Carolien H. Smorenburg

Frailty screening methods for predicting outcome of a comprehensive geriatric assessment in elderly patients with cancer: a systematic review

Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is done to detect vulnerability in elderly patients with cancer so that treatment can be adjusted accordingly; however, this process is time-consuming and pre-screening is often used to identify fit patients who are able to receive standard treatment versus those in whom a full CGA should be done. We aimed to assess which of the frailty screening methods available show the best sensitivity and specificity for predicting the presence of impairments on CGA in elderly patients with cancer. We did a systematic search of Medline and Embase, and a hand-search of conference abstracts, for studies on the association between frailty screening outcome and results of CGA in elderly patients with cancer. Our search identified 4440 reports, of which 22 publications from 14 studies, were included in this Review. Seven different frailty screening methods were assessed. The median sensitivity and specificity of each screening method for predicting frailty on CGA were as follows: Vulnerable Elders Survey-13 (VES-13), 68% and 78%; Geriatric 8 (G8), 87% and 61%; Triage Risk Screening Tool (TRST 1+; patient considered frail if one or more impairments present), 92% and 47%, Groningen Frailty Index (GFI) 57% and 86%, Fried frailty criteria 31% and 91%, Barber 59% and 79%, and abbreviated CGA (aCGA) 51% and 97%. However, even in case of the highest sensitivity, the negative predictive value was only roughly 60%. G8 and TRST 1+ had the highest sensitivity for frailty, but both had poor specificity and negative predictive value. These findings suggest that, for now, it might be beneficial for all elderly patients with cancer to receive a complete geriatric assessment, since available frailty screening methods have insufficient discriminative power to select patients for further assessment.

Effect of Low-Intensity Physical Activity and Moderate- to High-Intensity Physical Exercise During Adjuvant Chemotherapy on Physical Fitness, Fatigue, and Chemotherapy Completion Rates: Results of the PACES Randomized Clinical Trial

PURPOSE We evaluated the effectiveness of a low-intensity, home-based physical activity program (Onco-Move) and a moderate- to high-intensity, combined supervised resistance and aerobic exercise program (OnTrack) versus usual care (UC) in maintaining or enhancing physical fitness, minimizing fatigue, enhancing health-related quality of life, and optimizing chemotherapy completion rates in patients undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS We randomly assigned patients who were scheduled to undergo adjuvant chemotherapy (N = 230) to Onco-Move, OnTrack, or UC. Performance-based and self-reported outcomes were assessed before random assignment, at the end of chemotherapy, and at the 6-month follow-up. We used generalized estimating equations to compare the groups over time. RESULTS Onco-Move and OnTrack resulted in less decline in cardiorespiratory fitness (P < .001), better physical functioning (P ≤ .001), less nausea and vomiting (P = .029 and .031, respectively) and less pain (P = .003 and .011, respectively) compared with UC. OnTrack also resulted in better outcomes for muscle strength (P = .002) and physical fatigue (P < .001). At the 6-month follow-up, most outcomes returned to baseline levels for all three groups. A smaller percentage of participants in OnTrack required chemotherapy dose adjustments than those in the UC or Onco-Move groups (P = .002). Both intervention groups returned earlier (P = .012), as well as for more hours per week (P = .014), to work than the control group. CONCLUSION A supervised, moderate- to high-intensity, combined resistance and aerobic exercise program is most effective for patients with breast cancer undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy. A home-based, low-intensity physical activity program represents a viable alternative for women who are unable or unwilling to follow the higher intensity program.

The Value of Geriatric Assessments in Predicting Treatment Tolerance and All-Cause Mortality in Older Patients With Cancer

BACKGROUND Awareness of the use of geriatric assessments for older patients with cancer is increasing. The aim of this review is to summarize all available evidence on the association between geriatric assessments and relevant oncologic outcomes. METHOD A systematic search was conducted in Medline and Embase of studies on geriatric assessment in oncology, focusing on the association between baseline assessment and outcome. RESULTS The literature search identified 2008 reports; 51 publications from 37 studies were selected for inclusion in the review. The quality of studies was heterogeneous and generally poor. A median of five geriatric conditions were assessed per study (interquartile range: 4-8). Little consistency was found in the results of the studies. Furthermore, different tools appear to be predictive depending on the outcome measure: frailty, nutritional status, and comorbidity assessed by the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale for Geriatrics were predictive for all-cause mortality; frailty was predictive for toxicity of chemotherapy; cognitive impairment and activities of daily living impairment were predictive for chemotherapy completion; and instrumental activities of daily living impairment was predictive for perioperative complications. CONCLUSION Although various geriatric conditions appear to be of some value in predicting outcome in elderly patients with cancer, the results are too inconsistent to guide treatment decisions. Further research is needed to elucidate the role of geriatric assessments in the oncologic decision-making process for these patients.

