Carolyn Santora
Stony Brook University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Carolyn Santora.
Annals of Emergency Medicine | 2009
Asa Viccellio; Carolyn Santora; Adam J. Singer; Henry C. Thode; Mark C. Henry
STUDY OBJECTIVE We developed and implemented an institutional protocol aimed at reducing crowding by admitting boarded patients to hospital inpatient hallways. We hypothesized that transfer of admitted patients from the emergency department (ED) to inpatient hallways would be feasible and not create patient harm. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study in a suburban, academic ED with an annual census of 70,000. We studied consecutive patients admitted from our ED between January 2004 and January 2008. In 2001, a multidisciplinary team developed and implemented an institutional protocol in which admitted adult patients boarded in the ED were transferred to hospital inpatient hallways under select conditions. We extracted data from the electronic medical record system, measuring patient demographics, ED disposition (discharge, admit to floor, admit to hallway), ED length of stay, and inhospital mortality. We report ED length of stay, subsequent transfer to an ICU, and hospital mortality of patients admitted to standard and hallway inpatient beds. RESULTS Of 55,062 ED patients admitted, there were 1,798 deaths. Of all admissions, 2,042 (4%) went to a hallway; 53,020 went to a standard bed. Patients admitted to standard and hallway beds were similar in age (median [interquartile range] 55 years [37 to 72 years] and 54 years [41 to 70 years], respectively) and sex (48.2% and 50% female patients, respectively). The median (interquartile range) times from ED triage to actual admission in patients admitted to standard and hallway beds were 426 minutes (306 to 600 minutes) and 624 (439 to 895 minutes) minutes, respectively (P<.001). Median ED census at triage was lower for standard bed admissions than for hallway patients (44 [33 to 53] versus 50 [38 to 61], respectively, P<.001). Inhospital mortality rates were higher among patients admitted to standard beds (2.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.5% to 2.7%) than among patients admitted to hallway beds (1.1%; 95% CI 0.7% to 1.7%). ICU transfers were also higher in the standard bed admissions (6.7% [95% CI 6.5% to 6.9%] versus 2.5% [95% CI 1.9% to 3.3%]). CONCLUSION Transfer of ED-boarded admitted patients to an inpatient hallway occurs during high ED census and waiting times for admission but does not appears to result in patient harm.
Journal of Emergency Medicine | 2013
Peter Viccellio; Joseph A. Zito; Valerie Sayage; Jasmine Chohan; Gregory Garra; Carolyn Santora; Adam J. Singer
BACKGROUND Boarding of admitted patients in the emergency department (ED) is a major cause of crowding. One alternative to boarding in the ED, a full-capacity protocol where boarded patients are redeployed to inpatient units, can reduce crowding and improve overall flow. OBJECTIVE Our aim was to compare patient satisfaction with boarding in the ED vs. inpatient hallways. METHODS We performed a structured telephone survey regarding patient experiences and preferences for boarding among admitted ED patients who experienced boarding in the ED hallway and then were subsequently transferred to inpatient hallways. Demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as patient preferences, including items related to patient comfort and safety using a 5-point scale, were recorded and descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. RESULTS Of 110 patients contacted, 105 consented to participate. Mean age was 57 ± 16 years and 52% were female. All patients were initially boarded in the ED in a hallway before their transfer to an inpatient hallway bed. The overall preferred location after admission was the inpatient hallway in 85% (95% confidence interval 75-90) of respondents. In comparing ED vs. inpatient hallway boarding, the following percentages of respondents preferred inpatient boarding with regard to the following 8 items: rest, 85%; safety, 83%; confidentiality, 82%; treatment, 78%; comfort, 79%; quiet, 84%; staff availability, 84%; and privacy, 84%. For no item was there a preference for boarding in the ED. CONCLUSIONS Patients overwhelmingly preferred the inpatient hallway rather than the ED hallway when admitted to the hospital.
Annals of Emergency Medicine | 2007
Adam J. Singer; Amit Shembekar; Farid Visram; Joshua Schiller; Valerie Russo; William Lawson; Carol A. Gomes; Carolyn Santora; Mary Maliszewski; Lisa Wilbert; Eileen Dowdy; Peter Viccellio; Mark C. Henry
Annals of Emergency Medicine | 2006
Peter Viccellio; Carolyn Santora; Henry C. Thode; E. Horbatuk
Annals of Emergency Medicine | 2006
Peter Viccellio; Carolyn Santora; Henry C. Thode; E. Horbatuk
Stroke | 2015
Carolyn Santora; Dan Cammarata; Eileen Conlon; Eileen Dowdy; Kathleen Ferrara; Michael Guido; Andrea Kabacinski; Julie Mount; Alison Rowe
Circulation-cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes | 2015
William Lawson; Carine E. Hamo; Joseph D. DeCristofaro; Lisa Wilbert; Kellie Gumersell; Yvonne Leippert; Patricia Caillias; Carolyn Santora
Circulation-cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes | 2015
William Lawson; Lisa Wilbert; Kellie Gumersell; Arthur Okere; Lisa Sokoloff; Carolyn Santora
Circulation-cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes | 2014
William Lawson; Lisa Wilbert; Kellie Gumersell; Lisa Sokoloff; Carolyn Santora; Anil Mani
Annals of Emergency Medicine | 2008
Asa Viccellio; Carolyn Santora; Adam J. Singer; Henry C. Thode; Mark C. Henry