Carrie K. Chu

A Multicenter Analysis of Distal Pancreatectomy for Adenocarcinoma: Is Laparoscopic Resection Appropriate?

BACKGROUND As compared with open distal pancreatectomy (ODP), laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) affords improved perioperative outcomes. The role of LDP for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is not defined. STUDY DESIGN Records from patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy (DP) for PDAC from 2000 to 2008 from 9 academic medical centers were reviewed. Short-term (node harvest and margin status) and long-term (survival) cancer outcomes were assessed. A 3:1 matched analysis was performed for ODP and LDP cases using age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, and tumor size. RESULTS There were 212 patients who underwent DP for PDAC; 23 (11%) of these were approached laparoscopically. For all 212 patients, 56 (26%) had positive margins. The mean number of nodes (+/- SD) examined was 12.6 +/-8.4 and 114 patients (54%) had at least 1 positive node. Median overall survival was 16 months. In the matched analysis there were no significant differences in positive margin rates, number of nodes examined, number of patients with at least 1 positive node, or overall survival. Logistic regression for all 212 patients demonstrated that advanced age, larger tumors, positive margins, and node positive disease were independently associated with worse survival; however, method of resection (ODP vs. LDP) was not. Hospital stay was 2 days shorter in the matched comparison, which approached significance (LDP, 7.4 days vs. ODP, 9.4 days, p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS LDP provides similar short- and long-term oncologic outcomes as compared with OD, with potentially shorter hospital stay. These results suggest that LDP is an acceptable approach for resection of PDAC of the left pancreas in selected patients.

Prosthetic Graft Reconstruction after Portal Vein Resection in Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Multicenter Analysis

BACKGROUND Use of prosthetic grafts for reconstruction after portal vein (PV) resection during pancreaticoduodenectomy is controversial. We examined outcomes in patients who underwent vein reconstruction using polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). STUDY DESIGN Review of prospectively maintained databases at 3 centers identified all patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with vein resection and reconstruction using PTFE grafts between 1994 and 2009. Patient, operative, and outcomes variables were studied. Graft patency and survival were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier technique. RESULTS Thirty-three patients underwent segmental vein resection with interposition PTFE graft reconstruction. Median age was 67 years; median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score was 1. Most operations were performed for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (n = 28, 85%); 96% were T3 lesions or greater. Standard PD was performed in 12 (36%) patients, pylorus-preservation in 17 (52%), and total pancreatectomy in 4 (12%). Combined resection of portal and superior mesenteric veins (SMV) was required in 49%, with resection isolated to PV in 12% and SMV in 39%. Splenic vein ligation was necessary in 30%. Median graft diameter was 12 mm (range 8 to 20 mm), with the majority being ring-enforced (73%). Median operative and vascular clamp times were 463 and 41 minutes, respectively, with median blood loss of 1,500 mL. The negative margin rate was 64%. Overall morbidity rate was 46%, and 30-day mortality was 6%. No patients developed irreversible hepatic necrosis or graft infection. Pancreatic fistulas occurred in 3 (9.1%). With mean follow-up of 14 months, overall graft patency was 76%. Estimated median duration of graft patency was 21 months. Median survival was 12 months for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSIONS With careful patient selection, PTFE graft reconstruction of resected PV/SMV during pancreaticoduodenectomy is possible with minimal risk of hepatic necrosis or graft infection. Comparison studies to primary anastomosis and autologous vein reconstruction are necessary.

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: trends and lessons learned through an 11-year experience.

