Carolyn Kimme-Smith

Using tissue texture surrounding calcification clusters to predict benign vs malignant outcomes.

The positive predictive value of mammography is between 20% and 25% for clustered microcalcifications. For very early cancers there is often a lack of concordance between mammographic signs and pathology. This study examines the usefulness of computer texture analysis to improve the accuracy of malignant diagnosis. Texture analysis of the breast tissue surrounding microcalcifications on digitally acquired images during stereotactic biopsy is used in this study to predict malignant vs benign outcomes. 54 biopsy proven cases (36 benign, 18 malignant) are used. The texture analysis calculates statistical features from gray level co-occurrence matrices and fractal geometry for equal probability and linear quantizations of the image data. Discriminant models are generated using linear discriminant analysis and logistic discriminant analysis. Results do not differ significantly by method of quantization or discriminant analysis. Jackknife results misclassify 2 of 18 malignant cases (sensitivity 89%) and 6 of 36 benign cases (specificity 83%) for logistic discriminant analysis. From this preliminary study, texture analysis appears to show significant discriminatory power between benign and malignant tissue, which may be useful in resolving problems of discordance between pathological and mammographic findings, and may ultimately reduce the number of benign biopsies.

INTER- AND INTRA-OBSERVER VARIABILITY OF DOPPLER PEAK VELOCITY MEASUREMENTS : AN IN-VITRO STUDY

To determine the variability of pulsed Doppler peak velocity measurements, four radiologists with differing experience were tested using a calibrated flow phantom. Two ultrasound units, three probes and eight velocity rates varying between 40.5 and 78 cm/sec were studied, with a total of 303 measurements. The results were normalized against a set of 106 separate measurements made under highly-controlled conditions. The residual error standard deviation (not attributable to any systematically varied factor, including the velocity rate) was 6.8 cm/sec, with most of the remaining variation due to changing transducer or machine. Observer/equipment interactions accounted for 15.8% of the observed variability. The duration of the radiologists Doppler experience had no significant effect.

Recommendations on performance characteristics of diagnostic exposure meters: Report of AAPM Diagnostic X‐Ray Imaging Task Group No. 6

Task Group 6 of the Diagnostic X-Ray Imaging Committee of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) was appointed to develop performance standards for diagnostic x-ray exposure meters. The recommendations as approved by the Diagnostic X-Ray Imaging Committee and the Science Council of the AAPM are delineated in this report and provide specifications on meter precision, calibration accuracy, calibration reference points, linearity, energy dependence, exposure rate dependence, leakage, amplification gain settings, directional dependence, the stem effect, constancy checks, and calibration intervals. The report summarizes recommendations for meters used in mammography, general purpose radiography including special procedures, computed tomography, and radiation safety surveys for x-ray radiography.

A review of mammography test objects for the calibration of resolution, contrast, and exposure

Mandated and voluntary accreditation and quality control programs for mammography require the use of standardized mammography test objects. We evaluated eleven commercially available test objects and three prototype test objects, comparing them with respect to their resolution targets, contrast targets, and the dose they required when imaged by the same automatic exposure meter. Ion chamber and/or thermoluminescent dosimeter measurements of exposure were made with each test object, while attenuation was measured for seven. Measurements of dosage using acrylic (5 test objects) and tissue equivalent epoxy (9 test objects) showed as much as a 400% variation in the radiation supplied by the same automatic exposure device when differences in thicknesses of test objects were normalized. Speck visibility was as dependent on the composition of the specks and of the surrounding material as on the size of the specks. Contrast targets were adequate in only three test objects. Optical density differences between images of a 4-cm-thick breast and of different test object materials, also 4 cm in thickness, exposed to the same radiation, imply that untested acrylic or epoxy resin materials should not used in the calibration of automatic exposure controls.

Digital mammography. A comparison of two digitization methods.

A preliminary study of 40 different radiodense breasts digitized with a Fuji high resolution BAFBr:EU2+ imaging plate enabled us to establish acceptable enhancement procedures with a Fuji Computer Radiology 201 system. Screen-film images of 36 of these breasts were also digitized and enhanced on a Damon DETECT TV system. Three radiologists specializing in mammography reviewed each pair of images. For the 20 normal examinations, both digital methods were considered equivalent in image quality, while for the 16 cases containing pathology (masses and/or calcifications) the TV system was considered to provide the best image quality twice as often as the laser scanned system. The radiologists rejected both methods of enhancement for 8% of the images. Despite cost differences between the two systems, both have equal capability in penetrating dense breasts. However, both systems have several significant deficiencies which preclude their clinical use. At the present time, there is no objective justification for using either system for breast imaging other than in an experimental capacity.

