Carole A. Sable

Efficacy and Safety of Caspofungin for Treatment of Invasive Aspergillosis in Patients Refractory to or Intolerant of Conventional Antifungal Therapy

BACKGROUND Invasive aspergillosis (IA) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality among immunocompromised patients. Echinocandins are novel antifungal molecules with in vitro and in vivo activity against Aspergillus species. METHODS We investigated the efficacy and safety of caspofungin in the treatment of IA. Ninety patients with IA who were refractory to or intolerant of amphotericin B, lipid formulations of amphotericin B, or triazoles were enrolled to receive caspofungin. RESULTS Efficacy was assessed for 83 patients who had infection consistent with definitions of IA and who received >or=1 dose of study drug. Common underlying conditions included hematologic malignancy (48% of patients), allogeneic blood and marrow transplantation (25% of patients), and solid-organ transplantation (11% of patients). Seventy-one patients (86%) were refractory to and 12 patients (14%) were intolerant of previous therapy. A favorable response to caspofungin therapy was observed in 37 (45%) of 83 patients, including 32 (50%) of 64 with pulmonary aspergillosis and 3 (23%) of 13 with disseminated aspergillosis. Two patients discontinued caspofungin therapy because of drug-related adverse events. Drug-related nephrotoxicity and hepatotoxicity occurred infrequently. CONCLUSION Caspofungin demonstrated usefulness in the salvage treatment of IA.

Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study of Caspofungin versus Amphotericin B for Treatment of Oropharyngeal and Esophageal Candidiases

ABSTRACT Caspofungin is an antifungal agent of the novel echinocandin class. We investigated its efficacy, safety, and tolerability as therapy for oropharyngeal and/or esophageal candidiasis in a phase II dose-ranging study. Patients were randomized in a double-blind manner to receive either caspofungin acetate (35, 50, or 70 mg) or amphotericin B (0.5 mg/kg of body weight) intravenously once daily for 7 to 14 days. A favorable response required both complete resolution of symptoms and quantifiable improvement of mucosal lesions 3 to 4 days after discontinuation of study drug. Efficacy was assessed using a modified intent-to-treat analysis. No hypothesis testing of efficacy was planned or performed. Of 140 enrolled patients, 63% had esophageal involvement and 98% were infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (median CD4 count, 30/mm3). A modestly higher proportion of patients in each of the caspofungin groups (74 to 91%) achieved favorable responses compared to amphotericin B recipients (63%), but there was considerable overlap in the 95% confidence intervals surrounding these point estimates. Similar trends were found in the subgroups with esophageal involvement, a history of fluconazole failure, and CD4 counts of ≤50/mm3. A smaller proportion of patients receiving any dose of caspofungin experienced drug-related adverse events compared to patients given standard doses of conventional amphotericin B (P < 0.01). Caspofungin provided a generally well-tolerated parenteral therapeutic option for HIV-infected patients with oropharyngeal and/or esophageal candidiasis in this study.

Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Caspofungin in Children and Adolescents

ABSTRACT Caspofungin is a parenteral antifungal that inhibits beta-1,3-d-glucan synthesis. Although licensed for adult use, the appropriate caspofungin dosing regimen in pediatric patients is not yet known. We therefore investigated the pharmacokinetics and safety of caspofungin in pediatric patients. Thirty-nine children (ages 2 to 11 years) and adolescents (ages 12 to 17 years) with neutropenia were administered caspofungin using either a weight-based regimen (1 mg/kg of body weight/day) or a body surface area regimen (50 mg/m2/day or 70 mg/m2/day). Plasma samples for caspofungin profiles were collected on days 1 and 4. These results were compared to those from adults treated with either 50 or 70 mg/day for mucosal candidiasis. In children receiving 1 mg/kg/day (maximum, 50 mg/day), the area under the concentration-time curve over 24 h (AUC0-24) was significantly smaller (46% after multiple doses) than that observed in adults receiving 50 mg/day (P < 0.001). In children and adolescents receiving 50 mg/m2/day (maximum, 70 mg/day), the AUC0-24 following multiple doses was similar to that for the exposure in adults receiving 50 mg/day. The AUC0-24 and concentration trough (at 24 h) in pediatric patients receiving the 50-mg/m2 daily regimen were consistent across the range of ages. Caspofungin was generally well tolerated in this study. None of the patients developed a serious drug-related adverse event or were discontinued for toxicity. These results demonstrate that caspofungin at 1 mg/kg/day in pediatric patients is suboptimal. Caspofungin administration at 50 mg/m2/day provides a comparable exposure to that of adult patients treated with 50 mg/day.

Caspofungin Susceptibility Testing of Isolates from Patients with Esophageal Candidiasis or Invasive Candidiasis: Relationship of MIC to Treatment Outcome

ABSTRACT The caspofungin clinical trial database offers an opportunity to assess susceptibility results for Candida pathogens obtained from patients with candidiasis and allows for correlations between efficacy outcomes and MICs. Candida isolates have been identified from patients enrolled in four studies of esophageal candidiasis and two studies of invasive candidiasis. The MICs of caspofungin for all baseline isolates were measured at a central laboratory using NCCLS criteria (document M-27A); MICs for caspofungin were defined as the lowest concentration inhibiting prominent growth at 24 h. MICs were then compared to clinical and microbiological outcomes across the two diseases. Susceptibility testing for caspofungin was performed on 515 unique baseline isolates of Candida spp. obtained from patients with esophageal candidiasis. MICs for caspofungin ranged from 0.008 to 4 μg/ml; the MIC50 and MIC90 were 0.5 and 1.0 μg/ml, respectively. Susceptibility testing was also performed on 231 unique baseline isolates of Candida spp. from patients with invasive candidiasis. The majority (∼96%) of MICs were between 0.125 and 2 μg/ml, with MIC50 and MIC90 for caspofungin being 0.5 and 2.0 μg/ml, respectively. Overall, caspofungin demonstrated potent in vitro activity against clinical isolates of Candida species. A relationship between MIC for caspofungin and treatment outcome was not seen for patients with either esophageal candidiasis or invasive candidiasis. Patients with isolates for which the MICs were highest (>2 μg/ml) had better outcomes than patients with isolates for which the MICs were lower (<1 μg/ml). Additionally, no correlation between MIC and outcome was identified for specific Candida species.

Global Distribution and Outcomes for Candida Species Causing Invasive Candidiasis: Results from an International Randomized Double-Blind Study of Caspofungin Versus Amphotericin B for the Treatment of Invasive Candidiasis

AbstractIn a randomized study, caspofungin was compared with amphotericin B for the treatment of invasive candidiasis in a total of 239 adults from 56 sites in 20 countries. This study provided a unique opportunity to assess the frequency and outcome of invasive candidiasis caused by different Candida species worldwide, and the results are presented here. Efficacy was primarily assessed at the end of intravenous therapy using a modified intent-to-treat (MITT) analysis. This analysis was performed on 224 of the 239 patients enrolled in the study. Attempts were made to collect baseline Candida isolates from all patients for species identification at a central laboratory. Yeasts were identified to the species level using two commercial systems and microscopic examination. Viable baseline isolates were recovered from 210 of the 224 (94%) patients included in the MITT analysis. Candida albicans was the most frequently isolated species in all regions and was responsible for 45% of cases overall. Nevertheless, the majority of cases of infection were caused by non-albicans Candida species. In the USA and Canada, Candida glabrata was the second most commonly isolated pathogen (18%). In contrast, Candida parapsilosis and Candida tropicalis accounted for 55% of cases in Latin America. Outcomes were comparable for patients treated with caspofungin (74% overall; 64% and 80% for infections due to Candida albicans and non-albicans species) and amphotericin B (62% overall; 58% and 68% for infections due to Candida albicans and non-albicans species), and were generally similar across continents. The distribution of Candida species isolated from patients enrolled in a clinical trial may not be representative of pathogens causing invasive candidiasis in the general population. Nevertheless, our findings may affect the regional choice of empirical antifungal therapy for seriously ill patients with suspected or documented invasive candidiasis since different Candida species have varying susceptibility to conventional antifungal drugs.

Retrospective study of the hepatic safety profile of patients concomitantly treated with caspofungin and cyclosporin A.

Abstract: Background. Mild, transient alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevations were seen in Phase I studies of caspofungin and cyclosporin A (CsA).

Response and Relapse Rates of Candidal Esophagitis in HIV-Infected Patients Treated with Caspofungin

