Catherine Chirouze

Preeminence of Staphylococcus aureus in Infective Endocarditis: A 1-Year Population-Based Survey

BACKGROUND Observational studies showed that the profile of infective endocarditis (IE) significantly changed over the past decades. However, most studies involved referral centers. We conducted a population-based study to control for this referral bias. The objective was to update the description of characteristics of IE in France and to compare the profile of community-acquired versus healthcare-associated IE. METHODS A prospective population-based observational study conducted in all medical facilities from 7 French regions (32% of French individuals aged ≥18 years) identified 497 adults with Duke-Li-definite IE who were first admitted to the hospital in 2008. Main measures included age-standardized and sex-standardized incidence of IE and multivariate Cox regression analysis for risk factors of in-hospital death. RESULTS The age-standardized and sex-standardized annual incidence of IE was 33.8 (95% confidence interval [CI], 30.8-36.9) cases per million inhabitants. The incidence was highest in men aged 75-79 years. A majority of patients had no previously known heart disease. Staphylococci were the most common causal agents, accounting for 36.2% of cases (Staphylococcus aureus, 26.6%; coagulase-negative staphylococci, 9.7%). Healthcare-associated IE represented 26.7% of all cases and exhibited a clinical pattern significantly different from that of community-acquired IE. S. aureus as the causal agent of IE was the most important factor associated with in-hospital death in community-acquired IE (hazard ratio [HR], 2.82 [95% CI, 1.72-4.61]) and the single factor in healthcare-associated IE (HR, 2.54 [95% CI, 1.33-4.85]). CONCLUSIONS S. aureus became both the leading cause and the most important prognostic factor of IE, and healthcare-associated IE appeared as a major subgroup of the disease.

Low Serum Procalcitonin Level Accurately Predicts the Absence of Bacteremia in Adult Patients with Acute Fever

The ability of measurement of serum procalcitonin (PCT) levels to differentiate bacteremic from nonbacteremic infectious episodes in patients hospitalized for community-acquired infections was assessed. Serum samples were obtained from adult inpatients with fever to determine the serum PCT level, C-reactive protein (CRP) level, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). Of 165 patients, 22 (13%) had bacteremic episodes and 143 (87%) had nonbacteremic episodes. PCT levels, CRP levels, and ESRs were significantly higher in bacteremic patients than in nonbacteremic patients (P<.001,.007, and.024, respectively). The best cutoff value for PCT was 0.4 ng/mL, which was associated with a negative predictive value of 98.8%. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.83 for PCT, which was significantly higher than that for CRP (0.68; P<.0001) and ESR (0.65; P<.05). A serum PCT level of <0.4 ng/mL accurately rules out the diagnosis of bacteremia. The use of PCT assessment could help physicians limit the number of blood cultures to be processed and the number of antibiotic prescriptions.

Temporal Trends in Infective Endocarditis in the Context of Prophylaxis Guideline Modifications: Three Successive Population-Based Surveys

OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to evaluate temporal trends in infective endocarditis (IE) incidence and clinical characteristics after 2002 French IE prophylaxis guideline modifications. BACKGROUND There are limited data on changes in the epidemiology of IE since recent guidelines recommended restricting the indications of antibiotic prophylaxis of IE. METHODS Three 1-year population-based surveys were conducted in 1991, 1999, and 2008 in 3 French regions totaling 11 million inhabitants age ≥20 years. We prospectively collected IE cases from all medical centers and analyzed age- and sex-standardized IE annual incidence trends. RESULTS Overall, 993 expert-validated IE cases were analyzed (323 in 1991; 331 in 1999; and 339 in 2008). IE incidence remained stable over time (95% confidence intervals given in parentheses/brackets): 35 (31 to 39), 33 (30 to 37), and 32 (28 to 35) cases per million in 1991, 1999, and 2008, respectively. Oral streptococci IE incidence did not increase either in the whole patient population (8.1 [6.4 to 10.1], 6.3 [4.8 to 8.1], and 6.3 [4.9 to 8.0] in 1991, 1999, and 2008, respectively) or in patients with pre-existing native valve disease. The increased incidence of Staphylococcus aureus IE (5.2 [3.9 to 6.8], 6.8 [5.3 to 8.6], and 8.2 [6.6 to 10.2]) was not significant in the whole patient population (p = 0.228) but was significant in the subgroup of patients without previously known native valve disease (1.6 [0.9 to 2.7], 3.7 [2.6 to 5.1], and 4.1 [3.0 to 5.6]; p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS Scaling down antibiotic prophylaxis indications was not associated with an increased incidence of oral streptococcal IE. A focus on avoidance of S. aureus bacteremia in all patients, including those with no previously known valve disease, will be required to improve IE prevention.

