Catherine Bresee
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Catherine Bresee.
Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2014
Jennifer T. Anger; Elizabeth R. Mueller; Christopher Tarnay; Bridget Smith; Kevin T. Stroupe; Amy Rosenman; Linda Brubaker; Catherine Bresee; Kimberly Kenton
OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy are widely used for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) treatment. Evidence comparing outcomes and costs is lacking. We compared costs and clinically relevant outcomes in women randomized to laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy compared with robotic sacrocolpopexy. METHODS: Participants with symptomatic stage POP II or greater, including significant apical support loss, were randomized to either laparoscopic or robotic sacrocolpopexy. We compared surgical costs (including costs for robot, initial hospitalization) and rehospitalization within 6 weeks. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain, POP quantification, symptom severity and quality of life, and adverse events. RESULTS: We randomized 78 women (mean age 59 years): laparoscopic (n=38) and robotic (n=40). The robotic sacrocolpopexy group had higher initial hospital costs (
Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology | 2012
Lev Gertsik; Russell E. Poland; Catherine Bresee; Mark Hyman Rapaport
19,616 compared with
Biological Psychiatry | 2005
Mark Hyman Rapaport; Katia Delrahim; Catherine Bresee; Rachel Maddux; Oliver Ahmadpour; Douglas Dolnak
11,573, P<.001) and over 6 weeks, hospital costs remained higher for robotic sacrocolpopexy (
Human Pathology | 2012
Deepti Dhall; Richard B. Mertens; Catherine Bresee; Rugvedita Parakh; Hanlin L. Wang; Marissa Li; Girish Dhall; Steven D. Colquhoun; Delma Ines; Fai Chung; Run Yu; Nicholas N. Nissen; Edward M. Wolin
20,898 compared with
Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine | 2010
Mark Hyman Rapaport; Pamela J. Schettler; Catherine Bresee
12,170, P<.001). When we excluded costs of robot purchase and maintenance, we did not detect a statistical difference in initial day of surgery costs of robotic compared with laparoscopic (
Journal of Virology | 2009
Kevin R. Mott; Catherine Bresee; Sariah J. Allen; Lbachir BenMohamed; Steven L. Wechsler; Homayon Ghiasi
12,586 compared with
Fertility and Sterility | 2014
Erica T. Wang; Margareta D. Pisarska; Catherine Bresee; Yii-Der I da Chen; Jenny Lester; Yalda Afshar; Carolyn Alexander; Beth Y. Karlan
11,573; P=.160) or hospital costs over 6 weeks (
Endocrinology | 2010
Chun-Rong Chen; Sepehr Hamidi; Helen Braley-Mullen; Yuji Nagayama; Catherine Bresee; Holly A. Aliesky; Basil Rapoport; Sandra M. McLachlan
13,867 compared with
Neuropsychopharmacology | 2004
Robert N. Pechnick; Vera Chesnokova; Anastasia Kariagina; Shannon Price; Catherine Bresee; Russell E. Poland
12,170; P=.060). The robotic group had longer operating room times (202.8 minutes compared with 178.4 minutes, P=.030) and higher pain scores 1 week after surgery (3.5±2.1 compared with 2.6±2.2; P=.044). There were no group differences in symptom bother by Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory, POP stage, or rate of adverse events. CONCLUSION: Costs of robotic sacrocolpopexy are higher than laparoscopic, whereas short-term outcomes and complications are similar. Primary cost differences resulted from robot maintenance and purchase costs. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01124916. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I
The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology | 2009
Catherine Bresee; Mark Hyman Rapaport
Objective The objective of this study was to explore the efficacy of combination therapy with citalopram plus omega-3 fatty acids versus citalopram plus placebo (olive oil) in the initial treatment of individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD). We hypothesized that combination therapy would lead not only to greater efficacy but also to a more rapid onset of therapeutic response. Methods Forty-two subjects participated in this 9-week randomized, masked, placebo-controlled study of combination therapy (two 1 g capsules containing a blend of 900 mg of eicosapentaenoic acid, 200 mg of and docosahexaenoic acid, and 100 mg of other omega-3 fatty acids twice daily plus citalopram) versus monotherapy (two 1 g capsules of olive oil per day plus citalopram) treatment of MDD. Results The combination therapy demonstrated significantly greater improvement in Hamilton Depression Rating scale scores over time (F = 7.32; df 1,177; P = 0.008) beginning at week 4 (t = −2.48; df 177; P = 0.014). Conclusions Combination therapy was more effective than monotherapy in decreasing signs and symptoms of MDD during the 8 weeks of active treatment; however, combination therapy did not seem to enhance the speed of the initial antidepressant response. These findings suggest that there may be an advantage to combining omega-3 fatty acids with a selective serotonin uptake inhibitor in the initial treatment of individuals with MDD. A larger definitive study is warranted.