Catherine F. Sinclair
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Catherine F. Sinclair.
Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America | 2015
Christopher G. Tang; Catherine F. Sinclair
The ability to speak and communicate vocally is a unique human characteristic that is often taken for granted but is fundamental to many activities of daily living. Loss of voice after total laryngectomy can lead to a serious decrease in quality of life and can precipitate significant frustration over the inability to communicate effectively. There are 3 main methods of voice restoration: esophageal speech, usage of the electrolarynx, and tracheal-esophageal puncture for tracheal-esophageal speech, which can be performed primarily or secondarily. Although all 3 methods have potential benefits, the gold standard is tracheal-esophageal speech.
Head and Neck-journal for The Sciences and Specialties of The Head and Neck | 2016
Catherine F. Sinclair; Jeffrey M. Bumpous; Bryan R. Haugen; Andrés Chala; Daniel Meltzer; Barbra S. Miller; Neil Tolley; Jennifer J. Shin; Gayle E. Woodson; Gregory W. Randolph
This American Head and Neck Society (AHNS) consensus statement discusses the techniques of laryngeal examination for patients undergoing thyroidectomy and parathyroidectomy. It is intended to help guide all clinicians who diagnose or manage adult patients with thyroid disease for whom surgery is indicated, contemplated, or has been performed. This consensus statement concludes that flexible transnasal laryngoscopy is the optimal laryngeal examination technique, with other techniques including laryngeal ultrasound and stroboscopy being useful in selected scenarios.
Medical Devices : Evidence and Research | 2017
Rachel Kaye; Christopher G. Tang; Catherine F. Sinclair
The ability to speak and communicate with one’s voice is a unique human characteristic and is fundamental to many activities of daily living, such as talking on the phone and speaking to loved ones. When the larynx is removed during a total laryngectomy (TL), loss of voice can lead to a devastating decrease in a patient’s quality of life, and precipitate significant frustration over their inability to communicate with others effectively. Over the past 50 years there have been many advances in techniques of voice restoration after TL. Currently, there are three main methods of voice restoration: the electrolarynx, esophageal speech, and tracheoesophageal speech through a tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) with voice prosthesis. Although TEP voice is the current gold standard for vocal rehabilitation, a significant minority of patients cannot use or obtain TEP speech for various reasons. As such, the electrolarynx is a viable and useful alternative for these patients. This article will focus on voice restoration using an electrolarynx with the following objectives: 1) To provide an understanding of the importance of voice restoration after total laryngectomy. 2) To discuss how the electrolarynx may be used to restore voice following total laryngectomy. 3) To outline some of the current electrolarynx devices available, including their mechanism of action and limitations. 4) To compare pros and cons of electrolaryngeal speech to TEP and esophageal speech.
Archive | 2016
Catherine F. Sinclair; William S. Duke; Anca M. Barbu; Gregory W. Randolph
Postoperative voice changes are one of the most common and feared complications of thyroid surgery. In most cases, postoperative hoarseness is due to recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury, although injury to the external branch of the superior laryngeal nerve (EBSLN) can also result in significant vocal issues, including diminished vocal projection and inability to attain higher vocal registers. Voice complaints can also occur in the absence of neural dysfunction and may be present prior to any surgery being performed. Thus, timely and accurate evaluation of laryngeal function optimizes ongoing management efforts and provides important prognostic and outcome information.
Archive | 2016
Akira Miyauchi; Catherine F. Sinclair; Dipti Kamani; Whitney Liddy; Gregory W. Randolph
Patients who have undergone a transection or segmental resection of the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) suffer from hoarseness, reduced phonation time, and aspiration. These injuries can be repaired with a direct anastomosis of the transected nerve ends, free nerve grafting to fill the defect, or an ansa cervicalis-to-RLN anastomosis. Reports have indicated that following nerve reconstruction, patients’ voices typically improve, although the vocal cords remain immobile through misdirected regeneration. Despite this, reinnervated vocal cords demonstrate less muscular atrophy. Voice recovery can be obtained regardless of preoperative vocal cord status, age, or gender when nerve reconstruction is performed with a variety of reconstruction modality techniques.
Laryngoscope | 2015
Catherine F. Sinclair; Kristina Simonyan; Mitchell F. Brin; Andrew Blitzer
To present the first documented series of patients with negative dystonia (ND) of the palate, including clinical symptoms, functional MRI findings, and management options.
