Carole Keefe

Medical students, clinical preventive services, and shared decision-making.

OBJECTIVE Improving access to preventive care requires addressing patient, provider, and systems barriers. Patients often lack knowledge or are skeptical about the importance of prevention. Physicians feel that they have too little time, are not trained to deliver preventive services, and are concerned about the effectiveness of prevention. We have implemented an educational module in the required family practice clerkship (1) to enhance medical student learning about common clinical preventive services and (2) to teach students how to inform and involve patients in shared decision making about those services. DESCRIPTION Students are asked to examine available evidence-based information for preventive screening services. They are encouraged to look at the recommendations of various organizations and use such resources as reports from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force to determine recommendations they want to be knowledgeable about in talking with their patients. For learning shared decision making, students are trained to use a model adapted from Braddock and colleagues(1) to discuss specific screening services and to engage patients in the process of making informed decisions about what is best for their own health. The shared decision making is presented and modeled by faculty, discussed in small groups, and students practice using Web-based cases and simulations. The students are evaluated using formative and summative performance-based assessments as they interact with simulated patients about (1) screening for high blood cholesterol and other lipid abnormalities, (2) screening for colorectal cancer, (3) screening for prostate cancer, and (4) screening for breast cancer. The final student evaluation is a ten-minute, videotaped discussion with a simulated patient about screening for colorectal cancer that is graded against a checklist that focuses primarily on the elements of shared decision making. DISCUSSION Our medical students appear quite willing to accept shared decision making as a skill that they should have in working with patients, and this was the primary focus of the newly implemented module. However, we have learned that students need to deepen their understanding of screening services in order to help patients understand the associated benefits and risks. The final videotaped interaction with a simulated patient about colorectal cancer screening has been very helpful in making it more obvious to faculty what students believe and know about screening for colorectal cancer. As the students are asked to discuss clinical issues with patients and discuss the pros and cons of screening tests as part of the shared decision-making process, their thinking becomes transparent and it is evident where curricular changes and enhancements are required. We have found that an explicit model that allows students to demonstrate a process for shared decision making is a good introductory tool. We think it would be helpful to provide students with more formative feedback. We would like to develop faculty development programs around shared decision making so that more of our clinical faculty would model such a process with patients. Performance-based assessments are resource-intensive, but they appear to be worth the added effort in terms of enhanced skills development and a more comprehensive appraisal of student learning.

A Work Sampling Study of Provider Activities in School‐Based Health Centers

BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to describe provider activities in a convenience sample of School-Based Health Centers (SBHCs). The goal was to determine the relative proportion of time that clinic staff engaged in various patient care and non-patient care activities. METHODS All provider staff at 4 urban SBHCs participated in this study; 2 were in elementary schools, 1 in a middle school, and 1 in a school with kindergarten through grade 8. The study examined provider activity from 6 days sampled at random from the school year. Participants were asked to document their activities in 15-minute intervals from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. A structured recording form was used that included 35 activity categories. RESULTS Overall, 1492 records were completed, accounting for 2708 coded activities. Almost half (48%) of all staff activities were coded as direct patient contact, with clinic operations the second largest category. Limited variations in activities were found across clinic sites and according to season. CONCLUSIONS A significant amount of provider activity was directed at the delivery of health care; direct patient care and clinic operations combined accounted for approximately 75% of clinic activity. Patient, classroom, and group education activities, as well as contacts with parents and school staff accounted for 20% of all clinic activity and represent important SBHC functions that other productivity measures such as billing data might not consistently track. Overall, the method was acceptable to professional staff as a means of tracking activity and was adaptable to meet their needs.

Designing health plan benefits: a simulation exercise

Context and setting. We aimed to provide Year 2 medical students in an introductory health policy module with an opportunity to actively consider and discuss decisions payers and policy makers have to make in designing health plan benefit packages within the constraints of limited resources. Why the idea was necessary The Association of American Medical Colleges Medical School Objectives Project was implemented to help prepare new doctors to meet society’s changing expectations of them. Among the objectives developed for the medical school experience was knowledge of the various approaches to the organisation, financing and delivery of health care . We wanted to give students in a health policy module an opportunity to make decisions about health care coverage, understand the consequences of those decisions, and to discuss and reflect upon their decisions with other students. What was done We used the simulation exercise CHAT (Choosing Health Plans All Together ), developed by Danis and Goold. Nine groups of 10–11 medical students met with a facilitator for 2 rounds of the exercise. First, each student designed a basic benefit package for him ⁄herself and their family. Students could purchase up to 15 types of health benefits at basic, medium or high levels with limited health care insurance resources (50 pegs). In the second round, the small group worked together to design a basic benefit package for a whole community. After both rounds students tested their earlier benefit choices by drawing event cards representing possible health scenarios. They discussed the coverage they had chosen in light of these experiences . Evaluation of results The community benefit packages designed by the small groups were remarkably similar. The top 6 benefit rankings were primary care, hospitalisation, home health, specialty care, mental health care, and pharmacy. Only 1 group purchased infertility treatment and none of the groups covered complementary medicine. Students liked the interactive exercise. Most of the 93 students evaluated the game as very or fairly enjoyable (97%), and 94% said they would recommend the CHAT game to others. Faculty facilitators reported that the students actively engaged in the group process and discussed reasons for and against the purchase of various benefits. In subsequent weeks, as students studied various aspects of health policy, they were able to reflect upon the experience of actively making decisions about competing health and medical care needs given finite resources.

Using a formative simulated patient exercise for curriculum evaluation

BackgroundIt is not clear that teaching specific history taking, physical examination and patient teaching techniques to medical students results in durable behavioural changes. We used a quasi-experimental design that approximated a randomized double blinded trial to examine whether a Participatory Decision-Making (PDM) educational module taught in a clerkship improves performance on a Simulated Patient Exercise (SPE) in another clerkship, and how this is influenced by the time between training and assessment.MethodsThird year medical students in an internal medicine clerkship were assessed on their use of PDM skills in an SPE conducted in the second week of the clerkship. The rotational structure of the third year clerkships formed a pseudo-randomized design where students had 1) completed the family practice clerkship containing a training module on PDM skills approximately four weeks prior to the SPE, 2) completed the family medicine clerkship and the training module approximately 12 weeks prior to the SPE or 3) had not completed the family medicine clerkship and the PDM training module at the time they were assessed via the SPE.ResultsBased on limited pilot data there were statistically significant differences between students who received PDM training approximately four weeks prior to the SPE and students who received training approximately 12 weeks prior to the SPE. Students who received training 12 weeks prior to the SPE performed better than those who received training four weeks prior to the SPE. In a second comparison students who received training four weeks prior to the SPE performed better than those who did not receive training but the differences narrowly missed statistical significance (P < 0.05).ConclusionThis pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of a methodology for conducting rigorous curricular evaluations using natural experiments based on the structure of clinical rotations. In addition, it provided preliminary data suggesting targeted educational interventions can result in marked improvements in the clinical skills spontaneously exhibited by physician trainees in a setting different from which the skills were taught.