BACKGROUND As compared with open distal pancreatectomy, laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) is associated with lower morbidity and shorter hospital stays. Existing reports do not elucidate trends in patient selection, technique, and outcomes over time. We aimed to determine outcomes after LDP at a specialized center, analyze trends of patient selection and operative technique, and validate a complication risk score (CRS). STUDY DESIGN Patients undergoing LDP between January 2000 and January 2011 were identified and divided into 2 equal groups to represent our early and recent experiences. Demographics, tumor characteristics, operative technique, and perioperative outcomes were examined and compared between groups. A CRS was calculated for the entire cohort and examined against observed outcomes. RESULTS A total of 132 LDPs were attempted, of which 8 (6.1%) were converted to open procedures. Thirty-day overall and major complication rates were 43.2% and 12.9%, respectively, with mortality < 1%. Pancreatic fistulas occurred in 28 (21%) patients, of which 14 (11%) were clinically significant. Recent LDPs (n = 66) included patients with increasingly severe comorbidities (Charlson scores > 2, 40.9% vs 16.7%, p = 0.003), more proximal tumors (74.2% vs 26.2%, p < 0.001), more extended resections (10.6 vs 8.3 cm, p < 0.001), shorter operative times (141 vs 172 minutes, p = 0.007), and less frequent use of a hand port (25.8% vs 66.6%, p < 0.001). No significant differences were found in perioperative outcomes between the groups. As compared with the hand access technique, the total laparoscopic approach was associated with shorter hospital stays (5.3 vs 6.8 days, p = 0.032). Increasing CRS was associated with longer operative time, significant fistulas, wound infections, blood transfusions, major complications, ICU readmissions, and rehospitalizations. CONCLUSIONS This large, single-institution series demonstrates that despite a shift in patient selection to sicker patients with more proximal tumors, similar perioperative outcomes can be achieved with laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. The CRS appears to be a reliable preoperative assessment tool for assessing other adverse perioperative outcomes in addition to predicting overall complications and fistulas as originally published.

Laparoscopic Management of Pancreatic Malignancies

Laparoscopic pancreatic resection is performed with increasing frequency for malignant tumors. Data are emerging demonstrating the safety of the laparoscopic approach for distal (left) pancreatectomy, with potential benefits over the standard open approach; however, less information exists as to the effects of laparoscopic resection of cancers of the pancreas. This article reviews and analyzes the existing literature on laparoscopic pancreatectomy for pancreatic malignancies.

Impact of diabetes mellitus on perioperative outcomes after resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND Associations between diabetes mellitus (DM) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are well established; however, the impact of DM on perioperative morbidity and mortality after PDAC resection is unclear. STUDY DESIGN A prospectively maintained database review identified all patients undergoing PDAC resection between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2008. Diagnosis of DM was established by history and biochemical profile. Records were reviewed for comorbidities, operative variables, and histologic parameters. Postoperative morbidity and mortality were assessed for diabetic and nondiabetic patients using standardized definitions. RESULTS Of 251 PDAC cases, 116 (46%) patients had preoperative DM. Pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed in 220 (87.6%), left pancreatectomy in 29 (11.6%), and total pancreatectomy in 2 (0.8%). The major complication rate was 25.5%, with 60-day mortality of 3.6%. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) occurred in 40.1% of patients. Pancreatic fistulas developed in 17 (6.8%) patients; 11 of them were clinically significant (grades B/C). DM patients had a higher likelihood of developing fistulas (DM 10.3%, non-DM 3.7%, p = 0.04). When controlled for age, comorbidities, body mass index, preoperative albumin level, operation type, operative time, and pancreatic quality, DM maintained an independent association with fistula formation (odds ratio 4.3, 95% CI 1.18 to 15.8, p = 0.027). Acute kidney injury was more frequent in the DM group (DM 23.3%, non-DM 12.6%, p = 0.03). DM and non-DM patients had similar frequency of DGE, wound infections, intra-abdominal abscesses, and cardiovascular and pulmonary complications, as well as length of stay and mortality. CONCLUSIONS Comorbid DM does not influence perioperative outcomes dramatically after pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma. The role of PDAC-associated DM as a risk factor for postresection pancreatic fistula should be further explored. Evaluation of glycemic control and outcomes after PDAC resection may be useful.

Multi-institutional analysis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma demonstrating the effect of diabetes status on survival after resection

BACKGROUND The effect of diabetes on survival after resection pancreatic ductal carcinoma (PDAC) is unclear. The present study was undertaken to determine whether pre-operative diabetes has any predictive value for survival. METHODS A retrospective review from seven centres was performed. Metabolic factors, tumour characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing resection for PDAC were collected. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to determine factors associated with disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Of the 509 patients in the present study, 31.2% had diabetes. Scoring systems were devised to predict OS and DFS based on a training set (n= 245) and were subsequently tested on an independent set (n= 264). Pre-operative diabetes (P < 0.001), tumour size >2 cm (P= 0.001), metastatic nodal ratio >0.1 (P < 0.001) and R1 margin (P < 0.001) all correlated with DFS and OS on univariate analysis. Scoring systems were devised based on multivariable analysis of the above factors. Diabetes and the metastatic nodal ratio were the most important factors in each system, earning two points for OS and four points for DFS. These scoring systems significantly correlated with both DFS (P < 0.001) and OS (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Pre-operative diabetes status provides useful information that can help to stratify patients in terms of predicted post-operative OS and DFS.