Randomized cross-over evaluation of body-surface area-based dosing versus flat-fixed dosing of paclitaxel.

PURPOSE Despite dose calculation using body-surface area (BSA), pharmacokinetics of most anticancer drugs show wide interindividual variability. In this study, we evaluated the role of BSA in paclitaxel disposition. PATIENTS AND METHODS Paclitaxel pharmacokinetics were prospectively studied in 12 patients that were treated in a randomized cross-over design with paclitaxel (3-hour infusion at a 3-week interval) at 175 mg/m2 in cycle 1 (A) and a flat-fixed dose of 300 mg in cycle 2 (B), or vice versa. Blood samples were collected up to 24 hours after dosing and analyzed for total and unbound paclitaxel. RESULTS The area under the curves (AUC) of unbound paclitaxel were similar in both dosing groups, with mean values +/- SD (A v B) of 1.34 +/- 0.158 versus 1.30 +/- 0.329 microM x h, indicating that BSA-based dosing reduced the coefficient of variation by 53.3%. Unbound and total paclitaxel clearance was also significantly related to various body-size measures, including BSA (R > or = 0.617; P < or =.033), weight (R >or = 0.621; P < or =.031), and lean-body mass (r > or = 0.630; P < or = .028). We hypothesize that this is caused by the association of paclitaxel in the circulation with Cremophor EL, the distribution of which is linked to total blood volume, and thus to BSA. CONCLUSION This study indicates that paclitaxel disposition is significantly related to BSA. This provides a pharmacokinetic rationale for BSA-based dosing of this drug.

Combination chemotherapy of the taxanes and antimetabolites: Its use and limitations

In an effort to improve response rates of chemotherapy, taxanes have been combined with other cytotoxic agents such as antimetabolites. However, the use of some of these combinations in patients has been restricted by severe toxicity. The significance of the sequence of drug administration in combining methotrexate (MTX) and taxanes was recognised in in vitro studies, showing synergistic effects for the sequence of MTX followed by paclitaxel, and antagonism for exposure in the reverse order. A possible explanation might be an MTX-induced synchronisation of cells in the S phase of the cell cycle, after which cells are more susceptible for the cytotoxic action of taxanes. Clinical studies using this sequence were hampered by severe neutropenia and mucositis at relatively low doses of both drugs. As no pharmacokinetic interactions were observed, the excess of toxicity may have been due to sequence-dependent synergistic actions on bone marrow and mucosa. In contrast, and confusingly, in vitro studies on 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and taxanes indicate that 5-FU preceeding or simultaneously given to paclitaxel impairs cytotoxicity as compared with paclitaxel monotherapy, while the reverse sequence results in additive or synergistic cytotoxicity. While almost all clinical studies have used the sequence of a taxane followed by 5-FU, various schedules appeared feasible and effective. The combination of a 5-FU analogue, capecitabine and taxanes was supported by in vitro data. A large phase III trial confirmed the feasibility and superior efficacy of this combination in breast cancer patients relapsing after an anthracycline. Conflicting results exist on the benefit of combining gemcitabine and taxanes in tumour cell lines. Although the accumulation of gemcitabine triphosphate (dFdCTP) in mononuclear cells was significantly higher with an increasing dose of paclitaxel, no pharmacokinetic interactions for both agents were noticed. A pharmacokinetic analysis of the gemcitabine-docetaxel combination therapy has not been published in detail. Despite numerous trials, so far no optimum schedule has been established. Regarding data on actually delivered dose intensities, a 2- or 3-weekly cycle seems favourable and feasible. However, possible severe pulmonary toxicity warrants cautious monitoring of patients treated with this combination. Different outcomes of preclinical and clinical studies reveal that combining two chemotherapeutic agents is not simply a matter of putting antitumour activities together. Drug interaction may result in synergism, not only of efficacy but also of toxic side-effects. Adding two drugs may also implicate antagonism in drug efficacy due to unwanted interference in cytotoxicity or pharmacokinetics. For agents acting at a specific phase of the cell cycle, the sequence of administration may determine the efficacy and toxicity of a combination therapy. Because of an observed discrepancy between in vitro data and clinical studies, we would like to emphasise the need for adequate dose-finding clinical trials together with pharmacokinetic data analysis before examining any new combination chemotherapy in more detail in phase II studies.

