Carola Grönhagen-Riska

The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with simvastatin plus ezetimibe in patients with chronic kidney disease (Study of Heart and Renal Protection) : a randomised placebo-controlled trial

Summary Background Lowering LDL cholesterol with statin regimens reduces the risk of myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, and the need for coronary revascularisation in people without kidney disease, but its effects in people with moderate-to-severe kidney disease are uncertain. The SHARP trial aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of the combination of simvastatin plus ezetimibe in such patients. Methods This randomised double-blind trial included 9270 patients with chronic kidney disease (3023 on dialysis and 6247 not) with no known history of myocardial infarction or coronary revascularisation. Patients were randomly assigned to simvastatin 20 mg plus ezetimibe 10 mg daily versus matching placebo. The key prespecified outcome was first major atherosclerotic event (non-fatal myocardial infarction or coronary death, non-haemorrhagic stroke, or any arterial revascularisation procedure). All analyses were by intention to treat. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00125593, and ISRCTN54137607. Findings 4650 patients were assigned to receive simvastatin plus ezetimibe and 4620 to placebo. Allocation to simvastatin plus ezetimibe yielded an average LDL cholesterol difference of 0·85 mmol/L (SE 0·02; with about two-thirds compliance) during a median follow-up of 4·9 years and produced a 17% proportional reduction in major atherosclerotic events (526 [11·3%] simvastatin plus ezetimibe vs 619 [13·4%] placebo; rate ratio [RR] 0·83, 95% CI 0·74–0·94; log-rank p=0·0021). Non-significantly fewer patients allocated to simvastatin plus ezetimibe had a non-fatal myocardial infarction or died from coronary heart disease (213 [4·6%] vs 230 [5·0%]; RR 0·92, 95% CI 0·76–1·11; p=0·37) and there were significant reductions in non-haemorrhagic stroke (131 [2·8%] vs 174 [3·8%]; RR 0·75, 95% CI 0·60–0·94; p=0·01) and arterial revascularisation procedures (284 [6·1%] vs 352 [7·6%]; RR 0·79, 95% CI 0·68–0·93; p=0·0036). After weighting for subgroup-specific reductions in LDL cholesterol, there was no good evidence that the proportional effects on major atherosclerotic events differed from the summary rate ratio in any subgroup examined, and, in particular, they were similar in patients on dialysis and those who were not. The excess risk of myopathy was only two per 10 000 patients per year of treatment with this combination (9 [0·2%] vs 5 [0·1%]). There was no evidence of excess risks of hepatitis (21 [0·5%] vs 18 [0·4%]), gallstones (106 [2·3%] vs 106 [2·3%]), or cancer (438 [9·4%] vs 439 [9·5%], p=0·89) and there was no significant excess of death from any non-vascular cause (668 [14·4%] vs 612 [13·2%], p=0·13). Interpretation Reduction of LDL cholesterol with simvastatin 20 mg plus ezetimibe 10 mg daily safely reduced the incidence of major atherosclerotic events in a wide range of patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. Funding Merck/Schering-Plough Pharmaceuticals; Australian National Health and Medical Research Council; British Heart Foundation; UK Medical Research Council.

Rosuvastatin and Cardiovascular Events in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis

BACKGROUND Statins reduce the incidence of cardiovascular events in patients at high cardiovascular risk. However, a benefit of statins in such patients who are undergoing hemodialysis has not been proved. METHODS We conducted an international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, prospective trial involving 2776 patients, 50 to 80 years of age, who were undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. We randomly assigned patients to receive rosuvastatin, 10 mg daily, or placebo. The combined primary end point was death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. Secondary end points included death from all causes and individual cardiac and vascular events. RESULTS After 3 months, the mean reduction in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels was 43% in patients receiving rosuvastatin, from a mean baseline level of 100 mg per deciliter (2.6 mmol per liter). During a median follow-up period of 3.8 years, 396 patients in the rosuvastatin group and 408 patients in the placebo group reached the primary end point (9.2 and 9.5 events per 100 patient-years, respectively; hazard ratio for the combined end point in the rosuvastatin group vs. the placebo group, 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84 to 1.11; P=0.59). Rosuvastatin had no effect on individual components of the primary end point. There was also no significant effect on all-cause mortality (13.5 vs. 14.0 events per 100 patient-years; hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.07; P=0.51). CONCLUSIONS In patients undergoing hemodialysis, the initiation of treatment with rosuvastatin lowered the LDL cholesterol level but had no significant effect on the composite primary end point of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00240331.)

