Caspar Grond-Ginsbach

Pathogenesis of cervical artery dissections Association with connective tissue abnormalities

Background: The etiology of spontaneous cervical artery dissection (CAD) is largely unknown. An underlying connective tissue disorder has often been postulated. Objective: To further assess the association of CAD with ultrastructural abnormalities of the dermal connective tissue. Methods: In a multicenter study, skin biopsies of 65 patients with proven nontraumatic CAD and 10 control subjects were evaluated. The ultrastructural morphology of the dermal connective tissue components was assessed by transmission electron microscopy. Results: Only three patients (5%) had clinical manifestations of skin, joint, or skeletal abnormalities. Ultrastructural aberrations were seen in 36 of 65 patients (55%), consisting of the regular occurrence of composite fibrils within collagen bundles that in some cases resembled the aberrations found in Ehlers–Danlos syndrome type II or III and elastic fiber abnormalities with minicalcifications and fragmentation. A grading scale according to the severity of the findings is introduced. Intraindividual variability over time was excluded by a second biopsy of the skin in eight patients with pronounced aberrations. Recurrent CAD correlated with connective tissue aberrations. In addition, similar connective tissue abnormalities were detected in four first-degree relatives with familial CAD. Conclusion: CAD is associated with ultrastructural connective tissue abnormalities, mostly without other clinical manifestations of a connective tissue disease. A structural defect in the extracellular matrix of the arterial wall leading to a genetic predisposition is suggested. The dermal connective tissue abnormalities detected can serve as a phenotypic marker for further genetic studies in patients with CAD and large families to possibly identify the underlying basic molecular defect(s).

Antiplatelets Versus Anticoagulation in Cervical Artery Dissection

Background and Purpose— The widespread preference of anticoagulants over antiplatelets in patients with cervical artery dissection (CAD) is empirical rather than evidence-based. Summary of Review— This article summarizes pathophysiological considerations, clinical experiences, and the findings of a systematic metaanalysis about antithrombotic agents in CAD patients. As a result, there are several putative arguments in favor as well as against immediate anticoagulation in CAD patients. Conclusions— A randomized controlled trial comparing antiplatelets with anticoagulation is needed and ethically justified. However, attributable to the large sample size which is required to gather meaningful results, such a trial represents a huge venture. This comprehensive overview may be helpful for the design and the promotion of such a trial. In addition, it could be used to encourage both participation of centers and randomization of CAD patients. Alternatively, antithrombotic treatment decisions can be customized based on clinical and paraclinical characteristics of individual CAD patients. Stroke severity with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ≥15, accompanying intracranial dissection, local compression syndromes without ischemic events, or concomitant diseases with increased bleeding risk are features in which antiplatelets seem preferable. In turn, in CAD patients with (pseudo)occlusion of the dissected artery, high intensity transient signals in transcranial ultrasound studies despite (dual) antiplatelets, multiple ischemic events in the same circulation, or with free-floating thrombus immediate anticoagulation is favored.

Multiple Levels of Regulation of the Interleukin-6 System in Stroke

Background and Purpose— Serum levels of the cytokine interleukin-6 (IL-6) rise markedly in stroke. IL-6 is a key regulator of inflammatory mechanisms that play an important part in stroke pathophysiology. The action of IL-6 is modified by its soluble receptor subunits sgp130 and sIL-6R. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether serum levels of the receptor subunits are changed after ischemic stroke and to define the role of genetic influences on IL-6 expression in acute stroke. Methods— In 48 patients with acute stroke and 48 age- and sex-matched control subjects, serum concentrations of IL-6, sgp130, and sIL-6R were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Furthermore, IL-6 promoter haplotypes comprising 4 different polymorphisms (−597G→A, −572G→C, −373A(n)T(n), −174G→C) were determined by DNA sequencing and allele-specific oligonucleotide polymerase chain reaction. The effect of the common haplotypes on IL-6 gene transcription was tested by transfecting reporter fusion genes in the astrocytelike cell line U373. Results— Whereas serum concentrations of IL-6 significantly rose (P <0.001), sgp130 levels were transiently reduced after stroke (P <0.05), and sIL-6R levels remained unchanged. IL-6 levels depended on the infarct size and the haplotype of the promoter region. The common haplotype A-G-8/12-C was associated with low IL-6 levels after stroke and a reduced induction of IL-6 transcription on stimulation with an adenosine analog in vitro. Conclusions— The data demonstrate genetic variation in the expression of IL-6 in stroke. Induction of the inflammatory response by IL-6 might be enhanced by a transient downregulation of the potential IL-6 antagonist sgp130.