Angiotensin II-Receptor Inhibition With Candesartan to Prevent Trastuzumab-Related Cardiotoxic Effects in Patients With Early Breast Cancer : A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE This is the first randomized placebo-controlled evaluation of a medical intervention for the prevention of trastuzumab-related cardiotoxic effects. OBJECTIVE To determine as the primary end point whether angiotensin II antagonist treatment with candesartan can prevent or ameliorate trastuzumab-related cardiotoxic effects, defined as a decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of more than 15% or a decrease below the absolute value 45%. DESIGN This randomized, placebo-controlled clinical study was conducted between October 2007 and October 2011 in 19 hospitals in the Netherlands, enrolling 210 women with early breast cancer testing positive for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) who were being considered for adjuvant systemic treatment with anthracycline-containing chemotherapy followed by trastuzumab. INTERVENTIONS A total of 78 weeks of candesartan (32 mg/d) or placebo treatment; study treatment started at the same day as the first trastuzumab administration and continued until 26 weeks after completion of trastuzumab treatment. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was LVEF. Secondary end points included whether the N-terminal of the prohormone brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and high-sensitivity troponin T (hs-TnT) can be used as surrogate markers and whether genetic variability in germline ERBB2 (formerly HER2 or HER2/neu) correlates with trastuzumab-related cardiotoxic effects. RESULTS A total of 206 participants were evaluable (mean age, 49 years; age range, 25-69 years) 103 in the candesartan group (mean age, 50 years; age range, 25-69 years) and 103 in the placebo group (mean age, 50 years; age range, 30-67 years). Of these, 36 manifested at least 1 of the 2 primary cardiac end points. There were 3.8% more cardiac events in the candesartan group than in the placebo group (95% CI, -7% to 15%; P = .58): 20 events (19%) and 16 events (16%), respectively. The 2-year cumulative incidence of cardiac events was 0.28 (95% CI, 0.13-0.40) in the candesartan group and 0.16 (95% CI, 0.08-0.22) in the placebo group (P = .56). Candesartan did not affect changes in NT-proBNP and hs-TnT values, and these biomarkers were not associated with significant changes in LVEF. The Ala1170Pro homozygous ERBB2 genotype was associated with a lower likelihood of the occurrence of a cardiac event compared with Pro/Pro + Ala/Pro genotypes in multivariate analysis (odds ratio, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.02-0.45; P = .003). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The findings do not support the hypothesis that concomitant use of candesartan protects against a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction during or shortly after trastuzumab treatment in early breast cancer. The ERBB2 germline Ala1170Pro single nucleotide polymorphism may be used to identify patients who are at increased risk of trastuzumab-related cardiotoxic effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00459771.

Phase II study of miltefosine 6% solution as topical treatment of skin metastases in breast cancer patients

Topical treatment of skin metastases with a cytotoxic agent is attractive for its easy self-administration and absence of major systemic interference. Miltefosine exerts its cytotoxicity by acting on cell membrane phospholipids and can be administered topically. Twenty breast cancer patients with progression of skin metastases were treated with a 6% solution of miltefosine, which was topically administered once daily during the first week and twice daily thereafter. Sixteen out of 20 patients also had metastatic disease at other sites. Concomitant systemic treatment when ongoing for at least 2 months prior to study entry was permitted, and consisted of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy in seven and nine patients, respectively. Prior palliative cytotoxic and hormonal therapy had been administered to 11 and 19 patients, respectively. No grade 3 and 4 toxicity occurred. Miltefosine therapy was discontinued in two patients due to nausea and in one patient due to skin toxicity. Grade 1 and 2 adverse skin reactions, and nausea and vomiting were seen in 11 and two patients, respectively. In 18 patients evaluable for response, four partial responses were noted (response rate 22%), while seven patients had stable disease. Three partial responses were observed in patients in whom the skin lesions were smaller than 1.5 cm2. Median duration of respons was 2.5 months and median time to progression for all patients was 1.9 months. In this study topically applied miltefosine for metastatic skin lesions of breast cancer showed modest activity in a relatively heavily pretreated patient population, without serious systemic toxicity.