Effect of fluvastatin on cardiac outcomes in renal transplant recipients: a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND Renal transplant recipients are at increased risk of premature cardiovascular disease. Although statins reduce cardiovascular risk in the general population, their efficacy and safety in renal transplant recipients have not been established. We investigated the effects of fluvastatin on cardiac and renal endpoints in this population. METHODS We did a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 2102 renal transplant recipients with total cholesterol 4.0-9.0 mmol/L. We randomly assigned patients fluvastatin (n=1050) or placebo (n=1052) and follow up was for 5-6 years. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of a major adverse cardiac event, defined as cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), or coronary intervention procedure. Secondary endpoints were individual cardiac events, combined cardiac death or non-fatal MI, cerebrovascular events, non-cardiovascular death, all-cause mortality, and graft loss or doubling of serum creatinine. Analysis was by intention to treat. FINDINGS After a mean follow-up of 5.1 years, fluvastatin lowered LDL cholesterol concentrations by 32%. Risk reduction with fluvastatin for the primary endpoint (risk ratio 0.83 [95% CI 0.64-1.06], p=0.139) was not significant, although there were fewer cardiac deaths or non-fatal MI (70 vs 104, 0.65 [0.48-0.88] p=0.005) in the fluvastatin group than in the placebo group. Coronary intervention procedures and other secondary endpoints did not differ significantly between groups. INTERPRETATION Although cardiac deaths and non-fatal MI seemed to be reduced, fluvastatin did not generally reduce rates of coronary intervention procedures or mortality. Overall effects of fluvastatin were similar to those of statins in other populations.

Long‐term Cardiac Outcomes in Renal Transplant Recipients Receiving Fluvastatin: The ALERT Extension Study

Renal transplant recipients (RTR) have an increased risk of premature cardiovascular disease. The ALERT study is the first trial to evaluate the effect of statin therapy on cardiac outcomes following renal transplantation. Patients initially randomized to fluvastatin or placebo in the 5–6 year ALERT study were offered open‐label fluvastatin XL 80 mg/day in a 2‐year extension to the original study. The primary endpoint was time to first major adverse cardiac event (MACE). Of 1787 patients who completed ALERT, 1652 (92%) were followed in the extension. Mean total follow‐up was 6.7 years. Mean LDL‐cholesterol was 98 mg/dL (2.5 mmol/L) at last follow‐up compared to a pre‐study level of 159 mg/dL (4.1 mmol/L). Patients randomized to fluvastatin had a reduced risk of MACE (hazards ratio [HR] 0.79, 95% CI 0.63–0.99, p = 0.036), and a 29% reduction in cardiac death or definite non‐fatal MI (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.55–0.93, p = 0.014). Total mortality and graft loss did not differ significantly between groups. Fluvastatin produces a safe and effective reduction in LDL‐cholesterol associated with reduced risk of MACE in RTR. The lipid‐lowering and cardiovascular benefits of fluvastatin are comparable to those of statins in other patient groups, and support use of fluvastatin in RTR.

Insulin resistance and insulin deficiency in the pathogenesis of posttransplantation diabetes in man

Although steroids can induce insulin resistance, it is not known whether additional defects in insulin secretion are necessary for the development of diabetes. To address this question, we measured insulin sensitivity (euglycemic insulin clamp in combination with indirect calorimetry and infusion of tritiated glucose) and insulin secretion (hyperglycemic clamp) in three groups of subjects: (1) 10 kidney transplant patients with normal oral glucose tolerance, (2) 14 patients who developed diabetes after kidney transplantation, and (3) 10 healthy controls. Glucose utilization, primarily storage of glucose as glycogen, was reduced by 34% in kidney transplant patients with normal glucose tolerance when compared with healthy control subjects (18.2 +/- 2.9 vs. 27.5 +/- 2.7 microM/L; P less than 0.05). Insulin secretion was normal in relation to the degree of insulin resistance in transplanted non-diabetic patients, thus maintaining a normal oral glucose tolerance. Development of transplantation diabetes was associated with only minor further deterioration of glucose storage (14.7 +/- 2.7 microM/L; P less than 0.001 vs. control subjects), whereas first-phase, second-phase, and glucagon-stimulated insulin secretion measured during hyperglycemic clamping (incremental area under the insulin curve 287 +/- 120, 1275 +/- 419, and 3515 +/- 922 pM) became impaired as compared with nondiabetic kidney transplant patients (769 +/- 216, 3084 +/- 545, and 6293 +/- 533 pM; P less than 0.05). We conclude that both insulin resistance and insulin deficiency are necessary for the development of diabetes in kidney transplant patients.

International Differences in Dialysis Mortality Reflect Background General Population Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Mortality

Existing national, racial, and ethnic differences in dialysis patient mortality rates largely are unexplained. This study aimed to test the hypothesis that mortality rates related to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in dialysis populations (DP) and in the background general populations (GP) are correlated. In a cross-sectional, multinational study, all-cause and ASCVD mortality rates were compared between GP and DP using the most recent data from the World Health Organization mortality database (67 countries; 1,571,852,000 population) and from national renal registries (26 countries; 623,900 population). Across GP of 67 countries (14,082,146 deaths), all-cause mortality rates (median 8.88 per 1000 population; range 1.93 to 15.40) were strongly related to ASCVD mortality rates (median 3.21; range 0.53 to 8.69), with Eastern European countries clustering in the upper and Southeast and East Asian countries in the lower rate ranges. Across DP (103,432 deaths), mortality rates from all causes (median 166.20; range 54.47 to 268.80) and from ASCVD (median 63.39 per 1000 population; range 21.52 to 162.40) were higher and strongly correlated. ASCVD mortality rates in DP and in the GP were significantly correlated; the relationship became even stronger after adjustment for age (R(2) = 0.56, P < 0.0001). A substantial portion of the variability in mortality rates that were observed across DP worldwide is attributable to the variability in background ASCVD mortality rates in the respective GP. Genetic and environmental factors may underlie these differences.

An update on renal replacement therapy in Europe: ERA–EDTA Registry data from 1997 to 2006

BACKGROUND Recent studies have indicated a stabilization in the incidence rates of renal replacement therapy (RRT) for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in a number of European countries. The aim of this study was to provide an update on the incidence, prevalence and outcomes of RRT in Europe over the past decade. METHODS Nineteen European national or regional renal registries with registry data from 1997 to 2006 participated in the study. Incidence and prevalence trends were analysed with Poisson and Joinpoint regression. Cox regression methods were used to examine patient survival. RESULTS The total adjusted incidence rate of RRT for ESRD increased from 109.9 per million population (pmp) in 1997 to 119.7 pmp in 2000, i.e. an average annual percentage change (AAPC) of 2.9% (95% CI 2.1-3.8%). Thereafter, the incidence increased at a much lower rate to 125.4 pmp in 2006 [AAPC 0.6% (95% CI 0.3-0.8%)]. This change in the trend of the incidence of RRT was largely due to a stabilization in the incidence rates of RRT for females aged 65-74 years, males aged 75-84 years and patients receiving RRT for ESRD due to hypertension/renal vascular disease. The overall adjusted prevalence in Europe continued to increase linearly at 2.7% per year. Between the periods 1997-2001 and 2002-2006, the risk of death decreased for all treatment modalities, with the most substantial improvement in patients starting peritoneal dialysis [19% (95% CI 15-22%)] and in patients receiving a kidney transplant [17% (95% CI 11-23%)]. CONCLUSION This European study shows that the annual rise of the overall incidence rate of RRT for ESRD has diminished and that in several age groups the incidence rates have now stabilized. The survival of dialysis patients and kidney transplant recipients has continued to improve.

