Catharina M. Korse

Carcinoid Heart Disease The Role of Urinary 5-Hydroxyindoleacetic Acid Excretion and Plasma Levels of Atrial Natriuretic Peptide, Transforming Growth Factor- and Fibroblast Growth Factor

Serotonin excretion plays a role in the development of carcinoid heart disease (CHD), but the exact pathogenesis is not known. In the current study, the authors evaluated 24‐hour urinary 5‐hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5‐HIAA) excretion, as well as plasma levels of transforming growth factor‐β (TGF‐β), fibroblast growth factor (FGF), and atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) in patients with and without CHD determined by ultrasound examination.

Incidence and survival of neuroendocrine tumours in the Netherlands according to histological grade: experience of two decades of cancer registry.

PURPOSE Epidemiological studies on neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) generally show a major increase in incidence. To investigate this increase, epidemiological data from the Netherlands were evaluated according to histological grade. METHODS All 47,800 patients with NET (diagnosed 1990-2010) from the population-based Netherlands Cancer Registry were stratified according to the latest World Health Organization (WHO) classification for the digestive system: well-differentiated NET grade 1 and 2 (G1NET and G2NET), and poorly differentiated (grade 3) neuroendocrine carcinoma, subdivided into large cell (G3-LCNEC) and small cell (G3-SCNEC). RESULTS The age-standardised incidence rate (excluding G3-SCNEC) increased from 2.1/100,000 in 1990 to 4.9/100,000 in 2010. The incidence of G1NET increased from 2.0 to 3.0; there was a large increase in G2NET from 0.01 in 1990 to 0.2 in 2010, and of the G3-LCNEC from 0.01 to 1.8, respectively. In G3-SCNEC incidence in men decreased from 21.3 to 10.1, whereas in women it increased from 4.5 to 7.7. The 5-year survival improved in G1NET, particularly for metastatic disease, from 30% in 1990-2000 to 47% in 2001-2010. CONCLUSION The increasing incidence of NET (without G3-SCNEC) was mainly due to the increase of G3-LCNEC. This increase is related to improved diagnostic procedures and to shifting in pathology from other entities (such as undifferentiated carcinoma) to NET. Improved survival was seen in all sites and stages, especially in patients with metastatic G1NET. Because of its influence on incidence and survival, we recommend to present epidemiological studies on NET according to histological classification.

Chromogranin-A and N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide: An Excellent Pair of Biomarkers for Diagnostics in Patients With Neuroendocrine Tumor

PURPOSE For the last decade chromogranin-A (CgA) has been a well-established marker for neuroendocrine tumor (NET), and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) has been a useful marker for left ventricular dysfunction. This study examined the diagnostic value of CgA and NT-proBNP for carcinoid heart disease (CHD), and their prognostic value for overall survival in NET patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Serum samples were obtained and cardiac ultrasound studies performed in 102 NET patients. The criterion for mild and severe CHD was tricuspid regurgitation stage I/II and III/IV, respectively. Proportional odds and Cox proportional hazards models were constructed respectively to identify the association between CHD and overall survival with patient characteristics and the two markers. RESULTS Severe CHD was found in 15 (15%) of 102 patients, 13 of whom had elevated NT-proBNP levels. In the univariate proportional odds model CHD was correlated with age (P = .007), CgA (P = .002), and NT-proBNP (P < .001), whereas in the multivariate model NT-proBNP and CgA were significantly associated with CHD (P < .001 and P = .01). In the univariate Cox models, age (P = .04), sex (P = .03), CgA (P = .003), and NT-proBNP (P = .04) were related to overall survival, and in the multivariate model CgA and NT-proBNP remained significantly related to overall survival (P = .002 and P = .04, respectively). CONCLUSION NT-proBNP and CgA are very important markers in the diagnosis of CHD in patients with NET. Furthermore, patients with elevated NT-proBNP in addition to elevated CgA levels showed worse overall survival than patients with elevated CgA alone.