Head and Neck-journal for The Sciences and Specialties of The Head and Neck | 2018
Christopher Fundakowski; Nathan W. Hales; Nishant Agrawal; Marcin Barczyński; Pauline Camacho; Dana M. Hartl; Emad Kandil; Whitney Liddy; Travis J. McKenzie; John C. Morris; John A. Ridge; Rick Schneider; Jonathan W. Serpell; Catherine F. Sinclair; Samuel K. Snyder; David J. Terris; R. Michael Tuttle; Che Wei Wu; Richard J. Wong; Mark E. Zafereo; Gregory W. Randolph
“I have noticed in operations of this kind, which I have seen performed by others upon the living, and in a number of excisions, which I have myself performed on the dead body, that most of the difficulty in the separation of the tumor has occurred in the region of these ligaments…. This difficulty, I believe, to be a very frequent source of that accident, which so commonly occurs in removal of goiter, I mean division of the recurrent laryngeal nerve.” Sir James Berry (1887)
Laryngoscope | 2018
Rick Schneider; Gregory W. Randolph; Gianlorenzo Dionigi; Che-Wei Wu; Marcin Barczyński; Feng-Yu Chiang; Zaid Al-Quaryshi; Peter Angelos; Katrin Brauckhoff; Claudio Roberto Cernea; John M. Chaplin; Jonathan Cheetham; Louise Davies; Peter E. Goretzki; Dana M. Hartl; Dipti Kamani; Emad Kandil; Natalia Kyriazidis; Whitney Liddy; Lisa A. Orloff; Joseph Scharpf; Jonathan W. Serpell; Jennifer J. Shin; Catherine F. Sinclair; Michael C. Singer; Samuel K. Snyder; Neil Tolley; Sam Van Slycke; Erivelto Martinho Volpi; Ian J. Witterick
This publication offers modern, state‐of‐the‐art International Neural Monitoring Study Group (INMSG) guidelines based on a detailed review of the recent monitoring literature. The guidelines outline evidence‐based definitions of adverse electrophysiologic events, especially loss of signal, and their incorporation in surgical strategy. These recommendations are designed to reduce technique variations, enhance the quality of neural monitoring, and assist surgeons in the clinical decision‐making process involved in surgical management of recurrent laryngeal nerve. The guidelines are published in conjunction with the INMSG Guidelines Part II, Optimal Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Management for Invasive Thyroid Cancer–Incorporation of Surgical, Laryngeal, and Neural Electrophysiologic Data.
Laryngoscope | 2018
Che-Wei Wu; Gianlorenzo Dionigi; Marcin Barczyński; Feng-Yu Chiang; Henning Dralle; Rick Schneider; Zaid Al-Quaryshi; Peter Angelos; Katrin Brauckhoff; Jennifer A. Brooks; Claudio Roberto Cernea; John M. Chaplin; Amy Y. Chen; Louise Davies; Gill R. Diercks; Quan-Yang Duh; Christopher Fundakowski; Peter E. Goretzki; Nathan W. Hales; Dana M. Hartl; Dipti Kamani; Emad Kandil; Natalia Kyriazidis; Whitney Liddy; Akira Miyauchi; Lisa A. Orloff; Jeff C. Rastatter; Joseph Scharpf; Jonathan W. Serpell; Jennifer J. Shin
The purpose of this publication was to inform surgeons as to the modern state‐of‐the‐art evidence‐based guidelines for management of the recurrent laryngeal nerve invaded by malignancy through blending the domains of 1) surgical intraoperative information, 2) preoperative glottic function, and 3) intraoperative real‐time electrophysiologic information. These guidelines generated by the International Neural Monitoring Study Group (INMSG) are envisioned to assist the clinical decision‐making process involved in recurrent laryngeal nerve management during thyroid surgery by incorporating the important information domains of not only gross surgical findings but also intraoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve functional status and preoperative laryngoscopy findings. These guidelines are presented mainly through algorithmic workflow diagrams for convenience and the ease of application. These guidelines are published in conjunction with the INMSG Guidelines Part I: Staging Bilateral Thyroid Surgery With Monitoring Loss of Signal.
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery | 2017
Adnan M. Al-Ayoubi; Sadiq S. Rehmani; Catherine F. Sinclair; Robert S. Lebovics; Faiz Y. Bhora