Fluvastatin prevents cardiac death and myocardial infarction in renal transplant recipients: post-hoc subgroup analyses of the ALERT Study

Renal transplant recipients have a greatly increased risk of premature cardiovascular disease. The ALERT study was a multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial of fluvastatin (40–80 mg/day) in 2102 renal transplant recipients followed for 5–6 years. The main study used a composite cardiac end‐point including myocardial infarction, cardiac death and cardiac interventions. Although reduced by fluvastatin, this primary end‐point failed to achieve statistical significance thus precluding analysis of predefined subgroups. Therefore, in the present survival analysis, we used an alternative primary end‐point of cardiac death or definite nonfatal myocardial infarction (as used in other cardiac outcome trials) which was significantly reduced by Fluvastatin therapy and permits subgroup analysis. Fluvastatin reduced LDL‐cholesterol by 1 mmol/L compared with placebo, and the incidence of cardiac death or definite myocardial infarction was reduced from 104 to 70 events (RR 0.65; 95% CI 0.48, 0.88; p = 0.005). Fluvastatin use was associated with reduction in cardiac death or nonfatal myocardial infarction, which achieved statistical significance in many subgroups. The subgroups included patients at lower cardiovascular risk, who were younger, nondiabetic, nonsmokers and without pre‐existing CVD. These data support the early introduction of statins following renal transplantation.

European therapeutic trials in ANCA-associated systemic vasculitis: disease scoring, consensus regimens and proposed clinical trials EUROPEAN COMMUNITY STUDY GROUP ON CLINICAL TRIALS IN SYSTEMIC VASCULITIS ECSYSVASTRIAL (BMHl-Cr93-1078)

In previous phases of this project, proteinase 3 (PR3) and myeloperoxidase (MPO), the main antigenic target molecules of antineutrophil cytopiasmic antibodies, were isolated and applied in standardized ELISAs. In this study, standardized ELISAs with three PR3 preparations (from Copenhagen (CO), Raisdorf (RS) and Leiden (LF)) and one MPO preparation (from Copenhagen), were evaluated in a large retro-and prospective clitiical study. New patients (n=174) with primary systemic vasculitis (Wegeners granulomatosis, microscopic polyangiitis and idiopathic rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis, classical PAN and Churg-Strauss Syndrome) were included. Retrospectively, another 190 patients were evaluated. Furthermore control sera were obtained from patients with other forms of vasculitis, glomerulonephritis or granulomatous diseases (disease controls, n = 184) and healthy donors (healthy controls, n = 728). All patients were categorized by a system based on clinical and histoiogical data. Patients were followed up for at least 1 year after diagnosis in order to evaluate a possible correlation between ANCA levels and disease activity. The sensitivity of the anti-PR3 assays for histologically proven WG was between 59% and 69% in new patients, with a sensitivity of 22% for the anti-MPO assay. Similar figures were found for patients with clinically suspected WG. This was comparable with the results of the IIF test. In MPA and IRPGN a larger percentage of patients had antiMPO antibodies than in WG. Only a few patients with PAN and CSS were investigated, and most of these were negative in the ELISAs. The specificity ofthe assays for disease controls was 89-91% for the anti-PR3 assays and 95% for the anti-MPO assay. In the healthy controls the specificity was 98-99%. The specificity of the IIF test was 97% for a cANCA pattern and 81 % for a pANCA pattern in disease controls. The combination of cANCA with anti-PR3 and pANCA with anti-MPO both had a specificity of 99%. Further details will be presented during the meeting, in addition to the results of a follow-up study with correlation ofdisease activity and ANCA level. From this study we can conclude that ELISAs using purified PR3 or MPO are not more sensitive than the IIF test. However, the anti-MPO assay is more specific for systemic vascuitis as compared to disease controls with related diseases. Furthermore, the combination of the IIF test with antigen-specific ELISAs is very specific for the diagnosis Wegetiers granulomatosis, microscopic polyangiitis and idiopathic rapidly progressive gtomerulonephritis.

Induction of angiotensin I-converting enzyme in rat lung with captopril (SQ 14225)

Angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE, EC 2.4.15.1.) was measured in serum and in pulmonary plasma membranes of 40 spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR, Okamoto Aoki strain), divided into 4 groups, and treated with SQ 14225 (Captopril), 0.2 mg . ml-1 in drinking water, for 0-24 weeks. Serum ACE activity increased 2.5-3 fold after 12-24 weeks of SQ 14225 treatment, paralleled by an increase of ACE concentration in purified pulmonary plasma membranes (25-52%), and in ACE concentration upon solubilization with Triton X-100 from such plasma membranes (96-120%). We conclude that the ACE inhibitor, SQ 14225, causes marked induction of pulmonary ACE biosynthesis. High serum ACE activity probably reflects increased total biosynthesis of the enzyme.