Predictors of Nipple Ischemia after Nipple Sparing Mastectomy

Nipple sparing mastectomy (NSM) has become an accepted approach in selected cases of breast cancer and prophylactic mastectomy. Various surgical techniques have been described and nipple ischemia has been a common complication. Potential risk factors for nipple ischemia after NSM are examined. To examine predisposing factors for nipple ischemia after NSM. Prospective evaluation of 71 consecutive NSM in 45 patients from 2009 to 2011 was performed. There were 40 mastectomies for cancer (56.3%), and 31 (43.7%) prophylactic mastectomies. In cases of cancer, the ducts were excised from the undersurface of the nipple. Reconstructive methods included: expander 58, latissimus flap/expander 2, implant 10, and free TRAM flap 1. Various patient and technical factors were examined for impact on nipple ischemia. Partial nipple necrosis occurred in 20 cases (28.2%). Nineteen cases healed uneventfully and one required secondary nipple reconstruction. Operations for cancer (OR 10.54, CI 1.88–59.04, p = 0.007) and periareolar incisions (OR 9.69, CI 1.57–59.77, p = 0.014) predisposed to nipple ischemia. Periareolar incisions and dissection of the nipple ducts for cancer have a higher risk of nipple necrosis after NSM.

Analysis of regional recurrence after negative sentinel lymph node biopsy for head and neck melanoma.

The head and neck have a rich lymphatic drainage and complex anatomy, which complicate sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for melanoma. The incidence of regional recurrence after a negative SLN biopsy has been shown to be higher than that at other sites. Compounding factors in this scenario were analyzed to determine their impact on both SLN status and survival.

Laparoscopic Surgery for Pancreatic Tumors

The rapid growth of minimally invasive technology and experience in recent decades has revolutionized many aspects of oncologic surgery. Adoption of laparoscopic pancreatectomy has been slow due to the inherent anatomic complexity of pancreatic surgery, as well as concerns of perioperative complications and compromised oncologic results. With increasing surgeon experience and growing data, laparoscopic pancreatic resection is generating considerable attention and enthusiasm. This article provides an overview of laparoscopic pancreatic tumor surgery with respect to tumor biology and technical approaches. Current applications of laparoscopic approaches to left pancreatectomy, tumor enucleation, central pancreatectomy, and pancreaticoduodenectomy for treatment of pancreatic tumors are considered in light of available evidence demonstrating feasibility, safety, and oncologic efficacy. Future directions in minimally invasive pancreatic surgery are explored.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis and Resistance in Surgical Site Infection After Immediate Tissue Expander Reconstruction of the Breast.

BackgroundA recent survey of plastic surgeons showed that the majority prescribed prophylactic antibiotics after hospital discharge for breast reconstruction. There is no clinical evidence that this practice reduces surgical site infection (SSI) after immediate tissue expander breast reconstruction. Furthermore, multiple studies have suggested that current antibiotic choices may not be appropriately covering the causative organisms of SSI. MethodsAn institutional breast reconstruction database from January 2005 to December 2011 was queried to identify patients undergoing immediate tissue expander reconstruction of the breast. The bacteriology of the infection, prophylactic and empiric antibiotic use, and antibiotic sensitivities were analyzed. ResultsIn 557 cases of immediate tissue expander breast reconstruction performed in 378 patients, SSIs were diagnosed in 50 (9.0%) cases. Two hundred patients were given oral antibiotics at discharge; 178 did not receive antibiotics. Surgical site infection developed in 12.0% of patients given oral antibiotics and in 13.5% of those not receiving antibiotics (P = 0.67). Wound culture data were obtained in 34 SSIs. Twenty-nine had positive cultures. The most common offending organisms were methicillin-sensitive (11) and methicillin-resistant (6) Staphylococcus aureus. Despite increased use of postoperative prophylaxis over the years, SSI incidence remained unchanged. However, trends toward increased resistance of SSI organisms to the preoperative and postoperative prophylaxis agents were observed. When first-generation cephalosporins were used as prophylaxis, SSI organisms showed resistance rates of 20.5% (preoperative cefazolin) and 54.5% (postoperative cephalexin). ConclusionsAdministration of extended prophylactic antibiotics does not reduce overall risk of SSI after expander-based breast reconstruction but may influence antibiotic resistance patterns when infections occur. The organisms most commonly responsible for SSI are often resistant to cefazolin.