Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Carmen Suarez is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Carmen Suarez.


Clinical Infectious Diseases | 2014

Extensive drug resistance acquired during treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.

J. Peter Cegielski; Tracy Dalton; Martin Yagui; Wanpen Wattanaamornkiet; Grigory V. Volchenkov; Laura E. Via; Martie van der Walt; Thelma E. Tupasi; Sarah E. Smith; Ronel Odendaal; Vaira Leimane; Charlotte Kvasnovsky; Tatiana Kuznetsova; Ekaterina V. Kurbatova; Tiina Kummik; Liga Kuksa; Kai Kliiman; Elena V. Kiryanova; Hee Jin Kim; Chang-ki Kim; Boris Y. Kazennyy; Ruwen Jou; Wei-Lun Huang; Julia Ershova; Vladislav V. Erokhin; Lois Diem; Carmen Contreras; Sang-Nae Cho; Larisa N. Chernousova; Michael P. Chen

BACKGROUNDnIncreasing access to drugs for the treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis is crucial but could lead to increasing resistance to these same drugs. In 2000, the international Green Light Committee (GLC) initiative began to increase access while attempting to prevent acquired resistance.nnnMETHODSnTo assess the GLCs impact, we followed adults with pulmonary MDR tuberculosis from the start to the end of treatment with monthly sputum cultures, drug susceptibility testing, and genotyping. We compared the frequency and predictors of acquired resistance to second-line drugs (SLDs) in 9 countries that volunteered to participate, 5 countries that met GLC criteria, and 4 countries that did not apply to the GLC.nnnRESULTSnIn total, 832 subjects were enrolled. Of those without baseline resistance to specific SLDs, 68 (8.9%) acquired extensively drug-resistant (XDR) tuberculosis, 79 (11.2%) acquired fluoroquinolone (FQ) resistance, and 56 (7.8%) acquired resistance to second-line injectable drugs (SLIs). The relative risk (95% confidence interval [CI]) of acquired resistance was lower at GLC-approved sites: 0.27 (.16-.47) for XDR tuberculosis, 0.28 (.17-.45) for FQ, and 0.15 (.06-.39) to 0.60 (.34-1.05) for 3 different SLIs. The risk increased as the number of potentially effective drugs decreased. Controlling for baseline drug resistance and differences between sites, the odds ratios (95% CIs) were 0.21 (.07-.62) for acquired XDR tuberculosis and 0.23 (.09-.59) for acquired FQ resistance.nnnCONCLUSIONSnTreatment of MDR tuberculosis involves substantial risk of acquired resistance to SLDs, increasing as baseline drug resistance increases. The risk was significantly lower in programs documented by the GLC to meet specific standards.


Emerging Infectious Diseases | 2008

Scale-up of Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis Laboratory Services, Peru

Sonya Shin; Martin Yagui; Luis Ascencios; Gloria Yale; Carmen Suarez; Neyda Quispe; Cesar Bonilla; Joaquin Blaya; Allison Taylor; Carmen Contreras; Peter Cegielski

One-sentence summary for table of contents: Strategic design and implementation of these services is feasible in resource-poor settings.


Clinical Infectious Diseases | 2015

Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis Treatment Outcomes in Relation to Treatment and Initial Versus Acquired Second-Line Drug Resistance

J. Peter Cegielski; Ekaterina V. Kurbatova; Martie van der Walt; Jeannette Brand; Julia Ershova; Thelma E. Tupasi; Janice Campos Caoili; Tracy Dalton; Carmen Contreras; Martin Yagui; Jaime Bayona; Charlotte Kvasnovsky; Vaira Leimane; Liga Kuksa; Michael P. Chen; Laura E. Via; Soo Hee Hwang; Melanie Wolfgang; Grigory V. Volchenkov; Tatiana Somova; Sarah E. Smith; Somsak Akksilp; Wanpen Wattanaamornkiet; Hee Jin Kim; Chang-ki Kim; Boris Y. Kazennyy; Tatiana Khorosheva; Kai Kliiman; Piret Viiklepp; Ruwen Jou