Factors Influencing the Effectiveness of Scalp Cooling in the Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Alopecia

The success of scalp cooling in preventing or reducing chemotherapy-induced alopecia (CIA) is highly variable between patients and chemotherapy regimens. The outcome of hair preservation is often unpredictable and depends on various factors. Methods. We performed a structured search of literature published from 1970 to February 2012 for articles that reported on factors influencing the effectiveness of scalp cooling to prevent CIA in patients with cancer. Results. The literature search identified 192 reports, of which 32 studies were considered relevant. Randomized studies on scalp cooling are scarce and there is little information on the determinants of the result. The effectiveness of scalp cooling for hair preservation depends on dose and type of chemotherapy, with less favorable results at higher doses. Temperature seems to be an important determinant. Various studies suggest that a subcutaneous scalp temperature less than 22 °C is required for hair preservation. Conclusions. The effectiveness of scalp cooling for hair preservation varies by chemotherapy type and dose, and probably by the degree and duration of cooling.

Omission of surgery in elderly patients with early stage breast cancer

AIM To assess national trends over time in surgery for elderly patients with resectable breast cancer (BC) and to evaluate clinical outcome and cause of death after the omission of surgery in a regional cohort of elderly patients. METHODS National trends in 1995-2005 were calculated using cancer registry data. In addition, a chart review was performed in a cohort of patients aged ≥ 75 years, with early stage BC but no primary surgery, diagnosed at five Dutch hospitals in 1990-2005. Patient characteristics, comorbidity and reason for the omission of surgery were collected from the chart. Cause of death was retrieved from death certificate data registered at Statistics Netherlands. RESULTS Omission of surgery increased significantly over time for patients aged 80 years and older (p<0.05). Of the 187 patients in the regional cohort (median age 85.9 years (range 75.0-97.7), 174 (92%) received hormonal therapy. Omission of surgery was at the patients request in 59 patients (32%). Of the 178 patients that died during follow-up, 60 patients (34%) died of BC. For 81 patients (45%), BC was not clinically relevant at the time of death. Median overall survival was 2.3 years (range 0.2-10.7) and did not differ between BC and other causes of death (p=0.9). CONCLUSION Omission of surgery for elderly patients with resectable BC has increased significantly over the past decade; instead patients often received primary endocrine treatment. Although this may appear an effective alternative to surgery, the potential for a longer term negative impact on disease control and quality of life deserves further investigation.

Prospective clinical trials using a pharmacogenetic/pharmacogenomic approach.

Abstract The antitumor activity of most anticancer agents is limited by a number of different factors, such as their cellular targets and activating enzymes, while constitutive genetic polymorphisms may limit drug bioavailability and influence either antitumor efficacy or toxic side effects. An example of a drug for which clear predictive parameters have been identified is 5-fluorouracil (5FU): its antitumor activity is limited by either a high activity of the target enzyme thymidylate synthase (TS) and/or a high activity of its degrading enzyme, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). Retrospective studies showed a clear correlation between a high expression of TS and a poor response, which was stronger when DPD was included in the evaluation (high DPD, poor response). Therefore we initiated a clinical prospective study in which we treated previously untreated patients with advanced colorectal cancer with tailored chemotherapy: at a low TS-mRNA and low DPD-mRNA patients were stratified to receive a standard weekly 5FU-leucovorin regimen. At a high TS and/or DPD, patients were stratified to receive a combination of oxaliplatin and irinotecan. Up to now this proof-of-principle study demonstrated that selection of patients is possible and can clearly improve the clinical outcome. The next step is to develop algorithms to select patients for combination chemotherapy with 5Fuleucovorin and new compounds, such as oxaliplatin or irinotecan, or novel targeted agents such as bevacizumab or cetuximab. For these combination schedules the optimal combination of predictive factors has to be explored.