Non-HACEK Gram-Negative Bacillus Endocarditis

Context Infective endocarditis due to non-HACEK organisms has been considered to be associated with injection drug use. Contribution Analysis of 2761 cases of patients with infective endocarditis from an international collaborative of 61 hospitals found that non-HACEK organisms account for fewer than 2% of the cases, and that most patients with non-HACEK endocarditis had infections associated with health care. Of patients with non-HACEK infections, 59% had implanted endovascular devices or prosthetic valves, but only 4% had injection drug use. More than one half of patients with non-HACEK infections required cardiac surgery and 24% died. Implication Infective endocarditis due to non-HACEK organisms is a rare but frequently fatal condition. It is much more frequently associated with implanted endovascular devices than with injection drug use. The Editors Infective endocarditis caused by non-HACEK (species other than Haemophilus species, Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Cardiobacterium hominis, Eikenella corrodens, or Kingella species) gram-negative bacilli is a rare and poorly characterized disease. The literature describing non-HACEK gram-negative bacillus endocarditis primarily consists of several small case series from the 1970s and 1980s of outbreaks in injection drug users in large urban areas, such as Detroit (1, 2), Cleveland (3), and San Francisco (4, 5). As a result, endocarditis due to non-HACEK gram-negative bacilli has been considered to be almost exclusively associated with injection drug use (6, 7). In contrast to this reporting bias, however, non-HACEK gram-negative bacillus endocarditis has been occasionally reported to be a nosocomial problem, particularly in patients with early endocarditis after cardiac surgery (811). The International Collaboration on Endocarditis Prospective Cohort Study (ICE-PCS) database was created in 1999. From 1 January 2000 to 31 August 2005, 2761 patients with definite endocarditis from 61 centers in 28 countries were prospectively enrolled. This resource offers a unique opportunity to evaluate the epidemiology, characteristics, and outcome of endocarditis due to non-HACEK gram-negative bacilli in a large, contemporary, and international cohort of well-characterized patients with endocarditis. Methods The International Collaboration on Endocarditis Prospective Cohort Study Hospitalized patients with endocarditis (12) were identified prospectively by using site-specific procedures to ensure consecutive enrollment. Informed consent (oral or written) was obtained from all patients according to local institutional review board or ethics committee instructions. A standard case report form containing 275 variables was completed for each patient on enrollment at the participating site. The ICE-PCS database is maintained at the Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, which serves as the coordinating center for the ICE studies, with approval from the institutional review board. We included all patients with endocarditis from sites that met performance criteria for participation. These site criteria included 1) minimum enrollment of 12 cases per year in a center with access to cardiac surgery, 2) the presence of patient identification procedures to ensure consecutive enrollment and to minimize ascertainment bias (as described elsewhere) (13, 14), 3) high-quality data with query resolution, and 4) institutional review board or ethics committee approval or waiver based on local standards. All patients from sites that did not meet these criteria (totaling 494 case-patients from 14 sites) were excluded. Sample We included patients who had both definite endocarditis according to the modified Duke criteria (12) and isolation of a pure culture of an aerobic gram-negative bacillus from the bloodstream or valve. To ensure that the diagnosis of gram-negative endocarditis was accurate, the following additional criteria were applied when interpreting the blood culture results: 1) the patients bacteremia had to meet the definition for persistently positive blood cultures when applying the modified Duke criteria; 2) a single blood culture positive for a gram-negative organism was not considered to constitute a minor microbiological criterion when applying the modified Duke criteria; and 3) patients with endocarditis due to anaerobes, Brucella species, HACEK organisms, or other fastidious gram-negative pathogens (for example, Pasteurella species) or polymicrobial infections were excluded. Definitions We used published definitions of health carerelated variables (15, 16). Nonnosocomial health careassociated infection was defined as a health careassociated infection that was not acquired as a hospital inpatient (for example, hemodialysis, outpatient cancer chemotherapy, or receipt of intravenous antibiotics at home) (16). A nosocomial infection was defined as a health careassociated infection that was acquired after at least 48 hours as a hospital inpatient. Prosthetic endocarditis was defined