Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Carol Portwine is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Carol Portwine.


Pediatric Blood & Cancer | 2013

Guideline for the Prevention of Acute Nausea and Vomiting Due to Antineoplastic Medication in Pediatric Cancer Patients

L. Lee Dupuis; Sabrina Boodhan; Mark T. Holdsworth; Paula D. Robinson; Richard Hain; Carol Portwine; Erin O'Shaughnessy; Lillian Sung

This guideline provides an approach to the prevention of acute antineoplastic‐induced nausea and vomiting (AINV) in children. It was developed by an international, inter‐professional panel using AGREE and CAN‐IMPLEMENT methods. Evidence‐based interventions that provide optimal AINV control in children receiving antineoplastic agents of high, moderate, low, and minimal emetogenicity are recommended. Recommendations are also made regarding selection of antiemetic agents for children who are unable to receive corticosteroids for AINV control, the role of aprepitant and optimal doses of antiemetic agents. Gaps in the evidence used to support the recommendations were identified. The contribution of this guideline to AINV control in children requires prospective evaluation. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2013; 60: 1073–1082.


Pediatric Blood & Cancer | 2011

Guideline for the classification of the acute emetogenic potential of antineoplastic medication in pediatric cancer patients.

L. Lee Dupuis; Sabrina Boodhan; Lillian Sung; Carol Portwine; Richard Hain; Patricia McCarthy; Mark T. Holdsworth

This guideline provides clinicians caring for children with an approach to assessing the acute emetogenic potential of antineoplastic therapies. It was developed by an international, inter‐professional panel of clinicians and researchers using AGREE and CAN‐ADAPTE methods. The emetogenicity of antineoplastic agents was evaluated and ranked as high, moderate, low, or minimal. The emetogenicity of multiple‐agent and multiple‐day antineoplastic therapy was also classified. Gaps in the evidence used to underpin the guideline recommendations were identified. The contribution of this guideline to the prevention of antineoplastic‐induced nausea and vomiting in individual children about to receive antineoplastic therapy requires prospective evaluation. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2011; 57: 191–198.


European Journal of Cancer | 2009

A Canadian paediatric brain tumour consortium (CPBTC) phase II molecularly targeted study of imatinib in recurrent and refractory paediatric central nervous system tumours

Sylvain Baruchel; Julia R. Sharp; Ute Bartels; Juliette Hukin; Isaac Odame; Carol Portwine; Doug Strother; Chris Fryer; Jackie Halton; Merrill J. Egorin; Rui M. Reis; Olga Martinho; Diana Stempak; Cynthia Hawkins; Janet Gammon; Eric Bouffet

PURPOSE To evaluate the safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of imatinib in children with recurrent or refractory central nervous system (CNS) tumours expressing KIT and/or PDGFRA. METHODS Nineteen patients aged 2-18 years, with recurrent or refractory CNS tumours expressing either of the target receptors KIT and/or PDGFRA (by immunohistochemistry) were eligible. Participants received imatinib orally at a dose of 440 mg/m(2)/day and toxicities and tumour responses were monitored. Serial blood and cerebrospinal fluid samples for pharmacokinetics were obtained in a subset of consenting patients. Frozen tumour samples were analysed retrospectively for KIT and PDGFRA gene amplification in a subset of patients for whom samples were available. RESULTS Common toxicities were lymphopaenia, neutropaenia, leucopaenia, elevated serum transaminases and vomiting. No intratumoural haemorrhages were observed. Although there were no objective responses to imatinib, four patients had long-term stable disease (SD) (38-104 weeks). Our results suggest a possible relationship between KIT expression and maintenance of SD with imatinib treatment; KIT immunopositivity was seen in only 58% (11/19) of study participants overall, but in 100% of patients with SD at 38 weeks. All patient tumours showed PDGFRA expression. Pharmacokinetic data showed a high interpatient variability, but corresponded with previously reported values. CONCLUSIONS Imatinib at 440 mg/m(2)/day is relatively safe in children with recurrent CNS tumours, but induced no objective responses. Demonstration of SD in previously progressing patients (KIT-expressing) suggests cytostatic activity of imatinib.


Pediatric Blood & Cancer | 2014

Guideline for the prevention and treatment of anticipatory nausea and vomiting due to chemotherapy in pediatric cancer patients.

L. Lee Dupuis; Paula D. Robinson; Sabrina Boodhan; Mark T. Holdsworth; Carol Portwine; Paul Gibson; Robert Phillips; Cathy Maan; Nancy Stefin; Lillian Sung

This guideline provides an approach to the prevention and treatment of anticipatory chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in children. It was developed by an international, inter‐professional panel using AGREE II methods and is based on systematic literature reviews. Evidence‐based recommendations for pharmacological and non‐pharmacological interventions to prevent and treat anticipatory CINV in children receiving antineoplastic agents are provided. Gaps in the evidence used to support the recommendations are identified. The contribution of this guideline to anticipatory CINV control in children requires prospective evaluation. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2014; 61:1506–1512.


