Carol A. Cucchi

Metabolism of methotrexate and γ-tert-butyl methotrexate by human leukemic cells in culture and by hepatic aldehyde oxidase in vitro

The cellular uptake and metabolism of methotrexate (MTX) and gamma-tert-butyl methotrexate (TBM) were compared in CEM human leukemic lymphoblasts and a highly MTX-resistant subline (CEM/MTX) in which MTX uptake is defective. The CEM/MTX cells were found previously to be as sensitive as the parent line to TBM. While MTX was polyglutamylated extensively in the CEM cells, giving abundant levels of non-effluxing conjugates, polyglutamylation in CEM/MTX cells was reduced severely, even after exposure to a high MTX concentration (100 microM) in the medium. This treatment provided free intracellular MTX in greater than 100-fold excess over the dihydrofolate reductase level. In contrast to MTX, the ester TBM was unmetabolized in either cell line. Uptake levels after incubation of CEM and CEM/MTX cells with 2 microM TBM for 24 hr were 17 and 15 pmol/mg protein respectively. Thus, TBM accumulated equally in both cells and was well retained despite the lack of polyglutamylation. These results, together with the previously observed affinity of the drug for dihydrofolate reductase, provide a plausible rationale for the comparable sensitivity of CEM and CEM/MTX cells to TBM. Experiments were also performed to determine the susceptibility of TBM to metabolic detoxification by hepatic aldehyde oxidase. Km values were 8-fold lower for TBM than for MTX in assays using an enzyme preparation from rabbit liver, and Vmax values were 8-fold higher. Neither MTX nor TBM was oxidized to its 7-hydroxy derivative in intact CEM or CEM/MTX cells. Because TBM is capable of overcoming at least one of the modalities of MTX resistance, defective polyglutamylation, and may be more efficiently detoxified than MTX by the action of hepatic aldehyde oxidase, it has the potential to be a useful agent for the treatment of MTX-resistant tumors.

Methotrexate andγ-tert-butyl methotrexate transport in CEM and CEM/MTX human leukemic lymphoblasts

In a continuing investigation of determinants of their 200-fold methotrexate resistance and their collateral sensitivity to gamma-tert-butyl methotrexate, the ability of CEM/MTX cells to transport the two drugs was analyzed and compared with that of CEM cells. The Km and Vmax values for the influx of methotrexate into CEM cells did not differ significantly from those of CEM/MTX cells, and this was the case for gamma-tert-butyl methotrexate as well. Surface binding and influx rates were proportional to cell surface area, but differences in efflux rates and methotrexate uptake were too large to be explained on this basis. Neither methotrexate nor trimetrexate competed with gamma-tert-butyl methotrexate influx in CEM cells. However, both drugs perturbed the gamma-tert-butyl methotrexate steady state in CEM cells, resulting in slightly less uptake than with gamma-tert-butyl methotrexate alone. However, the major difference between the two cell types was in the methotrexate uptake plateau, which was much greater in the case of the parental cell line. A related observation was the more rapid efflux of methotrexate from CEM/MTX cells than from CEM cells. The poor uptake, the associated meager capacity to polyglutamylate methotrexate and the enhanced methotrexate efflux appear to be responsible for its decreased activity against CEM/MTX cells. Half-lives for gamma-tert-butyl methotrexate efflux were the same in both cell lines, allowing the drug to accumulate to cytotoxic levels despite its inability to form polyglutamates.