as endocarditis involving a prosthetic heart valve or implanted endovascular device, such as a permanent cardiac pacemaker, cardioverter defibrillator, or aortic stent. Statistical Analysis Patients with definite non-HACEK gram-negative bacillus endocarditis were compared with all other patients with definite endocarditis in the ICE-PCS database. Continuous variables are presented as medians and 25th and 75th percentiles. Categorical variables are presented as frequencies and percentages of the specified group. Univariable comparisons were made by using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test or the chi-square test as appropriate. For all tests, a P value of 0.05 or less was considered statistically significant. Missing data for each variable were excluded from the denominator as indicated in Table 1. All statistical analyses were performed by using SAS software (version 8.2, SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina). Table 1. Frequency of Individual Duke Criteria among 49 Patients with Non-HACEK Gram-Negative Bacillus Endocarditis* Role of the Funding Source The study did not receive funding. Results Of the 2761 patients with definite endocarditis, 49 (1.8%) had endocarditis due to non-HACEK gram-negative bacilli. Twenty-six of these patients (53%) were enrolled from Europe; 11 (22%) from North America; and the remainder from South America, New Zealand, Australia, the Middle East, and Asia. Patient enrollment was constant throughout the study period. Characteristics of Non-HACEK Gram-Negative Bacillus Endocarditis Patients with non-HACEK gram-negative bacillus endocarditis were more likely to have had symptoms for more than 1 month than were patients infected with other pathogens (90% [95% CI, 82% to 98%] vs. 77% [CI, 75% to 79%], respectively; P= 0.035) (Table 2). Injection drug use was uncommon in patients with non-HACEK gram-negative bacillus endocarditis and in patients with endocarditis due to other organisms (4% [CI, 0% to 9%] vs. 10% [CI, 9% to 11%]; P= 0.20). In contrast, health care contact was a statistically significant risk factor for non-HACEK gram-negative bacillus endocarditis (57% [CI, 43% to 71%] vs. 30% [CI, 28% to 32%]; P< 0.001), largely because the proportion of nosocomial infections was higher in the non-HACEK gram-negative bacillus endocarditis group (39% [CI, 25% to 53%] vs. 14% [CI, 13% to 15%]; P< 0.001). The Figure shows the routes of acquisition of non-HACEK gram-negative bacillus endocarditis compared with Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis (15) and all other causes of endocarditis in the ICE-PCS database. Table 2. Characteristics of Patients with Non-HACEK Gram-Negative Bacillus Infective Endocarditis and Those with Other Causes of Endocarditis* Figure. Routes of acquisition among patients with definite endocarditis due to non-HACEK gram-negative bacilli, Staphylococcus aureus , and other pathogens. HACEK = Haemophilus species, Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Cardiobacterium hominis, Eikenella corrodens, or Kingella species. Implanted endovascular devices were more common in patients with non-HACEK gram-negative bacillus endocarditis than in patients with other pathogens (29% [CI, 16% to 42%] vs. 11% [CI, 10% to 12%]; P< 0.001). Patients with non-HACEK gram-negative bacillus endocarditis were also statistically significantly more likely than patients with other causes of endocarditis to have a presumed source of infection involving the genitourinary or nonoral gastrointestinal tract (35% [CI, 22% to 48%] vs. 12% [CI, 11% to 13%]; P< 0.001). A nondental invasive procedure within 60 days before symptom onset was more likely in patients with non-HACEK gram-negative bacillus endocarditis than in patients with other causes of endocarditis (38% [CI, 24% to 52%] vs. 19% [CI, 18% to 20%]; P= 0.002). Intracardiac abscesses were statistically significantly more common in patients with non-HACEK gram-negative bacillus endocarditis than in patients with endocarditis due to other organisms (25% [CI, 13% to 37%] vs. 14% [CI, 13% to 15%]; P= 0.034). The in-hospital mortality rate was 24% (CI, 12% to 36%) for patients with non-HACEK gram-negative bacillus endocarditis and 17% (CI, 16% to 18%) for patients with other causes of endocarditis (P= 0.190). Of the 49 patients with non-HACEK gram-negative bacillus endocarditis, 20 (41%) had native-valve endocarditis and 29 (59%) had prosthetic endocarditis. All 49 cases were confirmed as definite endocarditis by the modified Duke criteria: 22 (45%) were histopathologically (16 patients [33%]) or macroscopically (at surgery in 6 patients [12%]) confirmed (Table 1). Of the 16 patients with pathologic confirmation, 8 had valve cultures, 2 had device cultures, and 1 had an aortic aneurysm culture. Microbiology of Non-HACEK Gram-Negative Bacillus Endocarditis The most common pathogens in patients with non-HACEK gram-negative bacillus endocarditis were Escherichia coli (14 patients [29%]) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (11 patients [22%]). Othe