Pediatric Blood & Cancer | 2017

Guideline for the prevention of acute chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting in pediatric cancer patients: A focused update

Priya Patel; Paula D. Robinson; Jennifer Thackray; Jacqueline Flank; Mark T. Holdsworth; Paul Gibson; Andrea D. Orsey; Carol Portwine; Jason L. Freedman; Jennifer R. Madden; Robert Phillips; Lillian Sung; L. Lee Dupuis

This update of the 2013 clinical practice guideline provides clinicians with guidance regarding the use of aprepitant and palonosetron for the prevention of acute chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in children. The recommendations were based on three systematic reviews. Substantive changes were made to the guideline recommendations including the inclusion of palonosetron to the 5‐HT3 antagonists recommended for children receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) and the recommendation of aprepitant for children 6 months of age or older receiving HEC. To optimize CINV control in children, future work must focus on closing critical research gaps.


Pediatric Blood & Cancer | 2010

PET imaging for pediatric oncology: An assessment of the evidence

Carol Portwine; Christopher Marriott; Ronald D. Barr

Positron emission tomography (PET) has shown potential benefits when used in therapeutic clinical trials for children with cancer. However, existing trials are limited in scope with small numbers of patients and varied observations, making accurate conclusions about the usefulness of PET scanning impossible. This review examines PET and its applications in pediatric oncology. While evidence is limited, there appears to be a basis for rigorous evaluation of this imaging modality before widespread application without validation from clinical trials. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2010;55:1048–1061.


Pediatric Blood & Cancer | 2016

Guideline for the Treatment of Breakthrough and the Prevention of Refractory Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Children With Cancer

Jacqueline Flank; Paula D. Robinson; Mark T. Holdsworth; Robert Phillips; Carol Portwine; Paul Gibson; Cathy Maan; Nancy Stefin; Lillian Sung; L. Lee Dupuis

This clinical practice guideline provides an approach to the treatment of breakthrough chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) and the prevention of refractory CINV in children. It was developed by an international, interprofessional panel and is based on systematic literature reviews. Evidence‐based interventions for the treatment of breakthrough and prophylaxis of refractory CINV are recommended. Gaps in the evidence used to support the recommendations made in this clinical practice guideline were identified. The contribution of these recommendations to breakthrough and refractory CINV control in children requires prospective evaluation.


Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing | 2017

Parent Attributions About Child Symptoms Related to Cancer Therapy.

Ashley Di Battista; L. Lee Dupuis; Marilyn Cassidy; Carol Portwine; Donna L. Johnston; Mariana Silva; Lillian Sung; Maru Barrera

Purpose: Symptom assessment is an emergent area of research in pediatric cancer. Our team previously reported on the development of a questionnaire to be completed by parents to determine symptom prevalence and bother. This exploratory study examined parental nonprobed, free-text comments about their child’s treatment-related symptoms reported on the questionnaire. Method: Participants were parents of children aged 4 to 18 years who had been diagnosed with cancer at least 2 months prior to enrolment and had received intravenous chemotherapy within the past month at 1 of 5 pediatric cancer centers. The questionnaire consisted of 69 or 71 items (based on child’s age) addressing physical and psychological sequelae. Each symptom query was accompanied by a blank space in which parents could comment on their response. Comments were analyzed guided by content analysis methodology. Results: Five major themes emerged: parental attributions for the symptoms experienced in their child; coping patterns and communication styles within the family; evidence of anticipatory, procedural, and other anxieties; interruption of daily life; and changes in the child’s physical appearance. Conclusions: These exploratory findings provide context to parental perception of their child’s treatment-related symptoms and may contribute to a better understanding of parental perception of child and the family coping and communicating style. These findings may assist in the development of psychoeducational interventions aimed at promoting open communication styles within the family and reducing child and parent burden during treatment procedures.


Transfusion | 2014

An epidemiologic cohort study reviewing the practice of blood product transfusions among a population of pediatric oncology patients.

Lani Lieberman; Yang Liu; Carol Portwine; Rebecca Barty; Nancy M. Heddle

Despite the high utilization of blood products by pediatric oncology patients, literature in this population remains scarce. The primary objective of this study was to assess red blood cell (RBC) and platelet (PLT) utilization rates and transfusion thresholds in pediatric oncology patients. The secondary objective was to describe transfusion‐related complications including RBC alloantibody development and transfusion reactions.


Pediatric Blood & Cancer | 2016

Health-Related Quality of Life in Survivors of High-Risk Neuroblastoma After Stem Cell Transplant: A National Population-Based Perspective

Carol Portwine; Cs Rae; Jeffrey H. Davis; Tal Schechter; Victor Lewis; David Mitchell; Donna A. Wall; Eleanor Pullenayegum; Ronald D. Barr

This study aimed to estimate the burden of morbidity, in terms of health‐related quality of life (HRQL), in survivors of high‐risk neuroblastoma (NBL) after myeloablative chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT).

Collaboration


Dive into the Carol Portwine's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Paul Gibson

London Health Sciences Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Donna L. Johnston

Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Cathy Maan

London Health Sciences Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mariana Silva

Kingston General Hospital

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge