Carola Lauster

Key susceptibility locus for nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate on chromosome 8q24.

We conducted a genome-wide association study involving 224 cases and 383 controls of Central European origin to identify susceptibility loci for nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate (NSCL/P). A 640-kb region at chromosome 8q24.21 was found to contain multiple markers with highly significant evidence for association with the cleft phenotype, including three markers that reached genome-wide significance. The 640-kb cleft-associated region was saturated with 146 SNP markers and then analyzed in our entire NSCL/P sample of 462 unrelated cases and 954 controls. In the entire sample, the most significant SNP (rs987525) had a P value of 3.34 × 10−24. The odds ratio was 2.57 (95% CI = 2.02–3.26) for the heterozygous genotype and 6.05 (95% CI = 3.88–9.43) for the homozygous genotype. The calculated population attributable risk for this marker is 0.41, suggesting that this study has identified a major susceptibility locus for NSCL/P.

Genome-wide association study identifies two susceptibility loci for nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate

We conducted a genome-wide association study for nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate (NSCL/P) in 401 affected individuals and 1,323 controls, with replication in an independent sample of 793 NSCL/P triads. We report two new loci associated with NSCL/P at 17q22 (rs227731, combined P = 1.07 × 10−8, relative risk in homozygotes = 1.84, 95% CI 1.34–2.53) and 10q25.3 (rs7078160, combined P = 1.92 × 10−8, relative risk in homozygotes = 2.17, 95% CI 1.32–3.56).

Genome-wide meta-analyses of nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate identify six new risk loci

We have conducted the first meta-analyses for nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate (NSCL/P) using data from the two largest genome-wide association studies published to date. We confirmed associations with all previously identified loci and identified six additional susceptibility regions (1p36, 2p21, 3p11.1, 8q21.3, 13q31.1 and 15q22). Analysis of phenotypic variability identified the first specific genetic risk factor for NSCLP (nonsyndromic cleft lip plus palate) (rs8001641; PNSCLP = 6.51 × 10−11; homozygote relative risk = 2.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.84–3.16).

IRF6 gene variants in Central European patients with non-syndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate

Variants in the interferon regulatory factor 6 (IRF6) gene have repeatedly been associated with non-syndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate (NSCL/P). A recent study has suggested that the functionally relevant variant rs642961 is the underlying cause of the observed associations. We genotyped rs642961 in our Central European case-control sample of 460 NSCL/P patients and 952 controls. In order to investigate whether other IRF6 variants contribute independently to the etiology of NSCL/P, we also genotyped the non-synonymous coding variant V274I (rs2235371) and five IRF6-haplotype tagging single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). A highly significant result was observed for rs642961 (P = 1.44 x 10(-6)) in our sample. The odds ratio was 1.75 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.38-2.22] for the heterozygous genotype and 1.94 (95% CI: 1.21-3.10) for the homozygous genotype, values that are similar to those reported in a previously published family-based study. Our results thus confirm the involvement of the IRF6 variant, rs642961, in the etiology of NSCL/P in the Central European population. We also found evidence suggestive of an independent protective effect of the coding variant V274I. In order to understand fully the genetic architecture of the IRF6 locus, it will be necessary to conduct additional SNP-based and resequencing studies using large samples of patients.

Genome-wide linkage scan of nonsyndromic orofacial clefting in 91 families of central European origin†

Orofacial clefts are among the most common of all congenital disorders. Nonsyndromic cases of cleft lip with or without cleft palate (NSCL/P) and cleft palate only (NSCPO) are considered to have a multifactorial etiology which involves both genetic and environmental factors. We present the results of a genome‐wide linkage scan in 91 families of central European descent with nonsyndromic orofacial clefts (NSC). The sample included 74 NSCL/P families, 15 NSCPO families, and 2 mixed families (a total of 217 affected and 230 unaffected individuals were genotyped). We genotyped 542 microsatellite markers (average intermarker distance = 6.9 cM). Multipoint nonparametric linkage analysis was performed using Allegro 2.0f. In addition to the factors investigated in previous genome‐wide linkage analyses, we searched for sex‐specific susceptibility loci, loci demonstrating parental imprinting and loci that are shared by NSCL/P and NSCPO. Several genomic regions likely to contain susceptibility loci for NSC were identified at the level of nominal significance. Some of these overlap with regions identified in previous studies. Suggestive evidence of linkage was obtained for the loci 4q21‐q26 and 1p31‐p21, with the chromosome 1 locus showing a male‐specific genetic effect. Our study has identified promising chromosomal regions for the identification of NSC‐associated genes, and demonstrates the importance of performing detailed statistical analyses which take into account complex genetic mechanisms such as sex‐specific effects and genomic imprinting. Further research in large patient samples is necessary to identify factors common to NSCL/P and NSCPO.

