Catherine Charbonnel
French Institute of Health and Medical Research
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Catherine Charbonnel.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2008
Olivier Decaux; Laurence Lodé; Florence Magrangeas; Catherine Charbonnel; Wilfried Gouraud; Pascal Jézéquel; Michel Attal; Jean-Luc Harousseau; Philippe Moreau; Régis Bataille; Loı̈c Campion; Hervé Avet-Loiseau; Stephane Minvielle
PURPOSE Survival of patients with multiple myeloma is highly heterogeneous, from periods of a few weeks to more than 10 years. We used gene expression profiles of myeloma cells obtained at diagnosis to identify broadly applicable prognostic markers. PATIENTS AND METHODS In a training set of 182 patients, we used supervised methods to identify individual genes associated with length of survival. A survival model was built from these genes. The validity of our model was assessed in our test set of 68 patients and in three independent cohorts comprising 853 patients with multiple myeloma. RESULTS The 15 strongest genes associated with the length of survival were used to calculate a risk score and to stratify patients into low-risk and high-risk groups. The survival-predictor score was significantly associated with survival in both the training and test sets and in the external validation cohorts. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of rates of survival at 3 years were 90.5% (95% CI, 85.6% to 95.3%) and 47.4% (95% CI, 33.5% to 60.1%), respectively, in our patients having a low risk or high risk independently of traditional prognostic factors. High-risk patients constituted a homogeneous biologic entity characterized by the overexpression of genes involved in cell cycle progression and its surveillance, whereas low-risk patients were heterogeneous and displayed hyperdiploid signatures. CONCLUSION Gene expression-based survival prediction and molecular features associated with high-risk patients may be useful for developing prognostic markers and may provide basis to treat these patients with new targeted antimitotics.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2009
Hervé Avet-Loiseau; Cheng Li; Florence Magrangeas; Wilfried Gouraud; Catherine Charbonnel; Jean-Luc Harousseau; Michel Attal; Gerald Marit; Claire Mathiot; Thierry Facon; Philippe Moreau; Kenneth C. Anderson; Loic Campion; Nikhil C. Munshi; Stephane Minvielle
PURPOSE Chromosomal aberrations are a hallmark of multiple myeloma but their global prognostic impact is largely unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed a genome-wide analysis of malignant plasma cells from 192 newly diagnosed patients with myeloma using high-density, single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays to identify genetic lesions associated with prognosis. RESULTS Our analyses revealed deletions and amplifications in 98% of patients. Amplifications in 1q and deletions in 1p, 12p, 14q, 16q, and 22q were the most frequent lesions associated with adverse prognosis, whereas recurrent amplifications of chromosomes 5, 9, 11, 15, and 19 conferred a favorable prognosis. Multivariate analysis retained three independent lesions: amp(1q23.3), amp(5q31.3), and del(12p13.31). When adjusted to the established prognostic variables (ie, t(4;14), del(17p), and serum beta(2)-microglobulin [Sbeta(2)M]), del(12p13.31) remained the most powerful independent adverse marker (P < .0001; hazard ratio [HR], 3.17) followed by Sbeta(2)M (P < .0001; HR, 2.78) and the favorable marker amp(5q31.3) (P = .0005; HR, 0.37). Patients with amp(5q31.3) alone and low Sbeta(2)M had an excellent prognosis (5-year overall survival, 87%); conversely, patients with del(12p13.31) alone or amp(5q31.3) and del(12p13.31) and high Sbeta(2)M had a very poor outcome (5-year overall survival, 20%). This prognostic model was validated in an independent validation cohort of 273 patients with myeloma. CONCLUSION These findings demonstrate the power and accessibility of molecular karyotyping to predict outcome in myeloma. In addition, integration of expression of genes residing in the lesions of interest revealed putative features of the disease driving short survival.
International Journal of Cancer | 2009
Sébastien Salas; Pascal Jézéquel; Loic Campion; Jean-Laurent Deville; Frédéric Chibon; Catherine Bartoli; Jean-Claude Gentet; Catherine Charbonnel; Wilfried Gouraud; Brigitte Voutsinos-Porche; Anne Brouchet; Florence Duffaud; Dominique Figarella-Branger; Corinne Bouvier
The therapy regimen of high‐grade osteosarcoma includes chemotherapy followed by surgical resection and postoperative chemotherapy. The degree of necrosis following definitive surgery remains the only reliable prognostic factor and is used to guide the choice of postoperative chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to find molecular markers able to classify patients with an osteosarcoma as good or poor responders to chemotherapy before beginning treatment. Gene expression screening of 20 nonmetastatic high‐grade osteosarcoma patients was performed using cDNA microarray. Expression of selected relevant genes was validated using QRT‐PCR. Immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays sections of 73 biopsies was performed to investigate protein expression. Fluorescent in situ hybridization was performed for RPL8 gene. We have found that HSD17B10 gene expression was up‐regulated in poor responders and that immunohistochemistry expression of HSD17B10 on biopsy before treatment was correlatedto response to chemotherapy. Other results include correlationof IFITM2, IFITM3, and RPL8 gene expression to chemotherapy response. A statistical correlation was found between polysomy 8 or gain of RPL8 and good response to chemotherapy. These data suggest that HSD17B10, RPL8, IFITM2, and IFITM3 genes are involved in the response to the chemotherapy and that HSD17B10 may be a therapeutic target. RPL8 and IFITM2 may be useful in the assessment at diagnosis and for stratifying patients taking part in randomized trials.