Establishing minimum performance standards, calibration intervals, and optimal exposure values for a whole breast digital mammography unit

Methods are developed to establish minimum performance standards, calibration intervals, and criteria for exposure control for a whole breast digital mammography system. A prototype phantom was designed, and an automatic method programmed, to analyze CNR, resolution, and dynamic range between CCD components in the image receptor and over time. The phantom was imaged over a 5 month period and the results are analyzed to predict future performance. White field recalibration was analyzed by subtracting white fields obtained at different intervals. Exposure effects were compared by imaging the prototype phantom at different kVp, filtration (Mo vs Rh) and mAs. Calcification detection tests showed that phantom images, obtained at 28 kVp with a Mo/Mo anode/filter and low mAs technique, often could not depict Al2O3 specks 0.24 mm in diameter, while a 28 kVp Mo/Rh, higher mAs technique usually could. Stability of the system tested suggests that monthly phantom imaging may suffice. Differences in CCD performance are greater (12%) than differences in a single CCD over time (6%). White field recalibration is needed weekly because of pixel variations in sensitivity which occur if longer intervals between recalibration occur. When mean glandular dose is matched, Rh filtration gives better phantom performance at 28 kVp than Mo filtration at 26 kVp and is recommended for clinical exposures. An aluminum step wedge shows markedly increased dynamic range when exit exposure is increased by using a higher energy spectrum beam. Phantoms for digital mammography units should cover the entire image receptor, should test intersections between components of the receptor, and should be automatically analyzed.

Detection of simulated lung nodules with computed radiography: Effects of nodule size, local optical density, global object thickness, and exposure

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES We quantified differences in the detection of simulated lung nodules on computed radiographs on the basis of variations in nodule size, local contrast, body habitus (global contrast), and exposure. METHODS A step-wedge phantom was developed to simulate the attenuation ranges of the lung, retrocardiac, and subdiaphragmatic regions of the adult human chest. Additional Lucite wedges were used to simulate two different body thicknesses and to provide variable structural noise. Soft-tissue-equivalent nodules of 3-mm and 5-mm diameter that resulted in 10% differences in attenuation from lung equivalence were embedded in lung-equivalent material. By superimposing the sheets in various positions, 84 unique nodule configurations containing eight nodules per image were exposed on a computed radiography system. Computed radiographs were acquired at two different exposures approximating standard exposure and underexposure. For each resulting phantom image, seven observers scored the presence or absence of a nodule within individual cells of a 5 x 5 grid matrix. RESULTS True-positive fractions for 3-mm-diameter nodules were very low across all conditions. True-positive fractions for 5-mm-diameter nodules varied from 0.23 to 0.98. Significant differences in the conspicuity of 5-mm nodules depended on differences in phantom thickness and differences in the locations of nodules within lung-, retrocardiac-, or subdiaphragmatic-equivalent regions. Accuracy in detecting nodules was significantly lower at lower exposures when nodules were located in the subdiaphragmatic-equivalent region. CONCLUSION On computed radiographs, small nodules (5-mm diameter) can be reliably detected when they are located in areas of high or moderate surrounding local contrast, such as the lung or mediastinal regions. Detection of nodules decreases in regions of lower optical density corresponding to the subdiaphragmatic regions of the chest. The decrease in nodule detectability is greatest under conditions that simulate large body thickness and underexposure.

Acceptance testing prone stereotactic breast biopsy units.

When the Mammography Quality Standards Act becomes law in October, 1994, stereotactic breast biopsy units may require yearly physicist calibration. Upright stereotactic units can be easily tested using conventional mammography procedures and a gelatin phantom containing simulated calcifications, but prone units are difficult to assess because of the under-table tube configuration. The two current manufacturers of these units have made different design decisions which affect each units calibration. There are a number of important distinctions between screening and prone biopsy units. For the two currently available prone units, a pronounced heel effect makes ion chamber position critical. Focal spot measurements are particularly difficult on one unit because there is no light field. The fixed grid on the other unit must be tested with a flood film. Physicists who inspect these units before their clinical use should be aware of variations needed by this equipment for specific acceptance tests.

Focal spot size measurements with pinhole and slit for microfocus mammography units.

Many mammography units now have microfocal spots ranging in size from 0.09 to 0.4 mm for magnification radiography. On site measurements of these focal spots are not possible without invasive procedures if National Equipment Manufactures Association (NEMA) specifications are to be followed. This paper describes a method to perform such measurements expeditiously (1.5 h) and noninvasively. We describe how this method differs from NEMA test specifications, and report the test results of 22 units from ten manufacturers. Six of the focal spots were larger than the manufacturers specifications which were based on current NEMA standards. Emphasis is placed on the need for verifiable standards for mammography x-ray systems.

The technology of mammography. Misunderstood and underutilized.

This article reviews milestones in the technological development of mammography since 1970. Mammography is particularly underutilized as a screening procedure for breast cancer and the reasons for its continued inappropriate and under use are explored. Although there are some known barriers to increased utilization among the female adult population, the majority of barriers reside within the domain of referring physicians. Remedies to address the low referral rates for screening mammography are outlined for federal agencies, radiology groups, mammography equipment companies, medical schools, and philanthropic groups. Until the developers of technological procedures such as mammography appreciate that the application of a technology and its appropriate utilization by professionals and the public are important to consider when the technology is developed, utilization rates may not do justice to the technologys potential.