Catherine A Forneris

Interventions to prevent post-traumatic stress disorder: a systematic review.

CONTEXT Traumatic events are prevalent worldwide; trauma victims seek help in numerous clinical and emergency settings. Using effective interventions to prevent post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is increasingly important. This review assessed the efficacy, comparative effectiveness, and harms of psychological, pharmacologic, and emerging interventions to prevent PTSD. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION The following sources were searched for research on interventions to be included in the review: MEDLINE; Cochrane Library; CINAHL; EMBASE; PILOTS (Published International Literature on Traumatic Stress); International Pharmaceutical Abstracts; PsycINFO; Web of Science; reference lists of published literature; and unpublished literature (January 1, 1980 to July 30, 2012). Two reviewers independently selected studies, extracted data or checked accuracy, assessed study risk of bias, and graded strength of evidence. All data synthesis occurred between January and September 2012. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Nineteen studies covered various populations, traumas, and interventions. In meta-analyses of three trials (from the same team) for people with acute stress disorder, brief trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy was more effective than supportive counseling in reducing the severity of PTSD symptoms (moderate-strength); these two interventions had similar results for incidence of PTSD (low-strength); depression severity (low-strength); and anxiety severity (moderate-strength). PTSD symptom severity after injury decreased more with collaborative care than usual care (single study; low-strength). Debriefing did not reduce incidence or severity of PTSD or psychological symptoms in civilian traumas (low-strength). Evidence about relevant outcomes was unavailable for many interventions or was insufficient owing to methodologic shortcomings. CONCLUSIONS Evidence is very limited regarding best practices to treat trauma-exposed individuals. Brief cognitive behavioral therapy may reduce PTSD symptom severity in people with acute stress disorder; collaborative care may help decrease symptom severity post-injury.

Review and special articleInterventions to Prevent Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: A Systematic Review

CONTEXT Traumatic events are prevalent worldwide; trauma victims seek help in numerous clinical and emergency settings. Using effective interventions to prevent post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is increasingly important. This review assessed the efficacy, comparative effectiveness, and harms of psychological, pharmacologic, and emerging interventions to prevent PTSD. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION The following sources were searched for research on interventions to be included in the review: MEDLINE; Cochrane Library; CINAHL; EMBASE; PILOTS (Published International Literature on Traumatic Stress); International Pharmaceutical Abstracts; PsycINFO; Web of Science; reference lists of published literature; and unpublished literature (January 1, 1980 to July 30, 2012). Two reviewers independently selected studies, extracted data or checked accuracy, assessed study risk of bias, and graded strength of evidence. All data synthesis occurred between January and September 2012. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Nineteen studies covered various populations, traumas, and interventions. In meta-analyses of three trials (from the same team) for people with acute stress disorder, brief trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy was more effective than supportive counseling in reducing the severity of PTSD symptoms (moderate-strength); these two interventions had similar results for incidence of PTSD (low-strength); depression severity (low-strength); and anxiety severity (moderate-strength). PTSD symptom severity after injury decreased more with collaborative care than usual care (single study; low-strength). Debriefing did not reduce incidence or severity of PTSD or psychological symptoms in civilian traumas (low-strength). Evidence about relevant outcomes was unavailable for many interventions or was insufficient owing to methodologic shortcomings. CONCLUSIONS Evidence is very limited regarding best practices to treat trauma-exposed individuals. Brief cognitive behavioral therapy may reduce PTSD symptom severity in people with acute stress disorder; collaborative care may help decrease symptom severity post-injury.

Comparative benefits and harms of second generation antidepressants and cognitive behavioral therapies in initial treatment of major depressive disorder: systematic review and meta-analysis

Study question What are the benefits and harms of second generation antidepressants and cognitive behavioral therapies (CBTs) in the initial treatment of a current episode of major depressive disorder in adults? Methods This was a systematic review including qualitative assessment and meta-analyses using random and fixed effects models. Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, the Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, PsycINFO, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature were searched from January1990 through January 2015. The 11 randomized controlled trials included compared a second generation antidepressant CBT. Ten trials compared antidepressant monotherapy with CBT alone; three compared antidepressant monotherapy with antidepressant plus CBT. Summary answer and limitations Meta-analyses found no statistically significant difference in effectiveness between second generation antidepressants and CBT for response (risk ratio 0.91, 0.77 to 1.07), remission (0.98, 0.73 to 1.32), or change in 17 item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression score (weighted mean difference, −0.38, −2.87 to 2.10). Similarly, no significant differences were found in rates of overall study discontinuation (risk ratio 0.90, 0.49 to 1.65) or discontinuation attributable to lack of efficacy (0.40, 0.05 to 2.91). Although more patients treated with a second generation antidepressant than receiving CBT withdrew from studies because of adverse events, the difference was not statistically significant (risk ratio 3.29, 0.42 to 25.72). No conclusions could be drawn about other outcomes because of lack of evidence. Results should be interpreted cautiously given the low strength of evidence for most outcomes. The scope of this review was limited to trials that enrolled adult patients with major depressive disorder and compared a second generation antidepressant with CBT, and many of the included trials had methodological shortcomings that may limit confidence in some of the findings. What this study adds Second generation antidepressants and CBT have evidence bases of benefits and harms in major depressive disorder. Available evidence suggests no difference in treatment effects of second generation antidepressants and CBT, either alone or in combination, although small numbers may preclude detection of small but clinically meaningful differences. Funding, competing interests, data sharing This project was funded under contract from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality by the RTI-UNC Evidence-based Practice Center. Detailed methods and additional information are available in the full report, available at http://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/.

Histories of major depression and premenstrual dysphoric disorder: Evidence for phenotypic differences.

This study examined unique versus shared stress and pain-related phenotypes associated with premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) and prior major depressive disorder (MDD). Sympathetic nervous system (SNS) and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA)-axis measures were assessed at rest and during mental stress, as well as sensitivity to cold pressor and tourniquet ischemic pain tasks in four groups of women: (1) non-PMDD with no prior MDD (N=18); (2) non-PMDD with prior MDD (N=9); (3) PMDD with no prior MDD (N=17); (4) PMDD with prior MDD (N=10). PMDD women showed blunted SNS responses to stress compared to non-PMDD women, irrespective of prior MDD; while women with prior MDD showed exaggerated diastolic blood pressure responses to stress versus never depressed women, irrespective of PMDD. However, only in women with histories of MDD did PMDD women have lower cortisol concentrations than non-PMDD women, and only in non-PMDD women was MDD associated with reduced cold pressor pain sensitivity. These results suggest both unique phenotypic differences between women with PMDD and those with a history of MDD, but also indicate that histories of MDD may have special relevance for PMDD.

Menstrual mood disorders are associated with blunted sympathetic reactivity to stress

OBJECTIVE Few studies have directly compared women with a menstrually related mood disorder (MRMD) with women who have suffered from depression for stress reactivity phenotypes. It is unclear whether blunted responses to stress in women with a MRMD reflect a unique phenotype of MRMDs or may be explained by a history of depression. METHODS We assessed cardiovascular reactivity to stress in four groups: 1) Women with a MRMD without a history of depression (n=37); 2) women with a MRMD plus a history of depression (n=26); 3) women without a MRMD and without a history of depression (n=43); and 4) women without a MRMD but with a history of depression (n=20). RESULTS Women with a MRMD showed blunted myocardial (heart rate and cardiac index) reactivity to mental stress compared to non-MRMD women, irrespective of histories of depression. Hypo-reactivity to stress predicted greater premenstrual symptom severity in the entire sample. Women with a MRMD showed blunted norepinephrine and diastolic blood pressure stress reactivity relative to women with no MRMD, but only when no history of depression was present. Both MRMD women and women with depression histories reported greater negative subjective responses to stress relative to their non-MRMD and never depressed counterparts. CONCLUSION Our findings support the assertion that a blunted stress reactivity profile represents a unique phenotype of MRMDs and also underscore the importance of psychiatric histories to stress reactivity. Furthermore, our results emphasize the clinical relevance of myocardial hypo-reactivity to stress, since it predicts heightened premenstrual symptom severity.

Comparative benefits and harms of complementary and alternative medicine therapies for initial treatment of major depressive disorder: Systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES To report the comparative benefits and harms of exercise and complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) treatments with second-generation antidepressants (SGA) for major depressive disorder (MDD). DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. SETTINGS Outpatient clinics. SUBJECTS Adults, aged 18 years and older, with MDD receiving an initial treatment attempt with SGA. INTERVENTIONS Any CAM or exercise intervention compared with an SGA. OUTCOME MEASURES Treatment response, remission, change in depression rating, adverse events, treatment discontinuation, and treatment discontinuation due to adverse events. RESULTS We found 22 randomized controlled trials for direct comparisons and 127 trials for network meta-analyses, including trials of acupuncture, omega-3 fatty acids, S-adenosyl methionine, St. Johns wort, and exercise. For most treatment comparisons, we found no differences between treatment groups for response and remission. However, the risk of bias of these studies led us to conclude that the strength of evidence for these findings was either low or insufficient. The risk of treatment harms and treatment discontinuation attributed to adverse events was higher for selective serotonin receptor inhibitors than for St. Johns wort. CONCLUSIONS Although we found little difference in the comparative efficacy of most CAM therapies or exercise and SGAs, the overall poor quality of the available evidence base tempers any conclusions that we might draw from those trials. Future trials should incorporate patient-oriented outcomes, treatment expectancy, depressive severity, and harms assessments into their designs; antidepressants should be administered over their full dosage ranges; and larger trials using methods to reduce sampling bias are needed.

Efficacy and Harms of Second-generation Antidepressants for the Prevention of Seasonal Affective Disorder: a Systematic Review

Introduction Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD) is a seasonal pattern of recurrent major depressive episodes that most commonly occur during autumn or winter and remit in spring. Second-generation antidepressants (SGAs) are established interventions to treat acute episodes of SAD. However, little is known about the efficacy and potential harms of these interventions for preventing SAD. Objectives To assess the efficacy and safety of SGAs to prevent SAD and improve patient–centered outcomes in adults with a history of SAD. Methods We searched the Cochrane Depression, Anxiety and Neuorosis Review Groups specialised register, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. In addition, we searched pharmaceutical industry trials registers via the Internet to identify unpublished trial data. We also conducted grey literature searches and handsearches of pertinent reference lists. Two authors reviewed the evidence, abstracted data, and assessed risk of bias. We pooled data for meta-analysis when participant groups were similar and the studies assessed the same treatments with the same comparator. Results We did not find eligible studies for most comparisons. We included three RCTs comparing bupropion XL with placebo. Statistically significantly fewer patients treated with bupropion experienced the onset of a major depressive episode during winter months. The overall risk of adverse events was similar between treatment groups. However, bupropionn-treated patients had significantly higher risk for headache, insomnia, and nausea. Conclusion The evidence base on SGA treatment to prevent SAD is limited. Future studies are needed to provide a sufficient evidence base for clinical decisionmaking.