Carmen Manzanedo

Effects of dopamine antagonists with different receptor blockade profiles on morphine-induced place preference in male mice

The effects of dopamine (DA) antagonists with different selectivity for the DA receptors (SCH 23390, 0.5, 0.25, 0.125 mg/kg; haloperidol, 0.2, 0.1 mg/kg; raclopride, 1.2, 0.6, 0.3 mg/kg; risperidone, 0.4, 0.2, 0.1 mg/kg; U-99194A maleate, 40, 20 mg/kg; clozapine, 2.5, 1.25, 0.625 mg/kg) on the acquisition of place conditioning and morphine-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) were explored in male mice. Morphine (40 mg/kg) produced CPP while SCH 23390, haloperidol and clozapine (highest dose) and risperidone (lowest dose) produced conditioned place aversion (CPA). Raclopride and U-99194A maleate did not produce CPP or CPA. Morphine-induced CPP was reversed by the administration of SCH 23390 and risperidone (all doses), haloperidol (highest dose) and raclopride and clozapine (intermediate and lowest doses). U-99194A maleate did not reverse morphine-induced CPP. These results suggest that the conditioned rewarding effects of morphine are mediated by the different subtypes of DA receptors.

Rewarding Effects and Reinstatement of MDMA-Induced CPP in Adolescent Mice

Although the rewarding effects of 3,4-methylenedioxy-metamphetamine (MDMA) have been demonstrated in self-administration and conditioned place preference (CPP) procedures, its addictive potential (ie, the vulnerability to relapse, measured by its ability to induce reinstatement of an extinguished response), remains poorly understood. In this study, the effects of MDMA (5, 10, and 20 mg/kg) on the acquisition, extinction and reinstatement of CPP were evaluated in mice, using two different protocols during acquisition of CPP. In the first experiment, animals were trained using a two-session/day schedule (MDMA and saline for 4 consecutive days), whereas in the second experiment, they were trained using an alternating day schedule (MDMA and saline each 48 h). After extinction, the ability of drug priming to reinstate CPP was evaluated. In Experiment 1, MDMA did not significantly increase the time spent in the drug-paired compartment during the post-conditioning (Post-C) test, although the preference was evident a week afterwards, lasting between 2 and 21 weeks. No reinstatement was observed after MDMA priming. In Experiment 2, all doses produced CPP in Post-C, which lasted between 1 and 4 weeks. MDMA induces reinstatement at doses up to 4 times lower than those used in conditioning. The analyses of brain monoamines revealed that the daily schedule of treatment induces a non-dose-dependent decrease in dopamine and serotonin (5-HT) in the striatum, whereas the alternating schedule produces a dose-dependent decrease of 5-HT in the cortex. These results demonstrate that MDMA produces long-lasting rewarding effects and reinstatement after extinction, suggesting the susceptibility of this drug to induce addiction.

NMDA glutamate but not dopamine antagonists blocks drug-induced reinstatement of morphine place preference.

The effects of dopaminergic and glutamatergic antagonists on the drug-induced reinstatement of a previously extinguished morphine conditioned place preference (CPP) in mice were evaluated. Following extinction of a place preference induced by morphine (40 mg/kg), a non-contingent injection of the dopaminergic antagonists SCH 23390 (0.125, 0.5 mg/kg), raclopride (0.3, 1.2 mg/kg), haloperidol (0.1, 0.2 mg/kg) and the dopamine (DA) release inhibitor CGS 10746B (1, 10 mg/kg) or glutamatergic NMDA antagonists memantine (10, 20, 40 mg/kg) and MK-801 (0.1, 0.2, 0.3 mg/kg) alone or with 10 mg/kg morphine was given. Neither the dopaminergic nor the glutamatergic antagonists alone reinstated the place preference. Dopamine antagonists failed to block the morphine-induced reinstatement of place preference while memantine and MK-801 blocked it with intermediate and high doses. These results suggest that drug-induced reinstatement of place preference may be largely independent of dopamine and more closely related to glutamatergic neurotransmission.

Effects of NMDA receptor antagonists (MK-801 and memantine) on the acquisition of morphine-induced conditioned place preference in mice

Several studies have shown that the systemic administration of a variety of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists can block the development or expression of conditioned place preference (CPP) induced by rewarding drugs such as morphine. In the present study, we examined the effects of different doses of two non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonists, MK-801 (0.1, 0.2 and 0.3 mg/kg) and memantine (2.5, 5, 10, 20 and 40 mg/kg), in CPP induced by 40 mg/kg of morphine in male mice. The CPP was carried out with an unbiased procedure in terms of initial spontaneous preference. Animals received the different doses of drugs in the conditioning sessions. MK-801 and memantine, at all doses used, produced neither place preference nor place aversion, but the higher doses of memantine (20 and 40 mg/kg) were able to completely block morphine-induced CPP. The present data show that the NMDA receptor antagonists MK-801 and memantine have no reinforcing properties but memantine is capable of preventing the acquisition of morphine-induced CPP. These results suggest that the development of morphine-induced CPP may be closely related to NMDA receptors and that the glutamatergic system can modulate opiate reward.

The effects of dopamine D2 and D3 antagonists on spontaneous motor activity and morphine-induced hyperactivity in male mice.

Rationale: Dopaminergic neurotransmission, in particular the mesolimbic pathway, is involved in spontaneous locomotor activity and in morphine-induced hyperactivity, since the drugs acting on DA receptors can modify the action of morphine and this effect could be dependent on the type of DA receptor affected. Objective: In this study, the action of U-99194A maleate, haloperidol, sulpiride and morphine (5, 10, 20, 40 mg/kg) on locomotor activity in male mice was evaluated. Likewise, the effects of these dopaminergic antagonists on morphine-induced hyperactivity were studied. Methods: Animals treated with U-99194A maleate (2.5, 5, 10, 20 mg/kg), haloperidol (0.075, 0.1 mg/kg), sulpiride (20, 40 mg/kg), or morphine (5, 10, 20, 40 mg/kg), and animals treated with these neuroleptics plus morphine were tested in an actimetre at different time points. Results: It was found that an increase in locomotor activity was produced between 0 and 30 min after the administration of 20 mg/kg U-99194A maleate and between 30 and 60 min after the administration of 20 and 40 mg/kg morphine. This dose of U-99194A maleate and the high dose of sulpiride reverts the hyperactivity induced by 20 mg/kg morphine. Haloperidol reversed the hyperactivity induced by all doses of morphine. Conclusions: Our results confirm that the action of DA D2 and D3 receptors could be dependent on the dopaminergic state, in this case modified by the action of morphine.

Effects of DA D1 and D2 antagonists on the sensitisation to the motor effects of morphine in mice

Acute morphine administration produces hyperactivity in mice and repeated treatment induces an enhancement of this effect. In this experiment, we study the sensitisation to the hyperactivity induced by intermittent morphine administration (40 mg/kg) and the effects of dopamine (DA) antagonists on this phenomenon. Animals received three injections, separated by 48 h, and after each injection, their activity was registered between 30 and 60 min. In Experiment 1, animals were divided into two groups, which received saline and morphine (S-S-M) or only morphine (M-M-M). In Experiment 2, animals were divided into 12 groups. Half, which was designed to study the effects of DA antagonists on the acquisition of morphine sensitisation, received morphine plus 0.125, 0.25, or 0.5 mg/kg SCH 23390 or raclopride in the two first administrations and only morphine in the third (M+SCH-M+SCH-M; M+R-M+R-M). The other groups, designed to study the effects of DA antagonists on the expression of morphine sensitisation, received morphine in the two first administrations and morphine plus DA antagonists in the last injection (M-M-M+SCH; M-M-M+R). Intermittent morphine administration produces greater hyperactivity than acute morphine. DA D1 antagonists reduce acquisition and block expression of sensitisation, while DA D2 antagonists only affect expression with the intermediate and high dose. These results support the implication of DA in the behavioural sensitisation of morphine in mice.

Reinstatement of morphine-induced conditioned place preference in mice by priming injections.

To construct a model of relapse of drug abuse in mice, the induction, we evaluated the extinction and reinstatement of morphine-induced place preference. In Experiment 1, we examined the effects of morphine (0, 2, 3, 5, 10, 20 and 40 mg/kg) in the conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm. Mice showed CPP with 5, 10, 20 and 40 mg/kg. In Experiment 2, we evaluated the effects of two different extinction procedures. After conditioning with 40 mg/kg of morphine, the mice underwent daily extinction sessions of 60 or 15 min of duration. CPP was extinguished after seven and nine sessions, respectively. In Experiment 3, we tested the reinstating effects of several priming doses of morphine. Mice were conditioned with 40 mg/kg of morphine and underwent the daily 15 min extinction sessions until CPP was no longer evident. Then, the effects of morphine (0, 2, 3, 5, 10, 20, 40 mg/kg, i.p.) were evaluated. CPP was reinstated by doses from 5 mg/kg upward. The results show that morphine priming injections are effective in reactivating opiateseeking behavior in mice, and thus, the CPP paradigm might be useful to investigate the mechanisms underlying relapse of drug abuse.

Effect of the CB1 cannabinoid agonist WIN 55212-2 on the acquisition and reinstatement of MDMA-induced conditioned place preference in mice

BackgroundNumerous reports indicate that MDMA users consume other psychoactive drugs, among which cannabis is one of the most common. The aim of the present study was to evaluate, using the conditioned place preference, the effect of the cannabinoid agonist WIN 55,212-2 on the rewarding effects of MDMA in mice.MethodsIn the first experiment adolescent mice were initially conditioned with 1.25, 2.5 or 5 mg/kg of MDMA or 0.1 or 0.5 mg/kg of WIN and subsequently with both drugs. Reinstatement of the extinguished preference by priming doses was performed in the groups that showed CPP. In the second experiment, animals were conditioned with 2.5 or 5 mg/kg of MDMA and, after extinction, reinstatement of the preference was induced by 0.5 or 0.1 mg/kg of WIN.ResultsA low dose of WIN 55212-2 (0.1 mg/kg) increased the rewarding effects of low doses of MDMA (1.25 mg/kg), although a decrease in the preference induced by MDMA (5 and 2.5 mg/kg) was observed when the dose of WIN 55212-2 was raised (0.5 mg/kg). The CB1 antagonist SR 141716 also increased the rewarding effects of the lowest MDMA dose and did not block the effects of WIN. Animals treated with the highest WIN dose plus a non-neurotoxic dose of MDMA exhibited decreases of striatal DA and serotonin in the cortex. On the other hand, WIN 55212-2-induced CPP was reinstated by priming injections of MDMA, although WIN did not reinstate the MDMA-induced CPP.ConclusionsThese results confirm that the cannabinoid system plays a role in the rewarding effects of MDMA and highlights the risks that sporadic drug use can pose in terms of relapse to dependence. Finally, the potential neuroprotective action of cannabinoids is not supported by our data; on the contrary, they are evidence of the potential neurotoxic effect of said drugs when administered with MDMA.

Sensitization to the rewarding effects of morphine depends on dopamine.

The influence of dopamine (DA) on sensitization to the rewarding effects of morphine was evaluated. The effects of pre-treatment with saline or morphine plus naloxone, CGS 10746B, haloperidol, SCH 23390 and raclopride, on the place conditioning induced by 2 mg/kg morphine were evaluated. This dose was ineffective in saline pre-treated animals but induced a clear conditioned place preference in mice pre-treated with morphine, CGS 10746B or haloperidol. Conversely, animals pre-treated with morphine plus naloxone, CGS 10746B, SCH 23390, raclopride and the high dose of haloperidol did not acquire place preference. Our results demonstrated that DA release and subsequent DA D1 and D2 receptor activation is essential for the development of sensitization to the rewarding effects of morphine.

Effect of adolescent exposure to WIN 55212-2 on the acquisition and reinstatement of MDMA-induced conditioned place preference

The present study employs a conditioned place preference procedure (CPP) to examine the effects of exposure to the cannabinoid agonist WIN 55212-2 (WIN) (0.1 and 0.5mg/kg) during adolescence on the reinforcing properties of +/-3,4-methylenedioxymetamphetamine hydrochloride (MDMA) (1.25 and 2.5mg/kg) in mice. On postnatal day (PD) 27, animals received a daily injection of the assigned treatment on 5 consecutive days, and three days later the place conditioning procedure was initiated (PD 35). The results suggest that pre-exposure to cannabinoids strengthens the properties of MDMA and favors reinstatement of the craving for the drug, which endorses the gateway hypothesis.