Carolina Fasola

Locoregional Recurrence Risk in Breast Cancer Patients with Estrogen Receptor Positive Tumors and Residual Nodal Disease following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Mastectomy without Radiation Therapy

Among breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and mastectomy, locoregional recurrence (LRR) rates are unclear in women with ER+ tumors treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy without postmastectomy radiation (PMRT). To determine if PMRT is needed in these patients, we compared LRR rates of patients with ER+ tumors (treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy) with women who have non-ER+ tumors. 85 consecutive breast cancer patients (87 breast tumors) treated with NAC and mastectomy without PMRT were reviewed. Patients were divided by residual nodal disease (ypN) status (ypN+ versus ypN0) and then stratified by receptor subtype. Among ypN+ patients (n = 35), five-year LRR risk in patients with ER+, Her2+, and triple negative tumors was 5%, 33%, and 37%, respectively (p = 0.02). Among ypN+/ER+ patients, lymphovascular invasion and grade three disease increased the five-year LRR risk to 13% and 11%, respectively. Among ypN0 patients (n = 52), five-year LRR risk in patients with ER+, Her2+, and triple negative tumors was 7%, 22%, and 6%, respectively (p = 0.71). In women with ER+ tumors and residual nodal disease, endocrine therapy may be sufficient adjuvant treatment, except in patients with lymphovascular invasion or grade three tumors where PMRT may still be indicated.

Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy is associated with comparable outcomes to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in post-menopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer

Objectives: We compared outcomes in post-menopausal estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NAHT) or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Methods: We retrospectively identified post-menopausal women who received either NAHT or NACT for non-metastatic, non-inflammatory, ER+, Her2neu negative breast cancer from 2004 to 2011. We compared long-term rates of locoregional relapse free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) using the Kaplan–Meier method. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify patient and disease factors significantly associated with these endpoints. Results: We identified 99 patients in our study, including 27 who received NAHT and 72 who received NACT. There were no differences in 4-year LRFS, DMFS, or OS between groups. On Cox proportional hazards modeling, the type of systemic therapy (NAHT versus NACT) was not associated with OS. However, patients with progesterone receptor (PR) positive disease had a 92% lower risk of death compared to patients with PR negative disease. Conclusion: Our data suggest that outcomes are not adversely affected by NAHT in post-menopausal women with ER+ breast cancer. Therefore, NAHT is a viable and potentially less toxic option than NACT in appropriately selected patients. Furthermore, although PR negative disease appears to be associated with poor prognosis, intensification of systemic treatment with chemotherapy may not be associated with improvement of disease-related outcomes in this patient population.

The Effect of Radiotherapy on Local Regional Recurrence among Patients with Pathologic Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer.

Background: Radiotherapy has been shown to reduce local recurrence rates of breast cancer after treatment with surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. Indications for postmastectomy radiation have historically been based on pathology, but indications for radiation in the setting of pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy are not well defined. The aim of this study was to evaluate the rates of local regional recurrence (LRR) among patients with pCR to neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery with or without radiation (XRT). Patients and Methods: The case histories of 337 patients with locally advanced breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgery with or without radiation from October 1997 to December 2006 were analyzed. Median age at diagnosis was 50.6 years (range: 25-84). The clinical stage at diagnosis was I in 3 (1%), IIA in 105 (31%), IIB in 94 (28%), and III in 135 (40%) patients. All patients received preoperative systemic therapy with a doxorubicin-based regimen (92%) or a single-agent taxane regimen (7%) or CMF (1%). A total of 272 patients received radiation following surgery and 65 did not receive any radiation. Median follow-up time was 40 months among all patients. The Kaplan-Meier method and log rank test were used to evaluate LRR rates and overall survival among both groups. Results: Patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery and XRT had a lower incidence of LRR at 3 years with 24 cases of local recurrence among 272 patients who received XRT compared with 12 cases of local recurrence among the 65 patients who did not receive XRT (8.9% v 18.5%, P =0.02). Radiation also reduced local regional recurrence at 3 years among a subset of patients with clinical stage T2N1 disease (4.9% v 28.6%, P =0.03). There was no difference in overall survival or disease free survival among patients who received XRT compared to patients who did not receive XRT. There were 62 (18%) patients who achieved a pCR to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Among patients with a pathologic complete response, radiation appeared to reduce the risk of LRR compared to patients who did not receive XRT (7.4% v 25%, P =0.17). Conclusion : Radiotherapy significantly reduced local regional recurrence rate among patients with locally advanced breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery. Of particular interest, patients who achieve a pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy still had high LRR rates and may benefit from radiotherapy by lowering the risk of local regional recurrence. Further studies on the significance of LRR and overall survival among these patients are needed. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 4114.