Carol Merry Stephenson
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Carol Merry Stephenson.
Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health | 2012
Lynda S. Robson; Carol Merry Stephenson; Paul A. Schulte; Benjamin C. Amick; Emma Irvin; Donald E. Eggerth; Stella Chan; Amber Bielecky; Anna M Wang; Terri L Heidotting; Robert H Peters; Judith A. Clarke; Kimberley Cullen; Cathy J Rotunda; Paula L. Grubb
OBJECTIVES Training is regarded as an important component of occupational health and safety (OHS) programs. This paper primarily addresses whether OHS training has a beneficial effect on workers. The paper also examines whether higher engagement OHS training has a greater effect than lower engagement training. METHODS Ten bibliographic databases were searched for pre-post randomized trial studies published in journals between 1996 and November 2007. Training interventions were included if they were delivered to workers and were concerned with primary prevention of occupational illness or injury. The methodological quality of each relevant study was assessed and data was extracted. The impacts of OHS training in each study were summarized by calculating the standardized mean differences. The strength of the evidence on trainings effectiveness was assessed for (i) knowledge, (ii) attitudes and beliefs, (iIi) behaviors, and (iv) health using the US Centers for Disease Control and Preventions Guide to Community Preventive Services, a qualitative evidence synthesis method. RESULTS Twenty-two studies met the relevance criteria of the review. They involved a variety of study populations, occupational hazards, and types of training. Strong evidence was found for the effectiveness of training on worker OHS behaviors, but insufficient evidence was found of its effectiveness on health (ie, symptoms, injuries, illnesses). CONCLUSIONS The review team recommends that workplaces continue to deliver OHS training to employees because training positively affects worker practices. However, large impacts of training on health cannot be expected, based on research evidence.
American Journal of Public Health | 2005
Paul A. Schulte; Carol Merry Stephenson; Andrea Okun; John Palassis; Elyce Biddle
The high rates of injury among young workers are a pressing public health issue, especially given the demand of the job market for new workers. Young and new workers experience the highest rates of occupational injuries of any age group. Incorporating occupational safety and health (OSH) information into the more than 20 000 vocational and other workforce preparation programs in the United States might provide a mechanism for reducing work-related injuries and illnesses among young and new workers. We assessed the status of including OSH information or training in workforce preparation programs and found there is an inconsistent emphasis on OSH information.
Noise & Health | 2011
Mark R. Stephenson; Peter B. Shaw; Carol Merry Stephenson; Pamela S Graydon
Two demonstration projects were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of a comprehensive training program for carpenters. This training was paired with audiometry and counseling and a survey of attitudes and beliefs in hearing loss prevention. All participants received hearing tests, multimedia instruction on occupational noise exposure/hearing loss, and instruction and practice in using a diverse selection of hearing protection devices (HPDs). A total of 103 apprentice carpenters participated in the Year 1 training, were given a large supply of these HPDs, and instructions on how to get additional free supplies if they ran out during the 1-year interval between initial and follow-up training. Forty-two participants responded to the survey a second time a year later and completed the Year 2 training. Significant test-retest differences were found between the pre-training and the post-training survey scores. Both forms of instruction (individual versus group) produced equivalent outcomes. The results indicated that training was able to bring all apprentice participants up to the same desired level with regard to attitudes, beliefs, and behavioral intentions to use hearing protection properly. It was concluded that the health communication models used to develop the educational and training materials for this effort were extremely effective.
Noise & Health | 2011
Carol Merry Stephenson; Mark R. Stephenson
In phase 1 of a large multiyear effort, health communication and health promotion models were used to develop a comprehensive hearing loss prevention training program for carpenters. Additionally, a survey was designed to be used as an evaluation instrument. The models informed an iterative research process in which the authors used key informant interviews, focus groups, and early versions of the survey tool to identify critical issues expected to be relevant to the success of the hearing loss prevention training. Commonly held attitudes and beliefs associated with occupational noise exposure and hearing losses, as well as issues associated with the use or non-use of hearing protectors, were identified. The training program was then specifically constructed to positively shape attitudes, beliefs, and behavioral intentions associated with healthy hearing behaviors - especially those associated with appropriate hearing protector use. The goal was to directly address the key issues and overcome the barriers identified during the formative research phase. The survey was finalized using factor analysis methods and repeated pilot testing. It was designed to be used with the training as an evaluation tool and thus could indicate changes over time in attitudes, beliefs, and behavioral intentions regarding hearing loss prevention. Finally, the training program was fine tuned with industry participation so that its delivery would integrate seamlessly into the existing health and safety training provided to apprentice carpenters. In phase 2, reported elsewhere in this volume, the training program and the survey were tested through a demonstration project at two sites.
American Journal of Industrial Medicine | 2017
Paul A. Schulte; Thomas R. Cunningham; Leslie Nickels; Sarah A. Felknor; Rebecca J. Guerin; Fred Blosser; Chia Chia Chang; Pietra Check; Donald E. Eggerth; Michael A. Flynn; Christy Forrester; David L. Hard; Heidi Hudson; Jennifer M. Lincoln; Lauralynn Taylor McKernan; Preethi Pratap; Carol Merry Stephenson; Donna Van Bogaert; Lauren Menger-Ogle
Translation research in occupational safety and health is the application of scientific investigative approaches to study how the outputs of basic and applied research can be effectively translated into practice and have an impact. This includes the study of the ways in which useful knowledge and interventions are disseminated, adopted, implemented, and institutionalized. In this paper, a 4-stage framework (Development, Testing, Institutionalization, and Evaluation) is presented. Translation research can be used to enhance the use and impact of occupational safety and health knowledge and interventions to protect workers. This type of research has not received much attention in the occupational safety and health field. However, in contemporary society, it is critical to know how to make an impact with the findings and outputs of basic and applied research. This paper provides a novel framework for consideration of how to advance and prioritize translation research for occupational safety and health.
New Solutions: A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy | 2013
Lynda S. Robson; Paul A. Schulte; Benjamin C. Amick; Carol Merry Stephenson; Emma Irvin
This commentary responds to the recent critique by Weinstock and Slatin [1] of our systematic review on the effectiveness of occupational safety and health (OSH) training conducted jointly by the Institute for Work & Health (IWH) in Canada and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) in the United States [2, 3]. We address misunderstandings of our perspectives on training, especially empowerment training, and the evaluation of such training.
American Journal of Industrial Medicine | 2003
Paul A. Schulte; Andrea Okun; Carol Merry Stephenson; Michael J. Colligan; Heinz W. Ahlers; C. Gjessing; G. Loos; Richard W. Niemeier; Marie Haring Sweeney
American Journal of Public Health | 2015
Paul A. Schulte; Rebecca J. Guerin; Anita L. Schill; Anasua Bhattacharya; Thomas R. Cunningham; Sudha P. Pandalai; Donald E. Eggerth; Carol Merry Stephenson
Journal of Safety Research | 2004
Mary M. Prince; Michael J. Colligan; Carol Merry Stephenson; B.J. Bischoff
Archive | 2016
Sherri Minhinnick; L Papet; Carol Merry Stephenson; Mark R. Stephenson