BACKGROUNDnResistance to second-line drugs develops during treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis, but the impact on treatment outcome has not been determined.nnnMETHODSnPatients with MDR tuberculosis starting second-line drug treatment were enrolled in a prospective cohort study. Sputum cultures were analyzed at a central reference laboratory. We compared subjects with successful and poor treatment outcomes in terms of (1) initial and acquired resistance to fluoroquinolones and second-line injectable drugs (SLIs) and (2) treatment regimens.nnnRESULTSnOf 1244 patients with MDR tuberculosis, 973 (78.2%) had known outcomes and 232 (18.6%) were lost to follow-up. Among those with known outcomes, treatment succeeded in 85.8% with plain MDR tuberculosis, 69.7% with initial resistance to either a fluoroquinolone or an SLI, 37.5% with acquired resistance to a fluoroquinolone or SLI, 29.3% with initial and 13.0% with acquired extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (P < .001 for trend). In contrast, among those with known outcomes, treatment success increased stepwise from 41.6% to 92.3% as the number of drugs proven effective increased from ≤1 to ≥5 (P < .001 for trend), while acquired drug resistance decreased from 12% to 16% range, depending on the drug, down to 0%-2% (P < .001 for trend). In multivariable analysis, the adjusted odds of treatment success decreased 0.62-fold (95% confidence interval, .56-.69) for each increment in drug resistance and increased 2.1-fold (1.40-3.18) for each additional effective drug, controlling for differences between programs and patients. Specific treatment, patient, and program variables were also associated with treatment outcome.nnnCONCLUSIONSnIncreasing drug resistance was associated in a logical stepwise manner with poor treatment outcomes. Acquired resistance was worse than initial resistance to the same drugs. Increasing numbers of effective drugs, specific drugs, and specific program characteristics were associated with better outcomes and less acquired resistance.


Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association | 2011

Full impact of laboratory information system requires direct use by clinical staff: cluster randomized controlled trial

Joaquin Blaya; Sonya Shin; Carmen Contreras; Gloria Yale; Carmen Suarez; Luis Asencios; Jihoon Kim; P. Rodriguez; Peter Cegielski; Hamish S. F. Fraser

OBJECTIVEnTo evaluate the time to communicate laboratory results to health centers (HCs) between the e-Chasqui web-based information system and the pre-existing paper-based system.nnnMETHODSnCluster randomized controlled trial in 78 HCs in Peru. In the intervention group, 12 HCs had web access to results via e-Chasqui (point-of-care HCs) and forwarded results to 17 peripheral HCs. In the control group, 22 point-of-care HCs received paper results directly and forwarded them to 27 peripheral HCs. Baseline data were collected for 15 months. Post-randomization data were collected for at least 2 years. Comparisons were made between intervention and control groups, stratified by point-of-care versus peripheral HCs.nnnRESULTSnFor point-of-care HCs, the intervention group took less time to receive drug susceptibility tests (DSTs) (median 9 vs 16 days, p<0.001) and culture results (4 vs 8 days, p<0.001) and had a lower proportion of late DSTs taking >60 days to arrive (p<0.001) than the control. For peripheral HCs, the intervention group had similar communication times for DST (median 22 vs 19 days, p=0.30) and culture (10 vs 9 days, p=0.10) results, as well as proportion of late DSTs (p=0.57) compared with the control.nnnCONCLUSIONSnOnly point-of-care HCs with direct access to the e-Chasqui information system had reduced communication times and fewer results with delays of >2 months. Peripheral HCs had no benefits from the system. This suggests that health establishments should have point-of-care access to reap the benefits of electronic laboratory reporting.


Emerging Infectious Diseases | 2011

Targeted drug-resistance testing strategy for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis detection, Lima, Peru, 2005-2008.

Gustavo E. Velásquez; Martin Yagui; J. Peter Cegielski; Luis Asencios; Jaime Bayona; Cesar Bonilla; Hector O. Jave; Gloria Yale; Carmen Suarez; Sidney Atwood; Carmen Contreras; Sonya Shin

Running head: Targeted Drug-Resistance Testing Strategy for MDR TB


International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease | 2012

Impact of rapid drug susceptibility testing for tuberculosis: program experience in Lima, Peru

Sonya Shin; Luis Asencios; Martin Yagui; Gloria Yale; Carmen Suarez; Jaime Bayona; Cesar Bonilla; Oswaldo Jave; Carmen Contreras; Sidney Atwood; Joaquin Blaya; Julia Ershova; Cegielski Jp

SETTINGnProgrammatic implementation of decentralized rapid drug susceptibility testing (DST) in Lima, Peru.nnnOBJECTIVEnPre-post analysis compared time to diagnosis, treatment outcome and survival among patients tested with direct nitrate reductase assay (NRA) vs. indirect conventional methods.nnnDESIGNnFrom 2005 to 2009, we prospectively followed all patients referred for DST before (control) and after (intervention) NRA implementation. Among those referred for DST, NRA was used for smear-positive samples of patients with no prior history of multidrug resistance or treatment for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (TB). Data were abstracted from patient charts and laboratory registers. Endpoints were favorable outcomes, time to result and time to death.nnnRESULTSnOf those patients who met the criteria for NRA, 740 underwent NRA and 621 underwent conventional DST. NRA yielded test results for 78.4% of cases vs. 68.8% for conventional DST (P < 0.0001); the median time to result was 44 vs. 133 days, respectively (adjusted HR 0.64, 95%CI 0.56-0.73). Among individuals without previous anti-tuberculosis treatment, NRA was associated with a favorable treatment outcome (adjusted OR 1.39, 95%CI 1.01-1.90) and prolonged survival (adjusted HR 0.53, 95%CI 0.31-0.90).nnnCONCLUSIONnDirect NRA significantly shortened time to test result and improved treatment outcomes and survival in certain groups.