Evidence for infection with Chlamydia pneumoniae in a subgroup of patients with multiple sclerosis

In a pilot study, we identified Chlamydia pneumoniae in the cerebrospinal fluid by polymerase chain reaction in 5 of 10 patients with definite multiple sclerosis (MS). In a second series, 2 of 20 patients with definite MS and 3 of 17 patients with possible/probable MS or MS variants, but none of 56 patients with other neurological, diseases were polymerase chain reaction–positive. We confirm that C pneumoniae can be found in the cerebrospinal fluid of MS patients, but our rate of positive results is lower than in a recent report. Ann Neurol 2000;47:652–655

Differential features of carotid and vertebral artery dissections The CADISP Study

Objective: To examine whether risk factor profile, baseline features, and outcome of cervical artery dissection (CEAD) differ according to the dissection site. Methods: We analyzed 982 consecutive patients with CEAD included in the Cervical Artery Dissection and Ischemic Stroke Patients observational study (n = 619 with internal carotid artery dissection [ICAD], n = 327 with vertebral artery dissection [VAD], n = 36 with ICAD and VAD). Results: Patients with ICAD were older (p < 0.0001), more often men (p = 0.006), more frequently had a recent infection (odds ratio [OR] = 1.59 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09–2.31]), and tended to report less often a minor neck trauma in the previous month (OR = 0.75 [0.56–1.007]) compared to patients with VAD. Clinically, patients with ICAD more often presented with headache at admission (OR = 1.36 [1.01–1.84]) but less frequently complained of cervical pain (OR = 0.36 [0.27–0.48]) or had cerebral ischemia (OR = 0.32 [0.21–0.49]) than patients with VAD. Among patients with CEAD who sustained an ischemic stroke, the NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at admission was higher in patients with ICAD than patients with VAD (OR = 1.17 [1.12–1.22]). Aneurysmal dilatation was more common (OR = 1.80 [1.13–2.87]) and bilateral dissection less frequent (OR = 0.63 [0.42–0.95]) in patients with ICAD. Multiple concomitant dissections tended to cluster on the same artery type rather than involving both a vertebral and carotid artery. Patients with ICAD had a less favorable 3-month functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score >2, OR = 3.99 [2.32–6.88]), but this was no longer significant after adjusting for baseline NIHSS score. Conclusion: In the largest published series of patients with CEAD, we observed significant differences between VAD and ICAD in terms of risk factors, baseline features, and functional outcome.

Epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of intracranial artery dissection

Spontaneous intracranial artery dissection is an uncommon and probably underdiagnosed cause of stroke that is defined by the occurrence of a haematoma in the wall of an intracranial artery. Patients can present with headache, ischaemic stroke, subarachnoid haemorrhage, or symptoms associated with mass effect, mostly on the brainstem. Although intracranial artery dissection is less common than cervical artery dissection in adults of European ethnic origin, intracranial artery dissection is reportedly more common in children and in Asian populations. Risk factors and mechanisms are poorly understood, and diagnosis is challenging because characteristic imaging features can be difficult to detect in view of the small size of intracranial arteries. Therefore, multimodal follow-up imaging is often needed to confirm the diagnosis. Treatment of intracranial artery dissections is empirical in the absence of data from randomised controlled trials. Most patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage undergo surgical or endovascular treatment to prevent rebleeding, whereas patients with intracranial artery dissection and cerebral ischaemia are treated with antithrombotics. Prognosis seems worse in patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage than in those without.

Chromosomal in situ suppression hybridization after Giemsa banding

SummaryWe report the successive application of classical Giemsa banding and chromosomal in situ suppression hybridization in clinical cytogenetics. The use of both techniques within one protocol requires an additional fixation of the chromosome preparations and an improved suppression of the labelled repetitive sequences. The combination of these two cytological techniques allows the high resolution mapping of translocated Y-chromosomal sequences in the chromosome set of an XX-male.

Cervical artery dissection: trauma and other potential mechanical trigger events.