Prognostic Factors in 61 Cases of Staphylococcus aureus Prosthetic Valve Infective Endocarditis from the International Collaboration on Endocarditis Merged Database

Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic valve infective endocarditis (SA-PVIE) is associated with a high mortality rate, but prognostic factors have not been clearly elucidated. The International Collaboration on Endocarditis merged database (ICE-MD) contained 2212 cases of definite infective endocarditis (as defined using the Duke criteria), 61 of which were SA-PVIE. Overall mortality rate was 47.5%, stroke was associated with an increased risk of death, and early valve replacement was not associated with a significant survival benefit in the whole population; however, patients who developed cardiac complications and underwent early valve replacement had the lowest mortality rate (28.6%).

Antibiotic treatment for 6 weeks versus 12 weeks in patients with pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND Duration of treatment for patients with vertebral osteomyelitis is mainly based on expert recommendation rather than evidence. We aimed to establish whether 6 weeks of antibiotic treatment is non-inferior to 12 weeks in patients with pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis. METHODS In this open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial, we enrolled patients aged 18 years or older with microbiologically confirmed pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis and typical radiological features from 71 medical care centres across France. Patients were randomly assigned to either 6 weeks or 12 weeks of antibiotic treatment (physicians choice in accordance with French guidelines) by a computer-generated randomisation list of permuted blocks, stratified by centre. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who were classified as cured at 1 year by a masked independent validation committee, analysed by intention to treat. Non-inferiority would be declared if the proportion of cured patients assigned to 6 weeks of treatment was not less than the proportion of cured patients assigned to 12 weeks of treatment, within statistical variability, by an absolute margin of 10%. This trial is registered with EudraCT, number 2006-000951-18, and Clinical Trials.gov, number NCT00764114. FINDINGS Between Nov 15, 2006, and March 15, 2011, 359 patients were randomly assigned, of whom six in the 6-week group and two in the 12-week group were excluded after randomisation. 176 patients assigned to the 6-week treatment regimen and 175 to the 12-week treatment regimen were analysed by intention to treat. 160 (90·9%) of 176 patients in the 6-week group and 159 (90·9%) of 175 of those in the 12-week group met the criteria for clinical cure. The difference between the groups (0·05%, 95% CI -6·2 to 6·3) showed the non-inferiority of the 6-week regimen when compared with the 12-week regimen. 50 patients in the 6-week group and 51 in the 12-week group had adverse events, the most common being death (14 [8%] in the 6-week group vs 12 [7%] in the 12-week group), antibiotic intolerance (12 [7%] vs 9 [5%]), cardiorespiratory failure (7 [4%] vs 12 [7%]), and neurological complications (7 [4%] vs 3 [2%]). INTERPRETATION 6 weeks of antibiotic treatment is not inferior to 12 weeks of antibiotic treatment with respect to the proportion of patients with pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis cured at 1 year, which suggests that the standard antibiotic treatment duration for patients with this disease could be reduced to 6 weeks. FUNDING French Ministry of Health.

Value of Preoperative Investigations in Diagnosing Prosthetic Joint Infection: Retrospective Cohort Study and Literature Review

The diagnosis of a prosthetic joint infection is difficult, but crucial for appropriate treatment. Scintigraphy with specific markers for infection (labelled white cells or immunoglobulin-G) has been reported as a more reliable diagnostic tool than clinical assessment (fever, fistula), laboratory studies (polynuclear neutrophil count, erythrocyte rate sedimentation, and C-reactive protein), and preoperative aspiration. In the first part of this study, we retrospectively reviewed 230 patients admitted with a suspected prosthetic joint infection, and examined the validity of the different diagnostic tools for the group as a whole and for subgroups according to the Coventry classification. In the second part, we reviewed 35 articles about preoperative evaluation of infection in prosthetic joints and compared them to our findings. Our study indicates that C-reactive protein and joint aspiration are the most useful tools to diagnose prosthetic joint infection even in situations of chronic infection (Coventry type II).

Emergence of endocarditis due to group D streptococci: findings derived from the merged database of the International Collaboration on Endocarditis

The aim of the present study was to compare the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of Streptococcus bovis endocarditis with those of endocarditis caused by oral streptococci, using data obtained from a large international database of uniformly defined cases of infective endocarditis. S. bovis, a well-known cause of infective endocarditis, remains the common name used to designate group D nonenterococcal streptococci. In some countries, the frequency of S. bovis endocarditis has increased significantly in recent years. Data from the International Collaboration on Endocarditis merged database was used to identify the main characteristics of S. bovis endocarditis and compared them with those of infective endocarditis (IE) due to oral streptococci. The database contained 136 cases of S. bovis IE and 511 cases of IE due to oral streptococci. Patients with S. bovis IE were significantly older those with IE due to oral streptococci (63±16 vs. 55±18 years, P<0.00001). The proportion of streptococcal IE due to S. bovis increased from 10.9% before 1989 to 23.3% after 1989 (P=0.0007) and was 56.7% in France as compared with 9.4% in the rest of Europe and 6.0% in the USA (P<0.00001). Patients with S. bovis IE had more comorbidity and never used intravenous drugs. Complication rates, rates of valve replacement, and mortality rates were similar in the two groups. In conclusion, this study confirmed that S. bovis IE has unique characteristics when compared to endocarditis due to oral streptococci and that it emerged in the 1990s, mainly in France, a finding that is yet unexplained.

Prosthetic valve endocarditis due to coagulase-negative staphylococci: findings from the International Collaboration on Endocarditis Merged Database

Infective endocarditis due to coagulase-negative staphylococci is increasingly recognized as a difficult-to-treat disease associated with poor outcome. The aim of this report is to describe the characteristics and outcome of patients with prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) due to coagulase-negative staphylococci versus those of patients with PVE due to Staphylococcus aureus and viridans streptococci. Patients were identified through the International Collaboration on Endocarditis Merged Database. A total of 54 cases of coagulase-negative staphylococci PVE, 58 cases of S. aureus PVE, and 63 cases of viridans-streptococci-related PVE were available for analysis. There was no difference between the three groups with respect to the type of valve involved or the rate of embolization. However, heart failure was encountered more frequently with coagulase-negative staphylococci (54%) than with either S. aureus (33%; p=0.03) or viridans streptococci (32%; p=0.02). In addition, valvular abscesses complicated 39% of infections due to coagulase-negative staphylococci compared with 22% of those due to S. aureus (p=0.06) and 6% of those due to viridans streptococci (p<0.001). Mortality was highest in patients with S. aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococcal endocarditis (47 and 36%, respectively; p=0.22) and was considerably lower in patients with viridans streptococcal endocarditis (p=0.002 compared to patients with coagulase-negative staphylococcal endocarditis). The results of this analysis demonstrate the aggressive nature of coagulase-negative staphylococcal PVE and the substantially greater morbidity and mortality associated with this infection compared to PVE caused by other pathogens.

Alternatives to carbapenems in ESBL-producing Escherichia coli infections

OBJECTIVES The authors had for objective to assess the activity of a wide panel of antibiotics on extended-spectrum-β-lactamase producing Escherichia coli isolates (ESBL-Ec), because of the sharp increase of their frequency, leading to an increased use of carbapenems. MATERIAL AND METHODS We selected 100 ESBL-Ec in which ESBLs were identified by PCR and sequencing, between 2009 and 2010. We determined the MICs of amoxicillin-clavulanate, piperacillin-tazobactam, temocillin, mecillinam, cefoxitin, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, aztreonam, tigecycline, nitrofurantoin, and fosfomycin using reference methods. The susceptibility profiles were defined according to EUCAST 2012 recommendations. RESULTS Fosfomycin, nitrofurantoin, and pivmecillinam were active against more than 90% of isolates and remain excellent choices for the oral treatment of urinary tract infections (UTIs). Temocillin and piperacillin-tazobactam are also good candidates for the treatment of pyelonephritis or bloodstream infections. Only 27, 23, and 8% of isolates were susceptible to ceftazidime, cefepime, and cefotaxime, respectively. CONCLUSION Our study results prove that in many cases, there are non-carbapenem alternatives for the treatment of ESBL-Ec infections.