PLOS ONE | 2014

Reducing Communication Delays and Improving Quality of Care with a Tuberculosis Laboratory Information System in Resource Poor Environments: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

Joaquin Blaya; Sonya Shin; Martin Yagui; Carmen Contreras; Peter Cegielski; Gloria Yale; Carmen Suarez; Luis Asencios; Jaime Bayona; Jihoon Kim; Hamish S. F. Fraser

Background Lost, delayed or incorrect laboratory results are associated with delays in initiating treatment. Delays in treatment for Multi-Drug Resistant Tuberculosis (MDR-TB) can worsen patient outcomes and increase transmission. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of a laboratory information system in reducing delays and the time for MDR-TB patients to culture convert (stop transmitting). Methods Setting: 78 primary Health Centers (HCs) in Lima, Peru. Participants lived within the catchment area of participating HCs and had at least one MDR-TB risk factor. The study design was a cluster randomized controlled trial with baseline data. The intervention was the e-Chasqui web-based laboratory information system. Main outcome measures were: times to communicate a result; to start or change a patients treatment; and for that patient to culture convert. Results 1671 patients were enrolled. Intervention HCs took significantly less time to receive drug susceptibility test (DST) (median 11 vs. 17 days, Hazard Ratio 0.67 [0.62–0.72]) and culture (5 vs. 8 days, 0.68 [0.65–0.72]) results. The time to treatment was not significantly different, but patients in intervention HCs took 16 days (20%) less time to culture convert (pu200a=u200a0.047). Conclusions The eChasqui system reduced the time to communicate results between laboratories and HCs and time to culture conversion. It is now used in over 259 HCs covering 4.1 million people. This is the first randomized controlled trial of a laboratory information system in a developing country for any disease and the only study worldwide to show clinical impact of such a system. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01201941


Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública | 2011

Análisis de costos de los métodos rápidos para diagnóstico de Tuberculosis multidrogorresistente en diferentes grupos epidemiológicos del Perú

Lely Solari; Alfonso Gutiérrez; Carmen Suarez; Oswaldo Jave; Edith Castillo; Gloria Yale; Luis Ascencios; Neyda Quispe; Eddy Valencia; Víctor Suárez

Objectives.To evaluate the costs of three methods for the diagnosis of drug susceptibility in tuberculosis, and to compare the cost per case of Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR TB) diagnosed with these (MODS, GRIESS and Genotype MTBDR plus ®) in 4 epidemiologic groups in Peru. Materials and methods.In the basis of programmatic figures, we divided the population in 4 groups: new cases from Lima/Callao, new cases from other provinces, previously treated patients from Lima/Callao and previously treated from other provinces. We calculated the costs of each test with the standard methodology of the Ministry of Health, from the perspective of the health system. Finally, we calculated the cost per patient diagnosed with MDR TB for each epidemiologic group. Results. The estimated costs per test for MODS, GRIESS, and Genotype MTBDR plus® were 14.83. 15.51 and 176.41 nuevos soles respectively (the local currency, 1 nuevos sol=0.36 US dollars for August, 2011). The cost per patient diagnosed with GRIESS and MODS was lower than 200 nuevos soles in 3 out of the 4 groups. The costs per diagnosed MDR TB were higher than 2,000 nuevos soles with Genotype MTBDR plus ® in the two groups of new patients, and lower than 1,000 nuevos soles in the group of previously treated patients. Conclusions. In high-prevalence groups, like the previously treated patients, the costs per diagnosis of MDR TB with the 3 evaluated tests were low, nevertheless, the costs with the molecular test in the low- prevalence groups were high. The use of the molecular tests must be optimized in high prevalence areas.


PLOS ONE | 2018

Predictive value for cardiovascular events of common carotid intima media thickness and its rate of change in individuals at high cardiovascular risk – Results from the PROG-IMT collaboration

Matthias W. Lorenz; Lu Gao; Kathrin Ziegelbauer; Giuseppe Danilo Norata; Jean Philippe Empana; Irene Schmidtmann; Hung-Ju Lin; Stela McLachlan; Lena Bokemark; Kimmo Ronkainen; Mauro D’Amato; Ulf Schminke; Lars Lind; Shuhei Okazaki; Coen D. A. Stehouwer; Peter Willeit; Joseph F. Polak; Helmuth Steinmetz; Dirk Sander; Holger Poppert; Moïse Desvarieux; M. Arfan Ikram; Stein Harald Johnsen; Daniel Staub; Cesare R. Sirtori; Bernhard Iglseder; Oscar Beloqui; Gunnar Engström; Alfonso Friera; Francesco Rozza

Aims Carotid intima media thickness (CIMT) predicts cardiovascular (CVD) events, but the predictive value of CIMT change is debated. We assessed the relation between CIMT change and events in individuals at high cardiovascular risk. Methods and results From 31 cohorts with two CIMT scans (total n = 89070) on average 3.6 years apart and clinical follow-up, subcohorts were drawn: (A) individuals with at least 3 cardiovascular risk factors without previous CVD events, (B) individuals with carotid plaques without previous CVD events, and (C) individuals with previous CVD events. Cox regression models were fit to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) of the combined endpoint (myocardial infarction, stroke or vascular death) per standard deviation (SD) of CIMT change, adjusted for CVD risk factors. These HRs were pooled across studies. In groups A, B and C we observed 3483, 2845 and 1165 endpoint events, respectively. Average common CIMT was 0.79mm (SD 0.16mm), and annual common CIMT change was 0.01mm (SD 0.07mm), both in group A. The pooled HR per SD of annual common CIMT change (0.02 to 0.43mm) was 0.99 (95% confidence interval: 0.95–1.02) in group A, 0.98 (0.93–1.04) in group B, and 0.95 (0.89–1.04) in group C. The HR per SD of common CIMT (average of the first and the second CIMT scan, 0.09 to 0.75mm) was 1.15 (1.07–1.23) in group A, 1.13 (1.05–1.22) in group B, and 1.12 (1.05–1.20) in group C. Conclusions We confirm that common CIMT is associated with future CVD events in individuals at high risk. CIMT change does not relate to future event risk in high-risk individuals.


BMC Infectious Diseases | 2015

Impact of HIV on mortality among patients treated for tuberculosis in Lima, Peru: a prospective cohort study

Gustavo E. Velásquez; J. Peter Cegielski; Megan Murray; Martin Yagui; Luis Asencios; Jaime Bayona; Cesar Bonilla; Hector O. Jave; Gloria Yale; Carmen Suarez; Eduardo Sanchez; Christian Rojas; Sidney Atwood; Carmen Contreras; Janeth Santa Cruz; Sonya Shin

BackgroundHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-associated tuberculosis deaths have decreased worldwide over the past decade. We sought to evaluate the effect of HIV status on tuberculosis mortality among patients undergoing treatment for tuberculosis in Lima, Peru, a low HIV prevalence setting.MethodsWe conducted a prospective cohort study of patients treated for tuberculosis between 2005 and 2008 in two adjacent health regions in Lima, Peru (Lima Ciudad and Lima Este). We constructed a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model to evaluate the effect of HIV status on mortality during tuberculosis treatment.ResultsOf 1701 participants treated for tuberculosis, 136 (8.0xa0%) died during tuberculosis treatment. HIV-positive patients constituted 11.0xa0% of the cohort and contributed to 34.6xa0% of all deaths. HIV-positive patients were significantly more likely to die (25.1 vs. 5.9xa0%, Pu2009<u20090.001) and less likely to be cured (28.3 vs. 39.4xa0%, Pu2009=u20090.003). On multivariate analysis, positive HIV status (hazard ratio [HR]u2009=u20096.06; 95xa0% confidence interval [CI], 3.96–9.27), unemployment (HRu2009=u20092.24; 95xa0% CI, 1.55–3.25), and sputum acid-fast bacilli smear positivity (HRu2009=u20091.91; 95xa0% CI, 1.10–3.31) were significantly associated with a higher hazard of death.ConclusionsWe demonstrate that positive HIV status was a strong predictor of mortality among patients treated for tuberculosis in the early years after Peru started providing free antiretroviral therapy. As HIV diagnosis and antiretroviral therapy provision are more widely implemented for tuberculosis patients in Peru, future operational research should document the changing profile of HIV-associated tuberculosis mortality.

Collaboration


Dive into the Carmen Suarez's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gloria Yale

Defense Information Systems Agency

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sonya Shin

Brigham and Women's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Martin Yagui

National University of San Marcos

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Joaquin Blaya

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hamish S. F. Fraser

Brigham and Women's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J. Peter Cegielski

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peter Cegielski

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jihoon Kim

University of California

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge