Caroline O. Michie

Association between BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations and survival in women with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer

CONTEXT Approximately 10% of women with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) carry deleterious germline mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2. A recent article suggested that BRCA2-related EOC was associated with an improved prognosis, but the effect of BRCA1 remains unclear. OBJECTIVE To characterize the survival of BRCA carriers with EOC compared with noncarriers and to determine whether BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers show similar survival patterns. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A pooled analysis of 26 observational studies on the survival of women with ovarian cancer, which included data from 1213 EOC cases with pathogenic germline mutations in BRCA1 (n = 909) or BRCA2 (n = 304) and from 2666 noncarriers recruited and followed up at variable times between 1987 and 2010 (the median year of diagnosis was 1998). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Five-year overall mortality. RESULTS The 5-year overall survival was 36% (95% CI, 34%-38%) for noncarriers, 44% (95% CI, 40%-48%) for BRCA1 carriers, and 52% (95% CI, 46%-58%) for BRCA2 carriers. After adjusting for study and year of diagnosis, BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers showed a more favorable survival than noncarriers (for BRCA1: hazard ratio [HR], 0.78; 95% CI, 0.68-0.89; P < .001; and for BRCA2: HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.50-0.76; P < .001). These survival differences remained after additional adjustment for stage, grade, histology, and age at diagnosis (for BRCA1: HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.64-0.84; P < .001; and for BRCA2: HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.39-0.61; P < .001). The BRCA1 HR estimate was significantly different from the HR estimated in the adjusted model (P for heterogeneity = .003). CONCLUSION Among patients with invasive EOC, having a germline mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2 was associated with improved 5-year overall survival. BRCA2 carriers had the best prognosis.

Germline Mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2 and Ten-Year Survival for Women Diagnosed with Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

Purpose: To analyze the effect of germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 on mortality in patients with ovarian cancer up to 10 years after diagnosis. Experimental Design: We used unpublished survival time data for 2,242 patients from two case–control studies and extended survival time data for 4,314 patients from previously reported studies. All participants had been screened for deleterious germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Survival time was analyzed for the combined data using Cox proportional hazard models with BRCA1 and BRCA2 as time-varying covariates. Competing risks were analyzed using Fine and Gray model. Results: The combined 10-year overall survival rate was 30% [95% confidence interval (CI), 28%–31%] for non-carriers, 25% (95% CI, 22%–28%) for BRCA1 carriers, and 35% (95% CI, 30%–41%) for BRCA2 carriers. The HR for BRCA1 was 0.53 at time zero and increased over time becoming greater than one at 4.8 years. For BRCA2, the HR was 0.42 at time zero and increased over time (predicted to become greater than 1 at 10.5 years). The results were similar when restricted to 3,202 patients with high-grade serous tumors and to ovarian cancer–specific mortality. Conclusions: BRCA1/2 mutations are associated with better short-term survival, but this advantage decreases over time and in BRCA1 carriers is eventually reversed. This may have important implications for therapy of both primary and relapsed disease and for analysis of long-term survival in clinical trials of new agents, particularly those that are effective in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Clin Cancer Res; 21(3); 652–7. ©2014 AACR.

Increased Incidence of Visceral Metastases in Scottish Patients With BRCA1/2-Defective Ovarian Cancer: An Extension of the Ovarian BRCAness Phenotype

PURPOSE To compare the frequency of visceral relapse of BRCA1/2-deficient ovarian cancer to that of nonhereditary controls. PATIENTS AND METHODS All patients diagnosed in Scotland with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) or primary peritoneal cancer (PPC) and a germline BRCA1/2 mutation were identified. Those with previous malignancy were excluded. Each remaining patient who experienced relapse was matched with two nonhereditary controls. RESULTS Seventy-nine patients with EOC/PPC and germline BRCA1/2 mutations were identified. Fifteen had inadequate clinical data, two had carcinosarcoma, 27 had previous breast cancer, and 16 were in remission. Of the remaining 19 patients who were BRCA1/2 deficient, 14 patients (74%) developed visceral metastases compared with six (16%) of 38 patients in the control group. The percentages of liver, lung, and splenic metastases were 53%, 32%, and 32%, respectively, in the patients compared with 5%, 3%, and 5%, respectively, in the controls. When events occurring outside the matched follow-up period were omitted, the percentages of visceral, liver, lung, and splenic metastases were 58%, 42%, 16%, and 32% in the patients compared with 5%, 0%, 0%, and 3% in controls (P < .001, P < .001, P = .066, and P = .011, respectively). In an independent validation set, the corresponding percentages of visceral, liver, lung, and splenic metastases were 63%, 46%, 13%, and 17% in the patients compared with 11%, 4%, 2%, and 2% in controls (P < .001, P < .001, P = .153, and P = .052, respectively). CONCLUSION Although sporadic EOC commonly remains confined to the peritoneum, BRCA1/2-deficient ovarian cancer frequently metastasizes to viscera. These data extend the ovarian BRCAness phenotype, imply BRCA1/2-deficient ovarian cancer is biologically distinct, and suggest that patients with visceral metastases should be considered for BRCA1/2 sequencing.

BRCA1 is both a prognostic and predictive biomarker of response to chemotherapy in sporadic epithelial ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVES We investigated the relationship between BRCA1 protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and clinical outcome following platinum and platinum/taxane chemotherapy in sporadic epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). METHODS BRCA1 IHC was performed on a cohort of 292 ovarian tumours from two UK oncology centres. BRCA1 protein expression levels were correlated with overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS) and clinical response to chemotherapy by multivariate analysis. RESULTS EOC patients with absent/low BRCA1 protein expression (41%) had a better chance of clinical response following chemotherapy as compared to patients with high BRCA1 expression (odds ratio 2.47: 95%CI 1.10-5.55, p=0.029). Patients with absent/low BRCA1 had a higher probability of clinical response following single agent platinum compared to high BRCA1 expressing patients (68.5% vs. 46.8%), while addition of a taxane increased response rates independent of BRCA1. Overall, patients with absent/low BRCA1 had a better clinical outcome compared to patients with high BRCA1 protein expression in terms of both OS (HR=0.65: 95%CI 0.48-0.88, p=0.006) and PFS (HR=0.74, 95%CI 0.55-0.98, p=0.040). CONCLUSIONS We confirm that absent/low BRCA1 protein expression is a favourable prognostic marker. However, we also provide the first evidence that absent/low BRCA1 protein expression in sporadic EOC patients predicts for an improved clinical response to chemotherapy.

Anterior Gradient-3: A novel biomarker for ovarian cancer that mediates cisplatin resistance in xenograft models

The Anterior Gradient (AGR) genes AGR2 and AGR3 are part of the Protein Disulfide Isomerase (PDI) family and harbour core thioredoxin folds (CxxS motifs) that have the potential to regulate protein folding and maturation. A number of proteomics and transcriptomics screens in the fields of limb regeneration, cancer cell metastasis, pro-oncogenic oestrogen-signalling, and p53 regulation have identified AGR2 as a novel component of these signalling pathways. Curiously, despite the fact that the AGR2 and AGR3 genes are contiguous on chromosome 7p21.1-3, the AGR3 protein has rarely been identified in such OMICs screens along with AGR2 protein. Therefore there is little information on how AGR3 protein is expressed in normal and diseased states. A panel of three monoclonal antibodies was generated towards AGR3 protein for identifying novel clinical models that can be used to define whether AGR3 protein could play a positive or negative role in human cancer development. One monoclonal antibody was AGR3-specific and bound a linear epitope that could be defined using both pep-scan and phage-peptide library screening. Using this monoclonal antibody, endogenous AGR3 protein expression was shown to be cytosolic in four human ovarian cancer subtypes; serous, endometrioid, clear cell, and mucinous. Mucinous ovarian cancers produced the highest number of AGR3 positive cells. AGR3 expression is coupled to AGR2 expression only in mucinous ovarian cancers, whereas AGR3 and AGR2 expressions are uncoupled in the other three types of ovarian cancer. AGR3 expression in ovarian cancer is independent of oestrogen-receptor expression, which is distinct from the oestrogen-receptor dependent expression of AGR3 in breast cancers. Isogenic cancer cell models were created that over-express AGR3 and these demonstrated that AGR3 mediates cisplatin-resistance in mouse xenografts. These data indicate that AGR3 is over-expressed by a hormone (oestrogen-receptor α)-independent mechanism and identify a novel protein-folding associated pathway that could mediate resistance to DNA-damaging agents in human cancers.

Expression of glycolytic enzymes in ovarian cancers and evaluation of the glycolytic pathway as a strategy for ovarian cancer treatment

BackgroundNovel therapeutic approaches are required to treat ovarian cancer and dependency on glycolysis may provide new targets for treatment. This study sought to investigate the variation of expression of molecular components (GLUT1, HKII, PKM2, LDHA) of the glycolytic pathway in ovarian cancers and the effectiveness of targeting this pathway in ovarian cancer cell lines with inhibitors.MethodsExpression of GLUT1, HKII, PKM2, LDHA were analysed by quantitative immunofluorescence in a tissue microarray (TMA) analysis of 380 ovarian cancers and associations with clinicopathological features were sought. The effect of glycolysis pathway inhibitors on the growth of a panel of ovarian cancer cell lines was assessed by use of the SRB proliferation assay. Combination studies were undertaken combining these inhibitors with cytotoxic agents.ResultsMean expression levels of GLUT1 and HKII were higher in high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), the most frequently occurring subtype, than in non-HGSOC. GLUT1 expression was also significantly higher in advanced stage (III/IV) ovarian cancer than early stage (I/II) disease. Growth dependency of ovarian cancer cells on glucose was demonstrated in a panel of ovarian cancer cell lines. Inhibitors of the glycolytic pathway (STF31, IOM-1190, 3PO and oxamic acid) attenuated cell proliferation in platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant HGSOC cell line models in a concentration dependent manner. In combination with either cisplatin or paclitaxel, 3PO (a novel PFKFB3 inhibitor) enhanced the cytotoxic effect in both platinum sensitive and platinum resistant ovarian cancer cells. Furthermore, synergy was identified between STF31 (a novel GLUT1 inhibitor) or oxamic acid (an LDH inhibitor) when combined with metformin, an inhibitor of oxidative phosphorylation, resulting in marked inhibition of ovarian cancer cell growth.ConclusionsThe findings of this study provide further support for targeting the glycolytic pathway in ovarian cancer and several useful combinations were identified.

An Association of Cancer Physicians’ strategy for improving services and outcomes for cancer patients

The Association of Cancer Physicians in the United Kingdom has developed a strategy to improve outcomes for cancer patients and identified the goals and commitments of the Association and its members.

Abstract MIP-055: IDENTIFICATION OF A MOLECULAR SUBTYPE OF HIGH GRADE SEROUS OVARIAN CANCER REPRESENTING MAPK PATHWAY ACTIVATION AND PLATINUM RESISTANCE

BACKGROUND: We previously defined 3 molecular subgroups of High Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer (HGSOC), using gene expression data from 265 FFPE samples obtained from treatment naive patients, who received platinum based treatment following surgical resection. The 3 molecular subgroups were Angio: characterised by upregulation of angiogenesis genes; Immune: characterised by upregulation of immune genes and AngioImmune: characterised by upregulation of angiogenesis and immune genes. Patients within these 3 subgroups respond differently to standard of care treatment The Immune subgroup have the best prognosis and the Angio and AngioImmune subgroups have similar worse prognosis. A weighted gene signature to identify each of the molecular subgroups was developed. This dataset was used as a reference to investigate the effect of chemotherapy on molecular subgroup designation. METHODS: To investigate the effect of chemotherapy on predefined molecular subgroups, we analysed 35 matched pre- and post- chemotherapy samples by gene expression. The molecular subgroup assignment for each of the paired samples was determined using the gene expression signatures for each subgroup. Novel cisplatin resistant HGSOC cell lines were generated to study the mechanisms of acquired cisplatin resistance. RESULTS: 40% of the treatment naive samples that were aligned with the AngioImmune subgroup and this increased to 67.5% post-chemotherapy. 10/15 (67%) treatment naive tumours that were initially assigned to the good prognostic Immune molecular subgroup shifted to the bad prognostic AngioImmune molecular subgroup post chemotherapy. Hence platinum chemotherapy selects for the AngioImmune subgroup, suggesting that this subgroup represents tumours which are innately platinum resistant but also provides a mechanism of acquired resistance. Additionally we demonstrate that the AngioImmune subgroup is driven by activation of the MAPK pathway and shows that cisplatin resistant HGSOC cell lines are specifically sensitive to MEK inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: The MAPK pathway is a mechanism of innate and acquired platinum resistance in HGSOC. Furthermore the data suggests that original pre-treatment surgical/biopsy samples may fall within a different molecular subgroup to samples taken post-platinum therapy. Citation Format: Aya El-Helali, Nuala McCabe, Charlie Gourley, Andrena McCavigan, Caroline O. Michie, Bethanie Price, Niamh McGivern, Michael Churchman, Aya El-Helai, Eamonn J. O9Brien, Laura Hill, Timothy S Davison, Alistair Williams, W Glenn McCluggage, Katherine E Keating, Denis P Harkin, and Richard Kennedy. IDENTIFICATION OF A MOLECULAR SUBTYPE OF HIGH GRADE SEROUS OVARIAN CANCER REPRESENTING MAPK PATHWAY ACTIVATION AND PLATINUM RESISTANCE [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Ovarian Cancer Research Symposium; Sep 12-13, 2016; Seattle, WA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2017;23(11 Suppl):Abstract nr MIP-055.

