND METHODS We searched for publicly available gene expression studies evaluating anthracycline with or without taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy and identified eight studies with 996 patients. We computed 17 gene modules and calculated odds ratios (ORs) for pathologic complete response (pCR) for one-unit increases in scaled modules with and without adjustment for clinicopathologic characteristics. Added predictive accuracy was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and integrated discrimination index (IDI). We used the false discovery rate (FDR) to adjust for multiple testing. RESULTS High immune module scores were associated with increased pCR probability in all BC subtypes. High module scores of chromosomal instability, phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) loss, and E2F3 transcription factor were associated with increased pCR probability in estrogen receptor (ER) -negative/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -negative and ER-positive/HER2-negative but not in HER2-positive tumors (interactions between HER2 and each of these modules for their association with pCR: P < .05; FDR, 0.17; trend for interaction between HER2 and PTEN). High values of insulin-like growth factor 1 activation module were associated with increased pCR probability only in ER-positive/HER2-negative tumors (interaction between insulin-like growth factor 1 and ER: P = .002; FDR, 0.03). When adding the immune module to clinicopathologic characteristics, we observed substantial increases in predictive accuracy for pCR in the HER2-positive subtype (IDI, 0.093; P = .004; increase in AUC from 0.760 to 0.836). CONCLUSION Different processes and pathways are associated with pCR in different BC subtypes.

Elucidating Prognosis and Biology of Breast Cancer Arising in Young Women Using Gene Expression Profiling

Purpose: Breast cancer in young women is associated with poor prognosis. We aimed to define the role of gene expression signatures in predicting prognosis in young women and to understand biological differences according to age. Experimental Design: Patients were assigned to molecular subtypes [estrogen receptor (ER)+/HER2−; HER2+, ER−/HER2−)] using a three-gene classifier. We evaluated whether previously published proliferation, stroma, and immune-related gene signatures added prognostic information to Adjuvant! online and tested their interaction with age in a Cox model for relapse-free survival (RFS). Furthermore, we evaluated the association between candidate age-related genes or gene sets with age in an adjusted linear regression model. Results: A total of 3,522 patients (20 data sets) were eligible. Patients aged 40 years or less had a higher proportion of ER−/HER2− tumors (P < 0.0001) and were associated with poorer RFS after adjustment for breast cancer subtype, tumor size, nodal status, and histologic grade and stratification for data set and treatment modality (HR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.10–1.63, P = 0.004). The proliferation gene signatures showed no significant interaction with age in ER+/HER2− tumors after adjustment for Adjuvant! online. Further analyses suggested that breast cancer in the young is enriched with processes related to immature mammary epithelial cells (luminal progenitors, mammary stem, c-kit, RANKL) and growth factor signaling in two independent cohorts (n = 1,188 and 2,334). Conclusions: Proliferation-related prognostic gene signatures can aid treatment decision-making for young women. However, breast cancer arising at a young age seems to be biologically distinct beyond subtype distribution. Separate therapeutic approaches such as targeting RANKL or mammary stem cells could therefore be needed. Clin Cancer Res; 18(5); 1341–51. ©2012 AACR.

Cardiotoxicity of anticancer treatments: Epidemiology, detection, and management.

Answer questions and earn CME/CNE

Molecular Pathways: Human leukocyte antigen G (HLA-G).

Human leukocyte antigen G (HLA-G) is a nonclassical MHC class I molecule that exerts important tolerogenic functions. Its main physiologic expression occurs in the placenta, where it participates in the maternal tolerance toward the fetus. HLA-G expression was found in embryonic tissues, in adult immune privileged organs, and in cells of the hematopoietic lineage. It is expressed in various types of primary solid (melanoma, head and neck, lung, urogenital, gastrointestinal, and breast cancers) and hematologic malignancies (acute leukemia, lymphomas) and metastases. HLA-G ectopic expression is observed in cancer, suggesting that its expression is one strategy used by tumor cells to escape immune surveillance. In this review, we will focus on HLA-G expression in cancers and its association with the prognosis. We will highlight the underlying molecular mechanisms of impaired HLA-G expression, the immune tolerant function of HLA-G in tumors, and the potential diagnostic use of membrane-bound and soluble HLA-G as a biomarker to identify tumors and to monitor disease stage. As HLA-G is a potent immunoinhibitory molecule, its blockade remains an attractive therapeutic strategy against cancer. Elimination of HLA-G–expressing cancer cells would be important in the efficacy of anticancer therapies. Clin Cancer Res; 19(20); 5564–71. ©2013 AACR.