Caspofungin is a new antifungal drug of the echinocandin class. We analyzed the clinical efficacy of caspofungin (50 mg/day) in the treatment of HIV-infected adults with endoscopically documented Candida esophagitis and enrolled in four clinical trials of caspofungin. Symptoms were evaluated daily; a favorable outcome required complete resolution of all esophageal symptoms assessed at the time of discontinuation of therapy. Relapse was defined as recurrent symptoms during the subsequent 2 weeks. A multivariate logistic regression model was developed to identify potential factors (including severity of symptoms at presentation, CD4(+) cell count on entry, extent of disease [assessed endoscopically at baseline], causative Candida species, duration of therapy [overall and after resolution of symptoms], time on treatment before symptom resolution, and antifungal prophylaxis) that might predict symptomatic relapse in the 2 weeks following completion of therapy. The median CD4(+) lymphocyte count for the entire population was 31/mm(3). Candida albicans was isolated from 109 of 110 patient samples cultured for the pathogen and constituted the sole isolate in 77%. Extensive esophageal involvement was present in 55% of patients at the time of pretreatment endoscopy. The duration of therapy ranged from 7 to 20 days (median, 12 days). Symptoms resolved in 117 of 123 patients (95%; 95% confidence interval, 90-98%) with a median time of ~4 days. Response rates were 43 of 46 (93%) and 70 of 73 (96%) for patients with greater or fewer than 50 CD4(+) cells/mm(3), and 80 of 85 (94%) and 23 of 24 (96%) in infections caused by C. albicans alone or in association with non-albicans isolates, respectively. Symptoms recurred within 2 weeks of stopping caspofungin in 19 of 115 evaluable patients (17%), including 3 of 16 (19%) receiving antifungal prophylaxis. Relapse rates were similar for patients with greater or fewer than 50 CD4(+) cells/mm(3). In this relatively small number of patients, only symptom severity and extent of disease judged endoscopically at baseline were significantly (p < 0.10) associated with early relapse in the multivariate model.

A web-based endpoint adjudication system for interim analyses in clinical trials

Background A data monitoring committee (DMC) is often employed to assess trial progress and review safety data and efficacy endpoints throughout a trail. Interim analyses performed for the DMC should use data that are as complete and verified as possible. Such analyses are complicated when data verification involves subjective study endpoints or requires clinical expertise to determine each subjects status with respect to the study endpoint. Therefore, procedures are needed to obtain adjudicated data for interim analyses in an efficient manner. In the past, methods for handling such data included using locally reported results as surrogate endpoints, adjusting analysis methods for unadjudicated data, or simply performing the adjudication as rapidly as possible. These methods all have inadequacies that make their sole usage suboptimal. Purpose For a study of prophylaxis for invasive candidiasis, adjudication of both study eligibility criteria and clinical endpoints prior to two interim analyses was required. Because the study was expected to enroll at a moderate rate and the sponsor required adjudicated endpoints to be used for interim analyses, an efficient process for adjudication was required. Methods We created a web-based endpoint adjudication system (WebEAS) that allows for expedited review by the endpoint adjudication committee (EAC). This system automatically identifies when a subjects data are complete, creates a subject profile from the study data, and assigns EAC reviewers. The reviewers use the WebEAS to review the subject profile and submit their completed review form. The WebEAS then compares the reviews, assigns an additional review as a tiebreaker if needed, and stores the adjudicated data. Results The study for which this system was originally built was administratively closed after 10 months with only 38 subjects enrolled. The adjudication process was finalized and the WebEAS system activated prior to study closure. Some website accessibility issues presented initially. However, once these issues were resolved, the reviewers found the system user-friendly and easy to navigate. Limitations Web-based data adjudication depends upon expeditious data collection and verification. Further, ability to use web-based technologies, in addition to clinical expertise, must be considered in selecting EAC members. Conclusion The automated nature of this system makes it a practical mechanism for ensuring timely endpoint adjudication. The authors believe a similar approach could be useful for handling endpoint adjudication for future clinical trials. Clinical Trials 2009; 6: 60—66. http://ctj.sagepub.com

Caspofungin exposure-response relationships in adult patients with mucosal or invasive candidiasis.

Caspofungin is an echinocandin antifungal agent administered once daily as an intravenous infusion. Relationships between caspofungin exposure and clinical efficacy and safety were investigated. End‐of‐infusion (CEOI) and trough (C24 hours) concentrations were obtained in 218 patients with mucosal (i.e., esophageal and/or oropharyngeal) candidiasis (MC) receiving caspofungin 35, 50, or 70 mg/day and 278 patients with invasive candidiasis (IC) receiving 50, 100, or 150 mg/day. Area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC0–24 hours) was obtained in a subset of MC patients (n = 99). Odds ratios were estimated for the association between log‐transformed PK and efficacy response and the occurrence of common adverse events. No pharmacokinetic or hybrid parameter (ratio of AUC:MIC, CEOI:MIC, C24 hours:MIC) was significantly correlated with overall treatment outcome in either MC or IC, although this patient population may exhibit confounding factors which masked a potential pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship. An exploratory evaluation of MC identified significant pharmacokinetic correlations with endoscopic response, but not symptom response. Statistically significant associations were identified for IC patients with C. parapsilosis infections. Occurrence of clinical adverse events and/or laboratory abnormalities did not appear to be increased by higher caspofungin plasma concentrations. Caspofungin concentrations achieved with 50 mg/day are generally within the therapeutic window for the treatment of candidiasis.