Objective: To examine the import of prior cervical trauma (PCT) in patients with cervical artery dissection (CeAD). Methods: In this observational study, the presence of and the type of PCT were systematically ascertained in CeAD patients using 2 different populations for comparisons: 1) age- and sex-matched patients with ischemic stroke attributable to a cause other than CeAD (non–CeAD-IS), and 2) healthy subjects participating in the Cervical Artery Dissection and Ischemic Stroke Patients Study. The presence of PCT within 1 month was assessed using a standardized questionnaire. Crude odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and ORs adjusted for age, sex, and center were calculated. Results: We analyzed 1,897 participants (n = 966 with CeAD, n = 651 with non–CeAD-IS, n = 280 healthy subjects). CeAD patients had PCT in 40.5% (38.2%–44.5%) of cases, with 88% (344 of 392) classified as mild. PCT was more common in CeAD patients than in non–CeAD-IS patients (ORcrude 5.6 [95% CI 4.20–7.37], p < 0.001; ORadjusted 7.6 [95% CI 5.60–10.20], p < 0.001) or healthy subjects (ORcrude 2.8 [95% CI 2.03–3.68], p < 0.001; ORadjusted 3.7 [95% CI 2.40–5.56], p < 0.001). CeAD patients with PCT were younger and presented more often with neck pain and less often with stroke than CeAD patients without PCT. PCT was not associated with functional 3-month outcome after adjustment for age, sex, and stroke severity. Conclusion: PCT seems to be an important environmental determinant of CeAD, but was not an independent outcome predictor. Because of the characteristics of most PCTs, the term mechanical trigger event rather than trauma may be more appropriate.

Association of Vascular Risk Factors With Cervical Artery Dissection and Ischemic Stroke in Young Adults

Background— Little is known about the risk factors for cervical artery dissection (CEAD), a major cause of ischemic stroke (IS) in young adults. Hypertension, diabetes mellitus, smoking, hypercholesterolemia, and obesity are important risk factors for IS. However, their specific role in CEAD is poorly investigated. Our aim was to compare the prevalence of vascular risk factors in CEAD patients versus referents and patients who suffered an IS of a cause other than CEAD (non-CEAD IS) in the multicenter Cervical Artery Dissection and Ischemic Stroke Patients (CADISP) study. Methods and Results— The study sample comprised 690 CEAD patients (mean age, 44.2±9.9 years; 43.9% women), 556 patients with a non-CEAD IS (44.7±10.5 years; 39.9% women), and 1170 referents (45.9±8.1 years; 44.1% women). We compared the prevalence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, smoking, and obesity (body mass index ≥30 kg/m2) or overweightness (body mass index ≥25 kg/m2 and <30 kg/m2) between the 3 groups using a multinomial logistic regression adjusted for country of inclusion, age, and gender. Compared with referents, CEAD patients had a lower prevalence of hypercholesterolemia (odds ratio 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.42 to 0.71; P<0.0001), obesity (odds ratio 0.37; 95% confidence interval, 0.26 to 0.52; P<0.0001), and overweightness (odds ratio 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.57 to 0.88; P=0.002) but were more frequently hypertensive (odds ratio 1.67; 95% confidence interval, 1.32 to 2.1; P<0.0001). All vascular risk factors were less frequent in CEAD patients compared with young patients with a non-CEAD IS. The latter were more frequently hypertensive, diabetic, and current smokers compared with referents. Conclusion— These results, from the largest series to date, suggest that hypertension, although less prevalent than in patients with a non-CEAD IS, could be a risk factor of CEAD, whereas hypercholesterolemia, obesity, and overweightness are inversely associated with CEAD.

Migraine in cervical artery dissection and ischemic stroke patients

Objective: Several small to medium-sized studies indicated a link between cervical artery dissection (CeAD) and migraine. Migrainous CeAD patients were suggested to have different clinical characteristics compared to nonmigraine CeAD patients. We tested these hypotheses in the large Cervical Artery Dissection and Ischemic Stroke Patients (CADISP) population. Methods: A total of 968 CeAD patients and 653 patients with an ischemic stroke of a cause other than CeAD (non-CeAD IS) were recruited. CeAD patients with stroke (CeADstroke, n = 635) were compared with non-CeAD IS patients regarding migraine, clinical characteristics, and outcome. CeAD patients with and without migraine were compared in terms of clinical characteristics and outcome. Results: Migraine was more common among CeADstroke patients compared to non-CeAD IS patients (35.7 vs 27.4%, p = 0.003). The difference was mainly due to migraine without aura (20.2 vs 11.2%, p < 0.001). There were no differences in prevalence of strokes, arterial distribution, or other clinical or prognostic features between migrainous and nonmigrainous CeAD patients. Conclusion: Migraine without aura is more common among CeADstroke patients compared to non-CeAD IS patients. The mechanisms and possible causative link remain to be proved. Although CeAD is often complicated by stroke, our data do not support increased risk of stroke in migrainous CeAD patients.