Circulating tumor cells and emerging blood biomarkers in breast cancer

Purpose of review To critically review the latest findings concerning the role of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and other blood biomarkers in breast cancer. Recent findings CTCs are epithelial tumor cells detected in the peripheral blood of patients with solid tumors using mainly cytometric/antibody-based and molecular approaches. Most technologies for CTC detection, including the FDA-approved CellSearch, are only detecting epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM)-positive CTCs and may miss clinically relevant subpopulations of CTCs. The value of CTC detection by CellSearch in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) may depend on the clinical setting and regimen used. In a retrospective analysis of 516 patients with MBC, CTC detection did not predict clinical outcome in chemo-naïve women with HER2-positive MBC treated with anti-HER2 therapy, but had prognostic value in other breast cancer subtypes. Similarly, changes in CTCs during treatment did not predict outcome in 67 women treated with first-line bevacizumab/chemotherapy. CTC detection by CellSearch before or after adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with worse disease-free survival in 1489 patients with early breast cancer. Circulating nucleic acids, microRNAs and genomic rearrangements have been suggested as promising blood biomarkers. Summary Currently, there is no role for CTCs in clinical practice. The clinical utility of CTCs and other blood biomarkers should be prospectively tested.

Adjuvant trastuzumab in elderly with HER-2 positive breast cancer: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Trastuzumab, in combination with chemotherapy, is the gold standard in the adjuvant treatment of patients with HER2 positive breast cancer. Limited data are available on the role of adjuvant trastuzumab in the elderly population. We performed a systematic review of prospective randomized trials with available data on the use of adjuvant trastuzumab in patients older than 60years, focusing on both the efficacy and the cardiac safety. Data extrapolated from two prospective trials were included for efficacy and cardiac safety. A significant 47% relative risk reduction was observed in elderly patients receiving trastuzumab compared to chemotherapy alone (pooled Hazard Ratio: 0.53; 95% CI, 0.36-0.77). The pooled proportion of cardiac events in elderly patients treated with trastuzumab was 5% (95% CI, 4-7%). The use of trastuzumab should be considered as a standard of care in the adjuvant therapy of elderly patients with HER-2 positive breast cancer. Acute and chronic medical conditions, nutritional status and level of daily activities should be considered. Uncertainty about cardiac safety in the elderly is a major concern.

Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Cancer Treatment: A Double-Edged Sword Cross-Targeting the Host as an "Innocent Bystander"

Targeted immune checkpoint blockade augments anti-tumor immunity and induces durable responses in patients with melanoma and other solid tumors. It also induces specific “immune-related adverse events” (irAEs). IrAEs mainly include gastrointestinal, dermatological, hepatic and endocrinological toxicities. Off-target effects that arise appear to account for much of the toxicity of the immune checkpoint blockade. These unique “innocent bystander” effects are likely a direct result of breaking immune tolerance upon immune check point blockade and require specific treatment guidelines that include symptomatic therapies or systemic corticosteroids. What do we need going forward to limit immune checkpoint blockade-induced toxicity? Most importantly, we need a better understanding of the roles played by these agents in normal tissues, so that we can begin to predict potentially problematic side effects on the basis of their selectivity profile. Second, we need to focus on the predictive factors of the response and toxicity of the host rather than serially focusing on individual agents. Third, rigorous biomarker-driven clinical trials are needed to further elucidate the mechanisms of both the benefit and toxicity. We will summarize the double-edged sword effect of immunotherapeutics in cancer treatment.

Biopsy confirmation of metastatic sites in breast cancer patients: clinical impact and future perspectives

Determination of hormone receptor (estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status in the primary tumor is clinically relevant to define breast cancer subtypes, clinical outcome, and the choice of therapy. Retrospective and prospective studies suggest that there is substantial discordance in receptor status between primary and recurrent breast cancer. Despite this evidence and current recommendations, the acquisition of tissue from metastatic deposits is not routine practice. As a consequence, therapeutic decisions for treatment in the metastatic setting are based on the features of the primary tumor. Reasons for this attitude include the invasiveness of the procedure and the unreliable outcome of biopsy, in particular for biopsies of lesions at complex visceral sites. Improvements in interventional radiology techniques mean that most metastatic sites are now accessible by minimally invasive methods, including surgery. In our opinion, since biopsies are diagnostic and changes in biological features between the primary and secondary tumors can occur, the routine biopsy of metastatic disease needs to be performed. In this review, we discuss the rationale for biopsy of suspected breast cancer metastases, review issues and caveats surrounding discordance of biomarker status between primary and metastatic tumors, and provide insights for deciding when to perform biopsy of suspected metastases and which one (s) to biopsy. We also speculate on the future translational implications for biopsy of suspected metastatic lesions in the context of clinical trials and the establishment of bio-banks of biopsy material taken from metastatic sites. We believe that such bio-banks will be important for exploring mechanisms of metastasis. In the future, advances in targeted therapy will depend on the availability of metastatic tissue.