Catherine Allaire

Efficacy and Tolerability of Besifloxacin Ophthalmic Suspension 0.6% Administered Twice Daily for 3 Days in the Treatment of Bacterial Conjunctivitis: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Masked, Vehicle-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study in Adults and Children

BACKGROUND Besifloxacin is a topical fluoroquinolone with potent in vitro activity against a broad spectrum of ocular pathogens, including drug-resistant strains. Besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% given 3 times daily for 5 days has been reported to be more effective than its vehicle in the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling suggests that besifloxacin might also be effective given twice daily. OBJECTIVE This study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% administered twice daily for 3 days compared with vehicle (formulation without besifloxacin) in the treatment of adults and children with bacterial conjunctivitis. METHODS This was a multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-masked, vehicle-controlled, parallel-group study. Patients aged ≥1 year with bacterial conjunctivitis were randomized to receive besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension or vehicle administered twice daily for 3 days. There were 3 study visits: the baseline visit, visit 2 (day 4 or 5), and visit 3 (day 7±1). Participants recorded the times of medication instillation in a patient diary. The primary end points were clinical resolution and bacterial eradication of the baseline bacterial infection at visit 2 in patients with culture-confirmed bacterial conjunctivitis. Secondary end points were clinical resolution and bacterial eradication of the baseline bacterial infection at visit 3, individual clinical outcomes (ocular conjunctival discharge and bulbar conjunctival injection) at the follow-up visits, and microbial and clinical outcomes for overall bacterial species and individual gram-positive and gram-negative bacterial species. Tolerability assessments included ocular adverse events (AEs), changes in visual acuity, biomicroscopy and ophthalmoscopy findings, and nonocular AEs. RESULTS Of 202 patients randomized to treatment (mean [SD] age, 25.2 [24.3] years; 56.9% female; 76.7% white), 109 had culture-confirmed bacterial conjunctivitis (53 besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension, 56 vehicle). At visit 2, the besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension group had significantly greater rates of clinical resolution compared with the vehicle group (37/53 [69.8%] vs 21/56 [37.5%], respectively; P < 0.001), as well as significantly greater rates of bacterial eradication (46/53 [86.8%] vs 32/56 [57.1%]; P < 0.001). At visit 3, rates of bacterial eradication were also significantly greater in the besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension group compared with the vehicle group (46/53 [86.8%] vs 39/56 [69.6%]; P = 0.038). Results for the individual clinical outcomes and microbial and clinical outcomes by gram-positive and gram-negative species were consistent with the primary efficacy outcomes. The incidence of ocular AEs did not differ significantly between treatment groups (4/94 [4.3%] vs 8/98 [8.2%]). Ocular AEs in all treated eyes in the respective groups included bacterial conjunctivitis (3/157 [1.9%] and 5/154 [3.2%]), conjunctivitis (3/157 [1.9%] and 4/154 [2.6%]), and allergic conjunctivitis (2/157 [1.3%] and 1/154 [0.6%]). These events were of mild or moderate severity. Changes in visual acuity and biomicroscopy and ophthalmoscopy findings were comparable between groups. There were few nonocular AEs (2/94 [2.1%] vs 3/98 [3.1%]; P = NS), none of them considered treatment related. CONCLUSION In these adults and children with bacterial conjunctivitis, treatment with besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% administered twice daily for 3 days was effective and well tolerated. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00972777.

Besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% administered twice daily for 3 days in the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis in adults and children.

AbstractBackground and Objective: Besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% given thrice daily for 5 days is safe and effective in the treatment of patients with bacterial conjunctivitis. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% administered twice daily for 3 days compared with vehicle in the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis. Study Design: This was a multicenter, double-masked, randomized, vehicle-controlled, parallel-group study. Methods: A total of 474 patients aged ≥1 year with bacterial conjunctivitis were randomized in a 1 : 1 ratio to receive either besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% or vehicle administered twice daily for 3 days. There were three study visits: day 1 (the baseline visit), day 4/5 (visit 2), and day 7±1 (visit 3). The co-primary efficacy endpoints were bacterial eradication and clinical resolution at day 4/5 in designated study eyes of patients with culture-confirmed bacterial conjunctivitis. Secondary efficacy endpoints were bacterial eradication and clinical resolution at day 7±1, individual clinical outcomes of ocular discharge and bulbar conjunctival injection at all visits; and microbial and clinical outcomes for overall bacterial species and individual Gram- positive and Gram-negative bacterial species at each follow-up visit. Safety endpoints included adverse events (AEs), changes in visual acuity and biomicroscopy findings at each visit, and changes in ophthalmoscopy findings at day 7±1. Results: Bacterial eradication and clinical resolution rates were significantly higher in the besifloxacin group than in the vehicle group (115/135 [85.2%] vs 77/141 [54.6%], p<0.001, and 89/135 [65.9%] vs 62/141 [44.0%], p<0.001, respectively) at day 4/5. Rates of bacterial eradication continued to be significantly greater in the besifloxacin group (115/135 [85.2%] vs 91/141 [64.5%], respectively; p<0.001) at day 7±1; however, the rates of clinical resolution did not differ significantly between the groups (103/135 [76.3%] and 94/141 [66.7%], p =0.209) at this visit. Ocular discharge and bulbar conjunctival injection at each visit were consistent with the primary outcomes. Clinical resolution and bacterial eradication with Gram-positive or Gram-negative organisms were consistent with the overall findings. All AEs in both groups were of mild or moderate severity and were considered unrelated to the treatment. Conclusion: Treatment with besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% administered twice daily for 3 days was effective and safe in adults and children with bacterial conjunctivitis.

Efficacy and safety of indomethacin 0.1% eye drops compared with ketorolac 0.5% eye drops in the management of ocular inflammation after cataract surgery

Purpose:  To determine whether indomethacin 0.1% eye drops are at least as effective as ketorolac 0.5% eye drops in treating ocular inflammation following cataract surgery.

Latanoprost 0.005% test formulation is as effective as Xalatan® in patients with ocular hypertension and primary open-angle glaucoma

Purpose To determine if a test formulation of latanoprost 0.005% (Bausch & Lomb) eyedrops reduced intraocular pressure (IOP) as well as Xalatan® (latanoprost 0.005%) in patients with ocular hypertension (OH) or primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). Methods This multicenter, randomized, investigator-masked, parallel-group study allocated 266 patients with OH or POAG in a 1:1 ratio to latanoprost or Xalatan administered once daily for 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was the mean change in 8:00 AM IOP of the study eye from baseline to week 6. Secondary endpoints included mean change in 8:00 AM IOP from baseline to week 2, and in 12:00 noon and 4:00 PM IOP from baseline to week 2 and week 6. The safety and tolerability of both drugs were also assessed. Results Both study groups had comparable demographics and baseline characteristics. The mean (SD) change in 8:00 AM IOP from baseline to week 6 was −7.29 (2.61) and −7.54 (2.80) mmHg with latanoprost and Xalatan, respectively. Latanoprost was found noninferior to Xalatan in the primary analysis (mean [SEM] treatment difference, 0.252 [0.504] mmHg; 95% confidence interval [CI] −0.408, 0.913; p = 0.0001; noninferiority margin, 1.5 mmHg) and met the predefined definition of equivalence to Xalatan (95% CI within [–1.5, 1.5 mmHg] margin). The IOP-lowering effects of latanoprost and Xalatan were comparable at all assessed time points. Both study treatments demonstrated a comparable safety and tolerability profile. Conclusions Bausch & Lomb latanoprost 0.005% is clinically equivalent to Xalatan for treating OH and POAG as demonstrated through this unique comparative trial.