TGFB3 displays parent-of-origin effects among central Europeans with nonsyndromic cleft lip and palate

AbstractMice with a deletion of Tgf-β3 (−/−) and association studies in humans of different ethnicities support the involvement of TGFB3 in the etiology of orofacial clefts. In this study, we investigated the relevance of TGFB3 in the development of cleft lip and palate (CL/P) among 204 triads of central European origin. Transmission-disequilibrium test (TDT) analysis revealed no significant transmission distortions for each marker alone, and none for any possible haplotypes. However, we found strong evidence for parent-of-origin effects, with lower risk of maternal transmission compared with paternal transmission [IM = 0.38; confidence interval (CI): 0.17–0.86] of the risk allele T to an affected offspring at marker rs2300607. This is also expressed in an increased risk of heterozygous children having the T allele inherited from the father (RP = 3.47; CI: 1.32–9.11). Our data support the involvement of TGFB3 in the development of oral clefts in patients of central European origin.

Mutation Screening in the IRF6-Gene in Patients With Apparently Nonsyndromic Orofacial Clefts and a Positive Family History Suggestive of Autosomal-Dominant Inheritance

Stefanie Birnbaum,* Heiko Reutter, Carola Lauster, Martin Scheer, Gül Schmidt, Mitra Saffar, Markus Martini, Alexander Hemprich, Henning Henschke, Franz-Josef Kramer, and Elisabeth Mangold Institute of Human Genetics, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany Department of Cleft Lip and Cleft Palate Surgery, Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany Department of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Surgery, University of Cologne, Köln, Germany Department of Orthodontics, University of Cologne, Köln, Germany Department of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Surgery, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany Department of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Surgery, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany Institute for Medical Biometry, Informatics and Epidemiology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany Department of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Surgery, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany

Cleft Lip and/or Palate With Monogenic Autosomal Recessive Transmission in Pyrenees Shepherd Dogs

Objective: To document the genetic background of Pyrenees shepherd dogs as it relates to the incidence of cleft lip and/or cleft palate, to describe the phenotype, and to determine possible candidate genes. Design: Pedigree analysis was performed and blood samples were taken from five affected pups, their siblings, and parents. Seven candidate genes were selected and linkage analysis was performed. Further methods used included sequencing and histology. Results: In 37 litters consisting of 163 pups, we found 47 affected pups in a total population of 2104. The male:female ratio was 1:0.96. Affected pups showed isolated cleft lip and/or cleft palate; no attendant disorders have been reported. Despite a high degree of relationship, two affected pups displayed a cleft palate (– H S H –) and a cleft lip with or without cleft palate (L A —) cleft formation. Histology of affected pups showed that the medial edge epithelium remained intact and did not undergo an epithelial-mesenchymal transformation. There was no evidence for linkage between the trait and TGFb3 or Msx1. Subsequent sequencing excluded the coding sequence of Fst as well. Conclusion: Pedigree analysis showed that cleft palate is not genetically distinct from cleft lip with or without cleft palate but is inherited in this breed as a monogenic autosomal recessive trait. Linkage analysis and sequencing excluded TGFb3, Msx1, and Fst as candidate genes. Histology of affected pups showed that the medial edge epithelium is still intact.

Further evidence for the involvement of MYH9 in the etiology of non-syndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate.

Non-syndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate (NSCL/P) is one of the most common birth defects and has a multifactorial etiology that includes both genetic and environmental components. MYH9, the gene coding for the heavy chain of non-muscle myosin II, has been considered as a good candidate gene in NSCL/P on the basis of its expression profile during craniofacial morphogenesis. Reports in an Italian sample, as well as in an ethnically mixed North American sample, of a positive association between single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the MYH9 gene and NSCL/P have provided further support for the role of MYH9 in the development of NSCL/P. In the present study, we aimed to replicate these findings by conducting a family-based association study with seven single nucleotide polymorphisms in MYH9 using a sample of 248 NSCL/P patients and their parents. Single marker analysis resulted in a highly significant association for rs7078. In haplotype analysis, the most significant result was obtained for the SNP combination (rs7078; rs2071731; rs739097; rs5995288). Our results thus confirm the potential involvement of MYH9 in the etiology of NSCL/P in our patients of Central European origin, although further studies are warranted to determine its exact pathogenetic role.

SUMO1 as a candidate gene for non-syndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate: no evidence for the involvement of common or rare variants in Central European patients

OBJECTIVE Studies in mice and humans have suggested that SUMO1, which codes for the small ubiquitin-related modifier 1 (SUMO1), is a promising candidate gene for non-syndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate (NSCL/P). To investigate the possible involvement of this gene in NSCL/P patients from Central Europe, we performed: (i) a case control association study, and (ii) a resequencing study. METHODS Genotyping and the subsequent single marker and haplotype association analyses were performed for 413 NSCL/P patients and 412 controls. A total of 17 tagging single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were used. In the resequencing study, the complete coding region and splice sites were sequenced in 65 index patients from multiply affected families. RESULTS One of the 17 tested SNPs (rs16838917) had a borderline significant P-value of 0.0416 in the single-marker association analysis. However, this result did not withstand correction for multiple testing (P(corr)=0.707). No association was observed for any haplotypic marker combination. Sequencing failed to identify any novel rare sequence variants. CONCLUSIONS The results of the present study do not support the hypothesis that common or rare variants in SUMO1 play a significant role in the development of NSCL/P in Central-European patients. However, smaller effects of common variants or the presence of rare high penetrance mutations in other non-investigated familial cases cannot be excluded. Further analysis of SUMO1 in independent samples from Central European and other populations is therefore warranted.