Choice of tumour markers in patients with neuroendocrine tumours is dependent on the histological grade. A marker study of Chromogranin A, Neuron specific enolase, Progastrin-releasing peptide and cytokeratin fragments

BACKGROUND Chromogranin A (CgA) is the most important tumour marker for well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours (NET) and neuron specific enolase (NSE) for poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). This study investigated whether the markers progastrin-releasing peptide (proGRP) and cytokeratin fragments (CKfr) CK8, CK18 and CK19 (MonoTotal) can be of additional value to the histological classification and help predict survival in these patients. METHODS CgA, NSE, proGRP and CKfr were measured in 242 patients with grade 1 NET (G1NET), 38 with grade 2 NET (G2NET), 42 with large cell NEC (LCNEC), 251 with small cell NEC (SCNEC) and in 282 healthy persons. Results were compared with tumour characteristics and survival by means of Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curves and Cox regression analyses. RESULTS The largest area under the ROC curve was for CgA (0.86, 0.91 and 0.90, respectively) when comparing patients with G1NET, G2NET and LCNEC with healthy persons. ProGRP showed the highest sensitivity (73%) at 95% specificity in patients with SCNEC. In a multivariate survival analysis, only CKfr was associated with survival (P<0.0001) for patients with well-differentiated NET (G1NET and G2NET). For patients with poorly differentiated NEC, both CKfr and NSE were associated with survival (P<0.0001 and P=0.003, respectively). CONCLUSION Within all histological groups a combination of tumour markers proved to be more informative as diagnostic and prognostic marker than each marker alone. In patients with well-differentiated NET and LCNEC we recommend the use of CgA and CKfr, whilst in patients with SCNEC, proGRP and CKfr are preferred.

Thalidomide versus active supportive care for maintenance in patients with malignant mesothelioma after first-line chemotherapy (NVALT 5): an open-label, multicentre, randomised phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND Standard chemotherapy does not lead to long-term survival in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. Malignant pleural mesothelioma is strongly dependent on vasculature with high vessel counts and high concentrations of serum vascular growth factors. Thalidomide has shown antiangiogenic activity, and we hypothesised that its use in the maintenance setting could improve outcomes. METHODS In this open-label, multicentre, randomised phase 3 study, eligible patients had proven malignant pleural or peritoneal mesothelioma and had received a minimum of four cycles of first-line treatment containing at least pemetrexed, with or without cisplatin or carboplatin, and had not progressed on this treatment. Patients were randomly assigned (in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by previous first-line chemotherapy, histological subtype, and recruiting hospital) to receive thalidomide 200 mg per day (including a 2 week run in of 100 mg per day) plus active supportive care or active supportive care alone until disease progression. Patients were required to be registered and to start treatment with thalidomide within 10 weeks after the end of the first-line chemotherapy. Thalidomide was given for a maximum of 1 year or until unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was time to progression. The primary analyses were by intention to treat. The study is registered, ISRCTN13632914. FINDINGS Between May 11, 2004, and Dec 23, 2009, we randomly assigned 222 patients, 111 in each group (one patient on active supportive care later withdrew consent and was excluded from analyses). At the time of this final analysis, median follow-up was 33.1 months (IQR 22.3-66.8), and physician-reported disease progression had occurred in 104 patients in the thalidomide group and 107 in the active supportive care group; 92 patients in the thalidomide group and 93 in the active supportive care group had died. Median time to progression in the thalidomide group was 3·6 months (95% CI 3.2-4.1) compared with 3.5 months (2.3-4.8) in the active supportive care group (hazard ratio 0.95, 95% CI 0.73-1.20, p=0.72). 43 (39%) grade 3 or 4 adverse events were reported in the thalidomide group and 31 (28%) in the active supportive care group; neurosensory events were reported by two (2%) patients on thalidomide and none on active supportive care, cardiac events by two (2%) patients on thalidomide and three (3%) on active supportive care, and thromboembolic events by three (3%) patients on thalidomide and none on active supportive care. INTERPRETATION No benefit was noted in time to progression with the addition of thalidomide maintenance to first-line chemotherapy. Different treatment strategies are needed to improve outcomes in patients with malignant mesothelioma. FUNDING Dutch Cancer Society (KWF), Eli Lilly, NSW Dust Disease Compensation Board, University of Sydney, and Cancer Australia.