Molecular Cancer | 2011
Mario Campone; Belinda Noël; Cécile Couriaud; Morgan Grau; Yannis Guillemin; Fabien Gautier; Wilfried Gouraud; Catherine Charbonnel; Loic Campion; Pascal Jézéquel; Frédérique Braun; Benjamin Barré; Olivier Coqueret; Sophie Barillé-Nion; Philippe Juin
BackgroundAnti-apoptotic signals induced downstream of HER2 are known to contribute to the resistance to current treatments of breast cancer cells that overexpress this member of the EGFR family. Whether or not some of these signals are also involved in tumor maintenance by counteracting constitutive death signals is much less understood. To address this, we investigated what role anti- and pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 family members, key regulators of cancer cell survival, might play in the viability of HER2 overexpressing breast cancer cells.MethodsWe used cell lines as an in vitro model of HER2-overexpressing cells in order to evaluate how anti-apoptotic Bcl-2, Bcl-xL and Mcl-1, and pro-apoptotic Puma and Bim impact on their survival, and to investigate how the constitutive expression of these proteins is regulated. Expression of the proteins of interest was confirmed using lysates from HER2-overexpressing tumors and through analysis of publicly available RNA expression data.ResultsWe show that the depletion of Mcl-1 is sufficient to induce apoptosis in HER2-overexpressing breast cancer cells. This Mcl-1 dependence is due to Bim expression and it directly results from oncogenic signaling, as depletion of the oncoprotein c-Myc, which occupies regions of the Bim promoter as evaluated in ChIP assays, decreases Bim levels and mitigates Mcl-1 dependence. Consistently, a reduction of c-Myc expression by inhibition of mTORC1 activity abrogates occupancy of the Bim promoter by c-Myc, decreases Bim expression and promotes tolerance to Mcl-1 depletion. Western blot analysis confirms that naïve HER2-overexpressing tumors constitutively express detectable levels of Mcl-1 and Bim, while expression data hint on enrichment for Mcl-1 transcripts in these tumors.ConclusionsThis work establishes that, in HER2-overexpressing tumors, it is necessary, and maybe sufficient, to therapeutically impact on the Mcl-1/Bim balance for efficient induction of cancer cell death.
Blood | 2007
Hervé Avet-Loiseau; Michel Attal; Philippe Moreau; Catherine Charbonnel; Frederic Garban; Cyrille Hulin; Serge Leyvraz; Mauricette Michallet; Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha; Laurent Garderet; Gerald Marit; Lucienne Michaux; Laurent Voillat; Marc Renaud; Bernard Grosbois; Gaelle Guillerm; Lotfi Benboubker; Mathieu Monconduit; Catherine Thieblemont; Philippe Casassus; Denis Caillot; Anne-Marie Stoppa; Jean-Jacques Sotto; Marc Wetterwald; Charles Dumontet; Jean-Gabriel Fuzibet; Isabelle Azais; Véronique Dorvaux; Marc Zandecki; Régis Bataille
Proteomics | 2006
Gabriel Ricolleau; Catherine Charbonnel; Laurence Lodé; Delphine Loussouarn; Marie-Pierre Joalland; Ralf Bogumil; Sabine Jourdain; Stephane Minvielle; Mario Campone; Régine Déporte‐Fety; Loic Campion; Pascal Jézéquel
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | 2008
Mario Campone; L. Campion; Henry Roché; Wilfried Gouraud; Catherine Charbonnel; Florence Magrangeas; Stephane Minvielle; Jean Genève; Anne-Laure Martin; Régis Bataille; Pascal Jézéquel
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | 2009
Pascal Jézéquel; Mario Campone; Henri Roché; Wilfried Gouraud; Catherine Charbonnel; Gabriel Ricolleau; Florence Magrangeas; Stephane Minvielle; Jean Genève; Anne-Laure Martin; Régis Bataille; Loic Campion
Blood | 2005
Herve Avet Loiseau; Michel Attal; Philippe Moreau; Catherine Charbonnel; Frederic Garban; Jean-Luc Harousseau; Thierry Facon; Claire Mathiot
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics | 2006
Marie Millour; Catherine Charbonnel; Florence Magrangeas; Stephane Minvielle; Loic Campion; Wilfried Gouraud; Mario Campone; Régine Déporte‐Fety; Yves-Jean Bignon; Frédérique Penault-Llorca; Pascal Jézéquel