Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Catherine Arvieux is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Catherine Arvieux.


Annals of Surgical Oncology | 2010

Peritoneal Carcinomatosis from Gastric Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Study of 159 Patients Treated by Cytoreductive Surgery Combined with Perioperative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy

Olivier Glehen; François Noël Gilly; Catherine Arvieux; Eddy Cotte; Florent Boutitie; Baudouin Mansvelt; Jean Marc Bereder; Gérard Lorimier; François Quenet; Dominique Elias

BackgroundPeritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) from gastric cancer has long been regarded a terminal disease with a short median survival. New locoregional therapeutic approaches combining cytoreductive surgery with perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (PIC) have evolved and suggest improved survival.Materials and MethodsA retrospective multicentric study was performed in French-speaking centers to evaluate the toxicity and the principal prognostic factors in order to identify the best indications. All patients had cytoreductive surgery and PIC: hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and/or early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC).ResultsThe study included 159 patients from 15 institutions between February 1989 and August 2007. The median follow-up was 20.4xa0months. HIPEC was the PIC used for 150 procedures. Postoperative mortality and grade 3–4 morbidity rates were 6.5 and 27.8%, respectively. By multivariate analysis, the institution had a significant influence on toxicity. The overall median survival was 9.2xa0months and 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 43, 18, and 13%, respectively. The only independent prognostic indicator by multivariate analysis was the completeness of cytoreductive surgery. For patients treated by complete cytoreductive surgery, the median survival was 15xa0months with a 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rate of 61, 30, and 23%, respectively.ConclusionsThe therapeutic approach combining cytoreductive surgery with PIC for patients with gastric carcinomatosis may achieve long-term survival in a selected group of patients (limited and resectable PC). The high mortality rate underlines this necessarily strict selection that should be reserved to experienced institutions involved in the management of PC and gastric surgery.


Annals of Surgery | 2010

A comparative study of complete cytoreductive surgery plus intraperitoneal chemotherapy to treat peritoneal dissemination from colon, rectum, small bowel, and nonpseudomyxoma appendix.

Dominique Elias; Olivier Glehen; Marc Pocard; François Quenet; Diane Goéré; Catherine Arvieux; Patrick Rat; François Noël Gilly

Objective:To report a large number of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) treated with complete cytoreductive (CCR-0) plus intraperitoneal chemotherapy, and to compare the results according to the origin of the primary: colon, rectum, small bowel, and appendix (excluding peritoneal pseudomyxoma). Patients and Methods:Among 615 patients treated for PC originating from these 4 types of primaries in 23 French centers, 440 were retrospectively selected as having undergone complete cytoreductive surgery and with complete data retrieval. Primary sites were: colon (n = 341), rectum (n = 27), appendix (n = 41), and small bowel (n = 31). Results:Postoperative mortality and morbidity (3.9% and 31%, respectively) did not differ according to the origin of the primary tumor. The mean follow-up was 60 months. The 5-year overall survival rates were not statistically different for the colon (29.7%), rectum (37.9%), nor the small bowel (33.8%), but was higher (P = 0.01) for appendix adenocarcinoma (63.2%). The multivariate analysis of prognostic factors singled out the extent of peritoneal seeding (P < 0.0001), positive lymph nodes (P = 0.001), and adjuvant systemic chemotherapy (P = 0.002), whereas the origin of the tumor was borderline (P = 0.06) in favor of appendix tumors. Conclusion:Cytoreductive surgery plus intraperitoneal chemotherapy yields satisfying and similar survival results in the treatment of PC from colon, rectum, and small bowel adenocarcinomas. Results were better for appendix adenocarcinoma. When feasible, this combined approach should become the gold standard treatment of PC.


Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 2011

Hepatic arterial embolization in the management of blunt hepatic trauma: indications and complications.

Christian Letoublon; Irene Morra; Yao Chen; Valérie Monnin; David Voirin; Catherine Arvieux

BACKGROUNDnThe objective was to clarify the role of hepatic arterial embolization (AE) in the management of blunt hepatic trauma.nnnMETHODSnRetrospective observational study of 183 patients with blunt hepatic trauma admitted to a trauma referral center over a 9-year period. The charts of 29 patients (16%) who underwent hepatic angiography were reviewed for demographics, injury specific data, management strategy, angiographic indication, efficacy and complications of embolization, and outcome.nnnRESULTSnAE was performed in 23 (79%) of the patients requiring angiography. Thirteen patients managed conservatively underwent emergency embolization after preliminary computed tomography scan. Six had postoperative embolization after damage control laparotomy and four had delayed embolization. Arterial bleeding was controlled in all the cases. Sixteen patients (70%) had one or more liver-related complications; temporary biliary leak (n=11), intra-abdominal hypertension (n=14), inflammatory peritonitis (n=3), hepatic necrosis (n=3), gallbladder infarction (n=2), and compressive subcapsular hematoma (n=1). Unrecognized hepatic necrosis could have contributed to the late posttraumatic death of one patient.nnnCONCLUSIONnAE is a key element in modern management of high-grade liver injuries. Two principal indications exist in the acute postinjury phase: primary hemostatic control in hemodynamically stable or stabilized patients with radiologic computed tomography evidence of active arterial bleeding and adjunctive hemostatic control in patients with uncontrolled suspected arterial bleeding despite emergency laparotomy. Successful management of injuries of grade III upward often entails a combined angiographic and surgical approach. Awareness of the ischemic complications due to angioembolization is important.


World Journal of Surgery | 2008

Delayed Celiotomy or Laparoscopy as part of the Nonoperative Management of Blunt Hepatic Trauma

Christian Letoublon; Yao Chen; Catherine Arvieux; David Voirin; Irene Morra; Christophe Broux; Olivier Risse

BackgroundNonoperative management (NOM) is considered standard treatment for 80% of blunt hepatic trauma (BHT). NOM is associated with some events that may require delayed operation (DO), usually considered a criterion of failure of NOM.MethodsA retrospective case note review was performed on 257 consecutive patients with BHT, with a median age of 32.7xa0years, admitted from 1994 to 2005. We considered the 186 patients (72%) who had an initial indication of NOM, and focused on the 28 patients who were secondarily operated (DO), mainly on the 22 patients operated on for liver-related indications. Celioscopy was used in five cases.ResultsThe severity grade of these 22 patients was: zero grade I, seven grade II, ten grade III, four grade IV, one grade V. The timing of DO varied from day 0 to day 11. Ten patients were operated on for a peritoneal inflammatory syndrome. Death occurred in three patients at days 2, 10, and 125. One was attributed to underestimation of hepatic necrosis, another to a nondiagnosed peritoneal inflammatory syndrome; 27, 3% of the patients had liver-related complications.ConclusionsOur data suggest that BHT treated by NOM must be frequently reevaluated and that DO is an actual part of the so-called nonoperative treatment. The use of laparoscopic washing has to be proposed as soon as day 3 or 5 in patients with large hemoperitoneum and any sign of inflammatory response (fever, leukocytosis, discomfort, tachycardia).


Critical Care | 2015

A regional trauma system to optimize the pre-hospital triage of trauma patients

Pierre Bouzat; François-Xavier Ageron; Julien Brun; Albrice Levrat; Marion Berthet; Elisabeth Rancurel; Jean-Marc Thouret; Frédéric Thony; Catherine Arvieux; Jean-François Payen

IntroductionPre-hospital triage is a key element in a trauma system that aims to admit patients to the most suitable trauma center, and may decrease intra-hospital mortality. We evaluated the performance of a pre-hospital procedure in a regional trauma system through measurements of the quality of pre-hospital medical assessment and the efficacy of a triage protocol.MethodsOur regional trauma system included 13 hospitals categorized as Level I, II or III trauma centers according to their technical facilities. Each patient was graded A, B or C by an emergency physician, according to the seriousness of their injuries at presentation on scene. The triage was performed according to this grading and the categorization of centers. This study is a registry analysis of a three-year period (2009 to 2011).ResultsOf the 3,428 studied patients, 2,572 were graded using the pre-hospital grading system (Graded group). The pre-hospital gradation was closely related with injury severity score (ISS) and intra-hospital mortality rate. The triage protocol had a sensitivity of 92% (95% confidence interval (CI) 90% to 93%) and a specificity of 41% (95% CI 39% to 44%) to predict adequate admission of patients with ISS more than 15. A total of 856 patients were not graded at the scene (Non-graded group). Undertriage rate was significantly reduced in the Graded group compared with the Non-graded group, with a relative risk of 0.47 (95% CI 0.40 to 0.56) according to the definition of the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma (P <0.001). Where adjusted for trauma severity, the expected mortality rate at discharge from hospital was higher than observed mortality, with a difference of +2.0% (95% CI 1.4 to 2.6%; P <0.01).ConclusionsImplementation of a regional trauma system with a pre-hospital triage procedure was effective in detecting severe trauma patients and in lowering the rate of pre-hospital undertriage. A beneficial effect on outcome of such an organization is suggested.


Journal of Pain and Symptom Management | 2014

Recommendations for bowel obstruction with peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Guillemette Laval; Blandine Marcelin-Benazech; Frédéric Guirimand; Laure Chauvenet; Laure Copel; Aurélie Durand; Eric Francois; Martine Gabolde; Pascale Mariani; Vincent Servois; Eric Terrebonne; Catherine Arvieux

This article reports on the clinical practice guidelines developed by a multidisciplinary group working on the indications and uses of the various available treatment options for relieving intestinal obstruction or its symptoms in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. These guidelines are based on a literature review and expert opinion. The recommended strategy involves a clinical and radiological evaluation, of which CT of the abdomen is a crucial component. The results, together with an analysis of the prognostic criteria, are used to determine whether surgery or stenting is the best option. In most patients, however, neither option is feasible, and the main emphasis, therefore, is on the role and administration of various symptomatic medications such as glucocorticoids, antiemetic agents, analgesics, and antisecretory agents (anticholinergic drugs, somatostatin analogues, and proton-pump inhibitors). Nasogastric tube feeding is no longer used routinely and should instead be discussed on a case-by-case basis. Recent studies have confirmed the efficacy of somatostatin analogues in relieving obstruction-related symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, and pain. However, the absence of a marketing license and the high cost of these drugs limit their use as the first-line treatment, except in highly selected patients (early recurrence). When these medications fail to alleviate the symptoms of obstruction, venting gastrostomy should be considered promptly. Rehydration is needed for virtually every patient. Parenteral nutrition and pain management should be adjusted according to the patient needs and guidelines.


Diagnostic and interventional imaging | 2014

Blunt splenic injury: Outcomes of proximal versus distal and combined splenic artery embolization

J. Frandon; Mathieu Rodière; Catherine Arvieux; M. Michoud; A. Vendrell; Christophe Broux; Christian Sengel; I. Bricault; Gilbert Ferretti; Frédéric Thony

PURPOSEnTo assess clinical outcomes of blunt splenic injuries (BSI) managed with proximal versus distal versus combined splenic artery embolization (SAE).nnnMATERIALS AND METHODSnAll consecutive patients with BSI admitted to our trauma centre from 2005 to 2010 and managed with SAE were reviewed. Outcomes were compared between proximal (P), distal (D) or combined (C) embolization. We focused on embolization failure (splenectomy), every adverse events occurring during follow up and material used for embolization.nnnRESULTSnFifty patients were reviewed (P n = 18, 36%; D n = 22, 44%; C n = 8, 16%). Mean injury severity score was 20. The technical success rate was 98%. Four patients required splenectomy (P n = 1, D n = 3, C n = 0). Clinical success rate for haemostasis was 92% (4 re-bleeds: P n = 2, D n = 2, C n = 0). Outcomes were not statistically different between the materials used. Adverse events occurred in 65% of the patients during follow up. Four percent of the patients developed major complications and 56% developed minor complications attributable to embolization. There was no significant difference between the 3 groups.nnnCONCLUSIONnSAE had an excellent success rate with adverse events occurring in 65% of the patients and no significant differences found between the embolization techniques used. Proximal preventive embolization appears to protect in high-grade traumatic injuries.


Injury-international Journal of The Care of The Injured | 2014

Detecting active pelvic arterial haemorrhage on admission following serious pelvic fracture in multiple trauma patients

Julien Brun; Stéphanie Guillot; Pierre Bouzat; Christophe Broux; Frédéric Thony; C. Genty; Christophe Heylbroeck; Pierre Albaladejo; Catherine Arvieux; Jérôme Tonetti; Jean Francois Payen

BACKGROUNDnThe early diagnosis of pelvic arterial haemorrhage is challenging for initiating treatment by transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) in multiple trauma patients. We use an institutional algorithm focusing on haemodynamic status on admission and on a whole-body CT scan in stabilized patients to screen patients requiring TAE. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of this approach.nnnMETHODSnThis retrospective cohort study included 106 multiple trauma patients admitted to the emergency room with serious pelvic fracture [pelvic abbreviated injury scale (AIS) score of 3 or more].nnnRESULTSnOf the 106 patients, 27 (25%) underwent pelvic angiography leading to TAE for active arterial haemorrhage in 24. The TAE procedure was successful within 3h of arrival in 18 patients. In accordance with the algorithm, 10 patients were directly admitted to the angiography unit (n=8) and/or operating room (n=2) for uncontrolled haemorrhagic shock on admission. Of the remaining 96 stabilized patients, 20 had contrast media extravasation on pelvic CT scan that prompted pelvic angiography in 16 patients leading to TAE in 14. One patient underwent a pelvic angiography despite showing no contrast media extravasation on pelvic CT scan. All 17 stabilized patients who underwent pelvic angiography presented a more severely compromised haemodynamic status on admission, and they required more blood products during their initial management than the 79 patients who did not undergo pelvic angiography. The incidence of unstable pelvic fractures was however comparable between the two groups. Overall, haemodynamic instability and contrast media extravasation on the CT-scan identified 26 out of the 27 patients who required subsequent pelvic angiography leading to TAE in 24.nnnCONCLUSIONSnAn algorithm focusing on haemodynamic status on arrival and on the whole-body CT scan in stabilized patients may be effective at triaging multiple trauma patients with serious pelvic fractures.