Abstract 453: MEK activation is associated with a molecular subgroup in high grade serous ovarian cancer

Introduction We have previously defined 3 molecular subgroups of High grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), ‘Angio’, ‘Immune’ and ‘Angio_immune’ subgroups using gene expression data from 265 FFPE HGSOC samples obtained from treatment naive patients and who were subsequently treated with platinum-based standard of care (SoC) chemotherapy (carboplatin +/- paclitaxel) (Gourley, et al. J Clin Oncol 32:5s, 2014). Patients within these 3 molecular subgroups respond differently to SOC treatment. The immune subgroup has the best outcome compared to the Angio and Angio_immune subgroups (HR of 0.63 and 0.66 respectively on multivariate analysis). Since it has previously been shown that the MAPK pathway is an important mediator of cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer, we wanted to investigate if the MAPK pathway was associated with one of the poor prognosis subgroups. Methods A gene signature that could detect each of the subgroups Angio, Immune and Angio_immune was generated from the clinical samples. Data from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Project was used to test for correlation between each subgroup and phospho-MEK as measured by Reverse Phase Proteomic Array (RPPA). Sensitivity to the MEK inhibitor trametinib (GSK1120212) and cisplatin was determined by 10-day colony formation assay. Results We found a statistically significant association between the Angio_immune subgroup signature and Phospho-MEK (serine 217/221) expression (p = 0.047) indicating activation of the MAPK pathway in this subgroup. Additionally we have demonstrated that the Angio_immune subgroup signature is suppressed by MEK inhibition (p = 0.0055) and elevated by KRAS, NRAS and MEK1 overexpression in cell line models (0.0072, 0.0004 and Conclusion We have identified a molecular subgroup in HGSOC that is associated with MAPK signalling. A gene signature to detect this subgroup from formalin fixed paraffin embedded samples has been developed and predicts sensitivity to MEK inhibitors in pre-clinical model systems. Further work aims to validate the signature in clinical samples from patients treated with a MEK inhibitor. Citation Format: Nuala McCabe, Charlie Gourley, Andrena McGavigan, Caroline O. Michie, Niamh McGivern, Michael Churchman, Eamonn J. O’Brien, Laura Hill, Timothy S. Davison, Alistair Williams, Glenn McCluggage, Karen E. Keating, Denis P. Harkin, Richard D. Kennedy. MEK activation is associated with a molecular subgroup in high grade serous ovarian cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 453.

Anterior Gradient-3

The Anterior Gradient (AGR) genes AGR2 and AGR3 are part of the Protein Disulfide Isomerase (PDI) family and harbour core thioredoxin folds (CxxS motifs) that have the potential to regulate protein folding and maturation. A number of proteomics and transcriptomics screens in the fields of limb regeneration, cancer cell metastasis, pro-oncogenic oestrogen-signalling, and p53 regulation have identified AGR2 as a novel component of these signalling pathways. Curiously, despite the fact that the AGR2 and AGR3 genes are contiguous on chromosome 7p21.1-3, the AGR3 protein has rarely been identified in such OMICs screens along with AGR2 protein. Therefore there is little information on how AGR3 protein is expressed in normal and diseased states. A panel of three monoclonal antibodies was generated towards AGR3 protein for identifying novel clinical models that can be used to define whether AGR3 protein could play a positive or negative role in human cancer development. One monoclonal antibody was AGR3-specific and bound a linear epitope that could be defined using both pep-scan and phage-peptide library screening. Using this monoclonal antibody, endogenous AGR3 protein expression was shown to be cytosolic in four human ovarian cancer subtypes; serous, endometrioid, clear cell, and mucinous. Mucinous ovarian cancers produced the highest number of AGR3 positive cells. AGR3 expression is coupled to AGR2 expression only in mucinous ovarian cancers, whereas AGR3 and AGR2 expressions are uncoupled in the other three types of ovarian cancer. AGR3 expression in ovarian cancer is independent of oestrogen-receptor expression, which is distinct from the oestrogen-receptor dependent expression of AGR3 in breast cancers. Isogenic cancer cell models were created that over-express AGR3 and these demonstrated that AGR3 mediates cisplatin-resistance in mouse xenografts. These data indicate that AGR3 is over-expressed by a hormone (oestrogen-receptor α)-independent mechanism and identify a novel protein-folding associated pathway that could mediate resistance to DNA-damaging agents in human cancers.