Prognostic value of the serum tumour markers Cyfra 21-1 and tissue polypeptide antigen in malignant mesothelioma

In malignant mesothelioma, survival is claimed to be related to age, duration of symptoms, performance status, histological subtype, stage and platelet count. However the exact prognostic value of these factors is still a matter of debate. We studied the two cytokeratin markers, Cyfra 21-1 and Tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA) for their significance in predicting survival retrospectively in 52 patients. Cyfra 21-1 and TPA were elevated in 26 (50%) and 30 (58%) patients, respectively, and were highly correlated (r = 0.98). Univariate analysis of data from 51 patients, showed a relation with survival for performance status (P = 0.010), thoracic pain (P = 0.014), platelet count (P = 0.027), Cyfra 21-1 (P = 0.002) and TPA (P = 0.003). Multivariate analysis identified independent prognostic significance for performance status, platelet count and Cyfra 21-1. In addition to performance status ( < 80 vs. > 80) the cytokeratin markers identified patients with good prognosis in a log rank test. Values of Cyfra 21-1 and TPA are significantly correlated.

Serum S100B in elderly patients with and without delirium

Elevation of S100B has been shown after various neurologic diseases with cognitive dysfunction. The aim of this study was to compare the serum level of S100B of patients with and without delirium and investigate the possible associations with different subtypes of delirium.

Clinical value of pretreatment serum Cyfra 21–1, tissue polypeptide antigen, and squamous cell carcinoma antigen levels in patients with cervical cancer

Background. The clinical value of pretreatment serum concentrations of cytokeratin 19 fragments, measured by Cyfra 21‐1, was compared with tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA) and squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC‐Ag) in 78 patients with squamous cell cervical cancer.

Two-protein signature of novel serological markers apolipoprotein-A2 and serum amyloid alpha predicts prognosis in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer and improves the currently used prognostic survival models

BACKGROUND In metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC), the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) risk model is widely used for clinical trial design and patient management. To improve prognostication, we applied proteomics to identify novel serological proteins associated with overall survival (OS). PATIENTS AND METHODS Sera from 114 mRCC patients were screened by surface-enhanced laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (SELDI-TOF MS). Identified proteins were related to OS. Three proteins were subsequently validated with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and immunoturbidimetry. Prognostic models were statistically bootstrapped to correct for overestimation. RESULTS SELDI-TOF MS detected 10 proteins associated with OS. Of these, apolipoprotein A2 (ApoA2), serum amyloid alpha (SAA) and transthyretin were validated for their association with OS (P = 5.5 x 10(-9), P = 1.1 x 10(-7) and P = 0.0004, respectively). Combining ApoA2 and SAA yielded a prognostic two-protein signature [Akaikes Information Criteria (AIC) = 732, P = 5.2 x 10(-7)]. Including previously identified prognostic factors, multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed ApoA2, SAA, lactate dehydrogenase, performance status and number of metastasis sites as independent factors for survival. Using these five factors, categorization of patients into three risk groups generated a novel protein-based model predicting patient prognosis (AIC = 713, P = 4.3 x 10(-11)) more robustly than the MSKCC model (AIC = 729, P = 1.3 x 10(-7)). Applying this protein-based model instead of the MSKCC model would have changed the risk group in 38% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS Proteomics and subsequent validation yielded two novel prognostic markers and survival models which improved prediction of OS in mRCC patients over commonly used risk models. Implementation of these models has the potential to improve current risk stratification, although prospective validation will still be necessary.

Comparison of four different assays for determination of serum S-100B

BACKGROUND S-100B determination has been shown to be clinically useful in the management of melanoma patients. After the development of a test for determination of the isoforms S100-A1B and S100-BB in serum (S-100B), several sensitive assays for the detection of serum S-100B have become available. We compared four S-100B assays, two automated (LIAISON Sangtec 100 and Elecsys S100) and two manual ones (Sangtec 100 ELISA and CanAg S100 EIA), with respect to clinical data, reference values and correlation. METHODS In a total of 280 samples from 155 melanoma patients and 98 healthy individuals S-100B values were measured simultaneously with the different assays. RESULTS The inter and intra coefficients of variation were best for the automated assays. The functional sensitivity of both manual assays was 0.15 microg/L. Method comparison revealed satisfactory correlation coefficients of 0.9 or higher, but the slopes ranged from 0.29 to 3.36. Except for the Sangtec 100 ELISA, the linearity between the assays was acceptable. The overall sensitivity for melanoma ranged from 37% (Elecsys S100) to 47% (LIAISON Sangtec 100) and the sensitivity increased with stage. ROC curves showed the best accuracy for the LIAISON Sangtec 100 assay. CONCLUSIONS All assays gave satisfactory results, but it is advisable to improve the performance of the manual assays for better sensitivity. Agreement about an international reference standard is needed.