European Journal of Cancer | 2016

Diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: Evaluation of systemic chemotherapy with comprehensive treatment through the RENAPE Database Multi-Institutional Retrospective Study *

V. Kepenekian; D. Elias; G. Passot; E. Mery; Diane Goéré; D. Delroeux; F. Quenet; G. Ferron; D. Pezet; J.M. Guilloit; P. Meeus; M. Pocard; J.M. Bereder; K. Abboud; Catherine Arvieux; C. Brigand; F. Marchal; J.M. Classe; G. Lorimier; C. De Chaisemartin; F. Guyon; Pascale Mariani; P. Ortega-Deballon; S. Isaac; C. Maurice; F.N. Gilly; Olivier Glehen; G. Averous; F. Bibeau; D. Bouzard

PURPOSEnDiffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) is a severe disease with mainly locoregional evolution. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) is the reported treatment with the longest survival. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of perioperative systemic chemotherapy strategies on survival and postoperative outcomes in patients with DMPM treated with curative intent with CRS-HIPEC, using a multi-institutional database: the French RENAPE network.nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnFrom 1991 to 2014, 126 DMPM patients underwent CRS-HIPEC at 20 tertiary centres. The population was divided into four groups according to perioperative treatment: only neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NA), only adjuvant chemotherapy (ADJ), perioperative chemotherapy (PO) and no chemotherapy before or after CRS-HIPEC (NoC).nnnRESULTSnAll groups (NA: nxa0=xa042; ADJ: nxa0=xa016; PO: nxa0=xa016; NoC: nxa0=xa048) were comparable regarding clinicopathological data and main DMPM prognostic factors. After a median follow-up of 61 months, the 5-year overall survival (OS) was 40%, 67%, 62% and 56% in NA, ADJ, PO and NoC groups, respectively (Pxa0=xa00.049). Major complications occurred for 41%, 45%, 35% and 41% of patients from NA, ADJ, PO and NoC groups, respectively (Pxa0=xa00.299). In multivariate analysis, NA was independently associated with worse OS (hazard ratio, 2.30; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-4.94; Pxa0=xa00.033).nnnCONCLUSIONnThis retrospective study suggests that adjuvant chemotherapy may delay recurrence and improve survivalxa0and that NA may impact negatively the survival for patients with DMPM who underwent CRS-HIPEC with curative intent. Upfront CRS and HIPEC should be considered when achievable, waiting for stronger level of scientific evidence.


Ejso | 2016

A new internet tool to report peritoneal malignancy extent. PeRitOneal MalIgnancy Stage Evaluation (PROMISE) application

L. Villeneuve; A. Thivolet; N. Bakrin; F. Mohamed; S. Isaac; P.-J. Valette; O. Glehen; P. Rousset; J. Abba; K. Abboud; Catherine Arvieux; G. Balagué; V. Barrau; H.B. Rejeb; J.M. Bereder; F. Bibeau; D. Bouzard; C. Brigand; S. Carrère; M. Carretier; C. De Chaisemartin; M. Chassang; A. Chevallier; T. Courvoisier; P. Dartigues; D. Delroeux; G. Desolneux; A. Dohan; C. Dromain; F. Dumont

Based on the importance of assessing the true extent of peritoneal disease, PeRitOneal MalIgnancy Stage Evaluation (PROMISE) internet application (www.e-promise.org) has been developed to facilitate tabulation and automatically calculate surgically validated peritoneal cancer index (PCI), and other surgically validated scores as Gilly score, simplified peritoneal cancer index (SPCI), Fagotti and Fagotti-modified scores. This application offers computer-assistance to produce simple, quick but precise and standardized pre, intra and postoperative reports of the extent of peritoneal metastases and may help specialized and non-specialized institutions in their current practice but also facilitate research and multicentre studies on peritoneal surface malignancies.

Collaboration


Dive into the Catherine Arvieux's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J. Abba

University of Grenoble

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Olivier Glehen

University of New South Wales

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Fabian Reche

Centre national de la recherche scientifique

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Guillemette Laval

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marc Pocard

Institut Gustave Roussy

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge